Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 变形本简短评测

Name: Trekstor SurfTab duo W3
Brand: Trekstor

低价变形本。 Trestor的11.6英寸变形本售价大概在230到250欧元（合约245到267美元）。购买者将会得到一台有着Cherry Trail处理器和广视角全高清屏幕的设备。虽然这台设备电池续航时间上表现不佳。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 02/13/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of Trekstor

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 (Surftab Series)

Processor

Intel Atom x5-Z8300 4 x 1.4 - 1.8 GHz, Cherry Trail

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Core: 500 MHz, 单通道, 20.19.15.4474

Memory

2048 MB

, DDR3-1600, 单通道, 板载 memory

Display

11.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 190 PPI, 电容, 十点触控, 支持主动手势, Chi Mei N116HSE-DA2, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen

Storage

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 17.6 GB free

Connections

3 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 复合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD, Sensors: 加速度计

Networking

Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.5 x 299 x 188

Battery

8.2 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 32 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 电源适配器 (micro-USB 3.0 转 Type-A 插槽), McAfee LiveSafe - Internet Security (trial), MS Office 365 (trial), 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

1.46 kg

Price

249 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP x360 310 G1 Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Medion Akoya E2215T HP x2 210 G1 Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR DIN A4 ❌


228 cd/m²	246 cd/m²	235 cd/m²
230 cd/m²	257 cd/m²	242 cd/m²
206 cd/m²	230 cd/m²	243 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei N116HSE-DA2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 257 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 235.2 cd/m² Minimum: 22.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 212 cd/m²
Contrast: 1028:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"	Medion Akoya E2215T IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"	HP x360 310 G1 TN, 1366x768, 11.6"	Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"	HP x2 210 G1 IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"	Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"
Display		-19%	-37%	-13%	-28%	-14%
Display P3 Coverage	63	48.12 -24%	37.47 -41%	52.5 -17%	42.77 -32%	51.1 -19%
sRGB Coverage	83.9	71.7 -15%	56.4 -33%	76.3 -9%	63.7 -24%	75.2 -10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.3	49.78 -19%	38.71 -37%	54.1 -12%	44.22 -28%	52.7 -14%
Response Times		-7%	-21%	-2%	-21%	-5%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	37 ?(16, 21)	31 ?(13, 18) 16%	43 ?(20, 23) -16%	29 ?(8, 21) 22%	43 ?(21, 22) -16%	31.6 ?(13.6, 18) 15%
Response Time Black / White *	20 ?(6, 14)	26 ?(6, 20) -30%	25 ?(7, 18) -25%	25 ?(9, 16) -25%	25 ?(10, 15) -25%	24.8 ?(6, 28.8) -24%
PWM Frequency		50 ?(20)	396 ?(90)	877 ?(90)	50 ?(60)	69.4
Screen		9%	-59%	16%	8%	-4%
Brightness middle	257	338 32%	199 -23%	270 5%	313 22%	251.9 -2%
Brightness	235	309 31%	186 -21%	239 2%	295 26%	233 -1%
Brightness Distribution	80	76 -5%	76 -5%	82 3%	84 5%	83 4%
Black Level *	0.25	0.39 -56%	0.8 -220%	0.21 16%	0.21 16%	0.348 -39%
Contrast	1028	867 -16%	249 -76%	1286 25%	1490 45%	724 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.98	3.94 51%	11.92 -49%	3.01 62%	6.79 15%	6.35 20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.25	9.96 19%	20.52 -68%	4.63 62%	14.11 -15%	11.15 9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.87	2.54 68%	12.92 -64%	7.66 3%	6.78 14%	7.09 10%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.38 ^92%	2.04 ^108%	1.45 ^152%	2.26 ^97%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	8815 ^74%	6902 ^94%	13589 ^48%	6665 ^98%	6708 ^97%	8590 ^76%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55	46 -16%	36 -35%	49 -11%	41 -25%	52.69 -4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	84	71 -15%	56 -33%	76 -10%	63 -25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-6% / 1%	-39% / -50%	0% / 8%	-14% / -3%	-8% / -6%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

951

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

2966

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

1962

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel Atom x5-Z8350	3130 Points +6%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2966 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2897 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2575 Points -13%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2135 Points -28%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel Atom x5-Z8350	999 Points +5%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	951 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	938 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	884 Points -7%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	855 Points -10%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel Atom x5-Z8350	796 Points +7%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	743 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	726 Points -2%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2332 Points +7%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2175 Points
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2130 Points -2%

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	517 ms * -5%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	493.3 ms *

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel Atom x5-Z8350	45.77 Points +10%
HP x2 210 G1 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	44.02 Points +6%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	42.55 Points +2%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	41.59 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	6122 ms * -6%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	5758 ms *
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	5509 ms * +4%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	7142 Points +12%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	6382 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel Atom x5-Z8350	6343 Points -1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1246 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1520 Points +22%
HP x360 310 G1 HD Graphics (Bay Trail), N3540, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	1445 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1419 Points +14%
HP x2 210 G1 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1391 Points +12%
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1282 Points +3%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1246 Points

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

32 GB eMMC Flash

Sequential Read: 142.8 MB/s

Sequential Write: 44.24 MB/s

512K Read: 125.4 MB/s

512K Write: 16.9 MB/s

4K Read: 7.82 MB/s

4K Write: 1.423 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 11.04 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 1.435 MB/s

	Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 32 GB eMMC Flash	Medion Akoya E2215T 64 GB eMMC Flash	HP x360 310 G1 Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q 64 GB eMMC Flash	HP x2 210 G1 64 GB eMMC Flash	Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR 64 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		157%	-25%	475%	241%	266%
Read Seq	142.8	169.6 19%	99.5 -30%	153.9 8%	134.1 -6%	151.9 6%
Write Seq	44.24	39.77 -10%	102.9 133%	101.1 129%	66.1 49%	87.3 97%
Read 512	125.4	155.3 24%	34.45 -73%	136.2 9%	112.9 -10%	144.5 15%
Write 512	16.9	27.45 62%	42.7 153%	91.5 441%	57.7 241%	58 243%
Read 4k	7.82	13.09 67%	0.439 -94%	12.58 61%	15.79 102%	9.35 20%
Write 4k	1.423	7.915 456%	0.013 -99%	12.38 770%	10.06 607%	12.26 762%
Read 4k QD32	11.04	15.11 37%	0.851 -92%	23.81 116%	35.31 220%	29 163%
Write 4k QD32	1.435	10.05 600%	0.033 -98%	33.93 2264%	11.84 725%	13.18 818%

3DMark 11 Performance		322 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	358 Points +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	298 Points +2%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	297 Points +1%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	293 Points
HP x2 210 G1 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8300	291 Points -1%
HP x360 310 G1 Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Intel Pentium N3540	221 Points -25%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)	92.6		21.3	9.6

Max. Load

Idle


22.6 °C	31 °C	26.6 °C
37.6 °C	29.6 °C	26.9 °C
31.6 °C	31.2 °C	28.1 °C

Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 29.5 °C


27.7 °C	33.1 °C	37.8 °C
28 °C	31.6 °C	36.1 °C
28.1 °C	30.8 °C	32.1 °C

Maximum: 37.8 °C
Average: 31.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).

Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.7 / 2.8 Watt
Idle	2 / 2.2 / 2.7 Watt
Load	8.5 / 8.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		4h 54min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
HP x360 310 G1 N3540, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 30 Wh	684 min +133%
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 33 Wh	643 min +119%
HP x2 210 G1 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 33 Wh	550 min +87%
Acer Switch V 10 SW5-017-196Q Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 28.2 Wh	493 min +68%
Medion Akoya E2215T Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 38 Wh	474 min +61%
Trekstor SurfTab duo W3 Z8300, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 8.2 Wh	294 min

Pros

+ IPS 面板

+ 全高清分辨率

+ 静音

+ 低发热

+ 键盘出色

Cons

- 糟糕的电池续航时间

- 无 Type-C USB

- micro-USB 3.0 接口质量不佳

In review: Trekstor SurfTab duo W3. Test model courtesy of Trekstor Germany

Trekstor的SurfTab Duo W3是一款11.6英寸的Windows变形本，为基础办公与了网络应用而设计。这款设备运行时几乎不会发热且安静。然而，有一种从内部发出的电流声时常可以听见。这款设备并没有超大的存储空间。在32GB的机身存储中，仅有17.6GB可用。由于Windows 10在大的系统更新时需要10GB的空闲内存，所以7GB是实际可用最大存储空间大小。

键盘扩展坞整体上给我们留下了很好的印象。键盘本身很合适频繁的打字操作。Trekstor可能在它的产品线上为小学生和其他学生提供了一台用于打字和浏览网页的设备。但很不幸的是它在很关键的一个项目上表现得并不好：电池续航能力。这台变形本在Wi-Fi测试中仅有不到5小时的续航时间，这对于一整天在学校或大学的使用来说太短了。但在另一方面，屏幕的广视角及高对比度令我们满意，虽然亮度过低。