Notebookcheck Logo

联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)平板电脑评测--采用金属底盘的轻量级预算设备

负担得起而又有光泽。

第三代联想Tab M10是一款经济型10英寸平板电脑,具有GPS功能,并且在价格上有相当大的存储空间。但你需要忍受电池寿命和屏幕亮度方面的一些缺点。在这篇评论中,我们将讨论这款廉价的平板电脑是否值得购买。
Android ARM Tablet
联想Tab M10 2022 (第三代)

如今,如果你想要一个经济型的平板电脑,你往往不得不看一下不太知名的公司的设备。然而,一些大型制造商继续为预算紧张的人提供设备。联想就是这样一个例子。Tab M10 2022已经是这家中国公司发布的第三代经济型10英寸平板电脑。

在这个价格段,消费者往往不得不接受一些缺点,无论是性能、电池容量还是屏幕质量。我们对联想Tab M10 2022进行了测试,仔细看看在日常使用中哪些地方可能会困扰消费者,以及这款平板电脑是否仍然令人愉快。

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Tab M Series)
Processor
UNISOC T610 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
, DDR4
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, acceleration sensor, hall sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 239.84 x 158.62
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10-watt charging
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix AF
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
460 g
Price
180 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
80 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
T610, Mali-G52 MP2
460 g8.5 mm10.10"1920x1200
82.5 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
465 g7.45 mm10.61"2000x1200
82.2 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Nokia T10
T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1
375 g9 mm8.00"1280x800
82.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Lenovo Tab M9
Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2
344 g8 mm9.00"1340x800
81 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
508 g6.9 mm10.50"1920x1200

外壳 - 漂亮的金属底盘

机箱绝对是这个设备令人高兴的一个方面。联想Tab M10 2022的重量为460克(1.0磅),对于一款10英寸的平板电脑来说并不算太重。尽管边框非常显眼,但它有助于防止用户无意中接触到显示屏。联想当然可以把边框做得稍微薄一些,但无论如何,第三代Tab M10看起来仍然相当现代。

为了与联想当前的设计语言保持一致,机身背面被分为两部分。下部由金属制成,而上部较窄的部分则由塑料覆盖,以方便天线接收和传输数据的能力。

哑光金属和轻度纹理的塑料形成了一种时尚的对比。这款平板电脑具有卓越的合身性和完成度,拿在手里很舒服。不幸的是,至少在欧洲,没有其他颜色可供选择。

联想Tab M10
联想Tab M10
联想Tab M10
联想Tab M10
联想Tab M10
联想Tab M10

尺寸比较

251.2 mm 158.8 mm 7.45 mm 465 g246.8 mm 161.9 mm 6.9 mm 508 g239.84 mm 158.62 mm 8.5 mm 460 g215.4 mm 136.8 mm 8 mm 344 g208 mm 123.2 mm 9 mm 375 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

规格 - 提供LTE版本

联想Tab M10有纯Wi-Fi和LTE版本,以及两种存储选项。我们的评测单位是一个只有Wi-Fi的型号,有64GB的存储空间。联想提供以下配置:

  • 联想Tab M10 2022 Wi-Fi 3GB内存/32GB存储空间
  • 联想Tab M10 2022 LTE 3GB内存/32GB存储空间
  • 联想Tab M10 2022 Wi-Fi 4 GB内存/64 GB存储空间
  • 联想Tab M10 2022 LTE 4GB内存/64GB存储空间

根据联想提供的官方定价,所有变体的价格应该在200欧元(215美元)左右。也就是说,与此同时,你可以在互联网上以更低的价格买到大部分的变体。

这款平板电脑使用一个USB-C端口进行数据传输和充电。然而,由于其内部连接的方式,它只能以USB 2.0的速度运行。

左边:待机按钮,音量摇杆
左边:待机按钮,音量摇杆
右边:麦克风、3.5毫米音频插孔、USB-C端口、SIM卡托盘
右边:麦克风、3.5毫米音频插孔、USB-C端口、SIM卡托盘
首页: 扬声器
首页: 扬声器
底部:没有端口
底部:没有端口

微型SD卡读卡器

这款microSD读卡器还可以支持容量更大的卡,并提供适度的读写速度。

我们使用我们的参考microSD卡Angelbird V60对其进行了测试。在基准测试中,Tab M10在我们的比较组中排名靠前。这意味着在这个价格范围内,有一些平板电脑可以比Tab M10更快地读写SD卡。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
49.18 MB/s +131%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
21.3 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.8 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
16.11 MB/s -24%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø42 (31.2-52.8)
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (25.8-45.2)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.5 (14.1-42.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.7 (13.3-40.3)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø70.5 (13.8-78.6)
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø71.2 (36.7-79.1)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.6 (18.7-85.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø74.6 (37.9-86.8)

软件--老旧而臃肿

联想在软件方面的情况值得被批评。Tab M10搭载的是过时的Android 11。根据联想的说法,应该已经有一个更新到稍新的Android 12。但我们在评测中没有找到。

联想承诺在2025年2月底之前为该平板电脑提供安全更新支持--但这些更新最多每六个月发布一次。这在我们的评测设备上很明显,在写这篇评测时,其补丁的日期是2022年9月。

然后还有一个预装软件的问题。多年来,当涉及到臃肿的软件时,联想是相当克制和模范的。但是这一次,Tab M10搭载了许多手机游戏以及相当多的第三方应用程序。一方面,这是令人讨厌的,因为对于这个价格范围内的设备来说,存储量是相当适中的。另一方面,你会不断收到通知,缠着你去尝试这个或那个游戏。

不用说,不需要的应用程序大多可以不费吹灰之力就被卸载掉。但考虑到联想过去主要提供股票的做法,这仍然给用户留下了不好的印象Android 。

软件联想Tab M10 2022
软件联想Tab M10 2022
软件联想Tab M10 2022

连接性和GNSS - 快速和稳定

Wi-Fi 5是我们的评测装置所支持的最快的Wi-Fi标准。然而,这对联想Tab M10(第三代)来说并不是一个大问题。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,该平板电脑提供了快速和稳定的数据传输率,该测试是使用我们的参考路由器--华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000进行的。

这款平板电脑的信号强度还不错。当平板电脑靠近路由器时,Wi-Fi信号是全强度的。即使两台设备之间隔着10米和3堵墙,我们仍然有大约50%的信号强度。这就是说,当Tab M10离路由器较远时,网站的加载速度明显较慢。

如前所述,联想Tab M10 2022也有一个LTE模块。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
347 (335min - 351max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
326 (271min - 340max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
325 (163min - 328max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
319 (310min - 325max) MBit/s
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
304 (279min - 315max) MBit/s -5%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
369 (346min - 374max) MBit/s +5%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
357 (333min - 367max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
351 (333min - 366max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (178min - 357max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (167min - 354max) MBit/s -1%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø319 (310-325)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (333-366)
户外的GPS测试
户外的GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

无论你购买哪种联想Tab M10(第三代),都会有一个GPS模块。然而,它在户外花了一些时间来定位我们,而且只精确到8米以内。在阴天,该设备无法探测到那么多卫星。

在我们的实地测试中,我们带着Tab M10和Garmin Venu 2一起骑自行车进行了比较。M10的表现相当好:当然,该设备产生了一些小的偏差,并显示我们应该是在骑车穿过前院和房屋,但如果你不需要导航非常精确,M10是完全可用的。

位置追踪联想Tab M10 2022 - 概述
位置追踪联想Tab M10 2022 - 概述
位置追踪联想Tab M10 2022 - 转折点
位置追踪联想Tab M10 2022 - 转折点
位置跟踪联想Tab M10 2022 - 桥梁
位置跟踪联想Tab M10 2022 - 桥梁
位置追踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
位置追踪 Garmin Venu 2 - 概述
位置追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
位置追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 转折点
位置追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁
位置追踪Garmin Venu 2 - 桥梁

照相机--典型的平板电脑质量

用前置摄像头拍摄的照片
用前置摄像头拍摄的照片

一个800万像素的后置摄像头对M10来说应该是足够了。无论如何,平板电脑基本上不用于高质量的摄影。对于这个价格范围内的设备来说,主摄像头可以拍出漂亮的照片,但你不应该指望它能拍出清晰、细腻的图像。在黑暗区域有适量的增亮,仔细观察也有明显的人工痕迹。但考虑到它可能主要用于拍摄快照和扫描二维码,该相机已经足够。

