Teclast Tbook 10s (x5-Z8350, 全高清) 变形本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 279 cd/m²
Contrast: 962:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.27
Teclast Tbook 10s IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Chuwi Hi10 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Xiaomi MiPad 2 IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9" | Haier Pad 971 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | Asus ZenPad 3s 10 Z500M IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 5% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 279 | 379 36% | 425 52% | 294 5% | 370 33% | 489 75% |
Brightness | 280 | 356 27% | 402 44% | 294 5% | 351 25% | 443 58% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 87 6% | 91 11% | 90 10% | 89 9% | 86 5% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.42 -45% | 0.4 -38% | 0.37 -28% | 0.4 -38% | 0.43 -48% |
Contrast | 962 | 902 -6% | 1063 10% | 795 -17% | 925 -4% | 1137 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 4.8 28% | 4.98 26% | 3.2 52% | 4.6 31% | 5.5 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 11.2 -4% | 6.61 39% | 6.5 40% | 9.5 12% | 11.6 -7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 6.7 1% | 5.2 24% | 3 56% | 6.5 4% | 6.7 1% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.23 99% | 2.65 83% | 2.3 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.06 107% |
CCT | 8466 77% | 6988 93% | 7249 90% | 6882 94% | 6354 102% | 7457 87% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro |
AndroBench 3-5 | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Random Write 4KB | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Random Read 4KB | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Sequential Write 256KB | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Sequential Read 256KB | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Haier Pad 971 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
3DMark | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
GFXBench | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Haier Pad 971 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi MiPad 2 | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi10 Pro | |
Haier Pad 971 | |
Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q | |
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Teclast Tbook 10s | |
Chuwi Hi12 | |
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
Teclast Tbook 10s audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Chuwi Hi10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi MiPad 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (95.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.13 / 0.32 Watt |
Idle | 1.46 / 5 / 5.08 Watt |
Load |
9.57 / 10.77 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Teclast Tbook 10s 6000 mAh | Chuwi Hi10 Pro 6500 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -7% | -21% | 45% | 39% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.46 | 1.4 4% | 3.33 -128% | 1.38 5% | 1.22 16% |
Idle Average * | 5 | 4.82 4% | 5.01 -0% | 1.46 71% | 3.15 37% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.08 | 5.43 -7% | 5.19 -2% | 1.6 69% | 3.39 33% |
Load Average * | 9.57 | 11.61 -21% | 8.32 13% | 5.06 47% | 3.95 59% |
Load Maximum * | 10.77 | 12.48 -16% | 9.33 13% | 6.95 35% | 5.64 48% |
* ... smaller is better
Teclast Tbook 10s 6000 mAh | Chuwi Hi10 Pro 6500 mAh | Xiaomi MiPad 2 6190 mAh | Haier Pad 971 7800 mAh | Asus ZenPad 10.0 Z300M-6A039A 4680 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 228 | 364 60% | 421 85% | 423 86% | 435 91% |
Pros
Cons
类似于Chuwi Hi10 Pro,Teclast Tbook 10s的时尚机身设计和高品质铝合金机身十分诱人。而安卓或Windows的双操作系统也带来了一些亮点。不过,生产商仅为它预装了过时的安卓5.1。这两台设备都在相机和扬声器方面节省了成本。基本上,这两款平板设备的外观和质感都十分接近。
我们并不是很满意Teclast Tbook 10s的可选配件。由于它搭配的低亮度屏幕,未优化的安卓用户界面和电池续航,我们认为其他一些同类设备相比更加完善。不过,正在寻找一台价格实惠,机身品质优秀,搭配高性能英特尔处理器,但不需要超长续航的用户可以考虑Teclast Tbook 10s。
Teclast Tbook 10s是一台优秀的低价平板电脑,不过它相比竞争机型没有太多的独特之处。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Teclast Tbook 10s
- 03/23/2017 v6 (old)
Marcus Herbrich