Teufel Real Blue Pro 评测--有趣的 ANC 耳机
与咪咪之声一起
Teufel Real Blue Pro 是一款耳罩式耳机，它拥有广泛的编解码器支持、良好的运行时间和包括混合 ANC 在内的众多功能，以及不错的传输范围。请继续阅读，了解这款耳机的不足之处。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Teufel Real Blue Pro 号称是真正的高级耳机，具有全面的功能。其中包括三级混合 ANC、透明模式、Mimi 音效、高分辨率音频编解码器和多种连接。
在这篇评测中，您可以了解到在竞争如此激烈的市场中，这些功能是否足以与竞争对手抗衡。Real Blue Pro 的 MRSP 约为 380 美元。
规格
| 类型 | 耳罩式 |
| 连接性 | Bluetooh 5.1，3.5 毫米插孔 |
| 最远可达 30 米 | |
| 扬声器 | 44 毫米驱动器，25 欧姆，10 - 21000 赫兹 |
| 音频编解码器 | SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive |
| 电池 | 800 mAh、3.7 V、2.96 Wh |
| 充电连接 | USB-C |
| 无线充电 | 无 |
| 重量 | 296 克 |
| 固件版本 | 2.5.0 |
| 交货包括 | 耳机、带遥控器和麦克风的音频线、USB-C 线缆、运输箱 |
| 价格 (MRSP) | 350 欧元 (MRSP) |
外壳和人体工学设计 - 设计时尚，佩戴舒适
Teufel Real Blue Pro 有夜黑和钛灰两种颜色，前者是我们的测试设备。耳机的主要材料是塑料和合成皮革，但这并不影响耳机的高品质感觉。我们尤其喜欢黄铜色的元素。
头戴式束带可以根据用户的头部大小进行调节，并提供了足够的操作空间。你可以随时感受到接触压力，但绝不会感到不舒服。耳垫柔软舒适，能很好地适应头部形状，即使在关闭耳机时也能明显阻隔噪音。缺点是耳机下方几乎没有空气流通，因此很快就会出汗。耳垫可以更换，如有需要，可以向 Teufel 购买。
连接和操作 - 带有集成听力测试功能的 Teufel Real Blue Pro
Teufel Real Blue Pro 易于连接。您可以通过蓝牙 5.1 与各种编解码器无线连接。此外，您还可以使用集成的插孔适配器（3.5 毫米），交货时还附带了一条布套连接线。这意味着，即使 Teufel 耳机的电池电量耗尽，您也可以使用它。连接线上还有一个小型遥控器，配有一个按钮和一个麦克风。按钮可以暂停或继续播放，也可以接听和结束通话。如果能配备飞机适配器就更实用了。此外，USB-C 端口并不适用于音频，而只能用于为电池充电和交换数据。
智能暂停、可定制均衡器、透明模式和 Mimi 声音个性化等功能也是 Teufel 耳机的一部分。后者通过小型听力测试对声音再现进行个性化处理，然后根据用户的听力表现调整播放。
Teufel 耳机可通过耳罩上的物理按钮进行操作。除了用于蓝牙控制的连接按钮外，还有一个用于 ANC 和透明模式的组合按钮。其余功能可通过操纵杆控制，包括连接语音助手、佩戴者检测、呼叫控制和媒体播放。虽然功能非常齐全，但也需要稍加练习。
Android 和 iOS 版的应用程序布局清晰，可以访问所有重要功能。在这里还可以进行 Mimi 听力测试或调节均衡器。
声音 - 采用三级混合 ANC 技术的 Teufel 耳机
Real Blue Pro 使用起来非常有趣，音域宽广。不过，它们的 Dynamore 功能必须激活，因为如果不激活该功能，低音范围尤其缺乏冲击力。在使用蓝牙时，Teufel 耳机的低音并不是最明显的。我们最喜欢通过音频插孔播放。突然间，声音变得更有力量，听起来各方面都更加丰满。这款耳机的蓝牙音频编解码器也非常完善，这就是为什么我们在这一点上期望更高一些。不过，驱动程序似乎有这个能力，所以我们只能希望 Teufel 能通过软件更新进行一些改进。
三级主动降噪（ANC）可以可靠地过滤背景噪音，但不如 Bose QC45 那样强大。此外，在聆听安静的音频时，还能听到一些反噪音。
耳机的透明模式能非常自然地传递环境声音，但在音频播放时作用非常有限。
电话通话并不是 Teufel Real Blue Pro 的强项，但这个级别的耳机几乎都是如此。它们在安静的环境中也能很好地工作，但用户听起来总是有点闷和刺耳。
| Loudspeakers | |
| THD | |
| Teufel Real Blue Pro (RMS: -0.6 dBFS) | |
| Bose QuietComfort 45 (RMS: -2.7 dBFS) | |
| Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless (RMS: -1.6 dBFS) | |
| THD+N | |
| Bose QuietComfort 45 (RMS: -2.7 dBFS) | |
| Teufel Real Blue Pro (RMS: -0.6 dBFS) | |
| Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless (RMS: -1.6 dBFS) | |
* ... smaller is better
THD（总谐波失真）：谐波失真量化了非线性失真（谐波含量）相对于原始信号的失真量。THD 仅指基波分量。失真系数经常被同时提及，但它指的是整体信号。
THD+N（总谐波失真 + 噪音）：该值与 THD 相似，但除了谐波的干扰功率外，噪声的干扰功率也作为有效值记录下来。
测量时，通过测试耳机播放低谐波正弦信号（1 kHz，> 0 dB），该信号由人工头中的线性测量麦克风（测量距离：约 1 厘米）记录。
两个数值都以百分比表示。数值越小，信号保真度越高。
Teufel Real Blue Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (97.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Bose QuietComfort 45 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命--Teufel Real Blue Pro的超长续航时间
在我们的电池测试中，Teufel Real Blue Pro 在调节音量并将 ANC 设为最大值的情况下取得了非常好的续航时间。
如果电池电量耗尽，还可以通过插孔播放音频。在我们的测试中，800 毫安时电池充满电需要近两个小时。
| Battery Runtime - Spotify loop at 65dB/A (incl ANC) | |
| Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless | |
| Teufel Real Blue Pro | |
| Bose QuietComfort 45 | |
评价：功能丰富的优秀耳机，也有一些小瑕疵
在测试过程中，Teufel Real Blue Pro 的良好音质给我们留下了深刻印象，但在某些情况下，它的音量还是略显不足。不过，低音不那么重的音乐爱好者可能不会认为这是一个问题。
反过来，Mimi Sound 还提供了适合个人用户的声音配置文件，这不仅仅是对年长用户的奖励。还可以选择通过音频插孔播放声音，其 ANC 功能也很有效。
Teufel 的 Real Blue Pro 是一款多功能高级耳机，没有任何严重的缺点。
Teufel 耳机的一大优点是电池续航时间长。声音方面的小瑕疵可能会让发烧友望而却步，但其他大多数人几乎不会注意到这些瑕疵。
可行的替代品包括Bose QuietComfort 45 ，但它们提供的编解码频谱要小得多。
价格和供应情况
您可以在亚马逊店面找到 Teufel 的现有产品。Real Blue Pro 的 MRSP 约为 380 美元，但目前无法通过美国的任何在线零售商购买。
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
