联想ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT台式机评测:性能打了折扣,但很安静
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
v (old) | 02 / 2020 | Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620 | 720 g | 22 mm | x | ||
v (old) | Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 499 g | 22 mm | 0.00" | x | ||
v (old) | Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 68 mm | x | |||
v (old) | Intel NUC8i7BEH Asura NVMe SSD i7-8559U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 683 g | 51 mm | x | |||
v (old) | Intel NUC8i3CYSM i3-8121U, Radeon RX 540 | 660 g | 52 mm | x |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Connectivity
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (233 - 356, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
Dell Latitude 3400 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Average Intel Core i3-8145U (139 - 154, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-54-P2RK | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Desktop (831 - 6588, n=22, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Dell Latitude 3400 | |
Average Intel Core i3-8145U (318 - 361, n=4) | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-54-P2RK |
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
Average of class Desktop (5067 - 10699, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
Average Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3042 - 3399, n=3) | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Essentials | |
Average of class Desktop (10303 - 12591, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Average Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6911 - 7625, n=3) | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Productivity | |
Average of class Desktop (7058 - 12944, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
Average Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5274 - 6096, n=3) | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Desktop (4848 - 22005, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Zotac ZBOX-CI660 Nano | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Average Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1762 - 2433, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Intel NUC8i7BEH Asura NVMe SSD Asura Genesis Xtreme NVMe M.2 SSD 1 TB | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Average of class Desktop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 48% | 108% | 46% | 228% | |
Seq Read | 992 | 1668 68% | 2288 131% | 2276 ? 129% | 4689 ? 373% |
Seq Write | 878 | 1150 31% | 1908 117% | 1486 ? 69% | 3296 ? 275% |
4K Read | 40.25 | 48.46 20% | 51.9 29% | 49.6 ? 23% | 76.1 ? 89% |
4K Write | 78 | 116.5 49% | 173.3 122% | 129.5 ? 66% | 234 ? 200% |
4K-64 Read | 643 | 726 13% | 1222 90% | 683 ? 6% | 1762 ? 174% |
4K-64 Write | 499.1 | 1074 115% | 1829 266% | 895 ? 79% | 2971 ? 495% |
Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.039 35% | 0.031 48% | 0.06433 ? -7% | 0.0615 ? -3% |
Access Time Write * | 0.047 | 0.032 32% | 0.083 -77% | 0.04793 ? -2% | 0.04583 ? 2% |
Score Read | 782 | 942 20% | 1502 92% | 960 ? 23% | 2308 ? 195% |
Score Write | 665 | 1305 96% | 2193 230% | 1173 ? 76% | 3534 ? 431% |
Score Total | 1853 | 2716 47% | 4454 140% | 2598 ? 40% | 6964 ? 276% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Desktop (2277 - 79185, n=23, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Desktop (13814 - 189497, n=15, last 2 years) | |
Intel NUC8i3CYSM | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre M90n-1 Nano IoT |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6043 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 811 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 26 | 19 | 16 | 5 |
Off / Standby | 0.53 / 1.7 Watt |
Idle | 3.3 / 3.7 / 3.8 Watt |
Load |
25.4 / 38.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Pros
Cons
联想ThinkCentre M90n Nano IoT是一款有趣的设备。它当然不是要成为消费类台式机。那些有兴趣购买家用或商务用途的Lenovo mini PC的人应该考虑非IoT版本的ThinkCentre M90n Nano。一些买家还可以考虑英特尔提供的各种NUC。
物联网是针对大规模企业部署而设计的,其中必须要求无声操作,紧凑的占地面积和低功耗。在这些领域,Nano IoT取得了成功。该设备体积小,功耗低,为企业用户选择了许多端口,并且完全安静。
顾名思义,Nano IoT最好用作“物联网”设备。在正常使用情况下,Nano IoT发热严重。该设备运行温度高,易降频。
在特定的情况下,需要计算机进行简短的交易计算(例如在销售点或作为服务器阵列的一部分),Nano IoT是有意义的。否则,Nano IoT不值得其相对较高的要价。消费者绝对应该将目光投向其他地方。