宏碁 TravelMate P648-G2 (i7, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0
Brand: Acer

宏碁TravelMate P648-G2的前代机型在和戴尔、联想和惠普的设备的竞争中取得了非常优秀的第四名成绩。从我们的测试结果来看，这台宏碁设备由于采用了最新硬件依然和竞争对手表现相近，这也应该足以让它保持高性能商务笔记本电脑的地位。

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 07/01/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Windows Kaby Lake

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 (TravelMate P6 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-7500U 2 x 2.7 - 3.5 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1050 MHz, QuickSync, 单通道

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, 2内存槽 (1 已占用, 1 空闲)

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, 256 GB

, 1076 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC3225

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: SD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0, 华为 LTE, LTE

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.2 x 328.7 x 235.5

Battery

54 Wh, 4850 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清摄像头
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, Foxit PhantomPDF, McAfee LiveSafe Internet Security (试用版), 微软Office (试用版), 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.7 kg, Power Supply: 312 g

Price

1500 Euro

Links

Acer homepage
Acer notebook section
TravelMate P6 (Series)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 14 E5470	136 MB/s +75%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0	77.8 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE	76.6 MB/s -2%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P	19.6 MB/s -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 14 E5470	207 MB/s +137%
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE	88.7 MB/s +2%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0	87.3 MB/s
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P	24.6 MB/s -72%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	512 MBit/s +1%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	509 MBit/s 0%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	509 MBit/s
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	241 MBit/s -53%
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	688 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	657 MBit/s -5%
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (jseb)	618 MBit/s -10%
HP EliteBook 840 G4-Z2V49ET ABD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (jseb)	579 MBit/s -16%


235 cd/m²	261 cd/m²	258 cd/m²
238 cd/m²	275 cd/m²	259 cd/m²
241 cd/m²	257 cd/m²	254 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 275 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 253.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 275 cd/m²
Contrast: 1100:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.91 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 B140HAN03_1, , 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 14 E5470 LP140WF3, , 1920x1080, 14"	Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P LP156WF6-SPP1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Dell Latitude 14 Rugged 5414 AU Optronics B140HAN, , 1920x1080, 14"
Display		-7%	-6%	-6%	-42%
Display P3 Coverage	67.2	61.4 -9%	64.8 -4%	65.4 -3%	37.23 -45%
sRGB Coverage	90.8	85.9 -5%	84.8 -7%	84.6 -7%	55.2 -39%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.4	62.4 -6%	62 -7%	61.8 -7%	38.48 -42%
Response Times		-18%	-4%	22%	-37%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	38 ?(20, 18)	41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2) -9%	39 ?(15, 24) -3%	20 ?(9, 11) 47%	49 ?(17, 32) -29%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(14, 11)	31.6 ?(18.8, 12.8) -26%	26 ?(5, 21) -4%	26 ?(13, 13) -4%	36 ?(14, 22) -44%
PWM Frequency				50 ?(40)	198 ?(90)
Screen		-8%	-14%	-7%	-25%
Brightness middle	275	311 13%	323 17%	288 5%	1152 319%
Brightness	253	288 14%	316 25%	277 9%	1067 322%
Brightness Distribution	85	85 0%	79 -7%	83 -2%	86 1%
Black Level *	0.25	0.24 4%	0.57 -128%	0.27 -8%	1.08 -332%
Contrast	1100	1296 18%	567 -48%	1067 -3%	1067 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.49	5.5 -58%	3.68 -5%	4.7 -35%	10.04 -188%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.77	9 -33%	8.33 -23%	11.7 -73%	19.43 -187%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.91	6.2 -26%	2.99 39%	3.1 37%	10.47 -113%
Gamma	2.39 ^92%	2.02 ^109%	2.49 ^88%	2.7 ^81%	2.42 ^91%
CCT	6271 ^104%	5950 ^109%	6572 ^99%	6603 ^98%	5576 ^117%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	55.96 -5%	55 -7%	61.9 5%	35 -41%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	91	85.77 -6%	85 -7%	90.3 -1%	63 -31%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -9%	-8% / -11%	3% / -3%	-35% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20 ms rise
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Intel Core i7-7500U	143 Points +1%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel Core i7-7500U	142 Points
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel Core i5-6440HQ	128 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel Core i7-6500U	110 Points -23%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Intel Core i5-6200U	105 Points -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel Core i5-6440HQ	501 Points +47%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Intel Core i7-7500U	360 Points +5%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel Core i7-7500U	341.4 Points
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel Core i7-6500U	284 Points -17%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Intel Core i5-6200U	280 Points -18%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

341.4 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

142 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

39 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4025 Points +15%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	3515 Points
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	3511 Points 0%
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 HD Graphics 530, 6440HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	3465 Points -1%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU	2991 Points -15%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4978 Points +7%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4639 Points
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 HD Graphics 530, 6440HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4612 Points -1%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256	4594 Points -1%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU	3842 Points -17%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3515 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4639 points
Help

	Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Lite-On CV1-8B256
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		172%	-13%	8%	-2%
Read Seq	518	1827 253%	465.4 -10%	512 -1%	531 3%
Write Seq	267.2	1383 418%	363.1 36%	415.8 56%	358.8 34%
Read 512	562	814 45%	338.4 -40%	404.4 -28%	384.8 -32%
Write 512	263.5	1098 317%	246.1 -7%	382.2 45%	363 38%
Read 4k	32.88	61 86%	25.83 -21%	24.05 -27%	31.3 -5%
Write 4k	85.6	172.2 101%	80.3 -6%	87.6 2%	80.3 -6%
Read 4k QD32	351.3	601 71%	246.1 -30%		239.4 -32%
Write 4k QD32	265.2	495.6 87%	197.7 -25%		225.3 -15%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A

Sequential Read: 518 MB/s

Sequential Write: 267.2 MB/s

512K Read: 562 MB/s

512K Write: 263.5 MB/s

4K Read: 32.88 MB/s

4K Write: 85.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 351.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 265.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1641 Points +12%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1462 Points
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel HD Graphics 530, Intel Core i5-6440HQ	1310 Points -10%
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1274 Points -13%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1142 Points -22%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	8971 Points +23%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	7264 Points
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	6674 Points -8%
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel HD Graphics 530, Intel Core i5-6440HQ	6185 Points -15%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	5834 Points -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1093 Points +33%
Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	821 Points
Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	814 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel HD Graphics 530, Intel Core i5-6440HQ	750 Points -9%
Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	613 Points -25%

3DMark 11 Performance		1591 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6159 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		768 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	42.91	24.62	20.22	6.43
Thief (2014)	19	12.3	10.2	4.9
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17.09	9.939	5.216	3.675

Noise Level

Idle		30.6 / 30.6 / 31 dB(A)
Load		34.5 / 32.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


34.9 °C	35.3 °C	34 °C
31.2 °C	39.1 °C	30 °C
26.6 °C	27.6 °C	28.1 °C

Maximum: 39.1 °C
Average: 31.9 °C


32.5 °C	35 °C	32.8 °C
30.7 °C	32.6 °C	31.3 °C
27.2 °C	28 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 35 °C
Average: 30.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.4 °C / -0.7 F).

Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.18 / 0.47 Watt
Idle	4.8 / 7.9 / 10.7 Watt
Load	35 / 31.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 14"	Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Lite-On CV1-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption		-3%	-9%	4%	-5%
Idle Minimum *	4.8	3.84 20%	4.1 15%	4.7 2%	5.3 -10%
Idle Average *	7.9	6.3 20%	8.1 -3%	8 -1%	9.3 -18%
Idle Maximum *	10.7	8.6 20%	11.4 -7%	9.8 8%	11.5 -7%
Load Average *	35	41.9 -20%	33.5 4%	29.7 15%	30.8 12%
Load Maximum *	31.6	48.7 -54%	49 -55%	32.6 -3%	32 -1%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		18h 07min
WiFi Surfing		0h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 55min

	Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 54 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh	Dell Latitude 14 E5470 6440HQ, HD Graphics 530, 62 Wh	Toshiba Tecra Z50-C-10P 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh	Acer TravelMate P648-M-757N 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 54 Wh
Battery Runtime		-5%	-26%	-47%	-8%
Reader / Idle	1087	1252 15%	913 -16%		1083 0%
WiFi v1.3	672	496 -26%	432 -36%	354 -47%	543 -19%
Load	115	110 -4%	85 -26%		110 -4%
H.264		711	411		545

Pros

+ Kaby Lake 处理器

+ 快速固态硬盘和大容量机械硬盘

+ 运行中非常安静

+ 低表面温度

Cons

- 键盘稍显绵软

- 散热风扇时断时续

- 屏幕亮度对于户外阳光下使用来说不够高

TravelMate P648 G2 M 7619是一台轻盈坚固的笔记本电脑。你一天内的一切工作任务将会由更新后的Kaby Lake处理器，更快的固态硬盘，更大容量的机械硬盘提供支持。它的屏幕也足够明亮，可以适合光线较亮环境中使用的需要。宏碁还提供了对应的扩展坞帮助提供更多的借口。它的键盘反馈稍弱，而宏碁也需要改进它时快时慢的风扇控制设计。

宏碁又一次更新了它的TravelMate P6系列。不过除了最新Kaby Lake处理器和更大机械硬盘外，它的变化并不大。

TravelMate P648 G2 M 7619会十分适合正在寻找除联想，戴尔和惠普之外的产品的用户考虑。我们的测试机售价约1500欧元（约1700美元）。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Acer TravelMate P648-G2-M-73T0 - 2017-06-06 06/06/2017 v6 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

93 / 98 → 95%

Keyboard

88%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

68 / 80 → 85%

Weight

67 / 20-67 → 99%

Battery

97%

Display

89%

Games Performance

55 / 68 → 81%

Application Performance

87 / 92 → 95%

Temperature

94%

Noise

93%

Audio

66%

Camera

37 / 85 → 43%

Average

79%

90%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 宏碁 TravelMate P648-G2 (i7, 256 GB) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Mike Wobker, 2017-07- 1 (Update: 2017-07- 1)