Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar第一印象: 联想 ThinkPad T450s
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP140WF3-SPD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 282 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 268.4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 273 cd/m²
Contrast: 1110:1 (Black: 0.245 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.68
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 HD Graphics 5500, 5600U, Intel SSD Pro 2500 Series SSDSC2BF360A5L | Dell Latitude E7450 HD Graphics 5500, 5300U, Samsung SSD PM851 mSATA 128 GB | HP EliteBook 840 G1 HD Graphics 4400, 4600U, Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series SSDSC2BF180A4H | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G HD Graphics 5000, 4650U, Liteonit LCS-256M6S | Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 HD Graphics 4400, 4200U, Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -1% | -70% | -63% | -119% | |
| Brightness middle | 272 | 280 3% | 280 3% | 216 -21% | 256 -6% |
| Brightness | 268 | 257 -4% | 280 4% | 209 -22% | 251 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 75 -18% | 87 -4% | 89 -2% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.245 | 0.3 -22% | 0.69 -182% | 0.436 -78% | 1.36 -455% |
| Contrast | 1110 | 933 -16% | 406 -63% | 495 -55% | 188 -83% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.35 | 3.45 21% | 9.41 -116% | 9.63 -121% | 10.86 -150% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.35 9% | 10.19 -175% | 10.72 -190% | 11.71 -216% |
| Gamma | 2.68 82% | 2.37 93% | 2.49 88% | 2.49 88% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6076 107% | 6940 94% | 12671 51% | 12873 50% | 12518 52% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54.7 | 60 10% | 40 -27% | 44.8 -18% | 38 -31% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83.5 | 92 10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 | |
| Pass 1 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Pass 2 (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS03F00 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G1 | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Toshiba Tecra Z40 A-147 | |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.3 / 34.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 6.6 / 7.9 Watt |
| Load |
30.8 / 48.8 Watt |
   
| |
ThinkPad T440s在我们的商务产品排行榜中占据首位已达一年之久——现在新的T450s非常可能会取代它的位置。这款商务经典再一次凭借全面的表现让人信服，从出色的机身做工到可作为行业标准的键盘质量再到低噪音低发热量的控制设计。整体上，这台ThinkPad几乎没有什么缺点。当然，我们会希望它能再多一个数字视频输出接口和一个内存槽，和容量更大的第二块电池。不过这些并不是严重的问题，特别是当联想解决了前作中的一大问题——不便于使用的点击触控板——之后。因此我们十分好奇戴尔 Latitude E7450和惠普 EliteBook 840 G1（接下来还有840 G2的评测）是否可以与这台设备抗衡。我们一如既往的全面评测将会在不久后发布。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。