后置摄像头可以拍摄高达30帧/秒的全高清视频。它的自动对焦往往略显迟缓,而且相机有时需要一段时间来适应照明情况。该相机几乎没有调整选项。

Tab M10有一个500万像素的前置摄像头。用这台相机拍摄的自拍最好不要被人发现,而且光线也要好。但除此之外,这款平板电脑拍摄的照片还可以。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera: PlantMain camera: EnvironmentMain camera: Low light
ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: 11.68 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 16.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
91 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: 46.99 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 90.99 ∆E

附件和保修 - 可提供对开盖子

在盒子里,你会发现一个10瓦的充电器,一条USB线和一个用于打开microSD和SIM卡插槽的工具。在该公司的网站上,联想还提供与对开盖子捆绑的平板电脑,你可以单独购买,价格约为18欧元(19.5美元)。

联想为在欧盟范围内购买的平板电脑提供24个月的保修。保修条款和条件可能因地区而异。

输入设备和操作 - 没有指纹传感器

由于Tab M10只配备了60Hz的面板,你必须满足于不完全流畅的用户体验。然而,除了一些偶尔的卡顿之外,联想Tab M10在可用性方面给人留下了良好的印象--触摸屏能够相当迅速和可靠地检测到输入。

这款平板电脑没有指纹传感器,但你可以使用人脸识别进行认证。该功能快速且相当可靠,但由于缺乏额外的专用硬件,该技术在防止操纵方面并不十分安全。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 可以更亮

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

这款10.1英寸的平板电脑有一个合适的WUXGA显示屏(比全高清略高),这意味着即使是更精细的细节也可以阅读,不会有太多的像素。你可以在屏幕上尽情享受流媒体服务的内容,因为Tab M10有Widevine认证。

然而,IPS屏幕很难达到330cd/m²的亮度,这可能是个问题,特别是如果你打算在户外或在一个非常明亮的房间里使用该设备。不过,该显示屏的黑度还是不错的(0.31cd/m²)。因此,它有一个令人满意的对比度,色彩也显得稍微鲜艳一些。

326
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 332.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 343 cd/m²
Contrast: 1106:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.184
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 10.6"
Nokia T10
IPS, 1280x800, 8"
Lenovo Tab M9
IPS, 1340x800, 9"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.5"
Screen
29%
-4%
32%
-19%
Brightness middle
343
510
49%
446
30%
405
18%
368
7%
Brightness
332
480
45%
429
29%
368
11%
346
4%
Brightness Distribution
94
85
-10%
94
0%
83
-12%
91
-3%
Black Level *
0.31
0.49
-58%
0.65
-110%
0.17
45%
0.61
-97%
Contrast
1106
1041
-6%
686
-38%
2382
115%
603
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.9
1.8
69%
4.87
17%
5.15
13%
6.9
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.2
3.7
67%
9.85
12%
10.12
10%
11.4
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.9
2.2
72%
5.7
28%
3.7
53%
7.7
3%
Gamma
2.184 101%
2.17 101%
2.189 101%
2.287 96%
2.16 102%
CCT
9198 71%
6907 94%
7781 84%
7379 88%
8547 76%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

我们在显示屏上没有检测到任何PWM。但在使用分光光度计和CalMAN软件分析面板时,我们确实发现了相当严重的蓝色色调。尤其是暖色调,也与各自的参考色有很大的偏差。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼的色彩准确性
卡尔曼的色彩准确性
CalMAN sRGB色域
CalMAN sRGB色域
CalMAN AdobeRGB色域
CalMAN AdobeRGB色域
卡尔曼DCI P3色域
卡尔曼DCI P3色域
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.8 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在可能的情况下,你应该避免在户外长时间使用联想Tab M10 2022,因为该显示屏在明亮的环境中是不适用的。高度反射的表面和低亮度使屏幕上的内容在这种情况下很难阅读。

视角是典型的IPS显示屏:从侧面看时,图像看起来很均匀,但亮度损失不大。

户外使用
户外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 中等强度

淘宝网 统一的T610被用于入门级平板电脑和手机,总体上为这个领域提供了很好的性能。在Tab M10中,该处理器设法超过了大多数竞争对手,但差异很小。这意味着你在日常使用中不应该注意到太大的性能差异。

在大多数情况下,这款平板电脑确实感觉使用起来很顺畅,但即使是要求稍高的应用程序也会导致明显的停顿,而且Play商店的一些应用程序会直接拒绝安装在设备上。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
365 Points +5%
Average UNISOC T610 (345 - 387, n=4)
357 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
346 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
343 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M9
338 Points -2%
Nokia T10
310 Points -10%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2494 Points +97%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1267 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (1034 - 1425, n=4)
1264 Points 0%
Nokia T10
1256 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1247 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab M9
1241 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1229 Points -3%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (417 - 1663, n=4, last 2 years)
808 Points +94%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
417 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()
417 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (1361 - 4130, n=4, last 2 years)
2253 Points +66%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1361 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()
1361 Points 0%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=48, last 2 years)
469872 Points +135%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
211417 Points +6%
Lenovo Tab M9
207904 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
201310 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
199786 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (162968 - 199786, n=2)
181377 Points -9%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
773 Points +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
361 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
356 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()
356 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M9
348 Points -2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 11721, n=59, last 2 years)
4205 Points +84%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
2283 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2134 Points -7%
Average UNISOC T610 (1862 - 2283, n=2)
2073 Points -9%
Lenovo Tab M9
2072 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1839 Points -19%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 16435, n=59, last 2 years)
7265 Points +52%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
4777 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
4729 Points -1%
Average UNISOC T610 (4461 - 4777, n=2)
4619 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
4133 Points -13%
Lenovo Tab M9
4045 Points -15%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10977, n=59, last 2 years)
4862 Points +42%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
3412 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
2436 Points -29%
Average UNISOC T610 (1449 - 3412, n=2)
2431 Points -29%
Lenovo Tab M9
2343 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
970 Points -72%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 57192, n=59, last 2 years)
9168 Points +512%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
2001 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M9
1818 Points +21%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1786 Points +19%
Average UNISOC T610 (1497 - 1522, n=2)
1510 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1497 Points
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2051, n=59, last 2 years)
1269 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
1246 Points +12%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
1186 Points +6%
Average UNISOC T610 (1114 - 1221, n=2)
1168 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1114 Points
Lenovo Tab M9
1069 Points -4%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=50, last 2 years)
7290 Points +2314%
Lenovo Tab M9
311 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
302 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()
302 Points 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=57, last 2 years)
11323 Points +581%
Lenovo Tab M9
3992 Points +140%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1662 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (1535 - 1662, n=2)
1599 Points -4%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia T10 Unisoc T7200 (T606), ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M9 Mediatek Helio G80, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

虽然 ARM Mali G52 MP2为入门级平板电脑提供了足够的图形性能,但GPU在联想Tab M10 2022中却难以展示它。因此,在我们的比较中,这款平板电脑始终有点落后于其他设备。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
179 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
171 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
110 Points -17%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
184 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
177 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
176 Points +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
135 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
114 Points -16%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
708 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
705 Points +35%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
691 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
522 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
411 Points -21%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
712 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
692 Points +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
687 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
524 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
412 Points -21%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1463 Points +28%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1355 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1146 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
976 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1875 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1284 Points +31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
826 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2865 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2848 Points
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2676 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2564 Points -10%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +28%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +28%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +11%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +20%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
23 fps +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +164%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps +18%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +25%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps +44%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.3 fps +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.4 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.2 fps +39%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps +30%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.6 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +80%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.1 fps +58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.5 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.6 fps +33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps +19%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.7 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -26%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +62%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.9 fps +34%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8 fps +8%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps +28%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps +12%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.2 fps +5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -29%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M9
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.2 fps
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.84 fps -30%

在浏览互联网时,你同样不应该期望网站和图片能在Tab M10 Gen 3上即时加载。综上所述,就其价格而言,这款平板电脑做得不错,只要有一点耐心,就可以用来频繁浏览网页。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=70, last 2 years)
111.2 Points +137%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
46.85 Points
Average UNISOC T610 (41.5 - 46.9, n=2)
44.2 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
43.98 Points -6%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
38.697 Points -17%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
32.868 Points -30%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=69, last 2 years)
106.9 Points +102%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
53 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()
53 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
45 Points -15%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
121.9 runs/min +254%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)
34.43 runs/min
Average UNISOC T610 (32.4 - 34.4, n=2)
33.4 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
33.35 runs/min -3%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chome 110)
30 runs/min -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
21.8 runs/min -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=87, last 2 years)
29371 Points +146%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
12744 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
12163 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
11952 Points
Average UNISOC T610 ()
11952 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
10787 Points -10%
Nokia T10 (Chrome 109)
9871 Points -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=75, last 2 years)
3734 ms * -21%
Lenovo Tab M9 (Chrome 110)
3467.2 ms * -13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 (Chrome 102)
3227.4 ms * -5%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
3075.1 ms *
Average UNISOC T610 ()
3075 ms * -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
3060 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Tab M10配备了eMMC闪存,这是目前智能手机和平板电脑中使用的最慢的存储技术。因此,这款平板电脑在这一领域的性能预期很低。

也就是说,在这个价位上,只有少数其他平板电脑的数据读写速度比M10快。

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3Nokia T10Lenovo Tab M9Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-11%
-13%
-2%
-31%
-30%
181%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.2
393.23
42%
273.5
-1%
274.3
-1%
255.1
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
210.4
234.88
12%
191.5
-9%
184.4
-12%
101.1
-52%
176.6 ?(40 - 274, n=204)
-16%
Random Read 4KB
105.1
75.12
-29%
71.4
-32%
95.2
-9%
68.3
-35%
Random Write 4KB
78.5
23.97
-69%
71.5
-9%
91
16%
57.5
-27%

游戏--在紧要关头是可能的

虽然可以在联想Tab M10(第三代)上进行游戏,但这种体验可能无法满足苛刻的游戏玩家。例如,PUBG Mobile的帧率太低。即使在低设置下,游戏的速度也不能超过40帧。其他游戏如《暗黑破坏神》甚至根本无法运行。

我们在快节奏的动作游戏Armajet中达到60帧,但帧率并不完全稳定。所有帧率测量都是使用我们的合作伙伴GameBench的软件进行的。.

无论你是使用触摸屏(例如在无尽跑酷中)还是使用运动传感器,控制都相当流畅。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø55.8 (38-61)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø37.2 (26-41)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.5.0: Ø29.3 (23-31)

排放--受热时刻

温度

根据我们的测量,平板电脑的表面在极高的负载下确实变得相当热。后置摄像头周围的区域甚至变得触感不适,高达48.2℃(118.8℉)。更重要的是,测量是在室温下进行的,而不是在户外烈日下进行的,在那里设备可能变得更热。然而,在正常使用过程中,热量不应该是一个问题。

性能也不受热的影响:联想Tab M10的帧数几乎是相同的,即使在运行相同的高要求基准测试20次后。

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.12.42.62.833.23.43.63.94.1Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.1 (4.03-4.12)
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.49 (2.46-2.54)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.2-4.28)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.26 (4.25-4.27)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø1.038 (1.025-1.051)
Lenovo Tab M9 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G80, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.07 (1.063-1.076)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø1.096 (1.091-1.101)
Max. Load
 38.4 °C33.5 °C29.1 °C 
 35.5 °C30.7 °C28.6 °C 
 33.3 °C28.9 °C27.6 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 31.7 °C
32 °C40.5 °C48.2 °C
29 °C30.6 °C33.2 °C
27.8 °C29.6 °C31.3 °C
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  39.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
热图前沿
热图前沿
热图后部
热图后部

发言人

两个扬声器都位于联想Tab M10的顶部。扬声器的位置使它们能够创造出温和的立体声效果,尽管由于它们之间的距离相对较近,并不是很好听。

总的来说,扬声器可以使用更多的功率,但没有削波,它们的声音整体上很好听。

通过3.5毫米音频插孔或蓝牙将扬声器或一副耳机连接到设备上,你会得到更好的音频。Tab M10支持以下蓝牙编解码器:SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD和LDAC。这意味着对于大多数无线耳机来说,应该有一个好的编解码器。但该设备缺乏对更高级编解码器的支持。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.438.8253736.13132.9304032.131.55035.732.26327.428.38021.5211002325.212524.129.316019.535.720013.54125013.648.531512.651.5400125650011.461.863011.965.780011.871.7100013.271.5125015.869.116001168.2200011.363.625001267.7315012.971.6400014.873.9500017.271.5630015.762.6800015.9641000016.561.51250016.8521600017.745.6SPL26.581.3N0.848.6median 13.6median 62.6Delta2.710.235.228.921.72018.622.421.720.43233.625.724.527.419.624.318.316.326.518.944.817.547.812.352.715.758.911.660.311.869.712.472.111.671.412.577.213.176.712.576.213.172.212.870.312.868.512.976.313.379.413.480.313.774.613.768.814.463.613.751.725.287.40.771.6median 13.1median 70.31.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M10 Gen 3Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--使用率相当高,充电速度慢

消耗功率

联想Tab M10 2022最低需要1.9瓦的功率,这比其他平板电脑的功率高很多。然而,在低负荷情况下,它几乎不消耗任何更多的电力,而且最大功率与同类设备差不多。

附带的适配器能够以高达10瓦的功率为该平板电脑充电。鉴于充电速度慢,Tab M10的电池不是很大,这是一件好事。即便如此,仍然需要三个小时才能将设备充满。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.9 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Load midlight 7.6 / 9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Power Consumption
-22%
27%
-34%
Idle Minimum *
1.9
0.94
51%
1.6
16%
1.19
37%
Idle Average *
2.1
4.22
-101%
1.7
19%
4.63
-120%
Idle Maximum *
2.5
4.37
-75%
1.8
28%
4.68
-87%
Load Average *
7.6
6.12
19%
2.8
63%
7.27
4%
Load Maximum *
9
9.14
-2%
8.1
10%
9.17
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3: Ø8.52 (6.01-11.4)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.73 (7.6-7.99)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.03 (1.907-2.62)

电池寿命

联想平板电脑的5100毫安时电池对于一个10英寸的设备来说并不算大,这意味着在耐力方面必须做出妥协。

然而,这些妥协其实并不激烈:在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,M10持续了14小时21分,这比许多其他设备的能力要短,但仍然足以满足日常使用。这款平板电脑在需要充电之前应该能够提供两天的使用时间。

当用于观看电影和玩游戏时,M10同样可以持续与同类平板电脑的时间相当。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 32min
WiFi Websurfing
14h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 33min
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10 Plus Gen 3
7500 mAh
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
Lenovo Tab M9
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
14%
4%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1952
2373
22%
2132
9%
1973
1%
H.264
1002
1151
15%
987
-1%
824
-18%
WiFi v1.3
861
909
6%
984
14%
955
11%
679
-21%
Load
213
239
12%
206
-3%
230
8%

Pros

+ 价格低廉
+ 优质的金属底盘
+ 良好的Wi-Fi接收
+ 即使是Wi-Fi型号也有GPS模块
+ 足够的电池寿命,适合日常使用
+ 负载下性能稳定
+ 没有PWM
+ 具备Widevine认证
+ 有LTE型号

Cons

- 性能平平
- 充电时间长
- 负载下会非常热
- 显示屏暗淡,有明显的蓝色色调
- 扬声器质量不高
- 在审查时只有Android 11
- 不经常更新
- 大量臃肿的软件

结论 - 标准的经济型平板电脑

审查:联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)。
审查:联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)。

联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)是一款令人喜欢的、相当轻便的平板电脑,规格也不错。它的价格约为200欧元(215美元),也可使用LTE。本评论中的Wi-Fi型号能够实现稳定的网络传输速度,并具有GPS模块,虽然不完美,但做得足够好。

在性能、显示亮度和电池寿命方面,必须做出妥协。但根据使用情况,它们绝对是可以容忍的(例如,如果你需要一个用于客厅的平板电脑)。我们更恼火的是,联想仍然用旧版本的Android ,而且在发布更新方面也非常缓慢。另外,尽管这款平板电脑在重负荷下会变得相当热,但其性能并没有受到影响。

你很难发现联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)有什么特别之处,但你得到的是一款运行良好的坚实、时尚的平板电脑。

那些想要更好的音质的人可以看一下 三星Galaxy Tab A8,它的特点是有多达四个扬声器。M10还面临着联想内部的大量竞争:Tab M9。 Tab M9略为紧凑,而 Tab M10 Plus而Tab M10 Plus则提供了更多存储空间,甚至支持笔的选择。

价格和可用性

联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)可以直接从制造商那里购买。在本评论发表时,配备3GB内存和32GB存储空间的机型价格大约为180欧元(195美元),配备对开盖子的价格为208欧元(225美元)。

Tab M10目前仍未在美国和英国上市销售。在德国,你可以购买4GB内存和64GB存储的机型,价格约为 200欧元(216美元)。在亚马逊上。LTE版本只能从第三方零售商处购买,如亚马逊Cyberport.

Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 - 03/25/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
40 / 70 → 57%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
90%
Display
81%
Games Performance
10 / 78 → 13%
Application Performance
46 / 92 → 50%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
48 / 85 → 57%
Average
68%
80%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想Tab M10 2022(第三代)平板电脑评测--采用金属底盘的轻量级预算设备
Florian Schmitt, 2023-03-29 (Update: 2024-08-15)