联想 ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (i5-7Y54) 平板电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 78 %
Center on Battery: 388.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 995:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, IPS, 12", 2160x1440 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet INT3470, IPS, 12", 2160x1440 | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 BOE06DC, IPS, 12.3", 1920x1280 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 CMN1374, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung SDC3853, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 LEN4140, OLED, 14", 2560x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||||
Display P3 Coverage | 62.4 | 62.8 | 65.5 | 67.5 | ||
sRGB Coverage | 93 | 94 | 88.8 | 96.6 | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.9 | 64.7 | 64.9 | 69 | ||
Response Times | 8% | -30% | -57% | -58% | 61% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.4 ? | 28.4 ? -0% | 42.4 ? -49% | 55.2 ? -94% | 46 ? -62% | 3.6 ? 87% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22.8 ? | 17.6 ? 23% | 30.8 ? -35% | 27.2 ? -19% | 31 ? -36% | 3.2 ? 86% |
PWM Frequency | 221.2 ? | 222.2 ? 0% | 210.1 ? -5% | 50 ? -77% | 240.4 ? 9% | |
Screen | -16% | 16% | -3% | 20% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 388.1 | 342.4 -12% | 523.2 35% | 262 -32% | 389.2 0% | 243 -37% |
Brightness | 344 | 315 -8% | 522 52% | 256 -26% | 392 14% | 240 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 78 | 85 9% | 88 13% | 83 6% | 92 18% | 95 22% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.744 -91% | 0.42 -8% | 0.25 36% | 0.27 31% | |
Contrast | 995 | 460 -54% | 1246 25% | 1048 5% | 1441 45% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 5.33 -16% | 4 13% | 5.13 -12% | 3.61 22% | 5.3 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 9.25 -2% | 8.6 5% | 9.46 -4% | 8.9 2% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.1 | 5.36 12% | 5.5 10% | 6.23 -2% | 3.8 38% | 3.7 39% |
Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.45 90% | 2.16 102% | 1.78 124% |
CCT | 7104 91% | 7671 85% | 7546 86% | 6413 101% | 5969 109% | 6202 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 57 -3% | 64.86 10% | 57.84 -2% | 63 7% | 84.8 44% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 93 2% | 93.97 3% | 88.57 -3% | 97 7% | 100 10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-11% | -7% /
5% | -30% /
-12% | -19% /
1% | 33% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 221.2 Hz | ≤ 49 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 221.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 49 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 221.2 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3092 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3924 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4288 points | |
Help |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -42% | -5% | -42% | -52% | 58% | |
Read Seq | 1739 | 420.3 -76% | 1294 -26% | 467.1 -73% | 663 -62% | 2004 15% |
Write Seq | 1259 | 305.6 -76% | 865 -31% | 443.6 -65% | 158.2 -87% | 1693 34% |
Read 512 | 698 | 324.6 -53% | 406 -42% | 312.3 -55% | 313.1 -55% | 1040 49% |
Write 512 | 869 | 297.8 -66% | 589 -32% | 372.5 -57% | 158.2 -82% | 1292 49% |
Read 4k | 52.3 | 32.36 -38% | 31.75 -39% | 29.43 -44% | 30.14 -42% | 58.2 11% |
Write 4k | 120 | 73.6 -39% | 72.2 -40% | 56.5 -53% | 68 -43% | 182.2 52% |
Read 4k QD32 | 247.9 | 325.6 31% | 493.3 99% | 311.3 26% | 243.7 -2% | 632 155% |
Write 4k QD32 | 259 | 215.5 -17% | 434.5 68% | 225.2 -13% | 149.2 -42% | 507 96% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 | |
Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6873 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1274 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 44515 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4509 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 678 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42 | 21 | 19 | 6 |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-19.1 °C / -34.4 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 2.6 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 6.3 / 7.8 Watt |
Load |
19.5 / 19.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), OLED, 2560x1440, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | -23% | -19% | -61% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 5.87 -17% | 2.85 43% | 3.2 36% | 4.9 2% | |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 6.05 4% | 6.76 -7% | 5.5 13% | 7.6 -21% | |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 6.13 21% | 6.91 11% | 6.5 17% | 13.8 -77% | |
Load Average * | 19.5 | 21.27 -9% | 32.88 -69% | 29.7 -52% | 33.4 -71% | |
Load Maximum * | 19.6 | 23.03 -18% | 37.41 -91% | 41.3 -111% | 46.5 -137% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh | Dell Latitude 12 5285 2-in-1 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G2 i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JES03T00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | 17% | 78% | 11% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 662 | 628 -5% | 1075 62% | 1387 110% | 791 19% | 784 18% |
WiFi v1.3 | 441 | 300 -32% | 486 10% | 630 43% | 488 11% | 368 -17% |
Load | 134 | 118 -12% | 105 -22% | 244 82% | 138 3% | 120 -10% |
Pros
Cons
今年的ThinkPad X1 Tablet(第二代)更新确实仅限于内部芯片组,而它的改变对整体性能的影响在我们的测试中缺并不小。例如,我们对它2015年m7处理器机型的三个不满意之处——持续运行处理器/显卡性能,表面温度和电池续航——都在这台新机型里至少在一定程度上得到了改进。它的处理器在持续运行时的性能仍然低于短时间的峰值性能,不过下降的幅度并不大,我们在Cinebench测试中得到的结果是它在持续运行时相比单次测试性能仅下降了12%(详见评测中的处理器部分),考虑到没有主动式散热系统,这并不是个太差的结果。同时,它的表面温度和电池续航时间都相对有所改善,对一些用途来说甚至可以说是十分出色。另外,它的屏幕效果也得到了一定的改进,主要是亮度和对比度(这也是我们去年最不满的部分之一)。
不过,我们也可以理解为什么很多用户会对它没有得到机身设计、接口选择和扬声器等方面的改进而有所不满。同类竞争机型也越来越多——包括一些新设备如戴尔 Latitude 12 5285 二合一设备,X1的自满可能会让它反而有所退步。除此之外,其他常见变形本也越来越便携,正在缩短与可分离键盘底座结合平板电脑设计的机型在重量和尺寸之间的差距。
时隔一年, ThinkPad X1 Tablet第二代仅仅在前代机型的基础上带来了略微的改进。不过它依然是为数不多的很好地结合了灵便与多用途的高端商务设备之一。
随着时间的流动,价位的差距和同类设备的稀少依然让X1保持着奢侈和独特的位置。对于移动商务用户来说,它是市场上为数不多的结合了可维护性,坚固性,易于管理等优势和平板电脑加可分离键盘设计的高端商务设备。对于适合的用户与适合的用途,尽管它缺少革新性的改进,也依然是个合理的选择。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
- 06/15/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein