联想ThinkPad X13 G2评论。完美的移动伴侣？

Name: Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE
Brand: Lenovo

16:10和5G。

联想为其紧凑型商务超极本配备了全新的机箱、更新的处理器和16：10的屏幕。你还可以得到一个快速的5G调制解调器，但制造商现在使用了一个更糟糕的键盘。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 08/14/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Intel Evo Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt ThinkPad Tiger Lake Ultrabook Windows

去年的笔记本X13确实得到了一个新的名称，但它仍然是基于旧的笔记本X390.另一方面，第二代ThinkPad X13是一次重大更新，采用了新的机箱，更新了CPU，而且和ThinkPad X1型号一样，采用了新的16：10长宽比屏幕。

ThinkPad X13 G2再次提供了英特尔或AMD的CPU，但英特尔的型号是最先提供的。我们的测试装置的代号为20WK0024GE，普通客户的价格约为1900欧元，如果你有机会参加联想的教育计划，则约为1800欧元。配置包括一个现代的Tiger Lake i7处理器，16GB内存，512GB PCI-SSD存储，16:10面板，1920 x 1200像素，以及一个5G调制解调器。

我们还没有审查戴尔、富士通或惠普的所有直接商业对手，所以我们也将使用一些消费者型号作为本次审查的比较设备。

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE (ThinkPad X13 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, 50 W PL2 / Short Burst, 30 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1300 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR4X-4266, Dual-Channel, soldered

Display

13.30 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 170 PPI, NV133WUM-N61, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP

Storage

SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, 512 GB

, 433 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 5G Modem-RF, LTE, 5G

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18.2 x 305.8 x 217.1

Battery

54.7 Wh, 3564 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W SPU, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.339 kg, Power Supply: 365 g

Price

1800 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Possible Competitors

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2021	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	18.2 mm	13.30"	1920x1200
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2020	Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	14.8 mm	13.40"	1920x1200
91.1 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2020	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU	1.4 kg	15.6 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
88.7 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2020	HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620	1.3 kg	18.1 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2021	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.3 kg	14.6 mm	13.90"	3000x2000

外壳 - 联想的新材料

联想为第二代产品使用了新的机箱。从外观上看，你不会注意到很大的区别，但当你打开盖子时，你会立即看到新的16:10面板和四面的细长边框，这显得更加现代。颜色是另一个区别，因为现在的黑色表面更亮一些，与键盘和触摸板有明显的对比。你也可以得到银色的X13 G2（风暴灰）。

材料也发生了相当大的变化，也有明显的差异，以X13 Yoga G2.基础单元的顶部和底部过去都是由镁制成的，但新机型只有顶部是由镁制成的，表面也更粗糙一些。后者的好处是你不会那么快看到指纹。底部面板现在是由铝制成的。总而言之，底板的稳定性非常好，我们只能在试图扭转底板时激起一些吱吱嘎嘎的声音。

盖子不再由PPS塑料/玻璃纤维复合材料制成，而只是PPS塑料。盖子非常结实，我们不能引起图片的刺激。两个铰链再次允许180度的最大开启角度，但对于我们的口味来说，它们可以更牢固一点。有一些弹跳，盖子从大约20度的角度关闭。

与老款相比笔记本X13，新机型更窄一些，但尺寸和约1.3公斤的重量是相当的。所有其他对比设备也都在同一范围内，只有戴尔XPS 13更加紧凑。

Size Comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 HP EliteBook 830 G7 Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - X13现在有了Thunderbolt 4技术

与竞争对手相比，X13 G2的端口情况要好得多。你不仅有两个支持Thunderbolt 4的USB-C端口，还有一个全尺寸的HDMI输出和两个普通的USB-A端口。然而，没有SD卡读卡器。

左侧：2个USB-C和雷电4（USB 4，40Gbps，PowerDelivery 3.0，DisplayPort 1.4a），以太网扩展，HDMI 2.0，USB-A 3.2 Gen.1，3.5毫米立体声插孔

右侧。智能卡读卡器，USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（永远在线），Kensington Nano安全插槽

通信 - 5G作为一种选择

除了有线千兆以太网（通过适配器），联想还为X13 G2配备了来自英特尔的最新Wi-Fi 6E模块（AX210）。在我们与路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120进行的标准化Wi-Fi测试中，它管理着非常高的传输率，在我们的审查期间，无论是Netgear路由器，还是AVM Fritz！Box（Wi-Fi 5），我们都没有注意到任何连接问题。

你也可以得到带有4G或5G调制解调器的X13 G2。我们的评测单元配备了高通公司的5G模块（骁龙X55），但它只能与eSIM卡结合使用。后面的Nano-SIM卡插槽与我们来自T-Mobile的SIM卡不兼容。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1602 (1477^min - 1662^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (675 - 1602, n=27)	1166 MBit/s -27%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1129 (947^min - 1229^max) MBit/s -30%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	984 (796^min - 1076^max) MBit/s -39%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	975 (786^min - 1026^max) MBit/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	903 (452^min - 920^max) MBit/s -44%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	649 (611^min - 664^max) MBit/s -59%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1524 (1322^min - 1649^max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1439 (1386^min - 1504^max) MBit/s -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1401 (1271^min - 1454^max) MBit/s -8%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1387 (1329^min - 1458^max) MBit/s -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1335 (1208^min - 1544^max) MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (914 - 1716, n=27)	1309 MBit/s -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	757 (378^min - 806^max) MBit/s -50%

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1524 (1322-1649)

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1602 (1477-1662)

网络摄像头 - ThinkPad现在有了1080p

联想现在使用的是200万像素的1080p摄像头，画质比以前要好一些。这款相机显然适用于视频会议等，但它仍然不能拍出好照片。

ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE: 9.54 ∆E min: 2.21 - max: 17.03 ∆E

维护

底部面板用几个飞利浦螺钉固定，很容易拆卸。联想在X13 G2和T14s G2上使用相同的主板。T14s G2，用户无法在里面做很多事情。Wi-Fi模块以及内存都是焊接的，所以你只能访问WWAN模块以及M.2-2280固态硬盘，风扇也可以清洗。

输入设备 - 较浅的按键和减少的行程

键盘

键盘的宽度再次有些缩小（约为常规尺寸的95%），但你很快就会习惯的。然而，类似于目前的ThinkPad X1 Carbon，现在的按键行程减少了1.5毫米，按键也更平坦。这显然影响了打字体验。与消费类笔记本电脑相比仍有优势，但惠普或戴尔的其他商务键盘基本处于同一水平，ThinkPad X13 G2已经没有大的优势。当然，我们在这里抱怨的水平很高，键盘也适合长篇文字，但以前的型号在这一领域有很大优势。

你仍然可以得到一个两段式的白色背景照明，效果很好，它使你在黑暗环境中工作更容易。

触摸板和TrackPoint

联想现在为新的X13 G2使用了更宽的触摸板（11.5 x 6.1厘米），它很容易使用。光滑的表面提供了良好的滑行能力，但是当你点击触摸板的下部时，你会听到相当响亮而廉价的点击声。

红色TrackPoint和键盘上方的额外按钮再次可用，一旦你习惯了，就很容易使用。专用按钮也很好用，但两个按钮的点击噪音有一点不同。

显示屏 - 13.3英寸，现在为16:10

联想为X13 G2配备了哑光的13.3英寸IPS屏幕，长宽比为16：10。你可以在四个不同的选项中选择。

WUXGA (1920 x 1200, 300 cd/m²)
WUXGA (1920 x 1200, Touch, 300 cd/m²)
WUXGA (1920 x 1200, Privacy Guard, 500cd/m²)
WQXGA (2560 x 1600, LowPower, 400cd/m²)

我们已经有机会审查了X13 Yoga G2的WQXGA面板。X13 Yoga G2我们的X13 G2评测单元配备的是默认的WUXGA显示屏，亮度为300尼特。我们对屏幕略感失望；我们希望看到至少400尼特和我们从联想14英寸产品系列中了解到的低功率屏幕。

我们的测试装置管理的平均亮度为310尼特，对比度超过1300:1。画面的主观印象很好，即使是明亮的表面看起来也不会有太多的颗粒感。我们没有发现任何PWM闪烁，IPS屏幕的视角稳定性非常好。背光渗漏不是什么大问题；当你使用最大亮度与深色背景相结合时，只在上边缘有一些亮点。


295 cd/m²	295 cd/m²	306 cd/m²
301 cd/m²	320 cd/m²	309 cd/m²
311 cd/m²	333 cd/m²	323 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

NV133WUM-N61 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 333 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 310.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 319 cd/m²
Contrast: 1333:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE NV133WUM-N61, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	HP EliteBook 830 G7 Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9"	Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 B133HAK01.1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 Yoga G2 LP133WQ1-SPF2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 13.3"
Display		1%		-5%	-7%	-7%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	71.1	70.9 0%		65.7 -8%	64.9 -9%	64.8 -9%	68.3 -4%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.1 -1%		97.4 -2%	94.4 -5%	95.6 -4%	99.1 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.1	72.9 3%		67.4 -5%	66.3 -7%	65.7 -8%	70.3 -1%
Response Times		-81%	-52%	-69%	-38%	-79%	-78%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	30.8 ?(14.8, 16)	52 ?(27.6, 24.4) -69%	48 ?(18.8, 29.2) -56%	46.8 ?(24, 22.8) -52%	37.6 ?(17.6, 20) -22%	56.8 ?(29.2, 27.6) -84%	52 ?(22, 30) -69%
Response Time Black / White *	17.2 ?(8.4, 8.8)	33.2 ?(19.2, 14) -93%	25.2 ?(8.4, 16.8) -47%	32 ?(15.6, 16.4) -86%	26.4 ?(11.6, 14.8) -53%	30 ?(16.8, 13.2) -74%	32 ?(20, 12) -86%
PWM Frequency		2475 ?(20)	122000 ?(49)	26600 ?(62)
Screen		2%	37%	2%	24%	-23%	30%
Brightness middle	320	543.3 70%	510 59%	454.5 42%	502 57%	331 3%	460 44%
Brightness	310	524 69%	491 58%	435 40%	474 53%	315 2%	423 36%
Brightness Distribution	89	92 3%	94 6%	91 2%	89 0%	90 1%	85 -4%
Black Level *	0.24	0.38 -58%	0.29 -21%	0.27 -13%	0.33 -38%	0.21 12%	0.33 -38%
Contrast	1333	1430 7%	1759 32%	1683 26%	1521 14%	1576 18%	1394 5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.7	3.02 -12%	1.3 52%	3.12 -16%	1.35 50%	6.1 -126%	1 63%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.6	7.61 -0%	3 61%	4.85 36%	3.67 52%	10 -32%	1.5 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.9	1.23 -37%		1.97 -119%	1.2 -33%	1.2 -33%	0.8 11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.1	5 -22%	2 51%	3.1 24%	1.7 59%	6.3 -54%	1.2 71%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.02 ^109%	2.23 ^99%	2.01 ^109%	2.24 ^98%	2.77 ^79%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6429 ^101%	6550 ^99%	6933 ^94%	6902 ^94%	6440 ^101%	6938 ^94%	6652 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		66.8	88.3	61.5	61.1	60.7	64.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		99.6	100	97	94.3	95.4	99.12
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-26% / -10%	-8% / 20%	-24% / -9%	-7% / 8%	-36% / -28%	-17% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

开箱后的色彩准确性已经非常好，与sRGB色彩参考相比，所有的色彩都在目标偏差3以内。我们用专业的CalMAN软件进行的显示分析显示，在灰度上有轻微的偏色，偏向粉红色。然而，这只有在与经过校准的屏幕直接比较时才会明显。

我们确实用X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计校准了面板（配置文件可在上面免费下载），我们设法改善了灰度和色彩。小的sRGB色彩空间被完全覆盖，这意味着该面板适用于图片/视频编辑。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于采用了哑光面板，在户外使用X13 G2是没有问题的。只要你避免阳光直射，你甚至可以在非常明亮的环境中看到内容。我们仍然希望有一个更明亮的面板，以获得更多的观看舒适度。

性能 -Tiger Lake 和焊接的RAM

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1165G7

我们的评测单元使用熟悉的Tiger Lake 处理器酷睿i7-1165G7(UP3)，一个核心的最高时钟为4.7GHz，当你强调所有四个核心（8个线程）时，最高时钟为4.1GHz。关于该处理器的更多信息可在这里.

联想非常慷慨地设定了功率限制，在基准测试的开始阶段，我们确实可以看到4.1GHz的最高时钟（相当于~50W）。然而，过了一会儿，该值就平息在4x 3.3 GHz和30W。总而言之，结果很好，但是处理器经常触及100℃的大关。我们可以看到大约15分钟后性能略有下降，但性能很快又稳定下来。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø827 (741.02-973.71)

Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø718 (617.03-918.32)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1: Ø1066 (1062.05-1069.6)

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)

Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U: Ø1173 (1057.08-1287.21)

Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø571 (548.08-726.48)

与其他Tiger Lake 笔记本电脑及其前身相比，新的X13 G2的性能如何？前代产品?在单核基准测试中，酷睿i7主要得益于高时钟，新的X13 G2经常在排名中名列前茅。其性能也不错，领先于所有其他基于英特尔的对手（采用Comet Lake的前辈被击败了30%），但旧的X13 G1 AMD仍然明显更快。我们已经急于看到X13 G2与新的Ryzen 5000 CPU的性能。如果功率限制相当的话，我们期望CPU更好。Apple's M1 CPU在MacBook Pro 13当你给一个核心施加压力时，它的速度一样快，但在原生多核心基准测试中要快得多（>30%）。

在电池供电的情况下，功耗被限制在30W，所以与主电源相比，只是有一个小的性能缺陷，约15%。

Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years)	1670 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	1526 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	1513 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1110 - 1539, n=59)	1425 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1350 Points -12%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years)	11681 Points +103%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	7811 Points +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	5750 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (2525 - 6862, n=64)	5110 Points -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	4043 (3994.31^min - 4043^max) Points -30%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years)	636 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	574 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	559 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81)	552 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	522 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	475 Points -17%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	444 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	406 Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	351 Points -39%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years)	4542 Points +108%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	2935 Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	2188 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	2109 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81)	1967 Points -10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	1913 Points -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1559 Points -29%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	1516 Points -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	1505 Points -31%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years)	250 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	226 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	218 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78)	212 Points -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	209 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	208 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	184 Points -19%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	182 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	167 Points -26%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years)	1983 Points +104%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	1287 (1057.08^min - 1287.21^max) Points +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	1070 (1060^min - 1070^max) Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	974 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	918 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86)	846 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	726 (548.08^min - 726.48^max) Points -25%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	635 (464.15^min - 634.96^max) Points -35%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	765 Seconds * -41%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	747 Seconds * -38%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	695 Seconds * -28%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	632 Seconds * -17%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80)	618 Seconds * -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	541 Seconds *
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	403 Seconds * +26%
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years)	360 Seconds * +33%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)	5478 MIPS +4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	5283 MIPS 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	5274 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80)	5182 MIPS -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5140 MIPS -3%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	4794 MIPS -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	4438 MIPS -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	4315 MIPS -18%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years)	48300 MIPS +91%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	37081 MIPS +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	25265 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80)	22935 MIPS -9%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	21925 MIPS -13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	20843 MIPS -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	19404 MIPS -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	17978 MIPS -29%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years)	1795 Points +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	1740 Points +12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	1547 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	1547 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77)	1524 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	1454 Points -6%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	1274 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	1157 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	1093 Points -29%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years)	10135 Points +79%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	7590 Points +34%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	5682 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	5653 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	5600 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5186 Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77)	5155 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	4256 Points -25%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	3671 Points -35%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years)	12.9 fps +85%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	8.33 fps +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	6.97 fps
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80)	6.3 fps -10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.84 fps -16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.23 fps -25%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	5.16 fps -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	4.68 fps -33%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	67.8 s * -48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	58.4 s * -27%
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years)	54.4 s * -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	53.8 s * -17%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78)	49.2 s * -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	46.2 s * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.9 s *
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	44.8 s * +2%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U	0.706 sec * -22%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U	0.651 sec * -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	0.613 sec * -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.605 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80)	0.594 sec * -2%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.586 sec * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.581 sec *
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years)	0.52 sec * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

