联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10笔记本电脑评论。桤木湖P28没有大的影响
十年的笔记本电脑设计在今天的评测单元中达到了高潮，即联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10。顾名思义，它是X1 Carbon系列的第十代产品。 它在2012年首次发布.与第一款机型相比，很多东西都发生了变化，但与ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9相比，ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10并没有很大的更新。
重点显然是内饰和英特尔桤木湖P28系列的新处理器。也有U15系列，它的核心数量较少。我们的评测设备包含英特尔酷睿i5-1250P ，这个处理器有12个核心（4个P+8个E），并支持vPro企业功能。它还有16GB内存，512GB固态硬盘，以及一个FHD低功率屏幕。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.2 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 15.36 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 90.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 17.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8 | 1.3 kg | 16.14 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
经典的ThinkPad机箱。X1 Carbon G10
联想至少在两代产品中使用相同的机箱设计。由于ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9是一次巨大的重新设计，X1 Carbon G10是一次更新，它保持了旧的设计。这是一款足够成熟的机箱，适合日常使用。对该机箱及其质量的更详细描述可以在我们对ThinkPad X1 Carbon第九代.
X1 Carbon采用了经典的ThinkPad设计和典型的ThinkPad材料--它完全被包裹在黑色中，而且是真正的黑色。它不是其他2022年ThinkPad上使用的非常深的灰色，比如ThinkPad T14 G3。机箱也是完全橡胶的，这使得ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10让人想起了 思考板X3002008年的产品。这类涂层的缺点是：非常容易出现指纹/污渍。
随着新的ThinkPad Z系列的推出，联想发布了具有竞争力的高端设计--与这些 "新一代 "ThinkPad相比，X1 Carbon是否已经过时？我们不会这么说，但视觉设计的某些方面可以改变。例如，我们认为掌托上的巨大X1标志是多余的。另外，为了清理设计，屏幕铰链可以重新变成黑色，就像旧版X1 Carbon机型那样。最后，更小的屏幕边框将受到欢迎，这可以通过使机箱更小或使用更大的14.5英寸显示屏来实现。
有一个相关的设计变化。联想不得不实施一个小的反向凹槽来实现新的网络摄像头。屏幕中央的小突起使其更容易打开屏幕。配备新网络摄像头的机型，如审查的变体，比之前的机型厚0.5毫米。
连接性。ThinkPad X1 Carbon仍然缺少SD卡读卡器
端口没有变化：ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2022提供Thunderbolt 4以及USB A和HDMI等传统端口，尽管机箱很紧凑。我们确实错过了这个型号的SD卡读卡器。
沟通
与前代产品相比，英特尔无线AX211（2x2）被添加为一个新的选项，这也出现在我们的评测样本中。与AX201不同，AX211支持新标准的WiFi 6E。我们在测试中没有使用它，但该WiFi模块仍然比X1 Carbon G9的AX201快。
在基准测试中，WiFi性能基本稳定。
网络摄像头
通常情况下，说到笔记本电脑的摄像头，没有什么可写的，但是对于联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10来说，网络摄像头是谈话的重要部分。联想将分辨率从720p提高到1080p，X1 Carbon G10还使用了f/2.0光圈，这应该会改善弱光性能。
这款相机相比于 X1 Carbon第9代，但它与智能手机的自拍相机相比仍有很大差距。
安全问题
X1 Carbon 2022提供了大多数典型的商业功能，如dTPM 2.0、Kensington锁插槽或指纹识别器。同时，智能卡读卡器并不在机上，尽管你会在普通的T/X ThinkPads上找到。新的是网络摄像头的Computervision功能，即 "人的存在检测"。该系统可以识别用户是否正在远离设备，并自动锁定设备。这个功能是可选的，可以在联想商用Vantage应用程序中禁用。
辅料
盒子里有65W的充电器，带USB-C插头，没有其他配件。值得称道的是：盒子和外包装首次完全由纸制成。联想免除了之前在这里使用的塑料。
维护
前代产品的维护设计没有任何变化。碳纤维底盖可以轻松拆卸，只需松开系统背面的五颗螺丝和几个夹子。M.2 2280固态硬盘是可以升级的，内存是焊接的。WiFi模块的情况也是如此。另一方面，可以插入WWAN卡，因为我们的模型有天线和SIM卡插槽。但只有4G是可能的，因为5G需要额外的天线。
担保
在测试的配置中，联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10有三年的保修期，其中包括现场服务。如果出现缺陷，联想笔记本电脑将在客户的家中或工作场所进行维修。这只适用于设备购买地所在的国家。在国际上，它是一个标准的仓库保修。
输入设备。非常好的ThinkPad键盘
键盘
联想使用的键盘与前代X1 Carbon G9几乎相同，但带有背光和六排按键的chiclet键盘在一个方面有所改变：第一排的按键和键盘左右边缘的按键，如Enter、Ctrl或Shift，现在是方形而不是圆形。打字的感觉没有受到影响，这纯粹是一种视觉上的变化。键盘仍然非常舒适，有1.5毫米的行程，布局良好，打字体验非常令人满意。也就是说，行程更多的老款ThinkPads更好。
触摸板
在ThinkPad中，X1型号有一个特殊的地位，因为它们是唯一拥有玻璃触摸板的设备--虽然，这真的不是真的了，因为ThinkPad Z系列目前正在发布，它也有一个玻璃触摸板。与Z系列的对比很有意思，因为ThinkPad Z13有一个新的触摸板设计，没有专用的TrackPoint按钮。这一功能是由触觉反馈来实现的。
与此相反，ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10仍然采用经典配置，有专用的TrackPoint按钮和机械触摸板，只在触控板区域的下部有点击。触摸板相对较小，但这并不影响其质量。光滑的表面使手指能够毫不费力地滑行，精确地操纵鼠标光标，以及像Zooma这样的手势。点击机制也是高质量的。
有三个按钮的TrackPoint完成了输入设备。它比触摸板更适合拖放，并能在打字时快速移动光标。总的来说，ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10的输入设备仍然是只有少数笔记本电脑可以匹敌的。
显示屏。ThinkPad X1 Carbon 10代中的低功率液晶显示器
对于像联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10这样的更新换代产品，可能的变化场所是屏幕。这里也是如此，因为联想利用这个机会推出新的屏幕选项。但就我们的评测设备而言，我们评测的14英寸16:10屏幕在前代产品中已经有了。
- WUXGA/FHD+ (1.920 x 1.200), IPS, 400 cd/m², 100 % sRGB, 哑光, 低功率
- WUXGA/FHD+ (1.920 x 1.200), IPS, 400 cd/m², 100 % sRGB, 哑光, 低功耗, 触摸开关
- WUXGA/FHD+ (1.920 x 1.200), IPS, 500 cd/m², 100 % sRGB, matte, Privacy Guard, On-Cell-Touch
- 2.2K (2.240 x 1.400), IPS, 300 cd/m², 100 % sRGB, 亚光
- 2.8K (2.880 x 1.800), OLED, 400 cd/m², 100 % DCI-P3, 抗反射, HDR
- WQUXGA/UHD+ (3.840 x 2.400), IPS, 500 cd/m², 100 % DCI-P3, 光面, HDR
- WQUXGA/UHD+ (3.840 x 2.400), IPS, 500 cd/m², 100 % DCI-P3, 防反射, HDR, 附加膜-触摸屏
(我们配置的屏幕为黑体，新的屏幕选项为斜体)
它甚至与我们已经在X1 Carbon G9上测试过的友达面板完全相同。在较新的ThinkPad X1 Carbon 10代中，亮度降低到362 cd/m²，低于宣传的400 cd/m²。在其他方面，该屏幕几乎是相同的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 352 cd/m²
Contrast: 2067:1 (Black: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
76.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
74.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE B140UAN02.1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XXS00100 B140UAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Chi Mei CMN1416 CHF07 140HCG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -6% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 74.6 | 76.1 2% | 68 -9% | 68 -9% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 99.9 1% | 99 0% | 97.6 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 76.5 | 77.7 2% | 70 -8% | 69.3 -9% |
| Response Times | -41% | -15% | -13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.5 ? | 62.4 ? -37% | 55 ? -21% | 48 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 34.8 ? -45% | 26 ? -8% | 28.8 ? -20% |
| PWM Frequency | 53050 ? | |||
| Screen | -8% | 20% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 372 | 396 6% | 408 10% | 466.4 25% |
| Brightness | 362 | 397 10% | 378 4% | 426 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 90 -4% | 86 -9% | 84 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.23 -28% | 0.22 -22% | 0.32 -78% |
| Contrast | 2067 | 1722 -17% | 1855 -10% | 1458 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 3.7 -9% | 1.54 55% | 2.84 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.7 | 7.6 -13% | 2.72 59% | 4.73 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 1.7 6% | 1.08 40% | 2.27 -26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.2 -21% | 1.95 55% | 3.7 14% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.11 104% | 2.33 94% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6158 106% | 6252 104% | 6806 96% | 6886 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 70.4 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -16% /
-11% | -0% /
10% | -8% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂时，颜色略微过暖，我们用CalMan和X-Rite i1 Pro 2彩色分光光度计测量了这一点。用X-Rite i1 Profiler校准后，颜色相当中性，最大的剩余误差在红色空间。我们创建的ICC配置文件可供免费下载。
小的sRGB色域几乎被完全覆盖，这使得LCD可以用于简单的照片编辑。
由于屏幕表面是哑光的，显示器在户外也可以使用，尽管这里使用的面板的尼特数缺失是很明显的。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 53050 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 53050 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 53050 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能。英特尔Alder Lake P28在X1 Carbon 2022年并没有持续多久
ThinkPad以有许多配置可用而闻名。随着ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10的推出，联想让选择合适的机型变得更加复杂，因为现在有两种不同级别的CPU可供选择。英特尔Alder Lake的U15和P28变体，以及vPro企业版和vPro精华版。AMD CPU不在表中，专用GPU也不在表中。
焊接的内存升级为LPDDR5-5200，最大容量为32GB。ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2022仍有一个M.2 2280插槽，最大容量为2TB。
测试条件
联想使用Windows能源设置进行电源管理。在我们的测试中，我们使用 "最佳性能 "模式，并禁用联想智能冷却模式 "自动"（FN+T）。这导致短期功率限制1为55W，长期功率限制2为15W。我们的WiFi电池测试在 "平衡 "模式下进行（PL1：20W/PL2：11W）。
处理器
ǞǞǞ 英特尔酷睿i5-1250P是最新一代英特尔Alder Lake处理器的四加八不对称核心（4 P + 8 E核心）。作为P级的CPU，它的典型TDP为28W，尽管这只是一个粗略的定位。它是vPro企业版的变体，即 英特尔酷睿i5-1240P的vPro企业版，它与i5-1250P几乎相同（时钟频率：P核心：1.7至4.4GHz，E核心：1.2至3.3GHz）。与其他处理器进行比较，可以使用 CPU列表.
联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10的性能让我们感到失望。提升性能非常好，但长期的多核性能很差。在所有核心的持续负载下，性能开始恶化，并低于之前的型号ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9.原因是：热限制过于严格，处理器不能长期保持20W的功耗。一个BIOS更新仍然可以改变这种情况。
如果不连接充电器，CPU的性能就会降低。在3DMark 11物理测试中，X1 Carbon G10没有得到10,058分，而在电池模式下只得到8,773分。这相当于减少了约13%。
Cinebench R15 Multi sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
系统性能
系统性能很好，在日常的浏览器使用中没有打嗝。不过，基准测试再次表明，与前代产品相比，性能并没有实质性的提高。联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs () | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5064 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P () | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1250P (0 - 0, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
对于音频工作，联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2022并不适合，至少在审查的配置中不适合，因为它有DPC延迟问题。这在Youtube的测试中也是如此，因为有掉帧的情况。联想将不得不发布一个驱动程序更新。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
* ... smaller is better
储存
联想使用的是三星PM9A1，这是一款采用PCIe 4.0标准的NVMe SSD。在这种情况下，该固态硬盘的容量为512GB。在联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10中，它的工作速度非常快。在持续负载下，性能并不稳定，可能是由于热管理问题。这是我们在最近的测试中观察到的更频繁的现象，所以它似乎不是联想独有的问题。
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形
的 英特尔Xe Graphics G7（含80个EUs是2021年和2022年所有U/P系列的i5 CPU的iGPU。其性能取决于系统内存，因为iGPU没有专用内存。就X1 Carbon G10而言，它是四通道配置的快速LPDDR5内存，这是英特尔Xe的理想选择。尽管如此，iGPU的表现并不尽如人意，这可能是由于ThinkPad笔记本电脑的散热限制。配备相同iGPU的戴尔Latitude 7420在3DMark测试中表现得更好。
在电池模式下没有性能下降。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5893 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17097 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3964 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1218 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
工作之余的游戏是不可能用ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10的，除了旧的标题。在任何情况下，质量和分辨率都要降低。
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average of class Office (12 - 106.3, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (21.8 - 56.9, n=103) | |
| Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH | |
| F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Office (34.8 - 93.7, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (20.1 - 42.9, n=12) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE | |
Witcher 3 测试再次表明，X1 Carbon 2022的散热有问题。iGPU的性能并不稳定。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73.7 | 45 | 22.3 | 10.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.3 | 64 | 36.6 | 32.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 30.9 | 13.5 | 9.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 32.8 | 26.7 | 24.1 | |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 48.3 | 20.1 | 18.1 | 13.1 |
排放。联想保持ThinkPad笔记本电脑的安静
噪声
令人惊讶的是，联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10是一个相当安静的系统。在空转时，两个小风扇完全保持安静。在负载情况下，它们达到35.47 dB(a)--对于最大的风扇速度来说是一个适中的水平。我们认为联想可以让风扇运行得更大声一些，以便从CPU中榨取更多的性能。
我们在这台联想笔记本电脑上没有发现线圈的啸叫。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 22.81 / 22.81 / 22.81 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31.59 / 35.47 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.81 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1145G7, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 Vega 8, R7 PRO 5850U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPETJ1T24MGE2QDQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -19% | 4% | -11% | |
| off / environment * | 22.81 | 23.66 -4% | 25.3 -11% | 24.1 -6% | 26.81 -18% |
| Idle Minimum * | 22.81 | 23.6 -3% | 25.3 -11% | 24.2 -6% | 26.81 -18% |
| Idle Average * | 22.81 | 23.6 -3% | 25.3 -11% | 24.2 -6% | 26.81 -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22.81 | 23.6 -3% | 25.3 -11% | 24.2 -6% | 26.81 -18% |
| Load Average * | 31.59 | 33.5 -6% | 44.9 -42% | 26.9 15% | 30.16 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.59 | 27.9 22% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 35.47 | 34.3 3% | 44.9 -27% | 29.9 16% | 33.98 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
尽管有安静的风扇，联想笔记本电脑X1 Carbon 2022并没有变得过于炎热。在压力测试和Witcher 3 测试中，在顶部测得的温度最高。键盘上方为45摄氏度或113华氏度。掌托在任何情况下都能保持凉爽。有点恼人的是在Witcher 3 测试中，键盘很热，但由于ThinkPad不是游戏笔记本，在日常使用中这应该不是问题。
经过一小时的压力测试，处理器仍然可以消耗14W。这导致了节流，尽管CPU温度保持在低水平，只有64摄氏度/147华氏度。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.3 °C / 86.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.7 °C / -4.8 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE Intel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH Intel Core i5-1145G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 14% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 51.5 -14% | 37.1 18% | 39.2 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44 | 45.3 -3% | 38.7 12% | 51.2 -16% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 31.2 | 29.6 5% | 27.3 12% | 33 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.2 | 30 10% | 28.1 15% | 34 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10有四个扬声器，两个在底部，两个在顶部，挨着键盘。它们足够响亮，而且确实有一些低音，但仍有很大的改进空间。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.09 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理。电池寿命比X1 Carbon G9要弱一些
消耗功率
联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10的功耗很好，去年的竞争对手消耗的能量更多。X1 Carbon G9只在最大闲置时消耗较少。
所提供的USB-C充电器可提供65瓦，完美地覆盖了63.3瓦的最大功耗。
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 4.9 / 6 Watt |
| Load |
29.3 / 63.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XXS00100 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 14" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | -10% | -12% | -69% | -36% | -39% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3 -3% | 2.7 7% | 3.2 -10% | 5 -72% | 4.48 ? -54% | 4.47 ? -54% |
| Idle Average * | 4.9 | 5.2 -6% | 6 -22% | 5.4 -10% | 10.2 -108% | 7.37 ? -50% | 7.42 ? -51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6 | 5.9 2% | 7.6 -27% | 6.9 -15% | 11 -83% | 9.24 ? -54% | 8.9 ? -48% |
| Load Average * | 29.3 | 42.8 -46% | 37 -26% | 38.9 -33% | 51.7 -76% | 36.4 ? -24% | 42.1 ? -44% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 36.6 | 33.2 9% | 37 -1% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 63.3 | 65.7 -4% | 65 -3% | 66.5 -5% | 67.5 -7% | 61.7 ? 3% | 61.8 ? 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption w/external monitor
电池寿命
联想没有改变电池容量。也许应该增加，因为ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10没有达到与X1 Carbon第9代相同的电池寿命，尽管它拥有相同的57Wh电池。在WiFi测试中，X1 Carbon的续航时间不是近12小时，而是仅略高于10小时（150cd/m²的亮度）。这并不可怕，但比2021年的Tiger Lake 笔记本电脑要弱：英特尔似乎已经忘记了能源效率的问题。
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XXS00100 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7420 JW6MH i5-1145G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 24% | 9% | -3% | |
| H.264 | 654 | 716 ? 9% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 610 | 700 15% | 848 39% | 685 12% | 611 ? 0% |
| Load | 142 | 155 9% | 151 6% | 116.7 ? -18% |
Pros
Cons
结论。联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon 10代需要更高效的CPU
对于联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10来说，平台升级到英特尔Alder Lake是主要重点。就所评测的设备而言，它是Alder Lake P28。综合考虑，我们可以说：新一代的产品未能满足我们的期望。
Alder Lake大幅提高了性能，但由于联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2022的散热限制，在持续负荷下无法获得增加的速率。持续负载下的多核性能甚至能够压制前面的X1 Carbon G9。此外，电池寿命也较短。从积极的方面看，MIPI网络摄像头与前代产品相比带来了巨大的改进。
Alder Lake P28没有持久的影响。联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10需要一个更强大的冷却系统
伴随着ThinkPad X1 Carbon的其他品质，如坚固而轻巧的机箱，良好的连接性，以及非常好的输入设备，联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10仍然能够达到非常好的评价。
但是在测试的配置中，与去年的机型相比，新机型并没有真正的升级ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9.虽然有一些有趣的新屏幕选项，但我们还没有测试。另外，联想可能仍然能够通过提高风扇水平来改善散热，而且我们也还没有测试Alder Lake U15的变体。不过，所有这些并不能改变英特尔Alder Lake存在效率问题。
这很可能也会影响到其他采用Alder Lake的英特尔竞争对手--这使得采用AMD Ryzen Pro 6000的商务笔记本，如惠普EliteBook 845 G9或联想ThinkPad Z13，更加令人感兴趣。
价格和可用性
测试的机型在联想网上商店配置时的价格大约为2030美元。截至撰写本评论时，ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10在美国的基本价格为1,560美元。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE
- 06/23/2022 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
