Tecno Phantom V Flip 5G 评测 - 700 欧元以下的翻盖手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Tecno Phantom V Flip Dimensity 8050, Mali-G77 MP9 | 194 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Motorola Razr 40 SD 7 Gen 1, Adreno 644 | 188.6 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.90" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740 | 187 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2640x1080 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Huawei P50 Pocket SD 888 4G, Adreno 660 | 190 g | 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.90" | 2790x1188 |
外壳和设备 - 坚固的铰链
比如 摩托罗拉 Razr 40或 三星Galaxy Z Flip5Phantom V Flip 的两侧短边可以打开，这让人想起 2000 年代的经典翻盖手机。正面有一个被制造商称为 "星球 "的圆形盖板显示屏，摄像头呈半径排列在盖板周围。这样的设计外观独特，但在操作外显示屏时，手指总是有可能伸进底部的摄像头，弄脏摄像头，留下油腻的痕迹。
有两种颜色可供选择：神秘黎明和标志性黑色。手机采用仿皮材质包覆，在我们的黑色测试机上，有些地方有明显的穿孔。淡紫色版本也采用仿皮材质，但背面有一条对比鲜明的条纹和一枚金属针。
Tecno Phantom V Flip 比其他翻盖手机重几克，但设计纤薄，可以很好地放入口袋。初次触摸时，稳定性看起来不错，适度扭动也不会影响手机。
我们喜欢它的铰链，单手就能轻松打开，并能使屏幕在多个位置保持稳定。因此，手机可以像使用三脚架一样在半开模式下拍照。遗憾的是，分屏使用多个应用程序的效果并不理想。
机身内置 256 GB 快速 UFS 3.1 大容量存储和 8 GB 工作内存，这是一个不错的配置，尤其是魅蓝 V Flip 在欧洲的售价应该是 699 欧元，因此比对比设备更便宜。该机安装了 NFC，但遗憾的是，USB-C 端口只能按照 USB 2.0 标准进行内部连接，因此无法进行图像输出和更快的数据传输。
通信、软件和操作 - 指纹传感器有点不可靠
WiFi 6 是目前支持的最快无线局域网标准，在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE 11000 路由器进行的测试中，魅蓝 V Flip 的传输速率达到了 588 到 877 MBit/s。这意味着你不能完全利用千兆互联网线路，但通常能实现相当不错的数据吞吐量。比较设备，如 Galaxy Z Flip5或 Razr 40支持 WiFi 6E，因此可以访问占用率较低的 6 GHz 频段，从而大大提高 Wi-Fi 网速。
Tecno Phantom V Flip 是一款 5G 智能手机，其频率足以在国外使用。不过，在某些国家可能会有问题，因为这款翻盖机型并非全球通用的全球手机。我们在市内地区进行了大约两周的测试，接收效果不错，但偶尔会出现掉线现象。
这款手机搭载Android 13，制造商用自己的 HiOS 13.5 定制了界面。安全补丁是从 2023 年 6 月开始的，因此在测试时已经比较旧了。
内部的触摸屏操作非常可靠，支持高达 360 Hz 的轮询率。很好：软件允许用户根据个人喜好调整操作灵敏度，例如滚动时的灵敏度。外屏也是触摸式的。在这里可以执行简单的小工具，例如用于自拍或在日历中查找约会。
指纹传感器集成在外壳右侧的待机键上。它偶尔会出现无法正确识别扫描手指的问题，但识别后解锁手机的速度还是相当快的。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| Motorola Razr 40 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| Motorola Razr 40 | |
摄像机 - 灵活的系统
背面有两个摄像头和一个闪光灯模块。一方面是主镜头，它的分辨率为 6400 万像素，但通常只能拍摄 1600 万像素的照片，因此使用的像素较大，出光率较高。
主摄像头拍摄的近距离物体照片色彩还算丰富，细节还不错，但虚化效果有些做作。周围图像的整体细节也相当丰富，亮度也不错。主摄像头在弱光和高对比度环境下的表现也不错，不过在较暗的区域很快就会出现明显的颗粒感。
视频最高可录制成 4K 分辨率和 30 帧/秒。画面看起来很清晰，快速自动对焦和精确的亮度调节令人信服。不过，在光线较暗的地方很快就会出现明显的颗粒感。
背面的广角镜头能拍摄出相当不错的快照，还能辨认出一些细节。不过，其他高端手机在亮部和暗部的动态效果要好得多。
折叠机构和第二块屏幕的一个优势是，您还可以用主摄像头自拍。不过，自拍摄像头也隐藏在主屏幕的一个冲孔中。它的分辨率为 3200 万像素，但也大多只使用了 1/4 的分辨率。拍出来的自拍照细节还不错，即使在较暗的地方也能拍出一些画质。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
显示屏 - PWM
22:9 格式的内部 AMOLED 屏幕采用扩展的全高清分辨率，可在 1 到 120 Hz 之间动态调节帧频。因此，在观看图像或文本时可以节省电量，同时还能顺利流畅地滚动。
在亮度方面，Tecno Phantom V Flip 的屏幕也毫不逊色：797 cd/m²（全白色）作为平均最大亮度是一个不错的值，尤其是在较小的表面上可以测量到高达 954 cd/m² 的亮度。
遗憾的是，我们在 AMOLED 屏幕上发现了 PWM 闪烁现象，因此敏感用户在购买手机前应先试用屏幕。屏幕的色彩还原度还不错，但特别强烈的色调与最佳色调的偏差比对比设备要大一些。
正面圆形屏幕采用 AMOLED 技术，分辨率为 466 x 466 像素。屏幕的最大刷新率为 60 Hz。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 822 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.249
| Tecno Phantom V Flip AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Motorola Razr 40 P-OLED, 2640x1080, 6.9" | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G Dynamic AMOLED, 2640x1080, 6.7" | Huawei P50 Pocket Foldable OLED, 2790x1188, 6.9" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 48% | 2% | -125% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.5 ? | 1.7 ? -13% | 1.42 ? 5% | 8.164 ? -444% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.9 ? | 1.3 ? -44% | 1.78 ? -98% | 1.18 ? -31% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 | 180.3 201% | 120 100% | 119.6 99% |
| Screen | 33% | 15% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 822 | 982 19% | 836 2% | 780 -5% |
| Brightness | 797 | 1002 26% | 848 6% | 768 -4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 85 -11% | 97 2% | 96 1% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 0.93 73% | 2.6 26% | 1.1 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.6 | 2.52 62% | 4.5 32% | 3.1 53% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.4 30% | 1.6 20% | 1.6 20% |
| Gamma | 2.249 98% | 2.188 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6815 95% | 6480 100% | 6319 103% | 6483 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 41% /
38% | 9% /
11% | -52% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 足够日常使用
相当新联发科 Dimensity 8050被用作 SoC，但其技术规格与已经老旧的 Dimensity 1300.真正的高端处理器，如 Galaxy Z Flip5等真正的高端处理器，SoC 在性能方面跟不上，但在日常使用中仍能获得非常流畅的系统。在要求非常苛刻的应用中，差异会更加明显。
特别是在图形要求较高的程序中，如 4K 渲染，Tecno Phantom V Flip 的速度要比配备高端 SoC 的竞争对手慢。在我们的测试设备上，互联网浏览速度很快，图片加载速度也很快，通常在滚动时就可以使用。内存速度也很快，但内存控制器无法充分利用闪存模块的最大速度。
由于手机外壳纤薄，在长时间负载的情况下会有明显的发热现象。不过，这并不影响 SoC；在 3DMark 压力测试中，其性能始终保持在较高水平。
翻盖手机的立体声扬声器可以发出相当大的音量，但在最大音量时听起来高音过重，令人不悦。当声压降低时，这种情况会稍有改善，但扬声器的音质始终不会很好。不过，可以通过 USB-C 或蓝牙连接外置扬声器或耳机。这可以顺利进行，还可以通过 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC 以及 LHDC V3 和 V5 等几种编解码器进行无线声音传输。
可折叠手机壳内没有太多空间容纳电池，所以你只能满足于 4,000 毫安时的电池容量。因此，这款手机与同类竞争产品相当，在我们的 WLAN 测试中也能提供近 10 小时的正常运行时间。如果您不使用手机进行要求过高的活动，您应该可以在不充电的情况下使用一天。最大充电功率为 45 瓦，这意味着只需不到 1 小时就能充满电池。
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | Motorola Razr 40 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | Huawei P50 Pocket | Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -17% | 47% | -3% | 6% | 11% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1814.9 | 955.8 -47% | 3412.35 88% | 1839 1% | 1749 ? -4% | 1867 ? 3% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 1490.7 | 804.3 -46% | 2289.61 54% | 575 -61% | 1163 ? -22% | 1451 ? -3% |
| Random Read 4KB | 249.9 | 290.8 16% | 444.6 78% | 263.5 5% | 286 ? 14% | 279 ? 12% |
| Random Write 4KB | 238.9 | 257.5 8% | 161.87 -32% | 342.1 43% | 319 ? 34% | 311 ? 30% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.4 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | |
| Motorola Razr 40 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | |
| Motorola Razr 40 | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
发言人
Tecno Phantom V Flip audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P50 Pocket audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Razr 40 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip5 5G | |
| Tecno Phantom V Flip | |
| Huawei P50 Pocket | |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Phantom V Flip 是更便宜的替代品
如果您想在翻盖手机上拥有超大的正面显示屏和绝对顶级的性能，您可能需要花费 700 欧元以上。不过，那些喜欢省钱的人可以选择 Tecno Phantom V Flip：主摄像头的拍照效果很好，而且由于支持广角，所以也很灵活。由于采用了坚固的铰链，手机可以稳定在多种位置，因此既可以用来观看视频，也可以像带三脚架的相机一样放在桌子上。
正面的圆形显示屏只能显示一些小部件，但对于基本信息或相机取景器来说完全足够。手机制造质量良好，性能足以满足日常使用。电池续航能力不如传统手机，但魅蓝 V Flip 的充电速度相当快。
不过，也有一些问题困扰着我们：手机没有充分利用 UFS 3.1 存储的高速性能，扬声器的音效不是特别好，安全补丁也有点老旧。在我们的测试中，指纹传感器也被证明有些不可靠。
作为 Tecno 在西方市场的首款翻盖手机，魅蓝 V Flip 的表现相当不错：高质量的主摄像头、明亮的 AMOLED 屏幕和稳定的铰链。所有这些都以低于同类竞争产品的价格提供。
翻盖手机中的佼佼者当然是 三星Galaxy Z Flip5它的功能更强大，而且价格已经下降。这款手机目前在德国亚马逊有售，起价 829 欧元。摩托罗拉 摩托罗拉 Razr 40也只提供了一个小的正面显示屏和一些优势，如 eSIM 支持和直流调光。
价格和供应情况
在测试期间，Tecno Phantom V Flip 尚未在欧洲上市，但很快就会以 699 欧元的厂商定价上市。
Tecno Phantom V Flip
- 10/05/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