96.6 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

226 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

974 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

2188 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

574 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1526 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

5750 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

ThinkPad X13 G2的主观性能印象非常好，所有输入的执行都没有明显的延迟。合成基准测试的结果也很好，尽管大多数对比设备由于采用了类似的组件而非常接近，你在实践中不会注意到差异。X13 G2的内存（LPDDR4x-4266）现在是焊接的，不能扩展。考虑到高昂的价格，我们建议至少要有16GB；你可以得到32GB。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years)	6454 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	5105 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4531 - 5454, n=50)	4959 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	4956 Points -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	4914 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4870 Points -5%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	4185 Points -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	4184 Points -18%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years)	10490 Points +4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	10184 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	10065 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8997 - 11505, n=50)	10014 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	9749 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9490 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9027 Points -10%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	8465 Points -16%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years)	8635 Points +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	7098 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6971 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	6926 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	6838 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	6792 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6719 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5570 - 7136, n=50)	6711 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years)	8143 Points +57%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	5180 Points
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4083 - 5550, n=50)	4937 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	4905 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	4832 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4583 Points -12%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	3373 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	3243 Points -37%

PCMark 10 Score		5105 points
Help

DPC-Latency

我们的标准化DPC延迟测试（网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载）没有显示ThinkPad X13 G2的任何问题，在YouTube视频播放过程中也没有出现丢帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	1502 μs * -149%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1225 μs * -103%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	1009 μs * -67%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	832 μs * -38%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	633 μs * -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	603 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - ThinkPad支持PCIe 4.0

新的ThinkPad X13 G2确实支持快速的PCIe 4.0标准，但我们的设备仍然使用PCIe-3.0-x4硬盘。不过在实践中你几乎不会注意到区别，因为这是一个来自SK Hynix的非常快的驱动器。

存储容量为512GB，在初始设置后你可以使用大约411GB。我们可以看到传输率高达3.5 GB/s（读取）和近2.9 GB/s（写入）。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.

	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	HP EliteBook 830 G7 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Average SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-12%	-7%	14%	-5%
Write 4K	171.4	97.5 -43%	118.3 -31%	197.5 15%	137.4 ?(114 - 171.4, n=3) -20%
Read 4K	70.8	50.9 -28%	60.4 -15%	52.9 -25%	61.7 ?(55.1 - 70.8, n=3) -13%
Write Seq	1771	1811 2%	2067 17%	2174 23%	2043 ?(1771 - 2180, n=3) 15%
Read Seq	1755	1836 5%	2394 36%	2156 23%	1800 ?(1755 - 1854, n=3) 3%
Write 4K Q32T1	525	521 -1%	325.5 -38%	632 20%	463 ?(325 - 540, n=3) -12%
Read 4K Q32T1	479.5	357.5 -25%	332.2 -31%	694 45%	408 ?(346 - 480, n=3) -15%
Write Seq Q32T1	2818	2879 2%	2978 6%	3017 7%	2893 ?(2778 - 3082, n=3) 3%
Read Seq Q32T1	3548	3204 -10%	3552 0%	3561 0%	3585 ?(3548 - 3607, n=3) 1%
AS SSD		-155%	-57%	-9%	-15%
Seq Read	2776	2091 -25%	2081 -25%	2794 1%	2727 ?(2427 - 2896, n=6) -2%
Seq Write	1461	1396 -4%	1433 -2%	2385 63%	1664 ?(1329 - 2573, n=6) 14%
4K Read	63.8	49.29 -23%	49.92 -22%	60.7 -5%	53.6 ?(44.4 - 64.6, n=6) -16%
4K Write	209.4	104.2 -50%	119.1 -43%	180.8 -14%	152.5 ?(111.4 - 209, n=6) -27%
4K-64 Read	1148	827 -28%	585 -49%	1768 54%	1025 ?(615 - 1887, n=6) -11%
4K-64 Write	1623	1636 1%	1630 0%	1800 11%	1731 ?(1442 - 2066, n=6) 7%
Access Time Read *	0.032	0.066 -106%	0.043 -34%	0.037 -16%	0.05417 ?(0.032 - 0.071, n=6) -69%
Access Time Write *	0.019	0.365 -1821%	0.097 -411%	0.073 -284%	0.026 ?(0.019 - 0.034, n=6) -37%
Score Read	1489	1086 -27%	843 -43%	2108 42%	1351 ?(925 - 2194, n=6) -9%
Score Write	1978	1880 -5%	1892 -4%	2219 12%	2051 ?(1717 - 2504, n=6) 4%
Score Total	4178	3499 -16%	3149 -25%	5392 29%	4051 ?(3252 - 5836, n=6) -3%
Copy ISO MB/s	1833	1544 -16%	2452 34%	2065 13%	2050 ?(1833 - 2426, n=4) 12%
Copy Program MB/s	993	613 -38%	72.2 -93%	734 -26%	542 ?(362 - 993, n=4) -45%
Copy Game MB/s	1607	1451 -10%	404 -75%	1629 1%	1228 ?(1052 - 1607, n=4) -24%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-84% / -103%	-32% / -39%	3% / -1%	-10% / -11%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3548 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2818 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 479.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 525 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1755 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1771 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 171.4 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能 - Iris Xe Graphics G7

芯片酷睿i7-1165G7配备了集成的Xe Graphics G7.它是更快的版本，有96个EUs，最大时钟为1300 MHz。iGPU还得益于双通道配置的快速内存。

X13 G2在合成基准测试中比竞争对手更快，在持续工作负荷下图形性能也很稳定；它通过了3DMark压力测试（Fire Strike ）。与旧的配备英特尔iGPU的X13 G1相比，性能几乎提高了3倍，现代Ryzen iGPU也被打败了。你可以在电池电源上使用全部的GPU性能。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=55, last 2 years)	9537 Points +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6711 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6698 Points 0%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6294 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	4690 Points -30%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U	1923 Points -71%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1862 Points -72%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years)	37257 Points +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	29901 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	26910 Points -10%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38578, n=180)	26508 Points -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	23053 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	22904 Points -23%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U	11127 Points -63%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=59, last 2 years)	6977 Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5202 Points
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5169 Points -1%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	4170 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	3019 Points -42%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U	1380 Points -73%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	1332 Points -74%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=60, last 2 years)	2577 Points +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1563 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1430 Points -9%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1209 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U	949 Points -39%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-10810U	432 Points -72%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U	421 Points -73%

3DMark 11 Performance		7169 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		95856 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		20532 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		4795 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1746 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

尽管图形性能有所提高，但X13 G2仍然不是游戏笔记本电脑，但你至少可以用iGPU玩旧的或要求不高的游戏。在较长时间的游戏过程中，游戏性能也很稳定。更多的游戏基准测试可在我们的技术部分.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=52, last 2 years)	21.8 fps +72%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	14.3 (12^min - 17^max) fps +13%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.79 - 20.1, n=179)	14 fps +10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.8 (10^min - 15^max) fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	12.7 (11^min, 11^P1 - 14^max) fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 71, n=50, last 2 years)	41.3 fps +33%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.7 (29^min - 36^max) fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 45.9, n=189)	28.7 fps -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.1 (24^min - 30^max) fps -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	17.6 (15^min - 20^max) fps -43%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (33 - 118, n=35, last 2 years)	70.5 fps +22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58.4 (17^min - 66^max) fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	58 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 77.8, n=184)	53.6 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46.6 (41^min - 51^max) fps -20%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (48 - 187, n=47, last 2 years)	118.2 fps +22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	97.7 (89^min - 107^max) fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	97 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (28.9 - 117.2, n=186)	84 fps -13%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	69.5 (64^min - 74^max) fps -28%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	56.1 (47^min - 62^max) fps -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	17.9 fps -82%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=60, last 2 years)	40.2 fps +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25 (5.9^min, 8.3^P1 - 201^max) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24 (5^min, 5.93^P1 - 304^max) fps -4%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.2 - 31.7, n=163)	23.7 fps -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.5 (5^min, 5.47^P1 - 263^max) fps -10%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Subnotebook (19.4 - 80.9, n=61, last 2 years)	48 fps +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.9 (8.7^min, 17.5^P1 - 184^max) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30.4 (6.3^min, 7.97^P1 - 280^max) fps -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15.4 - 39.8, n=165)	29.3 fps -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.4 (5.3^min, 6.9^P1 - 240^max) fps -11%
1920x1080 medium AA:medium AF:4
Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 96.5, n=61, last 2 years)	58.9 fps +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.9 (20.9^min, 22.4^P1 - 198^max) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.5 (8.5^min, 10^P1 - 315^max) fps -1%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (18.2 - 51.4, n=166)	36.5 fps -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.6 (7.3^min, 8.98^P1 - 248^max) fps -11%
1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average of class Subnotebook (65.6 - 229, n=60, last 2 years)	142.2 fps +56%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	94.4 (16.2^min, 33.1^P1 - 363^max) fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	91.2 (19.4^min, 35.3^P1 - 312^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (48.5 - 115.1, n=168)	84.8 fps -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	79.5 (15.3^min, 26.8^P1 - 243^max) fps -13%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=61, last 2 years)	23.4 fps +48%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=172)	16.8 fps +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.8 fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	15.4 fps -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	13.8 fps -13%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 59.9, n=61, last 2 years)	33.3 fps +56%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 31.2, n=179)	21.8 fps +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	21.3 fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19.6 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.1 fps -15%
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 111.6, n=61, last 2 years)	62 fps +58%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=183)	39.4 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	39.3 fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33.7 fps -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.4 fps -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	11.49 fps -71%

F1 2020
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	26.4 fps +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (15 - 28, n=31)	21.8 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	40.4 fps +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (22 - 44.4, n=32)	33.5 fps -1%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	51.9 fps +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.1 - 57.5, n=34)	42.8 fps -7%
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years)	98.8 fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	88 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (49 - 109.6, n=34)	82 fps -7%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=55, last 2 years)	19.6 fps +81%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.8 (3.82^min, 7.3^P1 - 31.5^max) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.5 (3.77^min, 8.26^P1 - 29^max) fps -3%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10 (3.07^min, 7.87^P1 - 73.9^max) fps -7%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4.13 - 22.9, n=151)	9.48 fps -12%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average of class Subnotebook (13.8 - 95.3, n=57, last 2 years)	45.1 fps +65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.4 (7.29^min, 19.2^P1 - 54.7^max) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	24.7 (7.44^min, 17.9^P1 - 101^max) fps -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.8 (6.07^min, 17.9^P1 - 102^max) fps -17%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9.39 - 51.6, n=157)	22.8 fps -17%
1920x1080 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Subnotebook (49 - 156, n=26, last 2 years)	101.9 fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65.5 (14.1^min, 35.7^P1 - 117^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20 - 119.3, n=137)	65.2 fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	54.7 (13.6^min, 32.3^P1 - 118^max) fps
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average of class Subnotebook (63.4 - 172.6, n=57, last 2 years)	119.1 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	89.2 (17^min, 50^P1 - 163^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (24.1 - 149.3, n=165)	83.1 fps -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	76.8 (5.78^min, 40^P1 - 185^max) fps -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.4 (6.35^min, 33.3^P1 - 196^max) fps -31%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Average of class Subnotebook (54 - 167.5, n=25, last 2 years)	111.2 fps +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	76.9 (11^min, 50^P1 - 232^max) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (34.7 - 132.1, n=136)	73.8 fps -4%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	72.6 (15.3^min, 38.5^P1 - 138^max) fps -6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	60.3 (11.2^min, 40^P1 - 99.4^max) fps -22%
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average of class Subnotebook (63.8 - 178.2, n=56, last 2 years)	132.3 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (52 - 166.4, n=162)	98.5 fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	84.3 (19.6^min, 45.5^P1 - 137^max) fps
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	70.6 (13.5^min, 38.5^P1 - 119^max) fps

X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Subnotebook (20.7 - 97.1, n=56, last 2 years)	34 fps +5%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.5 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	32.4 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.1 - 59.8, n=212)	31.6 fps -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29.2 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	25.6 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	14.4 fps -56%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	10.1 fps -69%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Subnotebook (24.2 - 116.2, n=56, last 2 years)	40.6 fps +12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.3 fps +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	36.1 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (11.6 - 69.5, n=213)	35.2 fps -2%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.8 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	28.5 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	15.9 fps -56%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	10.6 fps -71%
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Subnotebook (25.9 - 144.7, n=62, last 2 years)	50.3 fps +16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	48 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	43.2 fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13.4 - 88.4, n=212)	41.5 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	37.2 fps -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.2 fps -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	13.2 fps -69%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	11.9 fps -72%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=63, last 2 years)	62.5 fps +41%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (20.6 - 78.5, n=215)	49.4 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	44.4 (29.2^min) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	42.5 (24.8^min) fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	39.5 (34.4^min) fps -11%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.7 (25.7^min) fps -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	19.9 (18.8^min) fps -55%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	19.7 (18.1^min) fps -56%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Subnotebook (14.8 - 112.6, n=63, last 2 years)	68 fps +45%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (23.2 - 88.1, n=215)	54.2 fps +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	46.9 (32.2^min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	42.2 (35.7^min) fps -10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.5 (28.7^min) fps -14%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	38.2 (25.7^min) fps -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	22.6 (20.9^min) fps -52%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	22.4 (20.6^min) fps -52%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 137.8, n=63, last 2 years)	85.9 fps +19%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (31.6 - 108.5, n=215)	75.7 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	72.1 (49.1^min) fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	69.9 (57.3^min) fps -3%
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	54.3 (36.6^min) fps -25%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	51.4 (45.5^min) fps -29%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	49.1 (43.8^min) fps -32%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	47.6 (29^min) fps -34%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average of class Subnotebook (33.7 - 171.8, n=63, last 2 years)	107.6 fps +30%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (36 - 148, n=215)	100.3 fps +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7	90.5 (78.5^min) fps +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	83.7 (73.8^min) fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	83 (50.5^min) fps
Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	77.5 (42.7^min) fps -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	77.3 (47.3^min) fps -7%
HP EliteBook 830 G7 Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620	75.8 (66.3^min) fps -9%

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N: Ø12.7 (11-14)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)		89.2	27.4	10.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	97	58	31	12.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	83	72.1	46.9	44.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	39.3	21.3	15.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	43.2	36.1	32.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	55	26	24	21
Strange Brigade (2018)	91.2	38.9	30.9	25
F1 2020 (2020)	88	46	34	23

排放--性能更强，风扇噪音更大

系统噪音

由于功率限制较高，风扇在负载情况下必须加快旋转速度，而且新机型的声音明显比非常安静的前代产品大。不过，风扇的杂音并不令人讨厌，也没有高亢的声音。在日常情况下，当你使用 "最佳性能 "模式（Windows电源滑块）时，风扇也会很快启动。如果你不需要最大的性能，我们肯定会推荐两个不太强大的能源设置之一。我们的测试装置没有任何电子噪音的问题，如线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle		25.5 / 25.5 / 29 dB(A)
Load		37.4 / 37.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.5 dB(A)

	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N	Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Noise		6%	-7%	0%	7%	-2%
off / environment *	25.5	25.7 -1%	29.2 -15%	26.8 -5%	25.4 -0%	29.1 -14%
Idle Minimum *	25.5	25.7 -1%	29.2 -15%	27.1 -6%	25.6 -0%	29.1 -14%
Idle Average *	25.5	25.7 -1%	29.2 -15%	27.1 -6%	25.6 -0%	29.1 -14%
Idle Maximum *	29	25.9 11%	29.2 -1%	27.1 7%	25.6 12%	29.1 -0%
Load Average *	37.4	26.2 30%	32.1 14%	31.4 16%	28.7 23%	31.1 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	37.4	36.5 2%			32 14%
Load Maximum *	37.4	36.6 2%	41.9 -12%	39 -4%	38.2 -2%	31.8 15%

* ... smaller is better

温度

紧凑的X13 G2在负载下变得相当热，我们可以测量到在风扇排气口周围的底座右侧有超过50℃的温度。底部面板主要在CPU所在的中心位置发热。当你给笔记本施加压力时，你不应该把它放在腿上，但在日常情况下没有限制。

我们可以再次看到，在综合工作负载中，处理器在30W左右迅速趋于平稳（~1.9GHz CPU和~950MHz iGPU）。大约25分钟后，我们可以看到一个波动，但平均值大致相同。未来可能会有一个软件更新来稳定性能。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.8 °C	43.6 °C	52.8 °C
41.8 °C	42.9 °C	53.9 °C
32.2 °C	29.7 °C	37 °C

Maximum: 53.9 °C
Average: 41.7 °C


44.2 °C	49.1 °C	46 °C
42.4 °C	45.9 °C	41.7 °C
36.8 °C	35.6 °C	34.5 °C

Maximum: 49.1 °C
Average: 41.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


24.3 °C	24.2 °C	24.1 °C
24.1 °C	24.1 °C	24.1 °C
23.4 °C	23.6 °C	23.7 °C

Maximum: 24.3 °C
Average: 24 °C


23.9 °C	24.2 °C	24.3 °C
24.3 °C	24.5 °C	24.4 °C
23.8 °C	23.7 °C	23.7 °C

Maximum: 24.5 °C
Average: 24.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 24.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	41.5 °C	47.1 °C
40.6 °C	41.2 °C	47.5 °C
31.9 °C	29.1 °C	34.7 °C

Maximum: 47.5 °C
Average: 39.4 °C


42.7 °C	45 °C	42.5 °C
41.2 °C	42.5 °C	40.1 °C
35.8 °C	35.3 °C	34.5 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 40 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.9 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.1 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-8.7 °C / -15.7 F).

发言人

两个立体声扬声器位于键盘上方，将声音导向用户。质量上留有优化的余地，这一点从像X1 Carbon，比如说。消费类机型如MacBook Pro 13或华为MateBook X Pro在这方面也有很大优势。扬声器对于视频会议来说绝对够用，但当你听音乐或看电影时，我们建议使用耳机或外部扬声器。预装的杜比软件提供了不同的配置文件，但声音差异很小。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 体面的耐力

消耗功率

我们的能量测量没有显示出任何惊喜。X13 G2在空转时非常高效，也比旧的配备AMD处理器的X13 G1.我们已经迫不及待地想看看配备Ryzen 5000的新X13 G2将如何表现。你应该只使用电池供电的第一级键盘照明，因为它只增加了约0.4W的消耗（第二级+1.4W）。

在我们的压力测试中，消耗量攀升至68.2W，但很快就在45W左右趋于平稳。这意味着附带的65W电源适配器是完全足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.25 / 0.45 Watt
Idle	2.8 / 5.9 / 6.8 Watt
Load	41.5 / 68.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"	HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9"	Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		0%	16%	7%	-40%	-34%	-41%	-27%
Idle Minimum *	2.8	3.9 -39%	1.67 40%	3.6 -29%	6.7 -139%	6 -114%	5.34 ?(2.2 - 46.5, n=193) -91%	4.43 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=60, last 2 years) -58%
Idle Average *	5.9	5.9 -0%	6.7 -14%	4.7 20%	10 -69%	8.9 -51%	8.55 ?(3.8 - 63, n=193) -45%	7.58 ?(2.5 - 16, n=60, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Maximum *	6.8	6.3 7%	7.4 -9%	5.1 25%	10.3 -51%	11.3 -66%	10.8 ?(5.8 - 68.9, n=193) -59%	9.43 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=60, last 2 years) -39%
Load Average *	41.5	39.7 4%	28 33%	33.3 20%	35.7 14%	34.2 18%	45.3 ?(12.5 - 87.3, n=193) -9%	45.8 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=58, last 2 years) -10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	34.2	34.8 -2%			32.7 4%
Load Maximum *	68.2	47.5 30%	47.5 30%	70 -3%	67.6 1%	37.2 45%	67.5 ?(30.1 - 123.3, n=193) 1%	68.7 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=60, last 2 years) -1%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø34.2 (32.4-43.4)

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø50.5 (45.3-67.4)

电池运行时间

联想将电池容量从48Wh增加到54.7Wh，电池运行时间得到改善。在视频测试中，X13 G2得益于更高效的视频解码器，在150尼特的亮度下，运行时间为15小时。在150尼特的Wi-Fi测试中，运行时间接近10小时，但竞争对手的持续时间更长。我们仍然认为10小时对于大多数情况来说应该是足够的。全亮度下的Wi-Fi测试仍可运行约8.5小时。

当设备开机时，电池充满电需要111分钟。约28分钟后可使用50%的容量；54分钟后可使用80%。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 91)		9h 57min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 91)		8h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		15h 02min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 23min

	Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54.7 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9310 Core i7 FHD i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh	HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh	Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 48 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		72%	67%	91%	62%	-16%	23%	21%
H.264	902		1152 28%			495 -45%	704 -22%	917 ?(527 - 1298, n=26, last 2 years) 2%
WiFi v1.3	597	657 10%	1223 105%	692 16%	629 5%	522 -13%	559 -6%	729 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years) 22%
Load	83	193 133%		221 166%	182 119%	92 11%	163 96%	116.5 ?(57 - 197, n=47, last 2 years) 40%

Pros

+ 高质量和坚固的底盘

+ 非常好的系统性能

+ 哑光16:10屏幕，色彩准确

+ 带有Thunderbolt 4的全面端口

+ 电池运行时间长

+ 可选4G或5G

Cons

- 与前代产品相比，键盘质量有所下降

- 机箱温度高

- 没有SD卡读卡器

- 焊接的RAM

结论--ThinkPad X13 G2具有未使用的潜力

在审查中。联想ThinkPad X13 G2。测试模型由Campuspoint提供。

新的ThinkPad X13 G2是一个很好的更新。该设备略微紧凑，你得到了16:10的显示屏，Tiger Lake 处理器的性能不错，联想还设法增加了电池容量。

与消费类设备相比，最大的优势是戴尔XPS 13,Apple MacBook Pro 13和华为MateBook X Pro是全面的连接，包括智能卡读卡器和可选的WWAN模块，用于LTE甚至5G：商务设备在保修方面也有优势。

联想仍然遵循键盘的趋势，减少行程和较浅的按键以节省空间。制造商仍在宣传经过验证的ThinkPad质量，键盘也不差，但如果你将键盘与目前的ThinkPad E14 G3（价格为一半）进行比较，例如，你很快就会发现它可以做得更好。

5G的伟大连接，16:10的屏幕，以及长的电池运行时间。ThinkPad X13 G2仍然是一个非常好的移动伴侣，尽管键盘已经不像以前那么好了。

在屏幕方面，我们也略感失望。哑光IPS显示屏的画质很好，但我们只想看到更亮的面板。我们肯定会推荐可选的2560 x 1600像素的WQXGA面板，它更亮，提供更好的画质，而且对电池运行时间没有大的影响，我们在对X13 Yoga G2的评测中已经看到了这一点。X13 Yoga G2.我们将对新的EliteBook 830 G8和（一旦上市）ThinkPad X13 G2的AMD版本进行评论。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

你可以在Lenovo.com上配置自己的ThinkPad X13 G2，起价约1200美元。.我们的评测配置现在约为1500美元。

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE - 07/06/2021 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

86 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

73 / 75 → 97%

Weight

71 / 20-75 → 93%

Battery

89%

Display

88%

Games Performance

67 / 78 → 86%

Application Performance

89 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

84%

Noise

93%

Audio

75 / 91 → 82%

Camera

36 / 85 → 43%

Average

79%

89%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1707 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 23680 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad X13 G2评论。完美的移动伴侣？

Andreas Osthoff, 2021-08-14 (Update: 2021-08-14)

Possible Competitors

外壳 - 联想的新材料

Size Comparison

连接性 - X13现在有了Thunderbolt 4技术

通信 - 5G作为一种选择

网络摄像头 - ThinkPad现在有了1080p

维护

输入设备 - 较浅的按键和减少的行程

键盘

触摸板和TrackPoint

显示屏 - 13.3英寸，现在为16:10

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 -Tiger Lake 和焊接的RAM

处理器 - 酷睿i7-1165G7

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC-Latency

存储设备 - ThinkPad支持PCIe 4.0

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能 - Iris Xe Graphics G7

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

排放--性能更强，风扇噪音更大

系统噪音

温度

发言人

Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) audio analysis

Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 audio analysis

能源管理 - 体面的耐力

消耗功率

Power Consumption Witcher 3

电池运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论--ThinkPad X13 G2具有未使用的潜力

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison