联想 ThinkPad E470 (Core i5, GeForce 940MX) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Brand: Lenovo

小升级，大变化？ ThinkPad E470是联想最畅销的商务本系列的最新成员。这台E系列的入门机型搭配了第七代英特尔酷睿处理器，应该可以带来更高的性能和电池续航。它的价位也十分诱人，不过在质量上能够保持以往的水准吗？

Till Schönborn, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 01/22/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 (ThinkPad E470 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1122 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 369.32, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 2个内存槽1个已占用

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, N140HCA-EAB, IPS, LED 背光, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), 256 GB

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: SD, MMC

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23.7 x 339 x 242

Battery

45 Wh Lithium-Ion, 集成

Camera

Webcam: 90万像素

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, 65瓦电源适配器, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.87 kg, Power Supply: 330 g

Price

680 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE DIN A4 ❌

SD/MMC reader, Headset jack, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA	74.3 MB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000	73.2 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400	67.3 MB/s
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452	17.3 MB/s -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA	85.9 MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000	85.1 MB/s +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400	81 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	597 MBit/s
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	536 MBit/s -10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	92 MBit/s -85%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	447 MBit/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	377 MBit/s
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	91 MBit/s -76%


231 cd/m²	218 cd/m²	225 cd/m²
238 cd/m²	244 cd/m²	235 cd/m²
236 cd/m²	224 cd/m²	229 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

N140HCA-EAB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 244 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 231.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 242 cd/m²
Contrast: 659:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.23% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 LG LP140WF6-SPB2, , 1920x1080, 14"	HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14"	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Chi Mei N140HGE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE VVX14T058J02, , 2560x1440, 14"
Display		-5%	-9%	-7%	64%
Display P3 Coverage	41.23	39.1 -5%	37.6 -9%	38.15 -7%	68.7 67%
sRGB Coverage	61.4	58.8 -4%	56.6 -8%	56.7 -8%	98.1 60%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	42.67	40.41 -5%	38.85 -9%	39.48 -7%	70.4 65%
Response Times		13%	7%	20%	9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40.8 ?(22, 18.8)	40 ?(17, 23) 2%	43.2 ?(21.2, 22) -6%	44 ?(23, 21) -8%	35.6 ?(17.2, 18.4) 13%
Response Time Black / White *	30.4 ?(8.4, 22)	23.2 ?(6.8, 16.4) 24%	24.4 ?(7.2, 17.2) 20%	16 ?(10, 6) 47%	29.2 ?(14.4, 14.8) 4%
PWM Frequency				50 ?(10)	220 ?(90)
Screen		9%	-21%	-15%	27%
Brightness middle	244	233 -5%	216 -11%	249 2%	257 5%
Brightness	231	221 -4%	203 -12%	238 3%	248 7%
Brightness Distribution	89	88 -1%	83 -7%	87 -2%	94 6%
Black Level *	0.37	0.3 19%	0.47 -27%	0.41 -11%	0.26 30%
Contrast	659	777 18%	460 -30%	607 -8%	988 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.41	4.43 31%	8.98 -40%	9.09 -42%	4.59 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	13.4		14.07 -5%	14.64 -9%	9.72 27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.94	3.78 36%	9.61 -62%	9.92 -67%	6.38 -7%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.31 ^95%	2.63 ^84%	2.42 ^91%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	6101 ^107%	7171 ^91%	11265 ^58%	11177 ^58%	6238 ^104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39.3	37.3 -5%	35.9 -9%	36.5 -7%	65 65%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	61.1	58.7 -4%	56.7 -7%	56.7 -7%	98 60%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 7%	-8% / -15%	-1% / -9%	33% / 32%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points +13%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	141 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Intel Core i7-6500U	132 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	114 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	355 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Core i7-6600U	347 Points +5%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA Intel Core i7-7500U	335 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Intel Core i7-6500U	305 Points -8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel Core i5-6200U	294 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points -12%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.7 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

46.75 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

50.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-45%	-12%	8%	187%
Read Seq	476.5	497.6 4%	491.2 3%	510 7%	1778 273%
Write Seq	458.7	180 -61%	322.2 -30%	267.2 -42%	1530 234%
Read 512	346.4	297.1 -14%	310.1 -10%	347.6 0%	1339 287%
Write 512	291.1	169.1 -42%	276 -5%	267.5 -8%	1506 417%
Read 4k	35.15	18.91 -46%	19.57 -44%	33.12 -6%	51.3 46%
Write 4k	78.8	37.13 -53%	77.8 -1%	95.9 22%	139.3 77%
Read 4k QD32	276	95.7 -65%	146.3 -47%	392.8 42%	561 103%
Write 4k QD32	178.3	37.26 -79%	241.4 35%	266.4 49%	277 55%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)

Sequential Read: 476.5 MB/s

Sequential Write: 458.7 MB/s

512K Read: 346.4 MB/s

512K Write: 291.1 MB/s

4K Read: 35.15 MB/s

4K Write: 78.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 276 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 178.3 MB/s

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3614 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	3546 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	3542 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3472 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	3415 Points -4%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4837 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	4642 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4463 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)	4442 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	4415 Points -5%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3546 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4389 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4642 points
Help

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	2556 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2206 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U	1989 Points -22%
Intel Kaby Lake i7-7500U / HD Graphics 620 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1663 Points -35%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1343 Points -47%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	1752 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1621 Points -7%
Intel Kaby Lake i7-7500U / HD Graphics 620 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1128 Points -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U	1109 Points -37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	786 Points -55%

3DMark 11 Performance		2642 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		42449 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6759 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1528 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	92.4	53.1	43.1	15.1
Battlefield 4 (2013)	65.8	46.7	31.2	12.1
Sims 4 (2014)	150.6	68.9	41.4	29.9
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	24	16.5	8.5

Noise Level

Idle		29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load		35.6 / 38.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


33.9 °C	43.8 °C	38.7 °C
32.6 °C	42.3 °C	30.5 °C
25.5 °C	23.9 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 43.8 °C
Average: 32.9 °C


44.8 °C	53 °C	32.2 °C
30.5 °C	45.6 °C	28.8 °C
25.3 °C	25.3 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 34.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.9 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.2 °C / 4 F).

Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.32 / 0.7 Watt
Idle	2.7 / 5.5 / 6.5 Watt
Load	44.2 / 65.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14"	HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14"	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 3470 N2P7L347014EMEA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, , 1366x768, 14"
Power Consumption		-21%	3%	-4%	-13%
Idle Minimum *	2.7	4.1 -52%	3 -11%	3.8 -41%	4.3 -59%
Idle Average *	5.5	8 -45%	5.4 2%	7.6 -38%	8 -45%
Idle Maximum *	6.5	8.9 -37%	6.3 3%	8 -23%	10.3 -58%
Load Average *	44.2	39.3 11%	37.5 15%	30.5 31%	26.4 40%
Load Maximum *	65.2	52.2 20%	61.1 6%	32.5 50%	28.3 57%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		17h 23min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 23min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 04min

	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, 47 Wh	HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh	Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh
Battery Runtime		-16%	17%	-15%	-22%
Reader / Idle	1043	736 -29%	1083 4%	791 -24%	833 -20%
H.264	503	425 -16%	571 14%	361 -28%	397 -21%
WiFi v1.3	326	292 -10%	414 27%	400 23%	340 4%
Load	124	112 -10%	151 22%	87 -30%	62 -50%

Pros

+ 优秀的工艺品质

+ 出色的键盘

+ 可选指点杆

+ IPS屏幕可视角度稳定

+ 高应用程序性能

+ 快速的无线网络模组

+ 在日常使用中安静清凉

+ 不错的电池续航

+ 价位诱人

Cons

- 相对笨重

- 接口较少

- 有限的升级空间

- 仅12个月质保

In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E470. Test model provided by Campuspoint.de

今年，联想选择延续上代E400系列的外观设计，在一些内部组件上作出升级。这台笔记本电脑有出色的工艺品质，输入设备和优秀的噪音发热控制。另外，我们的测试机型搭载了一颗酷睿i5处理器，一块固态硬盘，IPS屏幕和一块独立GeForce显卡——这一切只需要700欧元（约5150人民币）。遗憾的是，这个配置机型的低价位只对学生有效。

高品质，高配置，优秀设计：联想ThinkPad E470是一台性价比出色的全功能设备。

我们必须同时考虑到这个机型的一些劣势：它的机身相对较重，同时升级空间也比较有限，最新接口没有得到很好的支持。我们很希望它能够提供至少一个M.2接口或一个USB-C接口。同类竞争机型如惠普ProBook 440 G4都提供了这些功能。从策略上说这个决定也有它的道理：这些功能上的区别将会让它与更贵的ThinkPad笔记本有所不同。对用户来说它是一个很好的选择：ThinkPad E470是一台有多种配置型号的优秀办公和多媒体设备。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 - 12/27/2016 v6 ^(old)
Till Schönborn

Chassis

81 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

52 / 80 → 64%

Weight

65 / 20-67 → 95%