联想 ThinkPad E570 (酷睿 i5, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000
Brand: Lenovo

实惠型ThinkPad新机。 在尺寸稍小的E470给我们不错的印象之后，我们现在又拿到了联想的15.6寸Kaby Lake ThinkPad E570。我们的深入评测将会考察这台大尺寸的E系列机型表现如何。

Benjamin Herzig, ✓ Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (ThinkPad E570 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 927 MHz, RAM: 1252 MHz, GDDR5, 369.59, Nvidia Optimus mit Intel HD 620

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, 两个内存槽一个已占用

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN04.4, IPS LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, 256 GB

, 2280 M.2 PCIe NVMe 固态硬盘

Soundcard

Conexant CX11852

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: 四合一SD读卡器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Optical drive

DVD +/- RW Double Layer

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25.4 x 379 x 261

Battery

41 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: JBL 2瓦立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 6行孤岛式键盘搭配数字键盘区, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.3 kg, Power Supply: 451 g

Price

699 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Screen with relatively wide display bezel

Size Comparison

Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Dell Latitude 15-3570 Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE DIN A4 ❌

Right: 3.5-mm audio, 1x USB 2.0, Ethernet, DVD drive, Kensington lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	107.8 MB/s +72%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA	72.7 MB/s +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000	62.5 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570	22.24 MB/s -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5	250.6 MB/s +207%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA	89 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000	81.7 MB/s
Dell Latitude 15-3570	24.15 MB/s -70%

Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	495 MBit/s
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	347 MBit/s -30%
HP 15-ba077ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	43 MBit/s -91%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	434 MBit/s
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	349 MBit/s -20%
HP 15-ba077ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	54 MBit/s -88%


289 cd/m²	265 cd/m²	265 cd/m²
233 cd/m²	242 cd/m²	226 cd/m²
230 cd/m²	223 cd/m²	216 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUO B156HAN04.4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 289 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 243.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 75 %
Center on Battery: 245 cd/m²
Contrast: 1008:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.39 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.66% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB LG Display LEN40BA / LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6"	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-7%	3%	5%	-0%	10%
Display P3 Coverage	38.65	36.05 -7%	39.89 3%	40.61 5%	38.57 0%	42.66 10%
sRGB Coverage	58	53.2 -8%	59.5 3%	61.1 5%	57.4 -1%	64.1 11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	39.94	37.4 -6%	41.24 3%	41.96 5%	39.89 0%	44.08 10%
Response Times			-16%	-14%	10%	-31%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44.8 ?(16.4, 28.4)		51 ?(23, 28) -14%	37 ?(13, 24) 17%	39 ?(21, 18) 13%	51 ?(18, 33) -14%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(6.8, 18.8)		30 ?(10, 20) -17%	37 ?(20, 17) -45%	24 ?(19, 5) 6%	38 ?(8, 30) -48%
PWM Frequency			50 ?(40)			50 ?(10)
Screen		-3%	-60%	-80%	-50%	9%
Brightness middle	242	332.2 37%	214 -12%	202 -17%	176 -27%	291 20%
Brightness	243	301 24%	201 -17%	211 -13%	169 -30%	265 9%
Brightness Distribution	75	80 7%	77 3%	88 17%	91 21%	86 15%
Black Level *	0.24	0.4 -67%	0.43 -79%	0.62 -158%	0.47 -96%	0.23 4%
Contrast	1008	831 -18%	498 -51%	326 -68%	374 -63%	1265 25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.65		10.68 -130%	12.35 -166%	8.83 -90%	4.78 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.64		18.07 -87%	19.9 -106%	14.01 -45%	9.51 1%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.39		11.32 -234%	13.46 -297%	8.97 -165%	3.49 -3%
Gamma	2.7 ^81%		2.26 ^97%	2.44 ^90%	2.43 ^91%	2.58 ^85%
CCT	6246 ^104%		12204 ^53%	15217 ^43%	10234 ^64%	6013 ^108%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	36.69		38 4%	39 6%	36.8 0%	40 9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.66		59 2%	61 6%	57.3 -1%	64 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-5% / -5%	-24% / -42%	-30% / -54%	-13% / -32%	-4% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.8 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16.4 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	148 Points +15%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Intel Core i7-6500U	132 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	355 Points +8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Intel Core i7-6500U	305 Points -8%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel Core i5-6200U	290 Points -12%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

72.2 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

330 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Liteonit CV3-DE256	3778 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	3550 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	3337 Points -6%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3163 Points -11%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points -11%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4725 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	4666 Points
Dell Latitude 15-3570 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4477 Points -4%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	4047 Points -13%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3550 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4666 points
Help

	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256
AS SSD		-70%	-46%	-75%	-33%
Seq Read	1227	489.5 -60%	493.8 -60%	489.1 -60%	479.8 -61%
Seq Write	636	169.9 -73%	315.9 -50%	130 -80%	377.8 -41%
4K Read	37.12	17.46 -53%	17.96 -52%	17.25 -54%	32.4 -13%
4K Write	73.1	34.76 -52%	73.4 0%	21.57 -70%	59.7 -18%
4K-64 Read	654	84.6 -87%	137.1 -79%	81.8 -87%	345.5 -47%
4K-64 Write	232.5	33.68 -86%	195.5 -16%	19.37 -92%	203.7 -12%
Score Total	1578	305 -81%	607 -62%	267 -83%	951 -40%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK

Sequential Read: 1140 MB/s

Sequential Write: 468.1 MB/s

512K Read: 759 MB/s

512K Write: 414 MB/s

4K Read: 34.3 MB/s

4K Write: 123.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 530 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 319.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4251 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4243 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U	2524 Points -41%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2436 Points -43%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2092 Points -51%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1273 Points -70%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	22439 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	21835 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U	10364 Points -53%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	9122 Points -58%
Dell Latitude 15-3570 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5909 Points -73%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3574 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3545 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB AMD Radeon R7 M370, Intel Core i7-6500U	1693 Points -52%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1637 Points -54%

3DMark 11 Performance		4255 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		10297 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3244 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	138.1	95.4	86.8	35.66
Company of Heroes 2 (2013)	47.25	40.03	27.41	16.89
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	71.4	40.32	21.2

Noise Level

Idle		29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load		34.3 / 40.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


38.5 °C	41.7 °C	25.1 °C
41.5 °C	46.6 °C	24.8 °C
26.8 °C	35.3 °C	21.1 °C

Maximum: 46.6 °C
Average: 33.5 °C


23.5 °C	39.7 °C	34 °C
24.5 °C	49.1 °C	41.1 °C
22 °C	33 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 49.1 °C
Average: 33.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.9 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.1 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.48 Watt
Idle	2.8 / 6.3 / 6.9 Watt
Load	51.6 / 69.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-29%	-9%	3%	-41%	-8%
Idle Minimum *	2.8	3.6 -29%	3.8 -36%	4.9 -75%	6 -114%	3.9 -39%
Idle Average *	6.3	8.7 -38%	6.6 -5%	7.2 -14%	8.1 -29%	7.4 -17%
Idle Maximum *	6.9	11.5 -67%	11.3 -64%	7.5 -9%	9.8 -42%	9.5 -38%
Load Average *	51.6	61.9 -20%	38 26%	25.4 51%	52.5 -2%	41 21%
Load Maximum *	69.7	64.8 7%	45 35%	28 60%	81.6 -17%	48 31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		14h 43min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		7h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 9min

	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, 48 Wh	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh	Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-3%	18%	-19%	-40%
Reader / Idle	883	789 -11%	746 -16%	1024 16%	767 -13%
WiFi v1.3	462		513 11%	542 17%	451 -2%	275 -40%
Load	129		123 -5%	157 22%	75 -42%
WiFi		331
H.264					460

Pros

+ 易用的输入设备

+ 可以令人满意的屏幕

+ 几乎无噪音

+ 高于平均水平的扬声器

+ 作为商务本显卡性能强劲

Cons

- 屏幕上盖：稳定性和工艺品质较差

- 不支持USB-C

- 接口布局不够理想

- 在负载下有降频问题

In review: Lenovo Thinkpad E570. Review sample courtesy of Campuspoint.de

E570作为第一台上市的15.6寸Kaby Lake ThinkPad设备，具备不少优秀特性：它的优秀输入设备更是其中的亮点。联想在屏幕的选择上没有重大失误；它的色域覆盖对于低售价设备来说并不算无法接受，而其他方面都表现不错。E570也十分易于维护，搭配了优秀的扬声器，和相对较强的显卡，为它带来了十分不错的多媒体性能。另外，我们发现这台设备在低负载下可以保持清凉和完全安静。

遗憾的是，联想的设计也有一些不足之处，它的接口布局不是特别合理，尽管搭配了DVD光驱，如果安排得当的话它的接口布局还可以得到不小的改善。在负载下它的处理器和显卡也有降频现象，这意味着散热系统能力不足。最后我们还需要提到它的机身，它的屏幕上盖不论在工艺还是坚固度上都难以令人满意。

十分遗憾联想在工艺品质上留下了这样的缺陷。E570实际上对于学生来说是一台十分有吸引力的设备——不过，尺寸稍小的E470可能更胜一筹。

不论如何，我们认为E570由于整体性价比优秀十分值得推荐。它对于需要一台搭配输入设备的机型的学生或者个人用户来说十分适合。不过对于除学生以外的消费者来说它的性价比并不算出色：固定配置机型售价750欧元（约5489人民币），但没有搭配固态硬盘仅提供了1TB的机械硬盘，同时没有搭载独立显卡。当从联想直接购买时，它至少搭配了较弱的940MX。惠普 ProBook 450 G4的售价相比稍低，不过采用了较差的TN屏幕。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 - 2017-02-03 02/03/2017 v6 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

73 / 98 → 74%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

49 / 81 → 60%

Weight

61 / 20-67 → 87%

Battery

90%

Display

84%

Games Performance

76 / 85 → 89%

Application Performance

88 / 92 → 95%

Temperature

90%

Noise

94 / 95 → 99%

Audio

69%

Camera

40 / 85 → 46%

Average

76%

84%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 ThinkPad E570 (酷睿 i5, GTX 950M) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Benjamin Herzig, 2017-02-11 (Update: 2017-02-11)