Vaio SX14 (i5-8265U, FHD) 笔记本电脑评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 |
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Contrast: 1108:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.25 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
VAIO SX14 HV140FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK Lenovo LEN40A9 / AUO B140HAK02.3, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 7390 LGD059B, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T AU Optronics AUO353D / B140HAN03.5, , 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Sharp LQ133M1JW28, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -3% | -9% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 72.4 | 68.3 -6% | 67.8 -6% | 64 -12% | 67.5 -7% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 94.9 0% | 95.1 0% | 89.1 -7% | 94.5 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.8 | 69.3 -1% | 67.8 -3% | 65.2 -7% | 68.7 -2% |
Response Times | 17% | 13% | -2% | -25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 40 ? 7% | 36.8 ? 14% | 48.8 ? -13% | 43 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 25 ? 26% | 30.4 ? 11% | 30.8 ? 9% | 29 ? 15% |
PWM Frequency | 2000 ? | 217 ? -89% | |||
Screen | 25% | 10% | -15% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 277 | 298 8% | 303.8 10% | 319 15% | 344 24% |
Brightness | 262 | 287 10% | 289 10% | 294 12% | 320 22% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 86 0% | 87 1% | 77 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.2 20% | 0.31 -24% | 0.26 -4% | 0.31 -24% |
Contrast | 1108 | 1490 34% | 980 -12% | 1227 11% | 1110 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.05 | 2.19 57% | 2.9 43% | 7.1 -41% | 2.72 46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.63 | 4.39 49% | 5.79 33% | 13.7 -59% | 5.92 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.25 | 1.97 68% | 3.7 41% | 9.61 -54% | 2.74 56% |
Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.43 91% | 2.118 104% | 2.33 94% | 2.38 92% |
CCT | 7227 90% | 6571 99% | 6323 103% | 6021 108% | 6794 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 62 0% | 63 2% | 54.01 -13% | 61 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 95 0% | 95 0% | 83.02 -13% | 94 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.67 | 1.72 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
19% | 7% /
8% | -9% /
-12% | -5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 2000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 7390 | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=62, last 2 years) | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G6-20KG0025UK | |
Dell Latitude 7390 | |
Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3496 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4919 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3846 points | |
Help |
VAIO SX14 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 7390 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 14% | 8% | -52% | 52% | |
Write 4K | 101.8 | 131.9 30% | 139.4 37% | 80.5 -21% | 116.1 ? 14% |
Read 4K | 37.63 | 44.6 19% | 43.18 15% | 26.14 -31% | 189.5 ? 404% |
Write Seq | 1384 | 1824 32% | 1075 -22% | 396.8 -71% | 1409 ? 2% |
Read Seq | 2061 | 2163 5% | 1639 -20% | 473.1 -77% | 1624 ? -21% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 489.3 | 338.1 -31% | 662 35% | 264.2 -46% | 360 ? -26% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 281.2 | 351.9 25% | 413.9 47% | 244 -13% | 396 ? 41% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1515 | 1972 30% | 1195 -21% | 464.6 -69% | 1492 ? -2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3324 | 3387 2% | 3116 -6% | 525 -84% | 3313 ? 0% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
Dell Latitude 7390 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=28, last 2 years) | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T | |
Dell Latitude 7390 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=56, last 2 years) | |
VAIO SX14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U938 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
Dell Latitude 7390 | |
Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2114 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9208 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1176 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 78.7 | 39.7 | 33.5 | 10.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.4 | |||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 24.5 | 14.9 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 32.5 / 32.5 / 32.5 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.3 / 43.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.1 °C / 82.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.2 °C / 0.3 F).
VAIO SX14 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.4 Watt |
Idle | 4.4 / 7.9 / 8 Watt |
Load |
38 / 44.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
VAIO SX14 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | 11% | 20% | 29% | 4% | -20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.8 14% | 3.3 25% | 3.1 30% | 2.4 45% | 3.81 ? 13% | 4.54 ? -3% |
Idle Average * | 7.9 | 8.9 -13% | 5.9 25% | 6.1 23% | 5.5 30% | 6.94 ? 12% | 7.75 ? 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 8 | 11.9 -49% | 6.2 22% | 6.8 15% | 6 25% | 8.75 ? -9% | 9.65 ? -21% |
Load Average * | 38 | 47.5 -25% | 43.2 -14% | 27.4 28% | 31 18% | 35 ? 8% | 46.7 ? -23% |
Load Maximum * | 44.9 | 52.5 -17% | 45.2 -1% | 43.7 3% | 32.6 27% | 47.5 ? -6% | 68.8 ? -53% |
* ... smaller is better
VAIO SX14 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS03900 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Dell Latitude 7390 i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Asus ASUSPRO B9440UA-GV0100T i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Fujitsu Lifebook U938 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 57% | 96% | 59% | 45% | 106% | |
Reader / Idle | 605 | 1328 120% | 1137 88% | 1167 93% | 1599 ? 164% | |
H.264 | 390 | 566 45% | 433 11% | 896 ? 130% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 339 | 519 53% | 664 96% | 531 57% | 506 49% | 710 ? 109% |
Load | 96 | 106 10% | 126 31% | 123 28% | 116 ? 21% |
Pros
Cons
Vaio SX14应该是Vaio回归世界PC市场的重要产品。这次复出是否成功?在某些方面它是,但遗憾的是,Vaio犯了两个相当大的错误。
让我们首先看看索尼Vaio继任者的积极方面。我们非常喜欢轻巧的机身,而且尽管它的轻盈,也仍然具有一定的稳定性。我们也喜欢舒适的键盘。雾面屏不是很亮,但它确实具有足够高的sRGB色域覆盖率,可以进行照片编辑。接口选择很丰富。特别是VGA端口是目前大多数其他笔记本电脑所不具备的。值得赞扬的是,所有型号(至少在德国都是这样)都具有LTE功能 - 但并非每个竞争对手都能使用LTE模块。最后值得一提的是,Vaio SX14提供了良好的CPU性能,即使在负载下也能保持机身凉爽。
一款带有LTE模块和大量端口的超轻型笔记本电脑——这听起来像是一台非常棒的商务本,但如果设备续航水平不佳,那么这些好处又有什么意义?不幸的是,这台笔记本内置电池非常小,甚至无法在WiFi测试中保持Vaio SX14运行5小时。似乎Vaio过分强调低重量,故意放入更小的电池以减轻重量。这几乎意味着Vaio在没有移动电源的情况下无法长时间使用。风扇控制是第二大问题:无论设备是空转还是负载,我们发现风扇始终非常烦人。这根本就没必要。考虑到这些问题,Vaio SX14的剩余问题,例如缺少的Thunderbolt 3端口,小触摸板,一般般的扬声器,缺少的ISO键盘选项和高价格看起来也没那么重要。
电池续航不佳和烦人的风扇导致了Vaio SX14的完败——尽管其具有无可否认的品质。
我们真的很想推荐Vaio SX14。紧凑轻巧的设计非常吸引人。不幸的是,面对续航时间不佳和烦人的风扇控制,我们无法做到。这实在是太可惜了,因为这个设备有很大的潜力。 Vaio只需要重新设计风扇控制器并在下一个版本中加入更大的电池——即使这会导致重量略高。
VAIO SX14
-
04/30/2019 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig