Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro在审查。适合基本任务的低价15英寸笔记本电脑

Name: Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Brand: Teclast

酷睿i3为500欧元。

通过F15 Pro，中国制造商Teclast提供了一款15英寸的笔记本电脑，采用铝制外壳和英特尔的Core i3处理器。还有足够的端口和一个IPS显示屏。对于大约500欧元（约合588美元），你还能期待什么？

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 09/17/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Ice Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Teclast

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro

Processor

Intel Core i3-1005G1 2 x 1.2 - 3.4 GHz, 34 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Ice Lake-U

Graphics adapter

Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR4-3200, Dual-Channel, soldered

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, N156HCA-EN1, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Storage

Teclast BD256GB, 256 GB

, 187 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 374 x 243

Battery

53.8 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 57W PSU, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.945 kg, Power Supply: 278 g

Price

500 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
77 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)	1.9 kg	20.5 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2020	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8	1.5 kg	16.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
76.5 % v7 ^(old)		Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Athlon 3150U, Vega 3	1.9 kg	20 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
78.2 % v7 ^(old)		Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳、设备和输入装置

Teclast使用铝（盖子）和塑料的混合材料制作深灰色的外壳。稳定性尚可，整体制造质量符合这一价格范围的预期，但其他制造商也在这一价格范围内提供更高质量的外壳（如Chuwi、华为）。然而，铰链调整得不好，因为它明显摇晃。黑色的键盘没有照明，击键的声音相当大。我们喜欢这个大的ClickPad，操作起来没有问题。

你得到一个USB-C接口，但它不能用于充电（也没有DisplayPort）。否则，有两个USB端口（3.2 Gen.1）和一个成熟的HDMI输出。microSD读卡器非常慢，RealTek WLAN模块（802.11ac 1x1 & BT 5.0）也是如此。

黑色的键盘提供了足够的行程，但由于敲击声很大，看起来不是特别高质量。没有背光，但专用数字键盘很实用。大型ClickPad工作良好，但响亮的点击声在这里也很烦人。

Rating,Rating Version,Date,Model,Weight,Drive,Size,Resolution,Price from Size comparison

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years)	58.1 MB/s +181%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	28 MB/s +35%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro (AV Pro v60)	20.7 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)	19.5 MB/s -6%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years)	72.5 MB/s +157%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.4 MB/s +33%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro (AV Pro v60)	28.2 MB/s
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)	26.29 MB/s -7%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1224 (586^min - 1492^max) MBit/s +367%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	690 (335^min - 729^max) MBit/s +163%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	618 (579^min - 655^max) MBit/s +136%
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (54.8 - 339, n=21)	278 MBit/s +6%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	262 (240^min - 277^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1429 (730^min - 1491^max) MBit/s +500%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	653 (593^min - 667^max) MBit/s +174%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	622 (585^min - 651^max) MBit/s +161%
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (86 - 348, n=21)	270 MBit/s +13%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	238 (207^min - 270^max) MBit/s

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø238 (207-270)

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø262 (240-277)

ColorChecker Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro: 18.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 28.76 ∆E

显示屏 - 1080p IPS面板

15.6英寸的IPS显示屏提供全高清分辨率，并有一个光泽的表面。这在户外是有问题的，但至少面板的主观画面印象是好的，颜色也看起来很生动。

平均亮度约为260cd/m²，对比度甚至达到了非常好的1400：1。然而，最低亮度有点问题，为77cd/m²，这在非常黑暗的环境中太高了。我们无法检测到PWM闪烁，光晕也不是一个问题。

由于几乎完整的sRGB，该面板在出厂前已经被很好地校准，甚至编辑图片/视频也是合理的。IPS显示屏的可视角度稳定性很好。


267 cd/m²	281 cd/m²	269 cd/m²
247 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	248 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	254 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

N156HCA-EN1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 293 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 266.3 cd/m² Minimum: 77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 294 cd/m²
Contrast: 1395:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro N156HCA-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AU Optronics AUO28ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Chi Mei CMN15F5, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-38%	-43%	-40%
Display P3 Coverage	65.6	40.49 -38%	37.13 -43%	39.42 -40%
sRGB Coverage	98.1	60.9 -38%	55.8 -43%	58.7 -40%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.8	41.84 -38%	38.36 -43%	40.73 -40%
Response Times		-13%	41%	-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.6 ?(20.4, 19.2)	43.6 ?(20.4, 23.2) -10%	26 ?(8, 18) 34%	45.6 ?(23.6, 22) -15%
Response Time Black / White *	26.8 ?(16, 10.8)	31.2 ?(18, 13.2) -16%	14 ?(4, 3) 48%	36.4 ?(20.4, 16) -36%
PWM Frequency				1020 ?(98)
Screen		-98%	-105%	-128%
Brightness middle	293	271 -8%	232 -21%	233.1 -20%
Brightness	266	256 -4%	211 -21%	226 -15%
Brightness Distribution	84	90 7%	82 -2%	90 7%
Black Level *	0.21	0.15 29%	0.41 -95%	0.21 -0%
Contrast	1395	1807 30%	566 -59%	1110 -20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.1	4.7 -124%	6.83 -225%	5.69 -171%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5	20.4 -308%	18.77 -275%	20.62 -312%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.7	4.6 -557%		5.12 -631%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.5	1.6 54%	8.52 -143%	3.3 6%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.17 ^101%	2.45 ^90%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	6681 ^97%	6649 ^98%	9753 ^67%	6749 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		38.5	35	37.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		60.6	56	58
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-50% / -73%	-36% / -68%	-65% / -95%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.4 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

截图CalMAN测量

性能、排放和电池寿命

笔记本电脑英特尔酷睿i3-1005G1仍然来自Ice Lake ，提供2个核心（4个线程），最大时钟为3.4GHz。TDP非常短暂地达到34瓦，然后立即下降到15瓦。因此，对于2021年来说，性能是非常弱的。由于采用了M.2固态硬盘（SATA-III），主观操作也很流畅。F15 Pro几乎不适合游戏，但来自英特尔的集成GPU可以轻松应对视频播放（甚至4K）等日常事务。然而，扬声器低于平均水平，我们建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。

有一个风扇，但即使在负载情况下，你也很难听到它。反过来，负载下的表面温度相当高，但在日常使用中没有问题。

闲置消耗有点高，你也不应该在电池寿命方面期望太多；我们在亮度为150cd/m²的WLAN测试中只运行了不到6小时。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1: Ø338 (334.54-346.03)

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø669 (662.73-672.62)

Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U: Ø348 (332.02-352.17)

Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4: Ø379 (375.47-384.71)

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=101, last 2 years)	9013 Points +322%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (2135 - 2636, n=4)	2303 Points +8%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	2135 Points

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=101, last 2 years)	1527 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (1046 - 1061, n=4)	1055 Points +1%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	1046 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=101, last 2 years)	3466 Points +323%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	1525 Points +86%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	961 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (820 - 1015, n=7)	892 Points +9%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	820 Points
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	795 Points -3%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=101, last 2 years)	588 Points +46%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	504 Points +25%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	402 Points
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (338 - 407, n=7)	395 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	364 Points -9%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	303 Points -25%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office (242 - 2642, n=102, last 2 years)	1519 Points +339%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	678 (671.21^min - 677.84^max) Points +96%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (346 - 407, n=7)	392 Points +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	384.7 (375.47^min - 384.71^max) Points +11%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	352 (332.02^min - 352.17^max) Points +2%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	346 (334.54^min - 346.03^max) Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=101, last 2 years)	226 Points +46%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	193.6 Points +25%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	155 Points
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (99.5 - 160, n=7)	147.8 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	144 Points -7%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	117 Points -25%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	1388 Seconds *
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	1348 Seconds * +3%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (1123 - 1388, n=7)	1234 Seconds * +11%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	1188 Seconds * +14%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	680 Seconds * +51%
Average of class Office (208 - 2248, n=103, last 2 years)	448 Seconds * +68%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Office (7212 - 65460, n=103, last 2 years)	37977 MIPS +290%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	16901 MIPS +74%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	11122 MIPS +14%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (9731 - 11135, n=8)	10735 MIPS +10%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	9731 MIPS
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	8752 MIPS -10%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Office (2769 - 6687, n=103, last 2 years)	5184 MIPS +34%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	4621 MIPS +20%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (3789 - 4057, n=8)	3952 MIPS +2%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	3862 MIPS
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	3536 MIPS -8%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	3065 MIPS -21%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=102, last 2 years)	7327 Points +183%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	3157 Points +22%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	2591 Points
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	2427 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (2153 - 2595, n=6)	2420 Points -7%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	1847 Points -29%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=103, last 2 years)	1540 Points +33%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	1337 Points +15%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	1158 Points
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (1118 - 1194, n=6)	1156 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	895 Points -23%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	751 Points -35%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Office (1.55 - 18.7, n=101, last 2 years)	10.1 fps +317%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	4.14 fps +71%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	3.25 fps +34%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (2.42 - 3.59, n=7)	3.18 fps +31%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	2.42 fps
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	2.03 fps -16%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	90.8 s * -11%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	81.7 s *
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (55.8 - 81.7, n=6)	63.1 s * +23%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	62.8 s * +23%
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=101, last 2 years)	54.8 s * +33%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	0.872 sec * -14%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1	0.762 sec *
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1 (0.746 - 0.763, n=6)	0.754 sec * +1%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	0.745 sec * +2%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4	0.655 sec * +14%
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.192, n=100, last 2 years)	0.56 sec * +27%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=93, last 2 years)	5567 Points +61%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G	3898 Points +13%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3743 Points +9%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB	3449 Points
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (3386 - 3562, n=6)	3448 Points 0%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Vega 3, Athlon 3150U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	3107 Points -10%

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Vega 3, Athlon 3150U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	2838 μs * -124%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G	1532 μs * -21%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB	1268 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Teclast BD256GB	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G	Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G	Average Teclast BD256GB	Average of class Office
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		182%	98%	38%	0%	317%
Write 4K	109.4	134.8 23%	124.8 14%	138.5 27%	109.4 ?() 0%	163.1 ?(50.1 - 291, n=60, last 2 years) 49%
Read 4K	38.89	41.68 7%	43.56 12%	41.98 8%	38.9 ?() 0%	63 ?(20.6 - 90.2, n=60, last 2 years) 62%
Write Seq	405.2	1651 307%	977 141%	213.5 -47%	405 ?() 0%	2625 ?(405 - 5030, n=42, last 2 years) 548%
Read Seq	529	2300 335%	1685 219%	1289 144%	529 ?() 0%	2835 ?(507 - 5559, n=42, last 2 years) 436%
Write 4K Q32T1	284.2	260 -9%	185.9 -35%	157.8 -44%	284 ?() 0%	412 ?(205 - 809, n=60, last 2 years) 45%
Read 4K Q32T1	337.8	335.1 -1%	272.7 -19%	448.9 33%	338 ?() 0%	537 ?(184.2 - 899, n=60, last 2 years) 59%
Write Seq Q32T1	436.5	1641 276%	971 122%	210.5 -52%	437 ?() 0%	3266 ?(315 - 6207, n=60, last 2 years) 648%
Read Seq Q32T1	560	3452 516%	2424 333%	1853 231%	560 ?() 0%	4399 ?(454 - 7123, n=60, last 2 years) 686%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office (712 - 9375, n=97, last 2 years)	4719 Points +208%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	2557 Points +67%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i3-1115G4	2250 Points +47%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i3-1005G1	1530 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (960 - 1755, n=15)	1480 Points -3%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, AMD Athlon Gold 3150U	1298 Points -15%

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	30.2	19.6	10.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	76.7	31.9	20.9	19.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	15.4	7.68	7.68
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	28.1	13.7	12.9

噪声排放

Noise Level

Idle		24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A)
Load		24.2 / 25.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)

温度

Max. Load

Idle


43.1 °C	39.1 °C	25.1 °C
42.7 °C	34.1 °C	24.8 °C
37.1 °C	30.6 °C	23.9 °C

Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 33.4 °C


25.1 °C	39 °C	51.8 °C
25.2 °C	33.5 °C	43.1 °C
25.5 °C	31.3 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 51.8 °C
Average: 34.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 35.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.8 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-9.4 °C / -16.9 F).

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源消耗

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.52 / 0.74 Watt
Idle	7.3 / 9.9 / 10.9 Watt
Load	22 / 38 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø23.3 (18.9-27.6)

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø23.8 (15.9-38.1)

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Average of class Office (300 - 1349, n=96, last 2 years)	598 min +69%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 53 Wh	539 min +53%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY R5 3500U, Vega 8, 42 Wh	470 min +33%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 53.8 Wh	353 min
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE Athlon 3150U, Vega 3, 35 Wh	241 min -32%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 93)		5h 53min

Pros

+ 具有良好视角稳定性的IPS显示屏

+ 准确的色彩和全sRGB覆盖

+ 适当的系统性能

+ 几乎总是无声运行

Cons

- 老旧的双核处理器

- 缓慢的WLAN

- 不能通过USB-C充电

- 没有键盘背光灯

结论 - 只有IPS显示屏令人信服

在审查中。Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro。测试设备由Teclast提供

当然，你必须问自己，你能从一台不到500欧元（约588美元）的新笔记本电脑中期待什么。Teclast F15 Pro在测试中没有表现出任何巨大的弱点，尤其是色彩强烈的IPS显示屏可以得分，它甚至可以提供完整的sRGB覆盖。在这个价格范围内，这绝不是一个理所当然的事情。

然而，我们在其他方面的表现则处于较低的边缘。除了缓慢的双核处理器，在端口和通信模块方面也没有亮点。

Teclast F15 Pro满足了基本要求，并提供了一个体面的IPS显示屏，但总的来说，即使在这个价格范围内，在竞争中也有更好的整体包装。

当你看一下竞争对手时，问题就来了。例如，有华为MateBook D 15它以较低的价格（目前约为450欧元/~529美元）提供了更好的整体包装，这取决于配置。

价格和可用性

Teclast F15 Pro在Aliexpress出售，价格约为490欧元（约576美元）。.

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro - 2021-09-14 09/14/2021 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

65 / 98 → 67%

Keyboard

72%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

41 / 80 → 52%

Weight

64 / 20-75 → 79%

Battery

68%

Display

82%

Games Performance

54 / 78 → 69%

Application Performance

80 / 95 → 84%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

71%

Camera

25 / 85 → 30%

Average

68%

77%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 452583 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 23556 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro在审查。适合基本任务的低价15英寸笔记本电脑

Andreas Osthoff, 2021-09-17 (Update: 2021-09-17)