联想 ThinkPad T470s (7300U, FHD) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 271.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1132:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.72% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.35% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US LEN40A9 (R140NWF5 R1), IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 B140QAN01.5, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | Dell Latitude 7480 LG Philips LGD0557, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 65% | 58% | 3% | 48% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.35 | 69 71% | 65.4 62% | 41.6 3% | 61.4 52% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.3 | 95.1 58% | 92.3 53% | 61.9 3% | 85.9 42% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.72 | 69.6 67% | 65.8 58% | 43.06 3% | 62.4 50% |
Response Times | -7% | -4% | -10% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 46.4 ? -14% | 40.8 ? -0% | 41.6 ? -2% | 41.6 ? -2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 28.8 ? -0% | 31.2 ? -8% | 34 ? -18% | 31.6 ? -10% |
PWM Frequency | 219.3 ? | ||||
Screen | 7% | 29% | -3% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 271.6 | 327 20% | 344 27% | 306 13% | 311 15% |
Brightness | 264 | 311 18% | 321 22% | 287 9% | 288 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 85 -3% | 88 0% | 85 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.25 -4% | 0.32 -33% | 0.3 -25% | 0.24 -0% |
Contrast | 1132 | 1308 16% | 1075 -5% | 1020 -10% | 1296 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 6.1 -0% | 2.6 57% | 6.2 -2% | 5.5 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 28.6 | 12.2 57% | 7.8 73% | 13.6 52% | 9 69% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 8.8 -159% | 2.6 24% | 5.8 -71% | 6.2 -82% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.18 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.04 108% | 2.02 109% |
CCT | 6077 107% | 6172 105% | 7050 92% | 6277 104% | 5950 109% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 61.56 62% | 65.82 73% | 39.62 4% | 55.96 47% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 94.88 58% | 92.27 54% | 61.44 2% | 85.77 43% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
17% | 28% /
30% | -3% /
-3% | 18% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 219.3 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 219.3 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 219.3 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3987 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4910 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4999 points | |
Help |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7480 Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | -56% | -10% | 10% | |
Read Seq | 1399 | 1760 26% | 486.5 -65% | 1155 -17% | 1827 31% |
Write Seq | 1213 | 1666 37% | 418.6 -65% | 1076 -11% | 1383 14% |
Read 512 | 831 | 832 0% | 354.3 -57% | 811 -2% | 814 -2% |
Write 512 | 856 | 1064 24% | 306.8 -64% | 862 1% | 1098 28% |
Read 4k | 60.7 | 53.2 -12% | 29.25 -52% | 55.5 -9% | 61 0% |
Write 4k | 159.2 | 167.4 5% | 90.5 -43% | 134.6 -15% | 172.2 8% |
Read 4k QD32 | 580 | 630 9% | 280.2 -52% | 496.2 -14% | 601 4% |
Write 4k QD32 | 499.4 | 533 7% | 252.8 -49% | 425.4 -15% | 495.6 -1% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
Dell Latitude 7480 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 7480 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 9671 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1741 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 67756 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6945 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 971 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.6 | 31.7 | 26 | 8.2 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.8 / 27.8 / 27.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 34.8 / 42 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Dell Latitude 7480 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | 6% | 3% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 27.8 | 28.9 -4% | 28 -1% | 29.3 -5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 28.9 -4% | 28.6 -3% | 28 -1% | 29.3 -5% |
Idle Average * | 27.8 | 28.9 -4% | 28.6 -3% | 28 -1% | 29.3 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.8 | 30.1 -8% | 28.6 -3% | 29.4 -6% | 32.2 -16% |
Load Average * | 34.8 | 39.2 -13% | 30.2 13% | 31.4 10% | 34.3 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | ||||
Load Maximum * | 42 | 39.2 7% | 31.2 26% | 34.6 18% | 39.3 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-6.2 °C / -11.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7480 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 4.8 / 6.6 / 7 Watt |
Load |
39.2 / 44.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | 16% | 19% | -3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.64 3% | 4.32 10% | 3.21 33% | 3.84 20% |
Idle Average * | 6.6 | 8.93 -35% | 6.27 5% | 6.15 7% | 6.3 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 9.12 -30% | 6.35 9% | 6.82 3% | 8.6 -23% |
Load Average * | 39.2 | 42.2 -8% | 29.82 24% | 28.5 27% | 41.9 -7% |
Load Maximum * | 44.8 | 47.3 -6% | 30.64 32% | 34.5 23% | 48.7 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell Latitude 7480 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -29% | 34% | -23% | -5% | |
Reader / Idle | 1062 | 787 -26% | 1662 56% | 1252 18% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 487 | 417 -14% | 719 48% | 438 -10% | 496 2% |
Load | 172 | 93 -46% | 171 -1% | 110 -36% | 110 -36% |
Pros
Cons
这是一台拥有凭借轻量级的构造,便携式和耐用性(由于采用高端镁和碳纤维混合结构),极好的电池续航能力以及深入人心的ThinkPad品牌出色的输入设备。联想ThinkPad T470s 全高清版本应该已经引起那些真正寻找下一个日常机的专业商务人士的关注。其应用程序性能(由三星NVMe SSD非常快)强大,酷睿i5处理器性能稳固,易于维护,这是一个难以被忽视的设备。
缺点?是的,还有几个。对于初次使用的人来说,屏幕并不像许多竞争对手那样令人印象深刻,而且 WQHD配置下,不仅是分辨率,还包括亮度,对比度和色彩表现方面都存在显着地下降。我们检测到了除了最大值以外的所有亮度级别下,存的屏幕闪烁,这对于ThinkPad来说是一个令人失望的事情。最后,该设备升温非常快,很快就温度就让人烦恼(负载下),特别是在使用中。
联想ThinkPad T470s 全高清版本除了存在屏幕闪烁现象,平庸的显示质量以及较重工作负载下的高温之外,还是一个很好的选择。
如果用户不介意稍微降低(但仍然很好)的电池运行时间和更高的价格,我们强烈建议您查看我们刚刚评测的 T470s WQHD 配置机,因为其显示不仅具有更好的亮度和颜色,而且还不采用脉冲宽度调制来管理亮度的降低。然而,我们在今天的配置中评测的酷睿i5 处理器似乎是一个更合理的投资,考虑到我们评估下,WQHD配置的i7拥有的出色性能和相对稳定性。 Dell Latitude 7480 同样是一个不错的选择,如果预算充足 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 也不错。除了显示问题,只要用户不介意在高负载下的发热,T470s FHD就是当今市场上最好的14英寸商用笔记本电脑之一。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US
- 05/13/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein