酷比魔方 Thinker Laptop (Core m3-7Y30, 8 GB, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Dell XPS 13 9365-4537 2-in-1 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 448 cd/m²
Contrast: 1723:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47.91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
46.36% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Cube Thinker m3 Panasonic MEI96A2, , 3000x2000, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 3000x2000, 13.5" | Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T AU Optronics AUO106D B125HANO1.0, , 1920x1080, 12.5" | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T AUO B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 42% | -5% | 37% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 46.36 | 67 45% | 43.9 -5% | 65.1 40% |
sRGB Coverage | 69.7 | 95.8 37% | 65.7 -6% | 93 33% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 47.91 | 68.9 44% | 45.38 -5% | 66.5 39% |
Response Times | 20% | 54% | 31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 65 ? | 48.4 ? 26% | 28 ? 57% | 29 ? 55% |
Response Time Black / White * | 38 ? | 32.8 ? 14% | 19 ? 50% | 22 ? 42% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 192 ? -4% | ||
Screen | 15% | -25% | -40% | |
Brightness middle | 448 | 430.9 -4% | 379 -15% | 302 -33% |
Brightness | 461 | 410 -11% | 364 -21% | 298 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 93 15% | 88 9% | 90 11% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.254 2% | 0.32 -23% | 0.21 19% |
Contrast | 1723 | 1696 -2% | 1184 -31% | 1438 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 2.06 38% | 4.78 -45% | 6.33 -92% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.91 | 8.28 -40% | 11.89 -101% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.53 | 2.22 12% | 4.27 -69% | 8.13 -221% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.13 103% | 2.34 94% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 6563 99% | 6520 100% | 7376 88% | 6811 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 44 | 64 45% | 42 -5% | 60 36% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 70 | 96 37% | 65 -7% | 93 33% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 26% /
21% | 8% /
-10% | 9% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31 ms rise | |
↘ 34 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ||
≤ 75 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 75 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Cube Thinker m3 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2881 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3801 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3656 points | |
Help |
Cube Thinker m3 | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe | Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Lite-On CV1-8B128 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 86% | -44% | -5% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.179 | 0.037 79% | 0.183 -2% | 0.073 59% |
Access Time Read * | 0.128 | 0.049 62% | 0.166 -30% | 0.109 15% |
4K-64 Write | 290.2 | 281.4 -3% | 21.55 -93% | 105.8 -64% |
4K-64 Read | 324.6 | 1409 334% | 82.9 -74% | 295.1 -9% |
4K Write | 55 | 85 55% | 27.49 -50% | 57 4% |
4K Read | 26.4 | 34.31 30% | 15.9 -40% | 28.29 7% |
Seq Write | 362.8 | 275.2 -24% | 130.3 -64% | 175.6 -52% |
Seq Read | 483.7 | 1223 153% | 480.9 -1% | 486.3 1% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop i5 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4571 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 682 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 317 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 180 points | |
Help |
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 | |
Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T | |
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
Cube Thinker m3 |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 31.45 | 17.64 | 14.15 | 4.57 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 31.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7.7 °C / -13.9 F).
Cube Thinker m3 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.31 Watt |
Idle | 4.5 / 10.3 / 11.5 Watt |
Load |
23.3 / 21.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Cube Thinker m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, , IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 12.5" | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, IPS with 72% NTSC, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 23% | 23% | 32% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 3.7 18% | 3.4 24% | 2.7 40% |
Idle Average * | 10.3 | 7.4 28% | 7 32% | 2.7 74% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.5 | 8.2 29% | 7.6 34% | 7.2 37% |
Load Average * | 23.3 | 17 27% | 19 18% | 22 6% |
Load Maximum * | 21.1 | 18.6 12% | 20.1 5% | 20.5 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Cube Thinker m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book Core i5 6300U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), 78 Wh | Asus TransformerBook T302CA-FL010T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 54 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 50% | 156% | 67% | |
Reader / Idle | 610 | 1070 75% | 1072 76% | 1027 68% |
WiFi v1.3 | 253 | 402 59% | 805 218% | 386 53% |
Load | 132 | 153 16% | 362 174% | 239 81% |
H.264 | 604 | 696 |
Pros
Cons
酷比魔方Thinker是一台典型的中国笔记本电脑:有很多炫目的闪光点,但在其他时候,难免有所不足。成功打动人心的设计,与一个有些毛病的屏幕(可以被修复)和具有不同的高度按键的键盘形成对比。由于电池续航时间短,用户不能长时间享受其良好的性能。而充电噪音可能会让那些敏感的用户感到烦恼。
优点在于,在这个价格下,它拥有一很好的显示效果、强大的基础、优秀的性能。更重要的是:一个无与伦比的价格。同样,缺少保修这点也是在购买时应该被考虑的因素。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Cube Thinker m3
-
06/29/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar