Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测

Name: Vivo Nex Dual Display
Brand: Vivo

前置摄像头已经成为过去了吗？

Vivo NEX Dual的亮点是它的两块屏幕。除了正面的传统屏幕外，NEX Dual背面还有另一个AMOLED面板。后者意味着您可以使用后置摄像头来自拍，而无需专用的前置摄像头。请继续阅读，了解这个概念的实际表现以及NEX Dual与其他旗舰智能手机的对比

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 06/05/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Vivo Nex Dual Display (Nex Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 630

Memory

10 GB

Display

6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive multitouch, Super AMOLED, 5.49英寸-1920×1080 OLED屏幕, glossy: yes

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米插孔, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计，接近传感器，电子罗盘，陀螺仪, USB Type-C，Miracast，通知LED

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G CDMA: BC0, BC1, BC10. 3G TD-SCDMA: B34, B39. 3G WCDMA: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B19. 4G FDD-LTE: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B19, B20, B25, B26. 4G TDD-LTE: B34, B38, B39, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 157.2 x 75.3

Battery

3500 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f / 1.8,1 / 2.55“，1.4μm.2MP辅助传感器，f / 1.8；ToF传感器，f / 1.3；摄像头2 API级别：完整

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB线，模块化电源，保护盖，屏幕保护膜, Funtouch OS 4.5, 12 Months Warranty, LTE Cat 16, DRM Widevine: L3, fanless

Weight

199 g, Power Supply: 79 g

Price

630 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

A look at the default keyboard and mostly Chinese UI

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (507^min - 704^max) MBit/s +16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	661 (613^min - 699^max) MBit/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 (558^min - 592^max) MBit/s +2%
Vivo Nex Dual Display Adreno 630, SD 845	570 (557^min - 582^max) MBit/s
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	554 (492^min - 579^max) MBit/s -3%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (278^min - 319^max) MBit/s -48%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	685 (657^min - 705^max) MBit/s +18%
LG V40 ThinQ Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 (655^min - 698^max) MBit/s +16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	674 (646^min - 691^max) MBit/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 (612^min - 683^max) MBit/s +10%
Vivo Nex Dual Display Adreno 630, SD 845	582 (430^min - 702^max) MBit/s
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	339 (325^min - 351^max) MBit/s -42%

Vivo Nex Dual Display; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø577 (430-702)

Vivo Nex Dual Display; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø570 (557-582)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour

1) Hauptdisplay (X-Rite i1Pro 2) 2) 2. Display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)


585 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	618 cd/m²
591 cd/m²	586 cd/m²	627 cd/m²
590 cd/m²	604 cd/m²	636 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with Hauptdisplay (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Maximum: 636 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 604.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 586 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.1


394 cd/m²	402 cd/m²	412 cd/m²
397 cd/m²	399 cd/m²	414 cd/m²
398 cd/m²	405 cd/m²	412 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with 2. Display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Maximum: 414 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 403.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 399 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.19

	Vivo Nex Dual Display Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	LG V40 ThinQ OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1"	Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4"	ZTE Axon 9 Pro AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"
Screen		51%	37%	41%	31%	33%
Brightness middle	399	599 50%	567 42%	701 76%	492 23%	521 31%
Brightness	404	593 47%	559 38%	705 75%	475 18%	517 28%
Brightness Distribution	95	96 1%	89 -6%	98 3%	94 -1%	96 1%
Black Level *					0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.5	1.4 69%	3.3 27%	3.7 18%	2.4 47%	2.9 36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.6	3.2 67%	6.1 36%	10.3 -7%	5.2 46%	5.5 43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.5	2 69%	1.1 83%	1.4 78%	3.2 51%	2.7 58%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.25 ^98%	2.46 ^89%	2.1 ^105%	2.06 ^107%	2.01 ^109%
CCT	7405 ^88%	6496 ^100%	6495 ^100%	6553 ^99%	7125 ^91%	6288 ^103%
Contrast					1230

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected	240.4 Hz	≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
Screen flickering / PWM detected	250 Hz	≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.4 ms rise
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	2407 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2333 Points -3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2397 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4499 Points +87%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3314 Points +38%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2418 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=27)	2416 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +125%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8879 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8634 Points -3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8687 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10162 Points +14%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9868 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8988 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=27)	8705 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +68%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	13467 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	13374 Points -1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13519 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10128 Points -25%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9028 Points -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13505 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=25)	13578 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points -11%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	9988 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	10052 Points +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10361 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9750 Points -2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12778 Points +28%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9795 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26)	10123 Points +1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8211 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8326 Points +1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8141 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7595 Points -8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9243 Points +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8099 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27)	8368 Points +2%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	63403 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	64627 Points +2%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	58651 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55524 Points -12%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	57073 Points -10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	63295 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=27)	61139 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	85487 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	83976 Points -2%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	79818 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	71292 Points -17%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67388 Points -21%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	81640 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 85487, n=27)	80548 Points -6%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	33309 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35987 Points +8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30418 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	31297 Points -6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	37164 Points +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35430 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=27)	33322 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	6156 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6118 Points -1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4947 Points -20%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4979 Points -19%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6355 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=27)	5811 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8225 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8236 Points 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6439 Points -22%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5252 Points -36%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8219 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=27)	7763 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3276 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3221 Points -2%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2731 Points -17%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4214 Points +29%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3543 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=27)	3115 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	6308 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	6054 Points -4%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4842 Points -23%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5087 Points -19%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6487 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=27)	5761 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=74, last 2 years)	11160 Points +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	8445 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8245 Points -2%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6024 Points -29%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5327 Points -37%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8341 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=27)	7671 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=74, last 2 years)	19815 Points +135%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	3332 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3060 Points -8%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2871 Points -14%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4393 Points +32%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3649 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=27)	3094 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=74, last 2 years)	5009 Points +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4349 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3677 Points -15%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3802 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4383 Points +1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4238 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4729 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=27)	4388 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5160 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4223 Points -18%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4275 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5176 Points 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4256 Points -18%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5181 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=27)	4919 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	2808 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2653 Points -6%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2740 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2854 Points +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4175 Points +49%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3623 Points +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=27)	3217 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4063 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3846 Points -5%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3741 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4551 Points +12%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3847 Points -5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5088 Points +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=28)	4607 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7682 Points +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	5387 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4480 Points -17%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4133 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5358 Points -1%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3718 Points -31%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5741 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=28)	5439 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11410 Points +112%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	2185 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	2802 Points +28%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2809 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2981 Points +36%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4381 Points +101%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3639 Points +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2185 - 3764, n=28)	3088 Points +41%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4587 Points +110%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	60 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	60 fps 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	60 fps 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=27)	62.1 fps +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	146 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	152 fps +4%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	105 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	143 fps -2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	118 fps -19%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	150 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=28)	142.5 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +91%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	56 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	56 fps 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps -5%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps +5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=27)	54.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +34%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	69 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	81 fps +17%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps +23%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67 fps -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	82 fps +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=27)	73.1 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +138%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	43 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	50 fps +16%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	21 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	30 fps -30%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	48 fps +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55 fps +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27)	45.3 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +52%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	49 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	59 fps +20%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	41 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps +8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	50 fps +2%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28)	53.9 fps +10%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +138%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	29 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	30 fps +3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps -21%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28 fps -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	33 fps +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=27)	27.7 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +64%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	33 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	35 fps +6%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps +6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=27)	33.4 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +113%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	32 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	20 fps -37%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	16 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	25 fps -22%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31 fps -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=17)	29.1 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)	49.3 fps +54%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	36 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	30 fps -17%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	30 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	44 fps +22%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	34 fps -6%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=16)	35.2 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)	79.4 fps +121%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	14 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	20 fps +43%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps +14%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps +43%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=17)	18.6 fps +33%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)	37.1 fps +165%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	21 fps
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	31 fps +48%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	12 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps -19%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=17)	15.6 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)	31.6 fps +50%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	280812 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	292798 Points +4%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	270884 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	328111 Points +17%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	306296 Points +9%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	287049 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27)	277434 Points -1%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	233369 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	228173 Points -2%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	229374 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	269219 Points +15%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	252800 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	231092 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)	225534 Points -3%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4421 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	4287 Points -3%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3565 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4320 Points -2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4746 Points +7%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4454 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=26)	4111 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +42%
System (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	7977 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	8146 Points +2%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6717 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7476 Points -6%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8594 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8212 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=26)	7644 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +27%
Memory (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	4356 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	3791 Points -13%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2910 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4570 Points +5%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5616 Points +29%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4492 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=26)	3649 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +54%
Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	7996 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	7891 Points -1%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6726 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7361 Points -8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7484 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7930 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=26)	7797 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +110%
Web (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240	1387 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192	1386 Points 0%
LG V40 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1228 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1385 Points 0%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1404 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1345 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=26)	1344 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +12%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	108.1 Points
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	86 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	84 Points
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	82.6 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25)	80.3 Points
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)	70.1 Points
Vivo Nex Dual Display	Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +698%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	22500 Points +388%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20286 Points +340%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	16489 Points +258%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	15906 Points +245%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)	15819 Points +243%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)	15153 Points +229%
Vivo Nex Dual Display (Chrome 72)	4606 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Vivo Nex Dual Display (Chrome 72)	5841 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)	2905 ms * +50%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)	2361 ms * +60%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)	2358 ms * +60%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)	2300 ms * +61%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	2048 ms * +65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1924 ms * +67%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +73%

* ... smaller is better

	Vivo Nex Dual Display	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3	LG V40 ThinQ	Samsung Galaxy S10	Honor View 20	ZTE Axon 9 Pro	Global Average -3	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-22%	-21%	-17%	19%	-19%	6%	255%
Sequential Read 256KB	768	675 -12%	690 -10%	832 8%	847 10%	719 -6%	624 ?(4.36 - 4512, n=1747) -19%	1834 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 139%
Sequential Write 256KB	193.9	206.8 7%	203.9 5%	193.2 0%	250.1 29%	196.4 1%	362 ?(2.04 - 3908, n=1747) 87%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 635%
Random Read 4KB	126.7	133.2 5%	130.1 3%	137.4 8%	168.9 33%	141.3 12%	106.5 ?(1.04 - 543, n=1747) -16%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=193, last 2 years) 119%
Random Write 4KB	135.8	19.54 -86%	23.36 -83%	24.44 -82%	138.9 2%	22.52 -83%	95.4 ?(3.84 - 753, n=1748) -30%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 128%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard			84.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		85.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	69.8 ?(8.1 - 153.8, n=663)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard			63.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		61.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	51.7 ?(1.7 - 87.1, n=663)

Max. Load

Idle


36.8 °C	35.6 °C	32.2 °C
35.9 °C	35.1 °C	31.6 °C
35.5 °C	32.4 °C	30.9 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 34 °C


34.3 °C	33.8 °C	31.5 °C
34.1 °C	32.4 °C	31.2 °C
32.8 °C	31.7 °C	30.5 °C

Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 32.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Vivo Nex Dual Display audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Idle	0.72 / 1.36 / 1.38 Watt
Load	3.56 / 8.61 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Vivo Nex Dual Display 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		23%	-7%	-9%	-53%	-11%	-28%	-28%
Idle Minimum *	0.72	0.49 32%	0.87 -21%	0.61 15%	0.97 -35%	0.86 -19%	0.862 ?(0.42 - 1.8, n=26) -20%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -24%
Idle Average *	1.36	0.67 51%	1.39 -2%	1.27 7%	2.58 -90%	1.1 19%	1.728 ?(0.67 - 2.9, n=26) -27%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Maximum *	1.38	0.87 37%	1.41 -2%	1.3 6%	2.63 -91%	1.21 12%	2.07 ?(0.87 - 3.5, n=26) -50%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) -17%
Load Average *	3.56	3.64 -2%	3.96 -11%	6.17 -73%	5.24 -47%	5.02 -41%	4.87 ?(3.56 - 7.41, n=26) -37%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -80%
Load Maximum *	8.61	9.04 -5%	8.6 -0%	8.55 1%	8.73 -1%	10.82 -26%	9.27 ?(6.2 - 12.3, n=26) -8%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		12h 56min

	Vivo Nex Dual Display 3500 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 3200 mAh	LG V40 ThinQ 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	ZTE Axon 9 Pro 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	776	719 -7%	510 -34%	427 -45%	969 25%	661 -15%

Pros

+ 几乎无边框的屏幕

+ 出色的自拍效果

+ 10GB RAM

+ 高速UFS存储

+ 强大的SoC

+ 不错的续航

+ OLED面板亮度高

Cons

- 颜色显示不准确

- 相机不是旗舰级别

- Funtouch OS限制

- 一般般的单声道扬声器

- 没有VoLTE

Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

Vivo NEX Dual是一个有趣的替代方案，它为了几乎100%的屏占比放弃了前置摄像头。Vivo决定采用耳机插孔和近乎无边框的坚固设计给我们留下了深刻的印象。同样，它具有非常明亮的显示屏和不错的电池续航时间，应该可以让您至少一天一充。

Vivo NEX Dual是一款令人兴奋的智能手机，可以突破界限，提供全面的体验，不过也有一些其他主流设计智能手机不会受到的限制。

但是，该设备有其缺点。首先，我们不是特别喜欢Funtouch OS，特别是其不完整的翻译和第三方应用扩展错误。此外，虽然相机在前置标准方面表现出色，但它们无法在低光下与其他旗舰智能手机中的光学镜头竞争。其他一些小批评包括我们的评测单位的摇摆按键，3级DRM Widevine认证和IP 67认证;考虑到它的价格，我们原本认为该设备至少具有IP68认证。总体而言，NEX Dual是双显示智能手机概念的成功实现，除了一些小问题问题外几乎没有真正的缺点。

Vivo Nex Dual Display - 2022-08-31 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

41 / 70 → 58%

Weight

88%

Battery

90%

Display

85%

Games Performance

49 / 64 → 76%

Application Performance

75 / 86 → 87%

Temperature

93%

Noise

100%

Audio

54 / 90 → 60%

Camera

75%

Average

76%

83%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11127 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 451873 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测

Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 5)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Vivo Nex Dual Display audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison