Umidigi Z2 Pro智能手机评测

Name: Umidigi Z2 Pro
Brand: Umidigi

引人注目的“傻瓜相机“

Umidigi Z2 Pro是众多iPhone X模仿者中的一员，它有着引人注目的外观设计和可圈可点的硬件配置，其中最具有辨识度的就是前后各一颗1600万像素的摄像头。

Florian Schaar, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 11/25/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Chinese Tech Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of coolicool.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Umidigi Z2 Pro (Z Series)

Processor

Mediatek Helio P60 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73 / A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G72 MP3, Core: 800 MHz

Memory

6 GB

Display

6.20 inch 18.7:9, 2246 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, 电容屏, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 112 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm jack, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: p-sensor, l-sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, geomagnetic sensor, USB-C

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM, HSPA, TLE 4G LTE: B28A/B28B, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 153.4 x 74.4

Battery

3550 mAh

Operating System

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix dual: 16MP + 8MP, 6 element lens, S5K2P7, f/1.7
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix dual: 16MP + 8MP, 5 element lens, IMX371, f/2.0

Additional features

Speakers: 1, Keyboard: virtual, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

165 g, Power Supply: 73 g

Price

300 Euro

Links

Umidigi homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	668 MBit/s +99%
HTC U11 Plus Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	583 MBit/s +74%
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash	335 (313^min - 342^max) MBit/s
Honor View 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	223 MBit/s -33%
Huawei P10 Plus Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	128 MBit/s -62%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	654 MBit/s +95%
HTC U11 Plus Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 MBit/s +3%
Umidigi Z2 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash	336 (200^min - 344^max) MBit/s
Honor View 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	200 MBit/s -40%
Huawei P10 Plus Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	40.8 MBit/s -88%

Umidigi Z2 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (200-344)

Umidigi Z2 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P60, 128 GB eMMC Flash; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (313-342)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


525 cd/m²	490 cd/m²	428 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	479 cd/m²	414 cd/m²
490 cd/m²	468 cd/m²	383 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 525 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 465.6 cd/m² Minimum: 17.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 73 %
Center on Battery: 479 cd/m²
Contrast: 1774:1 (Black: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.47

	Umidigi Z2 Pro IPS, 2246x1080, 6.2"	Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5"	HTC U11 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6"	Honor View 10 IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S IPS, 2160x1080, 6"
Screen		26%	27%	27%	5%
Brightness middle	479	568 19%	361 -25%	530 11%	492 3%
Brightness	466	562 21%	356 -24%	523 12%	463 -1%
Brightness Distribution	73	92 26%	90 23%	88 21%	90 23%
Black Level *	0.27	0.43 -59%	0.21 22%	0.35 -30%	0.59 -119%
Contrast	1774	1321 -26%	1719 -3%	1514 -15%	834 -53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.2	2.4 71%	2.5 70%	2.4 71%	2.4 71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	16.2	3.8 77%	5.3 67%	5.5 66%	6.2 62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.5	2.5 76%	1.7 84%	2.2 79%	4.5 57%
Gamma	2.47 ^89%	2.37 ^93%	2.21 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	9193 ^71%	6779 ^96%	6580 ^99%	6598 ^99%	6395 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25.2 ms rise
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1852 Points
HTC U11 Plus	1935 Points
Honor View 10	1918 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	2456 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1612 Points
BQ Aquaris X2	1323 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1620 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1472 - 1487, n=2)	1480 Points
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	Points
Huawei P10 Plus	6267 Points
HTC U11 Plus	6771 Points
Honor View 10	6785 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	8937 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	5615 Points
BQ Aquaris X2	4974 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6X	5843 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5554 - 5743, n=2)	5649 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
HTC U11 Plus	7946 Points
Honor View 10	9015 Points
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	3909 Points
BQ Aquaris X2	4309 Points
Xiaomi Mi 6X	5486 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5172 - 5309, n=2)	5241 Points
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	9893 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	7377 Points -25%
HTC U11 Plus	7964 Points -19%
Honor View 10	8306 Points -16%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	9179 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	8525 Points -14%
BQ Aquaris X2	6437 Points -35%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	6723 Points -32%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8609 - 11387, n=7)	9916 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	7384 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	6157 Points -17%
HTC U11 Plus	6695 Points -9%
Honor View 10	6724 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	8078 Points +9%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	Points -100%
BQ Aquaris X2	5706 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	5995 Points -19%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6934 - 7954, n=7)	7309 Points -1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	21538 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	26156 Points +21%
HTC U11 Plus	41644 Points +93%
Honor View 10	20022 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	56913 Points +164%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	20466 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	12120 Points -44%
BQ Aquaris X2	19743 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	26731 Points +24%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17082 - 22323, n=5)	20432 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	20991 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	33307 Points +59%
HTC U11 Plus	58307 Points +178%
Honor View 10	22429 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	76078 Points +262%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	21465 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	12426 Points -41%
BQ Aquaris X2	20806 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	28984 Points +38%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16820 - 21847, n=5)	19897 Points -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	23697 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	14934 Points -37%
HTC U11 Plus	20820 Points -12%
Honor View 10	14556 Points -39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	30245 Points +28%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	17598 Points -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	11158 Points -53%
BQ Aquaris X2	16747 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	21016 Points -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (18065 - 24828, n=5)	22578 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1273 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	2229 Points +75%
HTC U11 Plus	4982 Points +291%
Honor View 10	1943 Points +53%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	4540 Points +257%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1441 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	673 Points -47%
BQ Aquaris X2	1478 Points +16%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2023 Points +59%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1008 - 1755, n=6)	1421 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +230%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1112 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	2469 Points +122%
HTC U11 Plus	6060 Points +445%
Honor View 10	1954 Points +76%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	6630 Points +496%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1277 Points +15%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	568 Points -49%
BQ Aquaris X2	1337 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1891 Points +70%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (861 - 1593, n=6)	1272 Points +14%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +326%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2587 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1662 Points -36%
HTC U11 Plus	3071 Points +19%
Honor View 10	1906 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	2159 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	2625 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1907 Points -26%
BQ Aquaris X2	2338 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2680 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2159 - 2720, n=6)	2494 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +28%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1595 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	2638 Points +65%
HTC U11 Plus	4956 Points +211%
Honor View 10	2021 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	4054 Points +154%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1481 Points -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	844 Points -47%
BQ Aquaris X2	1540 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2121 Points +33%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1309 - 1817, n=6)	1649 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +596%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1423 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	2755 Points +94%
HTC U11 Plus	6359 Points +347%
Honor View 10	2062 Points +45%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	5228 Points +267%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1316 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	740 Points -48%
BQ Aquaris X2	1402 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1981 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1159 - 1680, n=6)	1495 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +1285%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2765 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	2296 Points -17%
HTC U11 Plus	2797 Points +1%
Honor View 10	1891 Points -32%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	2270 Points -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	2637 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1656 Points -40%
BQ Aquaris X2	2359 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2815 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2388 - 2924, n=6)	2664 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	959 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1747 Points +82%
HTC U11 Plus	3732 Points +289%
Honor View 10	2980 Points +211%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	4248 Points +343%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	960 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	550 Points -43%
BQ Aquaris X2	955 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1335 Points +39%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (733 - 1273, n=8)	1052 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +222%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	815 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1767 Points +117%
HTC U11 Plus	3987 Points +389%
Honor View 10	2994 Points +267%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	5181 Points +536%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	812 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	457 Points -44%
BQ Aquaris X2	816 Points 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1164 Points +43%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (628 - 1119, n=8)	910 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +300%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2512 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1679 Points -33%
HTC U11 Plus	3049 Points +21%
Honor View 10	2931 Points +17%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	2606 Points +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	2641 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1924 Points -23%
BQ Aquaris X2	2353 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2757 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2149 - 2528, n=8)	2455 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1007 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1750 Points +74%
HTC U11 Plus	4025 Points +300%
Honor View 10	2487 Points +147%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	3742 Points +272%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	952 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	563 Points -44%
BQ Aquaris X2	1016 Points +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1417 Points +41%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (853 - 1282, n=8)	1116 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +671%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	881 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1732 Points +97%
HTC U11 Plus	4471 Points +407%
Honor View 10	2730 Points +210%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	4621 Points +425%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	803 Points -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	470 Points -47%
BQ Aquaris X2	872 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1244 Points +41%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (721 - 1122, n=8)	964 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +1209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2013 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1817 Points -10%
HTC U11 Plus	2984 Points +48%
Honor View 10	1897 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	2246 Points +12%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	2699 Points +34%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1851 Points -8%
BQ Aquaris X2	2396 Points +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2764 Points +37%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2013 - 2918, n=8)	2540 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +129%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	31 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	40 fps +29%
HTC U11 Plus	60 fps +94%
Honor View 10	59 fps +90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	60 fps +94%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	36 fps +16%
BQ Aquaris X2	34 fps +10%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	48 fps +55%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (31 - 40, n=6)	34.2 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +178%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	37 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	56 fps +51%
HTC U11 Plus	113 fps +205%
Honor View 10	125 fps +238%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	150 fps +305%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	39 fps +5%
BQ Aquaris X2	36 fps -3%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	50 fps +35%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (30 - 38, n=6)	35.8 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +665%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	18 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	29 fps +61%
HTC U11 Plus	35 fps +94%
Honor View 10	55 fps +206%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	59 fps +228%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	19 fps +6%
BQ Aquaris X2	15 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	21 fps +17%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (17 - 29, n=6)	20.2 fps +12%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +319%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	20 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	19 fps -5%
HTC U11 Plus	60 fps +200%
Honor View 10	66 fps +230%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	74 fps +270%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	21 fps +5%
BQ Aquaris X2	16 fps -20%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	23 fps +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (16 - 21, n=6)	19.2 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +736%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	11 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	12 fps +9%
HTC U11 Plus	21 fps +91%
Honor View 10	36 fps +227%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	55 fps +400%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	13 fps +18%
BQ Aquaris X2	9.8 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	14 fps +27%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (11 - 20, n=6)	12.5 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +496%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	12 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	22 fps +83%
HTC U11 Plus	41 fps +242%
Honor View 10	21 fps +75%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	60 fps +400%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	14 fps +17%
BQ Aquaris X2	10 fps -17%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	15 fps +25%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (9.6 - 12, n=6)	11.6 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +888%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	6.7 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	10 fps +49%
HTC U11 Plus	13 fps +94%
Honor View 10	21 fps +213%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	34 fps +407%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	6.8 fps +1%
BQ Aquaris X2	6 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	8.6 fps +28%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.7 - 7.4, n=6)	7.03 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.9 fps +615%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	7.1 fps
Huawei P10 Plus	15 fps +111%
HTC U11 Plus	25 fps +252%
Honor View 10	21 fps +196%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	35 fps +393%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	7.6 fps +7%
BQ Aquaris X2	6.3 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	9 fps +27%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (5.8 - 7.7, n=6)	7.05 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	71.2 fps +903%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	6.6 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	4.6 fps -30%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.6 - 8.6, n=7)	7.5 fps +14%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 247, n=202, last 2 years)	50.5 fps +665%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	7.2 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	5.1 fps -29%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (6.2 - 8.3, n=7)	7.63 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	80.3 fps +1015%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	4.1 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	7 fps +71%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.6 - 6.4, n=7)	4.49 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.6 fps +817%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2.6 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	3.1 fps +19%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (2.1 - 4.3, n=7)	2.87 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	32.3 fps +1142%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	8.99 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	8 (4.37^min - 18.54^max) fps -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 ()	8.99 fps 0%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	7.78 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	7.26 (4.28^min - 15.89^max) fps -7%
BQ Aquaris X2	6.63 fps -15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	8.96 fps +15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 ()	7.78 fps 0%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	11.7 fps
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	10.3 (5.11^min - 27.4^max) fps -12%
BQ Aquaris X2	7.5 fps -36%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	10.11 fps -14%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (7.98 - 11.7, n=2)	9.84 fps -16%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	137018 Points
HTC U11 Plus	217442 Points +59%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	266601 Points +95%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	139050 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2	116748 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	140714 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (119367 - 138589, n=5)	131946 Points -4%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	110668 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	138326 Points +25%
HTC U11 Plus	183057 Points +65%
Honor View 10	173653 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	162183 Points +47%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	111303 Points +1%
BQ Aquaris X2	96430 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	110680 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (91667 - 110668, n=4)	102435 Points -7%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1119 Score
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	961 Score -14%
BQ Aquaris X2	681 Score -39%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	999 Score -11%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1029 - 1119, n=2)	1074 Score -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score +420%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2096 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	2563 Points +22%
HTC U11 Plus	3447 Points +64%
Honor View 10	3181 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	3614 Points +72%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	2417 (5556^min) Points +15%
BQ Aquaris X2	1972 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2343 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1830 - 2096, n=4)	1980 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +202%
System (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	3987 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	3572 Points -10%
HTC U11 Plus	5926 Points +49%
Honor View 10	5195 Points +30%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	5792 Points +45%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	5556 Points +39%
BQ Aquaris X2	4434 Points +11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	4797 Points +20%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (3817 - 4736, n=4)	4114 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +155%
Memory (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	2721 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	3331 Points +22%
HTC U11 Plus	3376 Points +24%
Honor View 10	4276 Points +57%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	3012 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	3507 Points +29%
BQ Aquaris X2	2016 Points -26%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2470 Points -9%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1958 - 2721, n=4)	2276 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +149%
Graphics (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1532 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	3438 Points +124%
HTC U11 Plus	6086 Points +297%
Honor View 10	3892 Points +154%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	7918 Points +417%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1450 Points -5%
BQ Aquaris X2	1597 Points +4%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2295 Points +50%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1262 - 1590, n=4)	1468 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +1020%
Web (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	1161 Points
Huawei P10 Plus	1054 Points -9%
HTC U11 Plus	1159 Points 0%
Honor View 10	1184 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	1234 Points +6%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	1208 Points +4%
BQ Aquaris X2	1059 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1108 Points -5%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (1083 - 1161, n=4)	1130 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +35%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Umidigi Z2 Pro	413 Points
HTC U11 Plus	868 Points +110%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite	431 Points +4%
BQ Aquaris X2	260 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 6X	353 Points -15%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (322 - 413, n=2)	368 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +461%

Legend

Umidigi Z2 Pro Mediatek Helio P60, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 128 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P10 Plus HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

HTC U11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 20 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek Helio P60

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	69.8 Points +52%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	64.9 Points +42%
Huawei P10 Plus	58.4 Points +28%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	52.1 Points +14%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)	47.32 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (41.7 - 48.9, n=6)	45.8 Points 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)	45.79 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)	44.24 Points -3%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	34.87 Points -24%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +332%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	14491 Points +68%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	11553 Points +34%
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)	10213 Points +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	9995 Points +16%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)	9041 Points +5%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)	9004 Points +4%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (8287 - 10257, n=7)	8975 Points +4%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)	8626 Points
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	6729 Points -22%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	6013 ms * -40%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	4769 ms * -11%
BQ Aquaris X2	4733 ms * -10%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (4309 - 4773, n=6)	4486 ms * -4%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)	4309 ms *
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)	4205 ms * +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	3132 ms * +27%
Huawei P10 Plus (Chrome 58.0.3029.83)	3107 ms * +28%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	2868 ms * +33%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +64%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +175%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	98 Points +81%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	61 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)	59 Points +9%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)	54 Points 0%
Umidigi Z2 Pro	54 Points
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (43 - 54, n=4)	49.8 Points -8%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)	228 Points +37%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	179 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	173 Points +4%
Umidigi Z2 Pro (Chrome 69)	167 Points
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)	164 Points -2%
Honor View 10 (Chrome 63)	157 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio P60 (139 - 167, n=2)	153 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 20 Lite (Chrome 69)	148 Points -11%
Huawei P10 Plus	140 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

	Umidigi Z2 Pro	Huawei P10 Plus	HTC U11 Plus	Honor View 10	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		135%	128%	159%	189%	29%	707%
Sequential Read 256KB	292.9	733 150%	728 149%	810 177%	756 158%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=76) -3%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 531%
Sequential Write 256KB	188.1	182.6 -3%	207.9 11%	194.3 3%	208.1 11%	194.6 ?(72.3 - 314, n=76) 3%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 663%
Random Read 4KB	86.2	173.1 101%	132.4 54%	144.3 67%	135.1 57%	82.7 ?(8.63 - 247, n=76) -4%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 221%
Random Write 4KB	20.34	149.8 636%	135.7 567%	160 687%	128.4 531%	55.1 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=76) 171%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 1414%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	54 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -29%	75.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	81 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%		78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	58.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	33.61 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -43%	51.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%	65.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11%		61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) 5%

Shadow Fight 3

Umidigi Z2 Pro; high: Ø52.4 (1-57)

Asphalt 9

Umidigi Z2 Pro; High Quality: Ø26.4 (1-31)

World of Tanks Blitz

Umidigi Z2 Pro; low AA:0x AF:0x: Ø45.3 (25-57)

Umidigi Z2 Pro; high AA:0x AF:0x: Ø47.4 (18-57)

Asphalt 9: Legends
	Settings	Value
	High Quality	28 fps
	Standard / low	29 fps

World of Tanks v8
	Resolution	Settings	Value
	1024x768	Minimum Preset

Max. Load

Idle


33.3 °C	32.5 °C	32.7 °C
29.3 °C	30.4 °C	32 °C
29.5 °C	30.6 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 33.3 °C
Average: 31.3 °C


28.3 °C	30 °C	32.9 °C
38.6 °C	29.5 °C	32.7 °C
28.8 °C	29.3 °C	30.6 °C

Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 31.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Umidigi Z2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | very high highs - on average 15.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.12 Watt
Idle	0.71 / 2.01 / 2.03 Watt
Load	3.61 / 7.34 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Umidigi Z2 Pro 3550 mAh	Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh	HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh	Honor View 10 3750 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh	Average Mediatek Helio P60	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-49%	7%	-29%	-19%	-12%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	0.71	1.03 -45%	0.51 28%	1.05 -48%	0.75 -6%	0.97 ?(0.56 - 1.8, n=6) -37%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Average *	2.01	2.61 -30%	1.62 19%	2.36 -17%	2.25 -12%	2.36 ?(1.72 - 3.3, n=6) -17%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 28%
Idle Maximum *	2.03	2.83 -39%	1.87 8%	2.41 -19%	2.26 -11%	2.41 ?(1.76 - 3.4, n=6) -19%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	3.61	7.03 -95%	3.92 -9%	4.93 -37%	4.89 -35%	3.53 ?(2.74 - 4.4, n=6) 2%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -80%
Load Maximum *	7.34	10.08 -37%	8.27 -13%	9.04 -23%	9.6 -31%	6.45 ?(5 - 8.3, n=6) 12%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -34%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		21h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 54min

	Umidigi Z2 Pro 3550 mAh	Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh	HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh	Honor View 10 3750 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		1%	6%	12%	7%
Reader / Idle	1269	1655 30%	1625 28%	1671 32%	1678 32%
WiFi v1.3	669	760 14%	607 -9%	679 1%	716 7%
Load	294	174 -41%	291 -1%	305 4%	239 -19%
H.264		756	611	819	718

Pros

+ 稳固的机身

+ 窄边框

+ 优秀的相机

+ 够用的性能

+ 发热极少

+ 低功耗

+ 精确的GPS

+ 双卡双待

+ 海量存储空间

+ 无线充电

+ 支持SD卡拓展

Cons

- 指纹识别器不准确

- 陀螺仪倾斜

- 外放效果差

- 无3.5毫米接口

In Review: Umidigi Z2 Pro. Test device courtesy of coolicool.com

Umidigi Z2 Pro 是一台典型的国产手机，它做得很不错，你可能会觉得这对你来说是台完美的手机，不过不久后你就会发现它的一些小缺陷。

不过，我们先来讲讲它的优点。不到3000的售价对于一台拥有6 GB运存和128 GB储存的手机来说很有吸引力。它的CPU和图形处理器不是最好的，但它们的性能已经超出了大部分用户的需求。外观设计也是非常吸引消费者的一点，机身做工无可挑剔，相机虽然算不上完美，但已经足够优秀。

“够用的硬件，有吸引力的相机，以及一点点小问题。“

所有的一切看起来相当诱人，但我们也遇到了问题：这台手机的陀螺仪是倾斜的，我们在两个赛车游戏中发现了这一点，以至于我们必须将手机略微倾斜来直线行驶。这一点使得我们将总体评分减去了一个百分点。因为对于经常使用这个功能的用户来说，无论是用指南针还是玩赛车游戏时，这都很成问题。如果后面我们发现这个问题只是个例，我们将加回这一分。除此之外，我们还发现这台手机的指纹识别非常缓慢，甚至有时会根本识别不到。

而对于不在意这些功能的消费者们，这台Z2 Pro值得购买。

Umidigi Z2 Pro - 10/26/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schaar

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

45 / 60 → 75%

Weight

91%

Battery

94%

Display

80%

Games Performance

47 / 63 → 75%

Application Performance

65 / 70 → 93%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

72%

Add Points

-1%

Average

71%

85%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 460014 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Umidigi Z2 Pro智能手机评测

Florian Schaar, 2018-11-25 (Update: 2018-11-25)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Shadow Fight 3

Asphalt 9

World of Tanks Blitz

Umidigi Z2 Pro audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison