Notebookcheck Logo

联想ThinkPad X395笔记本电脑评测：争夺商务笔记本电脑霸权

AMD还是Intel？

最近，随着越来越多采用Ryzen处理器的笔记本电脑出现在市场上，AMD一直在加强与英特尔的竞争。 联想已经推出了AMD和Intel版本的13.3英寸ThinkPad X39系列，我们将重点关注AMD版本。 ThinkPad X390在我们最近的评测中给人留下了深刻的印象，那么用了AMD的X395表现如何？继续阅读以了解它是否超过X390，以及两种型号的优缺点。
Business Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) ThinkPad
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Processor
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U 4 x 2.1 - 3.5 GHz, Zen+
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1200 MHz, RAM: 1200 MHz, 25.20.14122.15001
Memory
8 GB 
, 双通道，板载
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, no touchscreen, LP133WF7-SPB1, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD CZ FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, 256 GB 
, 165 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机和麦克风插孔组合, Card Reader: microSD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.9 x 312 x 217
Battery
48 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 14.5 h
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p网络摄像头
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 有线网转接器, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.281 kg, Power Supply: 370 g
Price
927 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

#compare_competitor

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2020
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6		1.3 kg16.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
90.3 %
v6 (old)
06 / 2019
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620		1.3 kg16.9 mm13.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
v6 (old)
08 / 2019
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620		1.3 kg15.95 mm13.30"1920x1080
84.2 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2019
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620		1.3 kg15 mm13.00"2160x1440
89.5 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2018
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620		1.3 kg15.8 mm13.30"1920x1080
84.9 %
v7 (old)
Dell Latitude 5300
i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620		1.4 kg19 mm13.30"1920x1080

Size Comparison

❌
312 mm 217 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg311.9 mm 217.2 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg310.4 mm 219 mm 15.95 mm 1.3 kg306 mm 208 mm 19 mm 1.4 kg305.8 mm 205 mm 15.8 mm 1.3 kg286 mm 211 mm 15 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Right-hand side: Smartcard reader, fan vent, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A (always-on), Kensington lock slot
Right-hand side: Smartcard reader, fan vent, USB 3.1 Gen2 Type-A (always-on), Kensington lock slot
Left-hand side: USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-C/proprietary Ethernet port, HDMI, 3.5 mm jack
Left-hand side: USB 3.0 Type-C, USB 3.0 Type-C/proprietary Ethernet port, HDMI, 3.5 mm jack
Rear: microSD card reader
Rear: microSD card reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 5300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
176 MB/s +138%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
81.4 MB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.1 MB/s +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
 
74.1 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years)
54.3 MB/s -27%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 5300
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
188.8 MB/s +119%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.5 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
 
86.2 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.6 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years)
72.6 MB/s -16%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
628 (493min - 645max) MBit/s
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
502 MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
652 (539min - 675max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s -1%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
627 MBit/s -4%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X395; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø651 (539-675)
Lenovo ThinkPad X395; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø628 (493-645)
314
cd/m²		331
cd/m²		320
cd/m²
347
cd/m²		356
cd/m²		340
cd/m²
341
cd/m²		342
cd/m²		332
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LP133WF7-SPB1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 356 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 335.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 300 cd/m²
Contrast: 2225:1 (Black: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.92
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"		Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"		HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Chi Mei CMN1380, , 1920x1080, 13.3"		Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
LP133WF7-SPA1, , 1920x1080, 13.3"		Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Chi Mei CMN8201, , 2160x1440, 13"		Dell Latitude 5300
LGD05ED-133WF6, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display
1%
3%
2%
5%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
64.1
65.3
2%
66.1
3%
65.2
2%
68.1
6%
68.2
6%
sRGB Coverage
95.2
95.9
1%
97.8
3%
97
2%
99.3
4%
94.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.8
66.6
1%
67.8
3%
67.3
2%
69.7
6%
68.7
4%
Response Times
-6%
25%
-2%
13%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
55 ?(26, 29)
57.6 ?(28.4, 29.2)
-5%
39.2 ?(20.4, 18.8)
29%
59.2 ?(30, 29.2)
-8%
43.2 ?(23.6, 19.6)
21%
38 ?(19.6, 18.4)
31%
Response Time Black / White *
32 ?(18, 14)
34 ?(18.4, 15.6)
-6%
25.6 ?(14, 11.6)
20%
30.8 ?(16.8, 14)
4%
30.4 ?(17.2, 13.2)
5%
27.2 ?(16, 11.2)
15%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(62)
60240 ?(30)
Screen
0%
-9%
-21%
-21%
-14%
Brightness middle
356
356
0%
470.1
32%
319
-10%
356
0%
326
-8%
Brightness
336
336
0%
443
32%
306
-9%
346
3%
313
-7%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
88
0%
90
2%
86
-2%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.16
0.16
-0%
0.38
-138%
0.15
6%
0.35
-119%
0.27
-69%
Contrast
2225
2225
0%
1237
-44%
2127
-4%
1017
-54%
1207
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.6
3.6
-0%
2.47
31%
6.1
-69%
3.3
8%
3.2
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
5.5
-0%
5.73
-4%
9.7
-76%
8.7
-58%
6.3
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.11
1.1
1%
1.52
-37%
1
10%
1.1
1%
1.6
-44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.7
4.7
-0%
3.7
21%
8.6
-83%
5.8
-23%
3.8
19%
Gamma
2.92 75%
2.48 89%
2.35 94%
2.62 84%
2.21 100%
2.14 103%
CCT
6222 104%
6374 102%
7373 88%
6613 98%
6670 97%
6900 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
61.3
0%
62
2%
61.9
1%
64.1
5%
63.8
5%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
96
95.7
0%
98.2
2%
96.8
1%
99.4
4%
94.8
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -0%
6% / -3%
-7% / -14%
-1% / -12%
4% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
55 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U: Ø416 (400.15-479.45)
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø569 (552-686)
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø483 (463.47-532.04)
Dell Latitude 3400 Intel Core i3-8145U, Intel Core i3-8145U: Ø313 (269.14-350.09)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years)
250 Points +98%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U
179 Points +42%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel Core i7-8565U
175 Points +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U
158 Points +25%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
154 Points +22%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
141 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
126 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
126 Points 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years)
1978 Points +311%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U
686 (552min - 686max) Points +43%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel Core i7-8565U
685 Points +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U
623 (498.14min - 623.19max) Points +30%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
532 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
481 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
481 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
350 Points -27%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2.75 - 3.62, n=11, last 2 years)
3.18 Points +122%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.63 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
1.43 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
1.43 Points 0%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.5 - 34.3, n=11, last 2 years)
24 Points +335%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
5.52 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
5.52 Points 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U
5.41 Points -2%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11845 - 82102, n=3, last 2 years)
36307 Points +466%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
6410 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
6410 Points 0%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13726 - 68857, n=3, last 2 years)
47582 Points +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
22657 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
  ()
22657 Points 0%
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
7069 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
22657 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6410 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
5.52 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
42.86 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.43 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
126 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
46.42 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
481 Points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years)
6447 Points +79%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4138 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4134 Points +15%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4086 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3832 Points +6%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3695 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3606 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
3606 Points 0%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years)
10480 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
9029 Points +23%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8863 Points +21%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
8535 Points +16%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
8356 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7982 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
7351 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
7351 Points 0%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years)
8633 Points +57%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7171 Points +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7066 Points +29%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
6623 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6273 Points +14%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
5739 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
5484 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
5484 Points 0%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years)
8124 Points +157%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3158 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
3158 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3154 Points 0%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3142 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3050 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3005 Points -5%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
2855 Points -10%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3668 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
3629 Points +11%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
3587 Points +10%
Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3546 Points +9%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
3453 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
3260 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
3260 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1739 - 4730, n=2, last 2 years)
3235 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5071 Points +16%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4958 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4896 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
4356 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  ()
4356 Points 0%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ
4336 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1609 - 5271, n=2, last 2 years)
3440 Points -21%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3260 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4356 points
PCMark 10 Score
3606 points
Help
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ		Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L		HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ		Dell Latitude 5300
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)		Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L		Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-2%
-57%
-9%
13%
35%
8%
Write 4K
129.4
120.7
-7%
64.3
-50%
119.2
-8%
144.1
11%
191.2
48%
135.2 ?(87.2 - 169.7, n=15)
4%
Read 4K
41.6
58.5
41%
34.13
-18%
41.43
0%
63.5
53%
53.1
28%
44.6 ?(36 - 58.2, n=15)
7%
Write Seq
2334
1491
-36%
466.4
-80%
1240
-47%
1496
-36%
1768
-24%
2091 ?(1761 - 2343, n=14)
-10%
Read Seq
2151
2760
28%
498.3
-77%
1668
-22%
2677
24%
1710
-21%
2097 ?(1359 - 2516, n=14)
-3%
Write 4K Q32T1
234
237.5
1%
193.3
-17%
381.7
63%
357.4
53%
575
146%
370 ?(208 - 526, n=15)
58%
Read 4K Q32T1
325.7
336.1
3%
179.7
-45%
371.5
14%
482.3
48%
654
101%
372 ?(149.5 - 514, n=15)
14%
Write Seq Q32T1
2348
1512
-36%
396.8
-83%
1369
-42%
1558
-34%
2544
8%
2308 ?(1896 - 2354, n=15)
-2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3563
3154
-11%
547
-85%
2652
-26%
3021
-15%
3433
-4%
3395 ?(2268 - 3569, n=15)
-5%
Write 4K Q8T8
1065
989
208 ?()
Read 4K Q8T8
891
883
383 ?()
AS SSD
26%
-63%
-12%
21%
30%
5%
Seq Read
2234
2689
20%
488.2
-78%
2123
-5%
2742
23%
2934
31%
2276 ?(992 - 2980, n=15)
2%
Seq Write
2110
1462
-31%
403.2
-81%
744
-65%
1511
-28%
2407
14%
1486 ?(391 - 2187, n=15)
-30%
4K Read
45.78
63.8
39%
31.07
-32%
43.02
-6%
66.3
45%
48.31
6%
49.6 ?(40.3 - 60.3, n=15)
8%
4K Write
102.7
139.8
36%
70.8
-31%
117.4
14%
175.2
71%
179.7
75%
129.5 ?(78 - 188.4, n=15)
26%
4K-64 Read
903
865
-4%
255.1
-72%
680
-25%
873
-3%
1296
44%
683 ?(504 - 947, n=15)
-24%
4K-64 Write
986
1041
6%
156.5
-84%
1039
5%
594
-40%
1459
48%
895 ?(282 - 1970, n=15)
-9%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.037
42%
0.093
-45%
0.057
11%
0.035
45%
0.103
-61%
0.06433 ?(0.046 - 0.089, n=15)
-1%
Access Time Write *
0.042
0.024
43%
0.048
-14%
0.051
-21%
0.021
50%
0.021
50%
0.04793 ?(0.022 - 0.104, n=15)
-14%
Score Read
1172
1198
2%
335
-71%
935
-20%
1213
3%
1638
40%
960 ?(733 - 1212, n=15)
-18%
Score Write
1300
1328
2%
268
-79%
1230
-5%
920
-29%
1879
45%
1173 ?(593 - 2214, n=15)
-10%
Score Total
3075
3095
1%
781
-75%
2586
-16%
2712
-12%
4334
41%
2598 ?(1649 - 3862, n=15)
-16%
Copy ISO MB/s
1008
1290
28%
208.1
-79%
1725
71%
1474 ?(1008 - 1962, n=10)
46%
Copy Program MB/s
237.6
436.5
84%
74.3
-69%
418.3
76%
426 ?(71 - 847, n=10)
79%
Copy Game MB/s
572
1147
101%
164.5
-71%
687
20%
760 ?(278 - 1632, n=10)
33%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 16%
-60% / -61%
-11% / -11%
17% / 18%
33% / 32%
7% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
Sequential Read: 2496 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2325 MB/s
512K Read: 1710 MB/s
512K Write: 530 MB/s
4K Read: 41.06 MB/s
4K Write: 117.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 295.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 216.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years)
9532 Points +187%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
3325 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (2986 - 3325, n=3)
3101 Points -7%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1927 Points -42%
Dell Latitude 5300
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8365U
1926 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1841 Points -45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1806 Points -46%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
1738 Points -48%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5577 - 58319, n=30, last 2 years)
37354 Points +123%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (15850 - 18140, n=3)
16926 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
16787 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10322 Points -39%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
10255 Points -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
10126 Points -40%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U
9478 Points -44%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years)
6964 Points +210%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U
2245 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (2064 - 2312, n=3)
2207 Points -2%
Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1339 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8565U
1278 Points -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1266 Points -44%
3DMark 11 Performance
3425 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
10619 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
2025 points
Help
The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Rocket League
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook
  (48 - 187, n=48, last 2 years)
118 fps +211%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (38 - 39, n=2)
38.5 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
38 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.7 fps -53%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.2 fps -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
16.9 fps -56%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 71, n=51, last 2 years)
41.2 fps +325%
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
9.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (7.4 - 9.7, n=2)
8.55 fps -12%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6.5 fps -33%
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
37.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (29.8 - 37.5, n=2)
33.7 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
25.7 fps -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
23.3 fps -38%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.7 fps -45%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
12.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (9.7 - 12.4, n=2)
11.1 fps -10%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6.6 fps -47%
Rocket League
1280x720 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
138.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (52.6 - 138.1, n=2)
95.4 fps -31%
1920x1080 Performance
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
78.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (42.2 - 78.9, n=2)
60.6 fps -23%
1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
47.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (26.9 - 47.9, n=2)
37.4 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
27.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
  (17.4 - 27.7, n=2)
22.6 fps -18%
lowmed.highultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 38 9.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 37.5 12.4
Rocket League (2017) 138.1 47.9 27.7
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ		Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L		HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ		Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L		Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Noise
2%
6%
1%
4%
5%
off / environment *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
28.8
5%
Idle Minimum *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
28.8
5%
Idle Average *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
28.8
5%
Idle Maximum *
30.2
29.2
3%
28.5
6%
29.2
3%
29.2
3%
29.8
1%
Load Average *
34.3
34.8
-1%
31.3
9%
35
-2%
31.7
8%
31.7
8%
Load Maximum *
34.3
34.8
-1%
33.5
2%
35
-2%
33
4%
33.2
3%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB(A)
Load
34.3 / 34.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.731.833.730.7253231.232.6323135.632.934.735.64031.130.433.231.15032.330.733.432.36329.828.327.929.88029.329.926.229.310032.12827.332.112531.124.82731.116024.424.523.624.420024.322.723.324.325022.922.322.722.931521.821.621.321.840021.321.820.221.350020.620.219.320.663019.52018.319.580020.620.41820.610002121.317.721125020.720.617.220.7160021.621.917.221.6200023.223.717.223.22500232317.52331502424.117.424400024.824.817.824.8500023.223.317.923.263002120.817.921800019.519.51819.51000018.718.71818.71250018.218.117.818.21600018.218.117.718.2SPL34.434.430.234.4N2.121.42.1median 21.6median 21.8median 18median 21.6Delta21.81.52hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X395
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
Vega 6, R3 PRO 3300U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ		Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L		HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ		Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L		Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Dell Latitude 5300
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8365U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Heat
4%
-4%
-11%
2%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
38.4
44.6
-16%
38
1%
41.7
-9%
39.7
-3%
43
-12%
Maximum Bottom *
39.7
41.1
-4%
45.4
-14%
50.1
-26%
44.4
-12%
53
-34%
Idle Upper Side *
28.1
23.2
17%
26.4
6%
27.8
1%
24.7
12%
23.9
15%
Idle Bottom *
28
22.8
19%
30
-7%
30.2
-8%
25.3
10%
24.7
12%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 32 °C38.4 °C37 °C 
 30.5 °C36.9 °C36.7 °C 
 27.9 °C28.5 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 33.2 °C
38.8 °C39.7 °C33.4 °C
31.8 °C36.4 °C31.7 °C
29.2 °C30.1 °C28.8 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Average: 33.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34 °C | Room Temperature 22.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.733.733.72535.932.635.93135.434.735.44030.933.230.95035.333.435.36328.127.928.18028.126.228.110029.427.329.412530.52730.516037.923.637.920040.123.340.125045.522.745.531559.321.359.340063.720.263.750057.619.357.663056.418.356.4800711871100068.317.768.3125062.117.262.1160059.117.259.1200060.217.260.225006417.564315060.617.460.6400064.417.864.4500059.517.959.5630058.617.958.680006118611000061.21861.21250058.817.858.8160005017.750SPL75.530.275.5N361.436median 59.3median 18median 59.3Delta6.11.56.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad X395Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad X395 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (71 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.55 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 6.3 / 9.3 Watt
Load midlight 34 / 42 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"		Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"		HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"		Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3"		Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 2160x1440, 13"		Dell Latitude 5300
i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"		Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
 		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-10%
4%
-14%
-20%
-12%
-13%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
4
3.4
15%
3.8
5%
3.46
13%
3.84
4%
3.8
5%
5.15 ?(4 - 6.3, n=2)
-29%
4.47 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=60, last 2 years)
-12%
Idle Average *
6.3
5.6
11%
7.5
-19%
5.88
7%
7.68
-22%
6.9
-10%
7.75 ?(6.3 - 9.2, n=2)
-23%
7.6 ?(2.5 - 16, n=60, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Maximum *
9.3
8.7
6%
8.6
8%
9.12
2%
9.36
-1%
7.5
19%
9.45 ?(9.3 - 9.6, n=2)
-2%
9.51 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=60, last 2 years)
-2%
Load Average *
34
43.6
-28%
33.1
3%
45.6
-34%
43.2
-27%
41.4
-22%
36 ?(34 - 38, n=2)
-6%
46.2 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=58, last 2 years)
-36%
Load Maximum *
42
65
-55%
31.8
24%
65.9
-57%
64.8
-54%
63.1
-50%
44 ?(42 - 46, n=2)
-5%
68.4 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=60, last 2 years)
-63%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 55min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 47min
Lenovo ThinkPad X395
R3 PRO 3300U, Vega 6, 48 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh		HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3
i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh		Dell Latitude 5300
i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh		Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh		Huawei Matebook 13-53010FYW
i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 41.7 Wh		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-20%
0%
-24%
-29%
-23%
17%
Reader / Idle
1103
1381
25%
1416
28%
1750 ?(581 - 3407, n=12, last 2 years)
59%
H.264
620
764
23%
600
-3%
911 ?(527 - 1298, n=27, last 2 years)
47%
WiFi v1.3
655
499
-24%
602
-8%
500
-24%
492
-25%
419
-36%
726 ?(389 - 1585, n=62, last 2 years)
11%
Load
227
94
-59%
189
-17%
91
-60%
88
-61%
115.1 ?(57 - 197, n=48, last 2 years)
-49%

Pros

+ HDMI 2.0
+ 出色的输入设备
+ 智能卡插槽
+ 众多安全功能
+ 明亮且对比度高的显示屏
+ 三年保固
+ 安静凉爽
+ 低功耗
+ 图形性能优于英特尔型号
+ 续航时间长

Cons

- 位置尴尬的microSD卡插槽
- 负载下CPU性能迅速下降
- 系统限制不插电时CPU的性能
- 没有Thunderbolt 3
- 载RAM
- 风扇通风孔放置不良
- 屏幕响应时间慢

Verdict - A great subnotebook with bearable CPU throttling

The Lenovo ThinkPad X395 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Lenovo.
The Lenovo ThinkPad X395 laptop review. Test device courtesy of Lenovo.

当我们在四月份进行评测时，配备英特尔CPU的ThinkPad X390得分为90％，比ThinkPad X395高出1％。不过，这并未使前者的整体表现更好，因为自4月以来我们已换成了新的评分系统。ThinkPad X390和X395彼此差不多，但是它们都有自己的特质。

但是，X395提供的安全功能比X390多，并且图形性能显着提高，同时在负载下使用的功率也更少。因此，在直接比较中，X395可能会领先于X390。

话虽这么说，虽然X395提供的GPU性能要比X390好，但在持续负载下，它也能更加节制CPU。联想似乎刻意这样做，以使X395安静，凉爽且低功耗地运行，尽管它以牺牲CPU性能为代价。顺便说一句，X395还缺少Thunderbolt 3端口，该端口目前仍是英特尔专有的接口，但是它确实具有HDMI 2.0而不是旧的1.4标准。

话虽这么说，虽然X395提供的GPU性能要比X390好，但在持续负载下，它也能更加节制CPU。联想似乎刻意这样做，以使X395安静，凉爽且低功耗地运行，尽管它以牺牲CPU性能为代价。顺便说一句，X395还缺少Thunderbolt 3端口，该端口目前仍是英特尔专有的接口，但是它确实具有HDMI 2.0而不是旧的1.4标准。

联想ThinkPad X395是一款出色的办公笔记本电脑，在我们的测试中几乎没有发现任何弱点。 AMD机器至少与Intel机器相同，但运行起来更加安静，凉爽且功耗低。 X395也比X390具有更强大的GPU性能，这是一个优势。

联想目前以927欧元（约合1022美元）的价格出售我们测试的这款配置，但第三方零售商可能会很快开始以更实惠的价格提供。总体而言，我们不仅将X395推荐给追求坚固的13.3英子笔记本的企业用户，而且也推荐给个人。

Lenovo ThinkPad X395 - 10/14/2019 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
87 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
64 / 75 → 85%
Weight
72 / 20-75 → 94%
Battery
87%
Display
88%
Games Performance
56 / 78 → 72%
Application Performance
77 / 85 → 91%
Temperature
93%
Noise
97%
Audio
60 / 91 → 66%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Average
77%
89%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad X395笔记本电脑评测：争夺商务笔记本电脑霸权
Christian Hintze, 2020-02- 2 (Update: 2020-02- 2)