UMI Plus 智能手机简短评测

Name: UMI Plus
Brand: UMI

更大，更便宜。 来自中国厂商的廉价手机每年都在追求更好的性能表现。UMI Plus也不例外，其代价是更大的体积和欠佳的相机。

Allen Ngo (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 12/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of Coolicool.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

UMI Plus (Plus Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53, 8x 2.00GHz Cortex-A53 (Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10, 64bit

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memory

4 GB

, LPDDR3

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, LTPS, 电容多点触控屏, glossy: yes

Storage

32GB, 最大 256 GB microSD 卡槽

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Sensors: 加速度计, 陀螺仪, 距离传感器, 光线传感器, 罗盘, 指纹识别

Networking

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 155 x 75

Battery

4000 mAh

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 13.0MP, f / 2.0, 相位对焦, 双 LED 闪光灯, 录像 @ 1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

24 Months Warranty

Weight

185 g

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
UMI Plus Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755	34.4 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
UMI Plus Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755	31.2 MBit/s


405.4 cd/m²	419.2 cd/m²	457.4 cd/m²
405.2 cd/m²	432.8 cd/m²	457.1 cd/m²
407.1 cd/m²	416.7 cd/m²	472.2 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 472.2 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 430.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 432.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 1866:1 (Black: 0.232 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.18 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4

	UMI Plus LTPS, 5.5", 1920x1080	UMI Max Sharp, IPS, 5.5", 1920x1080	Sony Xperia XZ IPS, 5.2", 1920x1080	ZTE Axon 7 AMOLED, 5.5", 2560x1440	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL IPS, 5.5", 1920x1080
Response Times		-25%	-88%	88%	-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(14, 22)	40 ?(17, 23) -11%	52 ?(22, 30) -44%	4.8 ?(2.4, 2.4) 87%	56 ?(17, 39) -56%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(5.2, 20.8)	36 ?(15, 21) -38%	60 ?(21, 39) -131%	3.2 ?(1.6, 1.6) 88%	36 ?(15, 21) -38%
PWM Frequency				240.4 ?(100)
Screen		-13%	-13%	-11%	-18%
Brightness middle	432.8	522 21%	544 26%	328 -24%	658 52%
Brightness	430	498 16%	521 21%	334 -22%	633 47%
Brightness Distribution	86	86 0%	93 8%	88 2%	93 8%
Black Level *	0.232	0.23 1%	0.37 -59%		0.66 -184%
Contrast	1866	2270 22%	1470 -21%		997 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.93	6.9 -40%	5.8 -18%	4.6 7%	4.9 1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.34	12.3 -47%	9.8 -18%	14.7 -76%	9.1 -9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.18	9.2 -78%	7.2 -39%	2.8 46%	5.8 -12%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.38 ^92%	2.18 ^101%	2.29 ^96%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	7461 ^87%	8687 ^75%	8619 ^75%	6612 ^98%	7840 ^83%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-19% / -15%	-51% / -28%	39% / 14%	-33% / -24%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
ZTE Axon 7	51.3 MB/s +138%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	50.1 MB/s +132%
Sony Xperia XZ	29.8 MB/s +38%
Honor 5C	24.21 MB/s +12%
UMI Plus	21.55 MB/s
Coolpad Modena 2	18.25 MB/s -15%
UMI Max	18.07 MB/s -16%
UMI Super Euro Edition	17.88 MB/s -17%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	79.2 MB/s +120%
ZTE Axon 7	78.4 MB/s +118%
Honor 5C	51.9 MB/s +44%
UMI Max	36.64 MB/s +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition	36.22 MB/s +1%
UMI Plus	35.95 MB/s
Coolpad Modena 2	35.59 MB/s -1%
Sony Xperia XZ	33.5 MB/s -7%
Random Write 4KB
ZTE Axon 7	16.22 MB/s +41%
Honor 5C	15.7 MB/s +36%
Google Pixel XL 2016	14.56 MB/s +26%
UMI Super Euro Edition	11.88 MB/s +3%
UMI Plus	11.54 MB/s
UMI Max	10.91 MB/s -5%
Sony Xperia XZ	10.5 MB/s -9%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	7.4 MB/s -36%
Coolpad Modena 2	6.79 MB/s -41%
Leagoo Shark 1	6.4 MB/s -45%
Acer Liquid Z630S	5.82 MB/s -50%
Random Read 4KB
ZTE Axon 7	121.1 MB/s +370%
Google Pixel XL 2016	87.7 MB/s +241%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	74 MB/s +187%
Sony Xperia XZ	71.5 MB/s +178%
Honor 5C	61.7 MB/s +140%
Leagoo Shark 1	29.6 MB/s +15%
Acer Liquid Z630S	28.43 MB/s +10%
UMI Super Euro Edition	28.17 MB/s +9%
UMI Max	26.66 MB/s +4%
UMI Plus	25.75 MB/s
Coolpad Modena 2	23.03 MB/s -11%
Sequential Write 256KB
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	188 MB/s +46%
ZTE Axon 7	150.9 MB/s +17%
Sony Xperia XZ	138 MB/s +7%
UMI Plus	128.5 MB/s
UMI Super Euro Edition	126.9 MB/s -1%
Google Pixel XL 2016	83.4 MB/s -35%
Honor 5C	75.5 MB/s -41%
UMI Max	69.5 MB/s -46%
Acer Liquid Z630S	67.7 MB/s -47%
Coolpad Modena 2	42.56 MB/s -67%
Leagoo Shark 1	39.6 MB/s -69%
Sequential Read 256KB
ZTE Axon 7	406.5 MB/s +67%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	282 MB/s +16%
Sony Xperia XZ	281 MB/s +15%
Leagoo Shark 1	264.1 MB/s +8%
Honor 5C	263 MB/s +8%
Google Pixel XL 2016	258.2 MB/s +6%
UMI Max	257.9 MB/s +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition	257.8 MB/s +6%
Acer Liquid Z630S	249 MB/s +2%
UMI Plus	244.1 MB/s
Coolpad Modena 2	147 MB/s -40%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Google Pixel XL 2016	138641 Points +186%
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points +166%
ZTE Axon 7	122524 Points +152%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	62484 Points +29%
Honor 5C	53143 Points +9%
UMI Super Euro Edition	50072 Points +3%
UMI Max	49057 Points +1%
UMI Plus	48558 Points
Acer Liquid Z630S	35585 Points -27%
Leagoo Shark 1	34261 Points -29%
Coolpad Modena 2	24875 Points -49%

Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score
Google Pixel XL 2016	7047 Points +390%
Sony Xperia XZ	7046 Points +390%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2515 Points +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1561 Points +9%
UMI Plus	1437 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Google Pixel XL 2016	4167 Points +55%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4042 Points +50%
ZTE Axon 7	3867 Points +43%
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points +37%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2818 Points +5%
UMI Max	2701 Points 0%
UMI Plus	2695 Points
Coolpad Modena 2	1274 Points -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points +138%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1513 Points +118%
ZTE Axon 7	1280 Points +85%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	820 Points +18%
UMI Max	734 Points +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition	727 Points +5%
UMI Plus	693 Points
Coolpad Modena 2	459 Points -34%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2119 Points +71%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2044 Points +65%
Sony Xperia XZ	1613 Points +30%
Honor 5C	1440 Points +16%
UMI Plus	1242 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1232 Points -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1131 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
ZTE Axon 7	3244 Points +809%
Sony Xperia XZ	3144 Points +781%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2863 Points +702%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	426 Points +19%
UMI Super Euro Edition	357 Points 0%
UMI Plus	357 Points
Honor 5C	303 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel XL 2016	2629 Points +520%
Sony Xperia XZ	2596 Points +512%
ZTE Axon 7	2380 Points +461%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	518 Points +22%
UMI Plus	424 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	421 Points -1%
Honor 5C	367 Points -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2091 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	2009 Points
Sony Xperia XZ	1516 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	1177 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1151 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
ZTE Axon 7	4901 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	4406 Points
Sony Xperia XZ	4333 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	739 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	511 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Google Pixel XL 2016	3483 Points
Sony Xperia XZ	3152 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2843 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	863 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	587 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2109 Points +66%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1935 Points +52%
ZTE Axon 7	1783 Points +40%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points +31%
Honor 5C	1418 Points +11%
UMI Plus	1272 Points
UMI Max	1247 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S	1126 Points -11%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1117 Points -12%
Leagoo Shark 1	828 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Sony Xperia XZ	2853 Points +711%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2820 Points +701%
ZTE Axon 7	2528 Points +618%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	380 Points +8%
UMI Max	354 Points +1%
UMI Plus	352 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	350 Points -1%
Honor 5C	317 Points -10%
Acer Liquid Z630S	148 Points -58%
Leagoo Shark 1	140 Points -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Google Pixel XL 2016	2560 Points +511%
Sony Xperia XZ	2548 Points +508%
ZTE Axon 7	2500 Points +497%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	465 Points +11%
UMI Max	421 Points 0%
UMI Plus	419 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	413 Points -1%
Honor 5C	383 Points -9%
Acer Liquid Z630S	183 Points -56%
Leagoo Shark 1	172 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2112 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	1902 Points
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points
Honor 5C	1418 Points
UMI Max	1239 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	1144 Points
Acer Liquid Z630S	1113 Points
ZTE Axon 7	1099 Points
Leagoo Shark 1	890 Points
Coolpad Modena 2	621 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
ZTE Axon 7	4619 Points
Sony Xperia XZ	4522 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	3935 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	719 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	523 Points
UMI Max	521 Points
Honor 5C	480 Points
Leagoo Shark 1	232 Points
Acer Liquid Z630S	229 Points
Coolpad Modena 2	106 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Sony Xperia XZ	3275 Points
Google Pixel XL 2016	3180 Points
ZTE Axon 7	2698 Points
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	842 Points
UMI Max	598 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	595 Points
Honor 5C	563 Points
Acer Liquid Z630S	278 Points
Leagoo Shark 1	278 Points
Coolpad Modena 2	130 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Sony Xperia XZ	20772 Points +72%
ZTE Axon 7	20408 Points +69%
Google Pixel XL 2016	18222 Points +51%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	15984 Points +32%
Honor 5C	13588 Points +13%
UMI Max	12239 Points +1%
UMI Plus	12078 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	11654 Points -4%
Acer Liquid Z630S	10508 Points -13%
Leagoo Shark 1	10325 Points -15%
Coolpad Modena 2	7061 Points -42%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Google Pixel XL 2016	32652 Points +210%
Sony Xperia XZ	32056 Points +204%
ZTE Axon 7	24310 Points +131%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13466 Points +28%
Honor 5C	11319 Points +7%
UMI Max	10612 Points +1%
UMI Super Euro Edition	10567 Points 0%
UMI Plus	10532 Points
Acer Liquid Z630S	6250 Points -41%
Leagoo Shark 1	4920 Points -53%
Coolpad Modena 2	2789 Points -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Sony Xperia XZ	28603 Points +164%
Google Pixel XL 2016	27766 Points +156%
ZTE Axon 7	23319 Points +115%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	13955 Points +29%
Honor 5C	11755 Points +8%
UMI Max	10942 Points +1%
UMI Plus	10840 Points
UMI Super Euro Edition	10791 Points 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S	6868 Points -37%
Leagoo Shark 1	5568 Points -49%
Coolpad Modena 2	3222 Points -70%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 battery life
Sony Xperia XZ	482 min
Work 2.0 performance score
Sony Xperia XZ	5616 Points
Work performance score
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	6785 Points +121%
Honor 5C	5120 Points +67%
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points +65%
ZTE Axon 7	4970 Points +62%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4739 Points +54%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4596 Points +50%
UMI Max	4485 Points +46%
Acer Liquid Z630S	3814 Points +24%
Leagoo Shark 1	3398 Points +11%
Coolpad Modena 2	3119 Points +2%
UMI Plus	3069 Points

BaseMark OS II
Web
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points +10560%
Google Pixel XL 2016	977 Points +9670%
ZTE Axon 7	963 Points +9530%
UMI Super Euro Edition	771 Points +7610%
Honor 5C	707 Points +6970%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	702 Points +6920%
Acer Liquid Z630S	627 Points +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1	611 Points +6010%
Coolpad Modena 2	565 Points +5550%
UMI Max	10 Points 0%
UMI Plus	10 Points
Graphics
Google Pixel XL 2016	5017 Points +653%
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points +608%
ZTE Axon 7	4631 Points +595%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1019 Points +53%
Honor 5C	814 Points +22%
UMI Super Euro Edition	666 Points 0%
UMI Max	666 Points 0%
UMI Plus	666 Points
Leagoo Shark 1	418 Points -37%
Acer Liquid Z630S	416 Points -38%
Coolpad Modena 2	178 Points -73%
Memory
Google Pixel XL 2016	1677 Points +69%
Honor 5C	1504 Points +52%
ZTE Axon 7	1489 Points +50%
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points +45%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1052 Points +6%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1042 Points +5%
UMI Max	998 Points +1%
UMI Plus	992 Points
Coolpad Modena 2	598 Points -40%
Acer Liquid Z630S	540 Points -46%
Leagoo Shark 1	515 Points -48%
System
Google Pixel XL 2016	3889 Points +83%
ZTE Axon 7	3307 Points +56%
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points +44%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	2923 Points +38%
Honor 5C	2600 Points +23%
UMI Super Euro Edition	2187 Points +3%
UMI Max	2123 Points 0%
UMI Plus	2120 Points
Acer Liquid Z630S	1614 Points -24%
Leagoo Shark 1	1195 Points -44%
Coolpad Modena 2	909 Points -57%
Overall
Google Pixel XL 2016	2378 Points +597%
ZTE Axon 7	2165 Points +535%
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points +535%
Honor 5C	1225 Points +259%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	1215 Points +256%
UMI Super Euro Edition	1043 Points +206%
Acer Liquid Z630S	691 Points +103%
Leagoo Shark 1	597 Points +75%
Coolpad Modena 2	483 Points +42%
UMI Max	341 Points 0%
UMI Plus	341 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Google Pixel XL 2016	55.4 Points +113%
Sony Xperia XZ	54.2 Points +108%
ZTE Axon 7	44.75 Points +72%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	31.12 Points +19%
Honor 5C	27.93 Points +7%
UMI Super Euro Edition	26.21 Points +1%
UMI Plus	26.05 Points
UMI Max	25.5 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S	19.03 Points -27%
Leagoo Shark 1	17.24 Points -34%
Coolpad Modena 2	13.15 Points -50%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Coolpad Modena 2	19647 ms * -90%
Leagoo Shark 1	14788 ms * -43%
Acer Liquid Z630S	12876 ms * -24%
UMI Plus	10343 ms *
UMI Max	9796 ms * +5%
UMI Super Euro Edition	9410 ms * +9%
Honor 5C	9111 ms * +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	8041 ms * +22%
ZTE Axon 7	3097 ms * +70%
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms * +73%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2654 ms * +74%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points +133%
Google Pixel XL 2016	8690 Points +124%
ZTE Axon 7	8062 Points +107%
Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL	4905 Points +26%
UMI Max	4231 Points +9%
Honor 5C	4188 Points +8%
UMI Super Euro Edition	4117 Points +6%
UMI Plus	3887 Points
Leagoo Shark 1	2992 Points -23%
Acer Liquid Z630S	2855 Points -27%
Coolpad Modena 2	1975 Points -49%

Legend

UMI Plus Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2,

UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Axon 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


44.8 °C	36.6 °C	34.8 °C
46.4 °C	36.6 °C	34.6 °C
42.8 °C	36.8 °C	34.6 °C

Maximum: 46.4 °C
Average: 38.7 °C


33.2 °C	34.4 °C	36.8 °C
33.6 °C	34.8 °C	35.4 °C
33.2 °C	34.2 °C	35.4 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 34.6 °C

Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.4 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

UMI Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.36 / 0.64 Watt
Idle	2.6 / 3.2 / 3.3 Watt
Load	7.7 / 4.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	UMI Plus Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, , LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	UMI Max Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia XZ 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash, AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 625, Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Power Consumption		53%	-19%	25%	36%
Idle Minimum *	2.6	1.02 61%	1.76 32%	0.64 75%	0.83 68%
Idle Average *	3.2	1.53 52%	3.6 -13%	0.84 74%	2.11 34%
Idle Maximum *	3.3	1.62 51%	4.06 -23%	0.87 74%	2.12 36%
Load Average *	7.7	2.91 62%	7 9%	6.02 22%	3.41 56%
Load Maximum *	4.8	2.93 39%	9.52 -98%	10.45 -118%	5.46 -14%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		21h 59min
WiFi Websurfing		9h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 52min

	UMI Plus Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, Wh	UMI Max Helio P10 MT6755, Mali-T860 MP2, Wh	Sony Xperia XZ 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, 11 Wh	ZTE Axon 7 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530, Wh	Asus Zenfone 3 ZE552KL 625, Adreno 506, Wh
Battery Runtime		5%	-24%	-4%	26%
Reader / Idle	1319		1125 -15%	1735 32%	1502 14%
WiFi v1.3	561	588 5%	438 -22%	411 -27%	797 42%
Load	292		187 -36%	245 -16%	352 21%

Pros

+ 双4G LTE SIM卡与MicroSD卡槽

+ 铝制外壳与大猩猩玻璃

+ 出色硬件性能

+ 相对准确的色彩

+ 高扬声器音量

+ USB Type-C 接口

+ 平价

Cons

- 糟糕的Home按键；按键无背光

- GPS应该更准确

- 对于屏幕大小来说太厚了

- 平均水平的屏幕亮度

- 平均水平的相机质量

- 扬声器音质不佳

- 无 802.11ac 无线网络

- 无 USB 3.0 速度

- 无 NFC

In review: UMI Plus. Test model provided by Coolicool.com

UMI带来了一台不错的智能手机，在不到200美元的价位上提供了令人印象深刻的配置。它能够像更加昂贵的主流手机一样流畅的运行，而没有在指纹识别，MicroSD卡槽甚至是USB Type-C接口等常用功能上进行缩水。将这些都整合进一个相对坚固的外壳设计后就成为了一架在这个价位上难寻对手的设备。

但像大多数廉价设备一样，其缺点主要体现在细节上。它的尺寸即使对于5.5寸手机来说也太大了而且它的后置摄像头仅仅代表了这个价位的平均水平。扬声器的质量很差，所有按钮按下时的反馈都应该得到改善。电话信号接收也是参差不齐，而且4G频段可能不合适北美用户。震动很弱，且GPS精度也只是平均水平。

如果说在列表中的缺陷不是日常使用的关注点的话，那么用户会对其核心硬件性能以及整体质量感到满意。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

UMI Plus - 11/27/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

44 / 60 → 74%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

82%

Games Performance

28 / 63 → 44%

Application Performance

38 / 70 → 55%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

58%

Average

70%

81%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5243 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > UMI Plus 智能手机简短评测

Allen Ngo, 2016-12- 5 (Update: 2016-12- 5)