联想ThinkPad E15 G3 AMD评测。采用Ryzen 7的廉价商务笔记本电脑
在我们回顾了ThinkPad E14 G3之后,我们现在来看看更大的E15 G3,它采用了AMD的新Ryzen 5000 CPU。客户现在还可以得到更明亮的显示屏(100% sRGB可选)以及更大的电池。联想的价格从770欧元开始,而我们的测试机配备Ryzen 7 5700U、16GB内存、1TB PCI-SSD和300尼特FHD屏幕,价格为1000欧元。参加联想校园计划的客户可以以950欧元的价格买到它。
Possible competitors
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.9 kg | 21 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
82.1 % v7 (old) | Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 16.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83.6 % v7 (old) | Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW i5-10400H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.9 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
与之前的型号相比,联想并没有改变外壳。 之前的型号.盖子是由铝制成的,而其他部分都是由塑料制成的。盖子以及底座的光滑顶部都非常容易沾染指纹,所以你必须定期清洁。整体稳定性非常好,当我们试图扭转底座单元时,只有轻微的吱吱声。
我们的测试装置显示出良好的制造质量,但盖子与底座并不完全对齐,这在设备关闭时略微突出的边缘很明显。整个底部的部分可以被移除,但你必须小心不要损坏塑料挂钩。8GB内存被焊接在主板上,但你可以使用一个SODIMM插槽来扩展内存,并且有一个空的M.2-2242。你可以更换Wi-Fi模块,但与ThinkPad L15 G2不同,没有WWAN模块。
连接性
联想肯定应该为下一个型号改善端口情况,因为USB 2.0端口对现代笔记本电脑来说实在太慢了。USB-C端口也只支持3.2 Gen.1标准,所以当你得到新的E15时,你应该只期待最低限度。
Wi-Fi模块支持Wi-Fi 6标准,但RealTek模块的最大传输速率被限制在1201 Mbps,这也被我们的Wi-Fi测试结果所显示。该hinkPad E15 G2配备了英特尔CPU的hinkPad E15 G2配备了更快的AX201 Wi-Fi模块。
720p的网络摄像头配备了机械快门,但即使在良好的照明条件下,图片质量也很差。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (424 - 928, n=20) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (621 - 877, n=20) |
输入设备 - 仍然是一个好的ThinkPad键盘
联想在E15上仍然使用熟悉的1.8毫米行程的键盘,它提供了丰富的打字体验,尽管价格低廉,但它是移动领域最好的键盘之一。你还可以得到一个专用的小键盘,但这意味着触摸板稍微向左偏移,这可能需要一些时间来适应。由于有两级背景照明,在较暗的环境中打字也不是问题。
触摸板运行良好,但由于有额外的TrackPoint按钮,其尺寸对于现代标准来说不是很宽裕。这些按钮产生了非常安静和低沉的点击声,给人留下了高质量的印象。在经过一段时间的培训后,使用TrackPoint的效果也不错。
显示器 - E15 G3,可选100% sRGB屏幕
显示屏一直是ThinkPad E15的弱点,亮度约为250尼特。联想改进了E15 G3的规格,面板的新亮度达到了300尼特,但我们的模型更亮,平均约为330尼特。由于黑值低,对比度非常好,主观画质也很好,但明亮的表面看起来有点颗粒感。
我们没有检测到PWM闪烁,但响应时间不是最快的,而且有一些重影。然而,对于办公用笔记本电脑来说,这不应该是一个大问题。背光出血在底部边缘非常轻微。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: 1388:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
41.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD N156HCA-EAB, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE Lenovo LEN40BA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Chi Mei N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW BOE0869, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 9% | -4% | 8% | -2% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.3 | 43.8 9% | 38.71 -4% | 43.6 8% | 39.56 -2% | 38.42 -5% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.2 | 65.7 9% | 58.2 -3% | 65.2 8% | 58.3 -3% | 57.8 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.6 | 45.3 9% | 39.99 -4% | 45 8% | 40.87 -2% | 39.69 -5% |
Response Times | 5% | 55% | 48% | -4% | -5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 40 9% | 28 ? 36% | 18 ? 59% | 48 ? -9% | 46.8 ? -6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 30 1% | 8 ? 74% | 19 ? 37% | 30 ? 1% | 31.2 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | |||||
Screen | 1% | -14% | -32% | -15% | -35% | |
Brightness middle | 347 | 298 -14% | 248 -29% | 289 -17% | 268 -23% | 249 -28% |
Brightness | 329 | 276 -16% | 244 -26% | 267 -19% | 241 -27% | 239 -27% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 86 -8% | 87 -6% | 85 -9% | 79 -15% | 87 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.26 -4% | 0.27 -8% | 0.56 -124% | 0.34 -36% | 0.22 12% |
Contrast | 1388 | 1146 -17% | 919 -34% | 516 -63% | 788 -43% | 1132 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 3.7 21% | 5.07 -8% | 3.96 16% | 4.64 1% | 6.7 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.4 | 15 23% | 17.47 10% | 6.76 65% | 7.11 63% | 19.7 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.4 | 3.5 20% | 3.67 17% | 4.4 -0% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.7 -0% | 1.91 -12% | 3.43 -102% | 2.96 -74% | 5.1 -200% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.21 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.48 89% |
CCT | 6475 100% | 6588 99% | 6697 97% | 7191 90% | 6343 102% | 7277 89% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 42 | 37 | 36.6 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 65 | 52 | 57.7 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
3% | 12% /
-1% | 8% /
-10% | -7% /
-11% | -15% /
-24% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2对该面板进行了分析和校准。首先,这是一个廉价的IPS屏幕,色彩偏差很大,即使是小的sRGB色域也只覆盖了60%。然而,灰度性能已经非常好了,没有偏色。我们可以通过自己的校准来略微改善结果,但用肉眼是看不出区别的。
对于办公环境来说,这款显示器是一个不错的选择,但如果你打算编辑一些图片/视频,我们建议你购买可选的全sRGB覆盖的FHD屏幕。
根据环境光线的不同,你可以在户外相当舒适地使用哑光面板工作,而且在视角稳定性方面没有限制。
性能 - AMD Ryzen 5000
处理器 - Ryzen 7 5700U (Zen 2)
我们的测试装置配备了AMD Ryzen 7 5700U有8个核心(16个线程),采用7纳米工艺制造,但它仍然基于Zen 2架构。最近评论的ThinkPad L15 G2已经配备了Zen 3芯片,甚至可以使用Ryzen Pro CPU,提供增强的安全功能。
CPU的功耗在一段时间内保持在30W(8x 3.3 GHz),大约15-20分钟后才开始降到25W。性能非常好,新的处理器比旧的约快30-40%。Ryzen 7 4700U在多核测试中,新的处理器比旧的Ryzen 7 4700U快30-40%。英特尔的Tiger Lake-U芯片显然被打败了,在单核测试中仅有很小的优势。然而,新的Zen 3 CPU(见ThinkPad L15 G2),已经缩小了差距。在电池电量上,CPU的性能并没有降低。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1177 - 1268, n=18) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6649 - 10139, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (478 - 495, n=19) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (2309 - 3877, n=19) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (184 - 190, n=17) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1130 - 1691, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (292 - 427, n=18) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (4476 - 4620, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (32529 - 47501, n=18) | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (1105 - 1205, n=17) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (4254 - 7635, n=17) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (6.97 - 12.1, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (52.4 - 68.5, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U (0.567 - 0.641, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
由于强大的处理器和PCI-SSD,E15 G3是一个非常快速和反应灵敏的伴侣,这也得到了合成基准测试的支持。在接下来的几年里,不会有任何瓶颈。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4775 - 5518, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8347 - 10091, n=13) | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7001 - 8457, n=13) | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Office (2126 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4583 - 5964, n=13) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
PCMark 10 Score | 5404 points | |
Help |
DPC-Latency
我们的DPC延迟测试显示出比以前的模型有所改进。 之前的模型,但仍有局限性。因此,E15 G3不是实时音频应用的理想选择。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
ThinkPad E15 G2有两个M.2-SSD插槽(PCIe 3.0 x4),我们的测试设备配备了一个M.2-2280驱动器,这意味着你可以使用空闲的M.2-2242插槽进行存储扩展。来自SK海力士的固态硬盘(PC711)提供了1TB的慷慨的存储容量,在初始设置后,你可以使用大约912GB。传输速率非常好,该SSD是最快的PCIe 3.0驱动器之一。更多的SSD基准测试可在 这里.
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW Micron 2200S 256GB | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | -18% | -1% | -19% | -12% | 22% | 37% | |
Write 4K | 87.7 | 126.9 45% | 118.8 35% | 116.8 33% | 72.6 -17% | 104.9 20% | 140.4 ? 60% | 165.2 ? 88% |
Read 4K | 48.69 | 59.2 22% | 37.55 -23% | 43.92 -10% | 43.41 -11% | 46.54 -4% | 64.5 ? 32% | 63.9 ? 31% |
Write Seq | 1829 | 2180 19% | 1224 -33% | 1990 9% | 1098 -40% | 1333 -27% | 2059 ? 13% | 2688 ? 47% |
Read Seq | 1579 | 1792 13% | 1589 1% | 1959 24% | 1770 12% | 1565 -1% | 1867 ? 18% | 2892 ? 83% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 482.4 | 540 12% | 409.5 -15% | 373.3 -23% | 465.8 -3% | 437.2 -9% | 432 ? -10% | 413 ? -14% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 422.8 | 399 -6% | 335.5 -21% | 524 24% | 374.9 -11% | 498.9 18% | 495 ? 17% | 540 ? 28% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3250 | 2778 -15% | 1427 -56% | 1985 -39% | 1104 -66% | 1315 -60% | 3777 ? 16% | 3330 ? 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3341 | 3601 8% | 2353 -30% | 2456 -26% | 2921 -13% | 2340 -30% | 4204 ? 26% | 4456 ? 33% |
AS SSD | -9% | -48% | -15% | -68% | -34% | 28% | -3% | |
Seq Read | 2432 | 2721 12% | 1886 -22% | 2082 -14% | 2058 -15% | 1934 -20% | 3325 ? 37% | 3452 ? 42% |
Seq Write | 1266 | 1329 5% | 1226 -3% | 1844 46% | 788 -38% | 1198 -5% | 2415 ? 91% | 2350 ? 86% |
4K Read | 48.88 | 51.5 5% | 32.37 -34% | 44.33 -9% | 39.7 -19% | 47.08 -4% | 59.2 ? 21% | 58.3 ? 19% |
4K Write | 128.4 | 132.5 3% | 100.8 -21% | 157.5 23% | 68.6 -47% | 132.8 3% | 169.1 ? 32% | 167.1 ? 30% |
4K-64 Read | 1805 | 932 -48% | 842 -53% | 1039 -42% | 731 -60% | 866 -52% | 1446 ? -20% | 1073 ? -41% |
4K-64 Write | 2470 | 1856 -25% | 485 -80% | 1556 -37% | 753 -70% | 872 -65% | 2526 ? 2% | 1612 ? -35% |
Access Time Read * | 0.044 | 0.038 14% | 0.102 -132% | 0.05 -14% | 0.079 -80% | 0.116 -164% | 0.035 ? 20% | 0.07797 ? -77% |
Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.028 26% | 0.037 3% | 0.065 -71% | 0.128 -237% | 0.03 21% | 0.0252 ? 34% | 0.06914 ? -82% |
Score Read | 2097 | 1256 -40% | 1063 -49% | 1292 -38% | 977 -53% | 1106 -47% | 1838 ? -12% | 1476 ? -30% |
Score Write | 2725 | 2122 -22% | 708 -74% | 1898 -30% | 900 -67% | 1125 -59% | 2937 ? 8% | 2014 ? -26% |
Score Total | 5837 | 3961 -32% | 2286 -61% | 3845 -34% | 2322 -60% | 2771 -53% | 5678 ? -3% | 4202 ? -28% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1301 | 1441 11% | 1258 -3% | 2288 ? 76% | 1901 ? 46% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 554 | 484.9 -12% | 411.2 -26% | 745 ? 34% | 634 ? 14% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 993 | 1098 11% | 945 -5% | 1687 ? 70% | 1400 ? 41% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-0% | -33% /
-35% | -8% /
-10% | -44% /
-47% | -23% /
-26% | 25% /
26% | 17% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
我们已经熟悉了集成显卡Radeon RX Vega 8来自旧的Ryzen 4000处理器。其性能基本相同,只是集成视频解码器的效率更高。我们的测试装置有一个双通道内存配置,这提高了iGPU的性能,但英特尔目前的 Xe Graphics G7 (96 EUs)在合成基准测试中仍然快20-40%。不过实际的游戏性能更具有可比性。办公用笔记本电脑的游戏性能显然不是很好,但许多流行的、要求不高的游戏在低/中设置下仍能顺利运行。
在持续的工作负荷下,性能很稳定,而且对电池电量也没有限制。更多关于RX Vega的游戏基准测试,可在我们的 技术部分.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (3459 - 7591, n=54) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=89, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1694 - 5041, n=54) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (13941 - 36134, n=46) | |
Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (540 - 1557, n=54) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5746 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 100849 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21645 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3220 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1274 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Strange Brigade | |
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Office (9.6 - 56.5, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (12.8 - 32.1, n=47) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8 | |
Average of class Office (10.8 - 64.5, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (14.6 - 37.7, n=49) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4 | |
Average of class Office (13.4 - 77.2, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (16.9 - 45.3, n=49) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
1280x720 lowest AF:1 | |
Average of class Office (37.7 - 175.7, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (43 - 117, n=50) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average of class Office (3.86 - 35.7, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (7.71 - 17.7, n=46) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Average of class Office (5.8 - 51.7, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (11.7 - 25, n=47) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Average of class Office (12.1 - 103.1, n=89, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (21.9 - 50.1, n=52) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 86.7 | 80.9 | 24.8 | 10.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 64 | 20.4 | 13.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 93.4 | 74.9 | 49.5 | 46.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.2 | 16.9 | 11.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 43.4 | 33.3 | 29.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 74 | 30 | 25 | 22 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 79.9 | 36.1 | 27.7 | 19.1 |
Emissions & Energy - E15 G3 is always quiet
系统噪音
新的ThinkPad E15 G3仍然是一台非常安静的笔记本电脑,在负载下你只能听到风扇发出的安静的杂音。在日常情况下,它通常是完全无声的,甚至在没有风扇的情况下也能处理短暂的峰值负载。在一些基准测试中,我们注意到一个安静的电子噪音,这似乎来自于固态硬盘,但在其他场合我们没有听到它。我们的测试装置没有受到线圈啸叫的影响。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.8 / 23.8 / 28 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.9 / 35 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE Vega 8, R7 5700U, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD Vega 7, R5 5600U, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00 | Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW UHD Graphics 630, i5-10400H, Micron 2200S 256GB | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 3% | -16% | -2% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 23.8 | 24.22 -2% | 25 -5% | 26 -9% | 24.9 -5% | 29.4 -24% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.8 | 24.22 -2% | 25 -5% | 26 -9% | 24.9 -5% | 29.4 -24% |
Idle Average * | 23.8 | 24.22 -2% | 25 -5% | 26 -9% | 24.9 -5% | 29.4 -24% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 24.22 13% | 25.2 10% | 28.8 -3% | 24.9 11% | 30.2 -8% |
Load Average * | 32.9 | 25.84 21% | 30.4 8% | 45 -37% | 27.1 18% | 31.1 5% |
Load Maximum * | 35 | 36.02 -3% | 30.6 13% | 45 -29% | 44.2 -26% | 32.2 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.15 | 32.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
高性能与安静的风扇结合在一起,导致在重载下的表面温度非常高。我们在热管周围测量了大约60°C的温度,这对一台办公用笔记本电脑来说实在是太高了。在这种情况下,你不应该把笔记本放在你的腿上。你也会注意到温暖的键盘,但没有任何限制。然而,该设备在常规办公场景(MS Office套件、邮件、网络工具等)中要冷得多。
在最初的15分钟内,功耗稳定在30W,然后慢慢平缓到25W。总而言之,这是一个好结果,但我们希望看到一个更好的冷却解决方案。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.9 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.3 °C / 90.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-4.6 °C / -8.2 F).
发言人
两个扬声器(2x 2W)位于底部(前缘),可以非常响亮。对于一台办公用的笔记本电脑来说,它们做得很好,在办公环境中(会议、视频)完全足够。
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
消耗功率
我们的消耗量测量没有显示出任何惊喜。与基于英特尔的笔记本电脑相反,在压力测试期间,消耗量稳定在53-54W左右,然后下降到47-48W。附带的65W电源适配器(USB-C)是完全足够的。
Off / Standby | 0.37 / 0.58 Watt |
Idle | 3.4 / 7.6 / 9.3 Watt |
Load |
44.5 / 54.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
电池运行时间
由于电池容量增加(从45瓦到57瓦),现在的电池运行时间更长。我们的Wi-Fi测试在150尼特下运行了近10个小时,在最大亮度下仍然超过了7个小时。这些都是非常好的结果,对于AMD系统来说,已经没有任何劣势了。当设备开启时,充满电需要两个小时(38分钟后为59%)。
Battery Runtime | |
WiFi Websurfing | |
Dell Latitude 15 5511-VNJNW | |
Average of class Office (300 - 1349, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Asus VivoBook S15 D533UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L15 G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness | |
Average of class Office (291 - 807, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20T9S00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 Gen2-20TD002MGE |
Pros
Cons
结论--ThinkPad E15 G3提供了一个良好的性价比
第三代ThinkPad E15提供了一个更快的处理器和一个更亮的显示屏。标准显示屏的亮度已经超过了300尼特,这解决了以前型号的问题。如果你想编辑图片或视频,甚至还可以选择具有全sRGB色域的面板,但标准面板完全可以满足大多数办公场景。
Ryzen 5000处理器(Zen 2)的性能利用率非常好,风扇也很安静,但这导致负载下的表面温度非常高。我们已经知道早期的ThinkPad E系列笔记本的温度问题,这些笔记本配有专用GPU。联想应该为未来的机型改进散热。带有HDMI 1.4b和USB 2.0的端口选择也相当过时,应该加以改进。
性能很好,显示屏更亮,键盘非常好,电池运行时间长。搭载AMD Ryzen处理器的ThinkPad E15 G3是一款价格合理的办公笔记本电脑,只是负载下的表面温度过高和端口选择过时影响了整体印象。
最近评论的ThinkPad L15 G2价格稍贵,但也提供了更现代的端口和更快的Zen 3处理器,可选择具有增强安全功能的Ryzen Pro芯片。我们还没有对戴尔(Vostro)和惠普(ProBook)等竞争对手目前的入门级办公笔记本电脑进行评测,所以我们还不能对这些设备进行比较。
价格和可用性
配备Ryzen 7 5700U的ThinkPad E15 G3在亚马逊上出售,售价1099美元.
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE
- 08/11/2021 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff