联想 ThinkPad T460p 笔记本电脑简短评测
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p (Thinkpad T Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6440HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 530, Core: 950 MHz
Memory
4 GB
, DDR4-2133, 单通道, 两个插槽一个已占用，最大支持32 GB
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, LP140WF6-SPB1, LEN40A9, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake QM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Toshiba MQ01ACF050, 500 GB
, 7200 rpm, 420 GB free
Weight
1.925 kg, Power Supply: 455 g
Price
1400 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP140WF6-SPB1, LEN40A9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 269 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 255.3 cd/m² Minimum: 7.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 270 cd/m²
Contrast: 1121:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.78% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p LP140WF6-SPB1, LEN40A9, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE Samsung LTN140KT14401, TN-Panel, 1600x900 | Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE Lenovo LP140WF3-SPL1, IPS, 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook 840 G2 Samsung, TN LED, 1600x900 | Dell Latitude E7450 AUO B140HAN, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 1% | 0% | 66% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.78 | 39.62 2% | 39.24 1% | 38.82 0% | 66.6 72% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.3 | 59.6 2% | 58.9 1% | 58.4 0% | 92.4 58% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.08 | 40.94 2% | 40.56 1% | 40.11 0% | 67.7 69% |
| Response Times | |||||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | ||||
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | ||||
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -75% | -41% | -111% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 269 | 166 -38% | 206 -23% | 267 -1% | 280 4% |
| Brightness | 255 | 163 -36% | 202 -21% | 240 -6% | 257 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 68 -25% | 91 0% | 84 -8% | 75 -18% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.71 -196% | 0.39 -63% | 0.8 -233% | 0.3 -25% |
| Contrast | 1121 | 234 -79% | 528 -53% | 334 -70% | 933 -17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.27 | 7.16 -68% | 6.63 -55% | 12.71 -198% | 3.45 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.82 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.95 | 7.62 -158% | 6.29 -113% | 13.91 -372% | 3.35 -14% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.48 89% | 2.35 94% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 7049 92% | 9371 69% | 5823 112% | 20099 32% | 6940 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 37.8 2% | 37.3 1% | 37.2 1% | 60 62% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.2 | 92 58% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-54% | -20% /
-29% | -56% /
-81% | 37% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 7 - Score | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 3002 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3088 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4072 points | |
Help | ||
Toshiba MQ01ACF050
Transfer Rate Minimum:
55.6 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
91.9 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
81.8 MB/s
Access Time:
17.3 ms
Burst Rate:
62 MB/s
CPU Usage:
1 %
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1327 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 49094 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5763 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 637 points | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| SCHENKER F516 Flex | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p | |
| Dell Latitude E7450 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G2 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 65.1 | 33.5 | 20 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.2 | 22.3 | 18.1 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 11 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 33.7 / 33.7 / 33.7 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 33.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36.2 / 41.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p Intel Core i5-6440HQ, Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE Intel Core i5-5200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP | Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE Intel Core i5-5300U, Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | HP EliteBook 840 G2 Intel Core i5-5200U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZ7TE256HMHP | Dell Latitude E7450 Intel Core i5-5300U, Samsung SSD PM851 mSATA 128 GB | Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE Intel Core i5-6200U, Seagate ST500LM000 Solid State Hybrid Drive | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 12% | 10% | 14% | 10% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | ||||
| Idle Minimum * | 33.7 | 29.2 13% | 30.8 9% | 29.1 14% | 29.1 14% | 30.8 9% |
| Idle Average * | 33.7 | 29.2 13% | 30.8 9% | 29.1 14% | 29.1 14% | 30.8 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.7 | 29.2 13% | 30.8 9% | 29.1 14% | 30 11% | 30.8 9% |
| Load Average * | 36.2 | 34.9 4% | 34.3 5% | 32.2 11% | 36.4 -1% | 33.1 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 41.9 | 35.1 16% | 34.3 18% | 34.2 18% | 37.8 10% | 34.4 18% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.7 °C / 101.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.7 °C / 101.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.47 Watt |
| Idle | 6.3 / 9.4 / 10.6 Watt |
| Load |
42.7 / 66.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p Intel Core i5-6440HQ, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE Intel Core i5-5200U, 48 Wh | Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE Intel Core i5-5300U, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G2 Intel Core i5-5200U, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude E7450 Intel Core i5-5300U, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE Intel Core i5-6200U, 67 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 41% | 37% | 46% | 30% | 34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 3 52% | 3.4 46% | 2.6 59% | 4 37% | 4.3 32% |
| Idle Average * | 9.4 | 5.5 41% | 6.1 35% | 5.1 46% | 7.8 17% | 7.3 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.6 | 6.4 40% | 7 34% | 5.8 45% | 9 15% | 7.8 26% |
| Load Average * | 42.7 | 28.4 33% | 29 32% | 28.7 33% | 31.6 26% | 26.3 38% |
| Load Maximum * | 66.7 | 40.7 39% | 42.4 36% | 36.8 45% | 29.6 56% | 32 52% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460p Intel Core i5-6440HQ, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T450-20BV001VGE Intel Core i5-5200U, 48 Wh | Lenovo Thinkpad L450 20DS0001GE Intel Core i5-5300U, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G2 Intel Core i5-5200U, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude E7450 Intel Core i5-5300U, 54 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH001FGE Intel Core i5-6200U, 67 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 46% | 35% | 68% | 67% | 170% | |
| Reader / Idle | 494 | 935 89% | 798 62% | 961 95% | 714 45% | 1085 120% |
| H.264 | 289 | 300 4% | 264 -9% | 324 12% | 452 56% | 571 98% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 265 | 324 22% | 288 9% | 422 59% | 422 59% | 661 149% |
| Load | 55 | 93 69% | 97 76% | 112 104% | 115 109% | 226 311% |
| WiFi | 459 |
Pros
+ 坚固的机身
+ 稳定的屏幕转轴
+ 非常优秀的输入设备
+ IPS屏幕色彩准确
+ 3年质保
+ 完备的安全功能
+ 优秀的处理器性能
Cons
- 不便于维护
- 处理器温度高
- 负载下性能略微下降
- 电池续航
- 传统硬盘造成的响应迟缓
- 测试机的机身品质小问题（屏幕边框）
新的联想ThinkPad T460p搭配了高速硬件，旨在吸引注重性能、对超低电压处理器不够满意的用户。这个初衷很好，不过在评测之后T460p给我们的印象比较复杂。
这主要出自几个原因。可能它最大的缺点是散热，处理器在使用中会很快达到90多度。需要注意的是，它的处理器热设计功率已经降低到了35瓦。如果对可选的i7芯片也是如此的话（考虑到散热系统的表现估计情况会类似），你将无法完全利用处理器的最大性能。如果考虑到这款设备是强调性能的，这就让人十分失望。另外，如果再加上可选独立显卡的话，我们很难说它将如何应付额外的发热量，负载下性能是否将会进一步下降。
另一个问题是我们测试机的简约配置。它搭配的仅仅4GB的内存以及传统硬盘很难达到现在高端设备的标准，同时也难以避免会影响主观上对性能的感受。你也需要放弃最新的接口如Thunderbolt，USB-C或M.2 2280，整机给人的感觉十分陈旧。你也无法得到双电池的“Power Bridge”系统，同时即使是不大的6芯电池也会把机身底部垫高一部分。它对续航的帮助十分有限。
ThinkPad T460p是最强劲的一款T系列机型，不过由于较弱的散热表现它损失了一部分性能。
这些问题一部分源自于仍然基于前代机型的机身设计。这十分遗憾，因为它也有很多优势。包括非常坚固的机身，出色的键盘以及不错的屏幕，它除了色域覆盖有限之外都无可挑剔。之前提到的一些问题可以通过选择其它配置型号解决（固态硬盘，更大内存），不过整体上我们对ThinkPad T460p还是有些失望。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo ThinkPad T460p
- 03/05/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Office - Weighted Average
Price comparison
