宏碁 TravelMate P249-M-3895 (酷睿 i3) 笔记本电脑简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP ProBook 440 G3 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 (jseb) | |
Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 217 cd/m²
Contrast: 436:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.84% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
34.69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G3 TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 TN LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 14% | 13% | 16% | 10% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 34.69 | 39.6 14% | 39.1 13% | 40.21 16% | 38.15 10% | 36.97 7% |
sRGB Coverage | 52.2 | 59.1 13% | 58.8 13% | 60.5 16% | 56.7 9% | 55.6 7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 35.84 | 40.94 14% | 40.41 13% | 41.55 16% | 39.48 10% | 38.2 7% |
Response Times | -16% | 1% | -14% | 12% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 46 ? -12% | 40 ? 2% | 47 ? -15% | 44 ? -7% | 42 ? -2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 27.6 ? -20% | 23.2 ? -1% | 26 ? -13% | 16 ? 30% | 28 ? -22% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
Screen | 13% | 33% | 3% | 17% | 43% | |
Brightness middle | 218 | 246 13% | 233 7% | 206 -6% | 249 14% | 230 6% |
Brightness | 214 | 215 0% | 221 3% | 193 -10% | 238 11% | 226 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 84 4% | 88 9% | 87 7% | 87 7% | 86 6% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.5 -0% | 0.3 40% | 0.48 4% | 0.41 18% | 0.2 60% |
Contrast | 436 | 492 13% | 777 78% | 429 -2% | 607 39% | 1150 164% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.68 | 8.6 26% | 4.43 62% | 11 6% | 9.09 22% | 5.07 57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.66 | 19.57 -11% | 14.64 17% | 10.07 43% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.1 | 9.36 29% | 3.78 71% | 11.51 12% | 9.92 24% | 3.64 72% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.31 95% | 2.23 99% | 2.42 91% | 2.46 89% |
CCT | 15815 41% | 11226 58% | 7171 91% | 13671 48% | 11177 58% | 6521 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 33 | 37.8 15% | 37.3 13% | 38.46 17% | 36.5 11% | 35 6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 52 | 59.1 14% | 58.7 13% | 60.61 17% | 56.7 9% | 55 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
9% | 16% /
24% | 2% /
4% | 13% /
15% | 13% /
28% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3149 points | |
Help |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | HP ProBook 440 G3 Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 4% | 2110% | -23% | 7741% | 7452% | |
Read Seq | 104.7 | 124.8 19% | 497.6 375% | 108.9 4% | 510 387% | 484.1 362% |
Write Seq | 104.2 | 123.6 19% | 180 73% | 103.2 -1% | 267.2 156% | 449.8 332% |
Read 512 | 39.38 | 42.34 8% | 297.1 654% | 347.6 783% | 399.1 913% | |
Write 512 | 58.3 | 61.9 6% | 169.1 190% | 267.5 359% | 355.1 509% | |
Read 4k | 0.501 | 0.559 12% | 18.91 3674% | 0.362 -28% | 33.12 6511% | 33.44 6575% |
Write 4k | 1.368 | 1.277 -7% | 37.13 2614% | 0.946 -31% | 95.9 6910% | 67.5 4834% |
Read 4k QD32 | 1.395 | 1.179 -15% | 95.7 6760% | 0.721 -48% | 392.8 28058% | 368.5 26316% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.412 | 1.304 -8% | 37.26 2539% | 0.901 -36% | 266.4 18767% | 280.6 19773% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1221 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 35.4 | 21.1 | 16.3 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 33.8 / 33.8 / 33.8 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33.8 / 34.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 1.8 / 2.3 Watt |
Idle | 6.1 / 8.4 / 10.2 Watt |
Load |
27 / 26 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Pros
Cons
TravelMate P249-M系列的入门机型搭载了一颗Skylake架构酷睿i3处理器。因此,这台测试机的性能足够日常使用的需要。它在使用中几乎不会变热,同时也十分安静。如果想要完全无声运行的话,用户可以方便地打开TravelMate的维护底盖将机械硬盘更换为固态硬盘。它的电池续航十分不错,背光键盘也很实用。生产商为这台机型提供了三年的质保。不过,和最近测试过的其他TravelMate同系列机型的全高清屏幕相似的是,它的屏幕品质也较低:昏暗,低对比度且视角有限。
只需支付550欧元(约4011人民币)用户就可以得到TravelMate P249-M-3895。这台14寸笔记本电脑是个不错的入门级商务设备。它最大的弱点在于屏幕品质。
如果你需要一块绚丽的IPS屏幕的话,我们建议考虑TravelMate X349-M。这个机型同样有搭配酷睿i3处理器的机型,售价不足600欧元(约4376人民币)。相比入门机型P249-M,X349-M提供了全高清IPS屏幕,固态硬盘和轻盈时尚的铝合金机身。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Acer TravelMate P249-M-3895
- 11/03/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck