Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: VAIO SX14
Brand: VAIO

久等了。

Vaio回来了！在前索尼个人电脑业务几乎完全只在日本市场运营的几年后，知名的PC品牌回归世界市场。新款Vaio SX14凭借其轻巧，几乎无边框的设计和出色的接口选择，试图给商务和办公用户留下深刻印象。

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/28/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Whiskey Lake Laptop / Notebook Business Ultrabook

Test device courtesy of notebook.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

VAIO SX14 (SX Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-8265U 4 x 1.6 - 3.9 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U

Graphics adapter

Intel UHD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR3-2133板载内存

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, HV140FHM-N61, IPS LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium

Storage

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB

, M.2 2280, PCIe NVMe

Soundcard

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 组合音频, Card Reader: SD卡读卡器, Touch-FP-Leser Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, Telit LM940, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 320.4 x 222.7

Battery

38 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 920p网络摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 扬声器, Keyboard: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard Light: yes, Vaio控制中心，Vaio剪切工具，Microsoft Office试用版, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.008 kg, Power Supply: 286 g

Price

9988 Euro

Links

VAIO homepage
VAIO notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size & weight comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 VAIO SX14 Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Dell Latitude 7390 DIN A4 ❌

right: SD card-reader, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type A, USB 3.1 Gen 2 type C, HDMI, RJ45, VGA

left: charging port, Kensington lock slot, 2x USB 3.0 type A, combo audio

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	667 MBit/s +9%
VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	610 (575^min - 631^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	511 MBit/s -16%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	463 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	633 MBit/s +15%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	578 MBit/s +5%
VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	550 (434^min - 580^max) MBit/s
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	525 MBit/s -5%

VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø549 (434-580)

VAIO SX14 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (575-631)


250 cd/m²	251 cd/m²	244 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	277 cd/m²	259 cd/m²
252 cd/m²	277 cd/m²	285 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

HV140FHM-N61 tested with 5.6

Maximum: 285 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 261.9 cd/m² Minimum: 281 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Contrast: 1108:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	VAIO SX14 HV140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14"	Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T AU Optronics AUO353D / B140HAN03.5, , 1920x1080, 14"	Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3"
Display		-2%	-3%	-9%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	72.4	68.3 -6%	67.8 -6%	64 -12%	67.5 -7%
sRGB Coverage	95.3	94.9 0%	95.1 0%	89.1 -7%	94.5 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.8	69.3 -1%	67.8 -3%	65.2 -7%	68.7 -2%
Response Times		17%	13%	-2%	-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	43 ?(22, 21)	40 ?(18, 22) 7%	36.8 ?(18, 18.8) 14%	48.8 ?(18, 30.8) -13%	43 ?(21, 22) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	34 ?(19, 15)	25 ?(14, 11) 26%	30.4 ?(18.8, 11.6) 11%	30.8 ?(8, 22.8) 9%	29 ?(16, 13) 15%
PWM Frequency	2000 ?(90)				217 ?(20) -89%
Screen		25%	10%	-15%	14%
Brightness middle	277	298 8%	303.8 10%	319 15%	344 24%
Brightness	262	287 10%	289 10%	294 12%	320 22%
Brightness Distribution	86	91 6%	86 0%	87 1%	77 -10%
Black Level *	0.25	0.2 20%	0.31 -24%	0.26 -4%	0.31 -24%
Contrast	1108	1490 34%	980 -12%	1227 11%	1110 0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.05	2.19 57%	2.9 43%	7.1 -41%	2.72 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.63	4.39 49%	5.79 33%	13.7 -59%	5.92 31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.25	1.97 68%	3.7 41%	9.61 -54%	2.74 56%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.43 ^91%	2.118 ^104%	2.33 ^94%	2.38 ^92%
CCT	7227 ^90%	6571 ^99%	6323 ^103%	6021 ^108%	6794 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	62	62 0%	63 2%	54.01 -13%	61 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95	95 0%	95 0%	83.02 -13%	94 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1.67	1.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)		13% / 19%	7% / 8%	-9% / -12%	-5% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2000 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

VAIO SX14 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø577 (571-626)

Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø504 (501.01-528.9)

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U; undervolted: Ø657 (651.36-692.5)

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø606 (601.59-638.02)

Dell Latitude 7390 Intel Core i7-8650U, Intel Core i7-8650U: Ø611 (578.18-626.37)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years)	250 Points +53%
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel Core i7-8650U	176 Points +8%
VAIO SX14 Intel Core i5-8265U	163 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35)	155 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Intel Core i5-8350U	150 Points -8%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Core i5-8250U	144 Points -12%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel Core i5-7200U	127 Points -22%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years)	1978 Points +209%
VAIO SX14 Intel Core i5-8265U	640 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Intel Core i5-8350U	631 Points -1%
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel Core i7-8650U	626 (578^min - 626^max) Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38)	592 Points -7%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel Core i5-8250U	529 Points -17%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel Core i5-7200U	321 Points -50%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

52.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

640 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

163 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1389 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

397 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years)	6447 Points +68%
Dell Latitude 7390 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4053 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3905 Points +2%
VAIO SX14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3846 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2247 - 3985, n=29)	3705 Points -4%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3514 Points -9%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years)	10480 Points +32%
Dell Latitude 7390 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	8253 Points +4%
VAIO SX14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7949 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7849 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5073 - 8689, n=29)	7833 Points -1%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	7149 Points -10%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years)	8633 Points +39%
Dell Latitude 7390 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	7142 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6727 Points +8%
VAIO SX14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6215 Points
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	6079 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2941 - 6556, n=29)	6061 Points -2%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years)	8124 Points +160%
VAIO SX14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3126 Points
Dell Latitude 7390 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3068 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3062 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2067 - 3210, n=29)	2917 Points -7%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	2711 Points -13%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7390 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3886 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3752 Points +7%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	3714 Points +6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3676 Points +5%
VAIO SX14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3496 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2747 - 4244, n=24)	3442 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (1739 - 4730, n=2, last 2 years)	3235 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 7390 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5197 Points +6%
VAIO SX14 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4919 Points
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	4747 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4664 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3132 - 4927, n=23)	4657 Points -5%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)	4630 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (1609 - 5271, n=2, last 2 years)	3440 Points -30%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3496 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4919 points
PCMark 10 Score		3846 points
Help

	VAIO SX14 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Dell Latitude 7390 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		14%	8%	-52%	52%
Write 4K	101.8	131.9 30%	139.4 37%	80.5 -21%	116.1 ?(50.2 - 183.6, n=25) 14%
Read 4K	37.63	44.6 19%	43.18 15%	26.14 -31%	189.5 ?(31.4 - 3738, n=25) 404%
Write Seq	1384	1824 32%	1075 -22%	396.8 -71%	1409 ?(991 - 1687, n=24) 2%
Read Seq	2061	2163 5%	1639 -20%	473.1 -77%	1624 ?(755 - 2300, n=24) -21%
Write 4K Q32T1	489.3	338.1 -31%	662 35%	264.2 -46%	360 ?(205 - 568, n=25) -26%
Read 4K Q32T1	281.2	351.9 25%	413.9 47%	244 -13%	396 ?(229 - 645, n=25) 41%
Write Seq Q32T1	1515	1972 30%	1195 -21%	464.6 -69%	1492 ?(1104 - 1712, n=25) -2%
Read Seq Q32T1	3324	3387 2%	3116 -6%	525 -84%	3313 ?(1529 - 3522, n=25) 0%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ

Sequential Read: 2410 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1392 MB/s

512K Read: 1624 MB/s

512K Write: 1429 MB/s

4K Read: 59.7 MB/s

4K Write: 132.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 421.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 673 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=56, last 2 years)	9532 Points +407%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1901 Points +1%
VAIO SX14 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1880 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244)	1749 Points -7%
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U	1697 Points -10%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1657 Points -12%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1557 Points -17%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=30, last 2 years)	37354 Points +248%
VAIO SX14 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	10724 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	10123 Points -6%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	9291 Points -13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225)	9262 Points -14%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8433 Points -21%
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U	8247 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=60, last 2 years)	6964 Points +438%
VAIO SX14 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1294 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1283 Points -1%
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1169 Points -10%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213)	1161 Points -10%
Dell Latitude 7390 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8650U	977 Points -24%
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	975 Points -25%

3DMark 11 Performance		2114 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		9208 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1176 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	78.7	39.7	33.5	10.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	17.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	24.5	14.9

Noise Level

Idle		32.5 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB(A)
Load		43.3 / 43.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


35.9 °C	35.4 °C	31.6 °C
35.4 °C	38.7 °C	31.7 °C
27.6 °C	27.9 °C	28.1 °C

Maximum: 38.7 °C
Average: 32.5 °C


32 °C	37 °C	41 °C
29.7 °C	42 °C	29.1 °C
27.6 °C	28.4 °C	24.7 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 32.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50.2 °C | Room Temperature 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

VAIO SX14 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.28 / 0.4 Watt
Idle	4.4 / 7.9 / 8 Watt
Load	38 / 44.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	VAIO SX14 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14"	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14"	Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Average Intel UHD Graphics 620	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		-18%	11%	20%	29%	4%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	4.4	3.8 14%	3.3 25%	3.1 30%	2.4 45%	3.81 ?(1 - 12.4, n=259) 13%	4.44 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=61, last 2 years) -1%
Idle Average *	7.9	8.9 -13%	5.9 25%	6.1 23%	5.5 30%	6.94 ?(2.8 - 15.7, n=261) 12%	7.55 ?(2.5 - 16, n=61, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Maximum *	8	11.9 -49%	6.2 22%	6.8 15%	6 25%	8.75 ?(3.8 - 30, n=259) -9%	9.45 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=61, last 2 years) -18%
Load Average *	38	47.5 -25%	43.2 -14%	27.4 28%	31 18%	35 ?(8.1 - 51.6, n=259) 8%	45.8 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=59, last 2 years) -21%
Load Maximum *	44.9	52.5 -17%	45.2 -1%	43.7 3%	32.6 27%	47.5 ?(22 - 96.3, n=261) -6%	68.4 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=61, last 2 years) -52%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		10h 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge)		5h 39min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 36min

	VAIO SX14 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh	Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh	Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		57%	96%	59%	45%	114%
Reader / Idle	605	1328 120%		1137 88%	1167 93%	1750 ?(581 - 3407, n=12, last 2 years) 189%
H.264	390	566 45%			433 11%	911 ?(527 - 1298, n=27, last 2 years) 134%
WiFi v1.3	339	519 53%	664 96%	531 57%	506 49%	726 ?(389 - 1585, n=62, last 2 years) 114%
Load	96	106 10%		126 31%	123 28%	115.4 ?(57 - 197, n=48, last 2 years) 20%

Pros

+ 轻巧稳定的机身

+ 舒适的键盘

+ 屏幕具有良好的色域覆盖范围

+ 丰富的接口选择（VGA，RJ45，SD卡读卡器）

+ 标配LTE模块

+ 良好的CPU性能

+ 机身在负载下不会变热

Cons

- 电池续航时间不佳

- 烦人的风扇控制

- 没有雷电3

- 触摸板太小了

- 扬声器很一般

- 没有ISO键盘

- 售价高昂

Vaio SX14应该是Vaio回归世界PC市场的重要产品。这次复出是否成功？在某些方面它是，但遗憾的是，Vaio犯了两个相当大的错误。

让我们首先看看索尼Vaio继任者的积极方面。我们非常喜欢轻巧的机身，而且尽管它的轻盈，也仍然具有一定的稳定性。我们也喜欢舒适的键盘。雾面屏不是很亮，但它确实具有足够高的sRGB色域覆盖率，可以进行照片编辑。接口选择很丰富。特别是VGA端口是目前大多数其他笔记本电脑所不具备的。值得赞扬的是，所有型号（至少在德国都是这样）都具有LTE功能 - 但并非每个竞争对手都能使用LTE模块。最后值得一提的是，Vaio SX14提供了良好的CPU性能，即使在负载下也能保持机身凉爽。

一款带有LTE模块和大量端口的超轻型笔记本电脑——这听起来像是一台非常棒的商务本，但如果设备续航水平不佳，那么这些好处又有什么意义？不幸的是，这台笔记本内置电池非常小，甚至无法在WiFi测试中保持Vaio SX14运行5小时。似乎Vaio过分强调低重量，故意放入更小的电池以减轻重量。这几乎意味着Vaio在没有移动电源的情况下无法长时间使用。风扇控制是第二大问题：无论设备是空转还是负载，我们发现风扇始终非常烦人。这根本就没必要。考虑到这些问题，Vaio SX14的剩余问题，例如缺少的Thunderbolt 3端口，小触摸板，一般般的扬声器，缺少的ISO键盘选项和高价格看起来也没那么重要。