Notebookcheck Logo

UMi Max 智能手机简短评测

入门级价位上提供USB Type-C接口。对于150欧元(约合160美金)的零售价格来说,中国厂商UMi在Max上提供了有趣的配置:强大的硬件,4000mAh的电池以及新一代Type-C USB接口。
Android Smartphone Touchscreen
UMI Max
Processor
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memory
3 GB 
, LPDDR3
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容屏, 多点触控, Sharp, IPS, 2.5D, 康宁大猩猩玻璃3代, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 三星, 10.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm 音频接口, Card Reader: 最高256G microSD 储存卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 线性加速度传感器, Glonass导航, 距离传感器, 光线传感器, 加速度计, 罗盘, 陀螺仪, 霍尔开关, Smart-Key, OTG, 状态指示LED灯, 无线显示
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1800(B3)/1900(B2) || WCDMA: 850(B5)/900(B8)/1900(B2)/2100(B1) | LTE FDD: 2100(B1)/1800(B3)/2600(B7)/800(B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 150.8 x 75
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 360 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 松下相机, 双闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix GalaxyCore GC5005
Additional features
Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 模块化电源适配器, USB线缆, UMi UI, 12 Months Warranty, SAR n.b., fanless
Weight
199 g, Power Supply: 27 g
Price
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size comparison

158.6 mm 82.8 mm 8.5 mm 241 g156.3 mm 77.5 mm 8.9 mm 156.3 g154.5 mm 76 mm 8.8 mm 199 g152 mm 78 mm 8.9 mm 197 g151 mm 77 mm 8.5 mm 202 g150.8 mm 75 mm 8.5 mm 199 g147.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.3 mm 156 g143.8 mm 70.2 mm 8.3 mm 135 g139 mm 67.8 mm 7.9 mm 119 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash
103 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
491 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
109 MBit/s
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49.8 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Moto Z
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
360 MBit/s
UMI Super Euro Edition
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s
Blackview R7
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
79.4 MBit/s
Honor 5C
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.3 MBit/s
GPS-Test UMi Max
GPS-Test UMi Max
GPS-Test UMi Max
GPS-Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS-Test Garmin Edge 500
GPS-Test Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
484
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
522
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 537 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 498.3 cd/m² Minimum: 20.26 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 2270:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.38
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
UMI Touch
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Coolpad Torino S
IPS, 1280x720, 4.7"
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Blackview R7
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Acer Liquid Z630S
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"
Leagoo Shark 1
IPS, 1920x1080, 6"
UMI Super Euro Edition
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Honor 5C
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
-24%
-22%
-14%
-51%
-3%
-52%
4%
-15%
Brightness middle
522
424
-19%
360
-31%
312
-40%
552
6%
350
-33%
471
-10%
418
-20%
515
-1%
Brightness
498
415
-17%
358
-28%
302
-39%
526
6%
345
-31%
465
-7%
410
-18%
498
0%
Brightness Distribution
86
91
6%
87
1%
79
-8%
91
6%
84
-2%
82
-5%
85
-1%
93
8%
Black Level *
0.23
0.54
-135%
0.45
-96%
0.15
35%
0.64
-178%
0.27
-17%
0.9
-291%
0.31
-35%
0.49
-113%
Contrast
2270
785
-65%
800
-65%
2080
-8%
863
-62%
1296
-43%
523
-77%
1348
-41%
1051
-54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.9
6.9
-0%
6.8
1%
8.2
-19%
11
-59%
4.7
32%
7.1
-3%
4.4
36%
6.2
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
12.3
10.9
11%
11.3
8%
16.5
-34%
20.8
-69%
8.5
31%
17
-38%
6.5
47%
11.4
7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.2
6.8
26%
6.2
33%
9.2
-0%
14.3
-55%
5.6
39%
7.5
18%
3.6
61%
7.4
20%
Gamma
2.38 92%
1.99 111%
2.14 103%
2.29 96%
2.21 100%
1.84 120%
2.23 99%
2.36 93%
2.28 96%
CCT
8687 75%
8131 80%
7975 82%
9017 72%
12996 50%
6795 96%
8261 79%
6993 93%
8664 75%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
UMI Max
18.07 MB/s
UMI Touch
21.02 MB/s +16%
Coolpad Torino S
16.54 MB/s -8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.62 MB/s -30%
Blackview R7
11.87 MB/s -34%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17.88 MB/s -1%
Honor 5C
24.21 MB/s +34%
Lenovo Moto Z
45.64 MB/s +153%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
UMI Max
36.64 MB/s
UMI Touch
42.92 MB/s +17%
Coolpad Torino S
25.79 MB/s -30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
22.77 MB/s -38%
Blackview R7
15.56 MB/s -58%
UMI Super Euro Edition
36.22 MB/s -1%
Honor 5C
51.9 MB/s +42%
Lenovo Moto Z
78.5 MB/s +114%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s
UMI Touch
14.63 MB/s +34%
Coolpad Torino S
6.94 MB/s -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s -24%
Blackview R7
11.4 MB/s +4%
Acer Liquid Z630S
5.82 MB/s -47%
Leagoo Shark 1
6.4 MB/s -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11.88 MB/s +9%
Honor 5C
15.7 MB/s +44%
Lenovo Moto Z
74.9 MB/s +587%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s
UMI Touch
19.88 MB/s -25%
Coolpad Torino S
18.34 MB/s -31%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s -32%
Blackview R7
28.02 MB/s +5%
Acer Liquid Z630S
28.43 MB/s +7%
Leagoo Shark 1
29.6 MB/s +11%
UMI Super Euro Edition
28.17 MB/s +6%
Honor 5C
61.7 MB/s +131%
Lenovo Moto Z
117.2 MB/s +340%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s
UMI Touch
72.5 MB/s +4%
Coolpad Torino S
41.81 MB/s -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.3 MB/s +1%
Blackview R7
122.7 MB/s +77%
Acer Liquid Z630S
67.7 MB/s -3%
Leagoo Shark 1
39.6 MB/s -43%
UMI Super Euro Edition
126.9 MB/s +83%
Honor 5C
75.5 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Moto Z
168.3 MB/s +142%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s
UMI Touch
219.3 MB/s -15%
Coolpad Torino S
140.3 MB/s -46%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.3 MB/s -27%
Blackview R7
247.6 MB/s -4%
Acer Liquid Z630S
249 MB/s -3%
Leagoo Shark 1
264.1 MB/s +2%
UMI Super Euro Edition
257.8 MB/s 0%
Honor 5C
263 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Moto Z
439.7 MB/s +70%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
49057 Points
UMI Touch
38617 Points -21%
Coolpad Torino S
22766 Points -54%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points -51%
Blackview R7
50572 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
35585 Points -27%
Leagoo Shark 1
34261 Points -30%
UMI Super Euro Edition
50072 Points +2%
Honor 5C
53143 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto Z
129197 Points +163%
Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Touch
626 Points
Coolpad Torino S
494 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
404 Points
Honor 5C
906 Points
Lenovo Moto Z
2080 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Touch
2798 Points
Coolpad Torino S
1511 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1147 Points
Honor 5C
3914 Points
Lenovo Moto Z
5450 Points
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
2701 Points
Blackview R7
2851 Points +6%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2818 Points +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
3946 Points +46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
734 Points
Blackview R7
728 Points -1%
UMI Super Euro Edition
727 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto Z
1480 Points +102%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
10942 Points
UMI Touch
6795 Points -38%
Coolpad Torino S
4430 Points -60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points -72%
Blackview R7
10762 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6868 Points -37%
Leagoo Shark 1
5568 Points -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10791 Points -1%
Honor 5C
11755 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
25135 Points +130%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
10612 Points
UMI Touch
6186 Points -42%
Coolpad Torino S
3858 Points -64%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points -75%
Blackview R7
10334 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
6250 Points -41%
Leagoo Shark 1
4920 Points -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition
10567 Points 0%
Honor 5C
11319 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
26659 Points +151%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
UMI Max
12239 Points
UMI Touch
10368 Points -15%
Coolpad Torino S
9205 Points -25%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points -43%
Blackview R7
12585 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
10508 Points -14%
Leagoo Shark 1
10325 Points -16%
UMI Super Euro Edition
11654 Points -5%
Honor 5C
13588 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
20948 Points +71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
UMI Max
598 Points
UMI Touch
291 Points -51%
Coolpad Torino S
52 Points -91%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points -79%
Blackview R7
590 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
278 Points -54%
Leagoo Shark 1
278 Points -54%
UMI Super Euro Edition
595 Points -1%
Honor 5C
563 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto Z
3023 Points +406%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
UMI Max
521 Points
UMI Touch
241 Points -54%
Coolpad Torino S
41 Points -92%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points -81%
Blackview R7
518 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
229 Points -56%
Leagoo Shark 1
232 Points -55%
UMI Super Euro Edition
523 Points 0%
Honor 5C
480 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z
3718 Points +614%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
UMI Max
1239 Points
UMI Touch
1045 Points -16%
Coolpad Torino S
735 Points -41%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points -50%
Blackview R7
1155 Points -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1113 Points -10%
Leagoo Shark 1
890 Points -28%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1144 Points -8%
Honor 5C
1418 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
1828 Points +48%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max
17 fps
UMI Touch
12 fps -29%
Coolpad Torino S
5.3 fps -69%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps -52%
Blackview R7
17 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
21 fps +24%
Leagoo Shark 1
8.7 fps -49%
UMI Super Euro Edition
18 fps +6%
Honor 5C
20 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
53 fps +212%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max
17 fps
UMI Touch
12 fps -29%
Coolpad Torino S
9.8 fps -42%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps -71%
Blackview R7
17 fps 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12 fps -29%
Leagoo Shark 1
8.9 fps -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition
17 fps 0%
Honor 5C
19 fps +12%
Lenovo Moto Z
77 fps +353%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
UMI Max
7.1 fps
UMI Touch
4.5 fps -37%
Coolpad Torino S
1.8 fps -75%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps -75%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S
9 fps +27%
Leagoo Shark 1
3.9 fps -45%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.5 fps +6%
Honor 5C
8.4 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto Z
26 fps +266%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max
7.1 fps
UMI Touch
4.5 fps -37%
Coolpad Torino S
4.3 fps -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps -52%
Blackview R7
4.7 fps -34%
Acer Liquid Z630S
4.2 fps -41%
Leagoo Shark 1
4.2 fps -41%
UMI Super Euro Edition
7.1 fps 0%
Honor 5C
7.9 fps +11%
Lenovo Moto Z
41 fps +477%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max
4.7 fps
UMI Touch
2.9 fps -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps -74%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps -47%
Leagoo Shark 1
2.2 fps -53%
UMI Super Euro Edition
5.1 fps +9%
Honor 5C
4.9 fps +4%
Lenovo Moto Z
15 fps +219%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
UMI Max
4.7 fps
UMI Touch
2.9 fps -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps -47%
Blackview R7
2.5 fps -47%
Leagoo Shark 1
2.5 fps -47%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4.7 fps 0%
Honor 5C
4.5 fps -4%
Lenovo Moto Z
27 fps +474%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
UMI Max
4485 Points
UMI Touch
3787 Points -16%
Coolpad Torino S
3932 Points -12%
Blackview R7
4364 Points -3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
3814 Points -15%
Leagoo Shark 1
3398 Points -24%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4596 Points +2%
Honor 5C
5120 Points +14%
Lenovo Moto Z
7637 Points +70%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
UMI Max
341 Points
UMI Touch
717 Points +110%
Coolpad Torino S
602 Points +77%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points +31%
Blackview R7
338 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
691 Points +103%
Leagoo Shark 1
597 Points +75%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1043 Points +206%
Honor 5C
1225 Points +259%
Lenovo Moto Z
2356 Points +591%
System (sort by value)
UMI Max
2123 Points
UMI Touch
1343 Points -37%
Coolpad Torino S
1102 Points -48%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points -62%
Blackview R7
1971 Points -7%
Acer Liquid Z630S
1614 Points -24%
Leagoo Shark 1
1195 Points -44%
UMI Super Euro Edition
2187 Points +3%
Honor 5C
2600 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
3398 Points +60%
Memory (sort by value)
UMI Max
998 Points
UMI Touch
787 Points -21%
Coolpad Torino S
607 Points -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points -51%
Blackview R7
1030 Points +3%
Acer Liquid Z630S
540 Points -46%
Leagoo Shark 1
515 Points -48%
UMI Super Euro Edition
1052 Points +5%
Honor 5C
1504 Points +51%
Lenovo Moto Z
2190 Points +119%
Graphics (sort by value)
UMI Max
666 Points
UMI Touch
429 Points -36%
Coolpad Torino S
321 Points -52%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points -74%
Blackview R7
655 Points -2%
Acer Liquid Z630S
416 Points -38%
Leagoo Shark 1
418 Points -37%
UMI Super Euro Edition
666 Points 0%
Honor 5C
814 Points +22%
Lenovo Moto Z
4321 Points +549%
Web (sort by value)
UMI Max
10 Points
UMI Touch
576 Points +5660%
Coolpad Torino S
599 Points +5890%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points +5820%
Blackview R7
10 Points 0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
627 Points +6170%
Leagoo Shark 1
611 Points +6010%
UMI Super Euro Edition
771 Points +7610%
Honor 5C
707 Points +6970%
Lenovo Moto Z
959 Points +9490%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
25.5 Points
UMI Touch
17.61 Points -31%
Coolpad Torino S
14.45 Points -43%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
12.73 Points -50%
Blackview R7
25.35 Points -1%
Acer Liquid Z630S
19.03 Points -25%
Leagoo Shark 1
17.24 Points -32%
UMI Super Euro Edition
26.21 Points +3%
Honor 5C
27.93 Points +10%
Lenovo Moto Z
47.5 Points +86%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
UMI Max
9796 ms *
UMI Touch
13953 ms * -42%
Coolpad Torino S
15784 ms * -61%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
19234 ms * -96%
Blackview R7
9748 ms * -0%
Acer Liquid Z630S
12876 ms * -31%
Leagoo Shark 1
14788 ms * -51%
UMI Super Euro Edition
9410 ms * +4%
Honor 5C
9111 ms * +7%
Lenovo Moto Z
3155 ms * +68%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
UMI Max
4231 Points
UMI Touch
2562 Points -39%
Coolpad Torino S
2364 Points -44%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1910 Points -55%
Blackview R7
3885 Points -8%
Acer Liquid Z630S
2855 Points -33%
Leagoo Shark 1
2992 Points -29%
UMI Super Euro Edition
4117 Points -3%
Honor 5C
4188 Points -1%
Lenovo Moto Z
7771 Points +84%

Legend

 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Touch Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Torino S Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Z630S Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Leagoo Shark 1 Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Super Euro Edition Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 40.2 °C38.8 °C38.2 °C 
 38.1 °C38.1 °C38.3 °C 
 37.6 °C37.8 °C38.2 °C 
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
33.8 °C35.6 °C36.3 °C
33.9 °C35.3 °C35.6 °C
33.8 °C35.4 °C35.7 °C
Maximum: 36.3 °C
Average: 35 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.644.52525.435.23125.336.54032.932.15033.641.26331.631.68028.435.31002727.512520.8241602226.120021.325.225020.829.431521.239.140019.444.150019.552.863017.759.980017.965.5100017.869.4125017.370.3160017.470.1200016.769.1250017.268.4315018.272.6400017.976.9500017.668.9630017.765.6800017.869.21000017.964.41250018.152.71600018.249.2SPL3082.4N1.348.5median 17.9median 64.4Delta1.413.224.323.124.324.322.32122.722.322.720.322.622.723.723.229.623.721.221.922.221.219.119.32019.117.617.118.517.620.120.12120.130.630.931.930.616.71616.516.718.218.317.318.217.817.618.317.81719.517.31719.529.216.419.527.13917.827.130.643.414.830.63850.915.73842.35616.442.345.66015.845.647.861.713.647.850.963.114.850.950.26312.650.252.264.711.252.252.86510.952.853.4669.753.452.4659.652.448.6619.748.64153.69.44134.147.69.434.129.743.79.429.761.774.426.161.712.828.50.812.8median 38median 50.9median 14.8median 3814.9173.314.936.331.432.436.334.429.331.334.431.632.231.731.635.134.12635.138.134.939.438.13132.536.23126.427.228.626.427.527.725.427.527.531.121.327.526.827.523.326.830.627.122.530.638.429.922.438.446.432.921.346.45240.318.45260.847.817.560.865.85517.565.870.661.817.270.67463.816.87473.96317.373.968.957.917.468.968.857.416.668.868.857.717.368.868.65717.668.668.255.217.668.268.453.817.768.469.85517.469.874.359.417.774.375.160.417.975.169.954.818.169.966.35118.166.382.670.729.882.653.425.61.353.4median 68.4median 55median 17.7median 68.49.910.41.79.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseUMI MaxBlackview R7ZTE Blade V7 Lite
UMI Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.02 / 1.53 / 1.62 Watt
Load midlight 2.91 / 2.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Leagoo Shark 1
6300 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
-36%
-19%
6%
-122%
-65%
-96%
-60%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
1.02
0.89
13%
0.68
33%
0.63
38%
1.83
-79%
1.82
-78%
0.59
42%
0.84
18%
0.89
13%
Idle Average *
1.53
2
-31%
2.2
-44%
1.37
10%
3.21
-110%
2.35
-54%
3.22
-110%
1.94
-27%
2.07
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.62
2.1
-30%
2.26
-40%
1.71
-6%
3.45
-113%
2.6
-60%
3.45
-113%
2.07
-28%
2.15
-33%
Load Average *
2.91
3.87
-33%
3.47
-19%
2.82
3%
5.67
-95%
3.69
-27%
6.93
-138%
5.88
-102%
3.46
-19%
Load Maximum *
2.93
5.79
-98%
3.71
-27%
3.36
-15%
9.16
-213%
5.98
-104%
7.59
-159%
7.67
-162%
5.18
-77%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
9h 48min
UMI Max
4000 mAh
UMI Touch
4000 mAh
Coolpad Torino S
1800 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Blackview R7
3000 mAh
Acer Liquid Z630S
4000 mAh
Leagoo Shark 1
6300 mAh
UMI Super Euro Edition
4000 mAh
Honor 5C
3000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
588
553
-6%
397
-32%
517
-12%
412
-30%
681
16%
542
-8%
638
9%
584
-1%

Pros

+ 高亮度高对比度IPS屏幕
+ 1080p分辨率
+ 铝制一体化机身
+ 智能按键
+ 低功耗/发热
+ 超长电池续航时间
+ 支持LTE Band 20
+ 3 GB 内存
+ 双频WLAN
+ 指纹识别
+ 良好的性能及高速eMMC存储(在这个价位上)

Cons

- 偏重
- 工艺缺陷
- GPS模块轻微不准确
- 成像模糊
- 充电时间
In Review: UMi Max. Test model provided by Gearbest.com
In Review: UMi Max. Test model provided by Gearbest.com

我们的测试表明,UMi Max是一台有着优秀外观的入门级手机,尽管有一些细小的工艺缺陷。考虑到它的价格,一些缺点是可以被接受的,例如:不准确的GPS模块,相对来说偏重的重量以及较长的相机加载时间。内置eMMC存储和SD卡读卡器的访问速度都偏低,这在入门级手机上是一个典型问题。

在另一方面,UMi Max以它有着高亮度,高分辨率以及出色对比度的屏幕得到了高分。在这个价位上很少看到这么好的屏幕。此外,它的性能和连接性都非常好。耗电量很低而且支持快速充电。

 

如果5.5寸显示屏和199g(约合7盎司)的重量不被考虑在内问题的话,作为入门级手机我们推荐UMi Max。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

UMI Max - 11/07/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
44 / 60 → 74%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
25 / 63 → 39%
Application Performance
41 / 70 → 58%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 91 → 59%
Camera
58%
Average
70%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > UMi Max 智能手机简短评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2016-11-28 (Update: 2016-11-28)