UMi Max 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
UMI Max | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
UMI Max | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5C | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Blackview R7 | |
Honor 5C |
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 2270:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.38
UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | UMI Touch IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Coolpad Torino S IPS, 1280x720, 4.7" | ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Z630S IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Leagoo Shark 1 IPS, 1920x1080, 6" | UMI Super Euro Edition IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -24% | -22% | -14% | -51% | -3% | -52% | 4% | -15% | |
Brightness middle | 522 | 424 -19% | 360 -31% | 312 -40% | 552 6% | 350 -33% | 471 -10% | 418 -20% | 515 -1% |
Brightness | 498 | 415 -17% | 358 -28% | 302 -39% | 526 6% | 345 -31% | 465 -7% | 410 -18% | 498 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 87 1% | 79 -8% | 91 6% | 84 -2% | 82 -5% | 85 -1% | 93 8% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.54 -135% | 0.45 -96% | 0.15 35% | 0.64 -178% | 0.27 -17% | 0.9 -291% | 0.31 -35% | 0.49 -113% |
Contrast | 2270 | 785 -65% | 800 -65% | 2080 -8% | 863 -62% | 1296 -43% | 523 -77% | 1348 -41% | 1051 -54% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.9 | 6.9 -0% | 6.8 1% | 8.2 -19% | 11 -59% | 4.7 32% | 7.1 -3% | 4.4 36% | 6.2 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.3 | 10.9 11% | 11.3 8% | 16.5 -34% | 20.8 -69% | 8.5 31% | 17 -38% | 6.5 47% | 11.4 7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.2 | 6.8 26% | 6.2 33% | 9.2 -0% | 14.3 -55% | 5.6 39% | 7.5 18% | 3.6 61% | 7.4 20% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 1.99 111% | 2.14 103% | 2.29 96% | 2.21 100% | 1.84 120% | 2.23 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 8687 75% | 8131 80% | 7975 82% | 9017 72% | 12996 50% | 6795 96% | 8261 79% | 6993 93% | 8664 75% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
Blackview R7 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
Blackview R7 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
UMI Max | |
UMI Touch | |
Coolpad Torino S | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Blackview R7 | |
Acer Liquid Z630S | |
Leagoo Shark 1 | |
UMI Super Euro Edition | |
Honor 5C | |
Lenovo Moto Z |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
UMI Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Blackview R7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 1.02 / 1.53 / 1.62 Watt |
Load |
2.91 / 2.93 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
UMI Max 4000 mAh | UMI Touch 4000 mAh | Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh | Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -36% | -19% | 6% | -122% | -65% | -96% | -60% | -30% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.02 | 0.89 13% | 0.68 33% | 0.63 38% | 1.83 -79% | 1.82 -78% | 0.59 42% | 0.84 18% | 0.89 13% |
Idle Average * | 1.53 | 2 -31% | 2.2 -44% | 1.37 10% | 3.21 -110% | 2.35 -54% | 3.22 -110% | 1.94 -27% | 2.07 -35% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.62 | 2.1 -30% | 2.26 -40% | 1.71 -6% | 3.45 -113% | 2.6 -60% | 3.45 -113% | 2.07 -28% | 2.15 -33% |
Load Average * | 2.91 | 3.87 -33% | 3.47 -19% | 2.82 3% | 5.67 -95% | 3.69 -27% | 6.93 -138% | 5.88 -102% | 3.46 -19% |
Load Maximum * | 2.93 | 5.79 -98% | 3.71 -27% | 3.36 -15% | 9.16 -213% | 5.98 -104% | 7.59 -159% | 7.67 -162% | 5.18 -77% |
* ... smaller is better
UMI Max 4000 mAh | UMI Touch 4000 mAh | Coolpad Torino S 1800 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Acer Liquid Z630S 4000 mAh | Leagoo Shark 1 6300 mAh | UMI Super Euro Edition 4000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 588 | 553 -6% | 397 -32% | 517 -12% | 412 -30% | 681 16% | 542 -8% | 638 9% | 584 -1% |
Pros
Cons
我们的测试表明,UMi Max是一台有着优秀外观的入门级手机,尽管有一些细小的工艺缺陷。考虑到它的价格,一些缺点是可以被接受的,例如:不准确的GPS模块,相对来说偏重的重量以及较长的相机加载时间。内置eMMC存储和SD卡读卡器的访问速度都偏低,这在入门级手机上是一个典型问题。
在另一方面,UMi Max以它有着高亮度,高分辨率以及出色对比度的屏幕得到了高分。在这个价位上很少看到这么好的屏幕。此外,它的性能和连接性都非常好。耗电量很低而且支持快速充电。
如果5.5寸显示屏和199g(约合7盎司)的重量不被考虑在内问题的话,作为入门级手机我们推荐UMi Max。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
UMI Max
- 11/07/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich