Vernee Mars 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Vernee Mars | |
Honor 5C | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Honor 5C | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
Vernee Mars |
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 345 cd/m²
Contrast: 2464:1 (Black: 0.14 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.47
Vernee Mars IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5" | ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | UMI Max IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Coolpad Modena 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -20% | -15% | 1% | -23% | -41% | -23% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 345 | 412 19% | 312 -10% | 522 51% | 515 49% | 482 40% | 414 20% | 696 102% |
Brightness | 339 | 414 22% | 302 -11% | 498 47% | 498 47% | 468 38% | 420 24% | 680 101% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 94 11% | 79 -7% | 86 1% | 93 9% | 86 1% | 94 11% | 93 9% |
Black Level * | 0.14 | 0.42 -200% | 0.15 -7% | 0.23 -64% | 0.49 -250% | 0.63 -350% | 0.33 -136% | 0.42 -200% |
Contrast | 2464 | 981 -60% | 2080 -16% | 2270 -8% | 1051 -57% | 765 -69% | 1255 -49% | 1657 -33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 5.6 21% | 8.2 -15% | 6.9 3% | 6.2 13% | 6.5 8% | 8.1 -14% | 4.3 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.9 | 9.7 30% | 16.5 -19% | 12.3 12% | 11.4 18% | 12.4 11% | 13.8 1% | 9.4 32% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 6.9 -3% | 9.2 -37% | 9.2 -37% | 7.4 -10% | 7.3 -9% | 9.6 -43% | 4.8 28% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.4 92% | 2.29 96% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 1.91 115% | 2 110% | 2.33 94% |
CCT | 7711 84% | 8422 77% | 9017 72% | 8687 75% | 8664 75% | 7249 90% | 7754 84% | 7255 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 41 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
Geekbench 3 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Honor 5C | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
Honor 5C |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
GFXBench | |
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei Mate 9 | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Vernee Mars | |
Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
ZTE Blade V7 Lite | |
UMI Max | |
Honor 5C | |
Coolpad Modena 2 | |
Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
Huawei Mate 9 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Vernee Mars audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 5C audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.14 / 0.31 Watt |
Idle | 1.02 / 1.69 / 1.82 Watt |
Load |
4.39 / 6.79 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 23% | 30% | 22% | 4% | 3% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.02 | 0.68 33% | 0.63 38% | 1.02 -0% | 0.89 13% | 0.64 37% | 0.83 19% |
Idle Average * | 1.69 | 1.58 7% | 1.37 19% | 1.53 9% | 2.07 -22% | 1.96 -16% | 2.06 -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.82 | 1.61 12% | 1.71 6% | 1.62 11% | 2.15 -18% | 1.98 -9% | 2.08 -14% |
Load Average * | 4.39 | 3.36 23% | 2.82 36% | 2.91 34% | 3.46 21% | 4.99 -14% | 3.53 20% |
Load Maximum * | 6.79 | 3.91 42% | 3.36 51% | 2.93 57% | 5.18 24% | 5.48 19% | 4.49 34% |
* ... smaller is better
Vernee Mars 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh | UMI Max 4000 mAh | Honor 5C 3000 mAh | Coolpad Modena 2 2500 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 427 | 630 48% | 517 21% | 588 38% | 584 37% | 518 21% | 815 91% |
Pros
Cons
Vernee带来的Mars是一台有着出色外观,十分晚上的智能手机。考虑到目前180~190欧元(约合190~201美金,进口)的售价,这台实惠的中端手机有着十分吸引人的性价比,一块高分辨率,高对比度的IPS屏幕,优秀的系统性能以及出色的配置。
但作为代价,在扬声器音质(相比于竞品型号)和GPS性能上必须做出让步。此外,很难用1300W像素的主相机拍出有用的相片,如果能加入光学防抖则会有很大的改善。
Vernee Mars在中等价位上是一台很好的智能手机,但它缺少一个独特的卖点。例如有着相近配置的华为荣耀5C在德国也与它有着相似的售价。这使得我们对于它是否值得进口产生了怀疑。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Vernee Mars
-
11/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Marcus Herbrich