华硕 VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH (N4200, HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
Brand: Asus

不值一提。 该华硕变形本拥有Apollo Lake处理器，提供了大量的存储空间。电池续航时间勉强算是平均水平。价格接近500欧元（约560美元），该设备不算是最实惠的型号之一。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 06/28/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T (VivoBook Flip 12 Series)

Processor

Intel Pentium N4200 4 x 1.1 - 2.5 GHz, Apollo Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 505, Core: 750 MHz, 21.20.16.4678

Memory

4 GB

, DDR3-1866

Display

11.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 135 PPI, 电容式, 10 点触控, AU Optronics B116XAN04.3, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, 1024 GB

, 900 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Apollo Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: combined audio, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: acceleration sensor, TPM 2.0

Networking

Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.35 x 293.4 x 198

Battery

42 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), Ms Office 365 (trial version), Team Viewer 11, WPS Office for Asus, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

1.3 kg, Power Supply: 132 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Dell Latitude 3189 Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T ODYS Vario Pro 12 Medion Akoya E2215T DIN A4 ❌

Left side: USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type A), audio combo, fingerprint reader, volume rocker, power button

Right side: card reader (microSD), 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (1x Type C, 1x Type A), HDMI, power

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	548 MBit/s +62%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	338 MBit/s
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Realtek RTL8723BS	46 MBit/s -86%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	657 MBit/s +91%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	344 MBit/s
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Realtek RTL8723BS	52 MBit/s -85%


260 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	266 cd/m²
234 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	277 cd/m²
179 cd/m²	221 cd/m²	266 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B116XAN04.3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 277 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 245.4 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 65 %
Center on Battery: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 1488:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.23% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"	Dell Latitude 3189 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"	ODYS Vario Pro 12 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"	Medion Akoya E2215T IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"	HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6"
Display		2%	2%	9%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	44.23	44.96 2%	45.16 2%	48.12 9%	45.21 2%
sRGB Coverage	66.3	67.3 2%	67.5 2%	71.7 8%	67.8 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	45.73	46.49 2%	46.71 2%	49.78 9%	46.73 2%
Response Times		-13%	-49%	9%	30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39 ?(18, 21)	40 ?(18.8, 21.2) -3%	60 ?(31, 29) -54%	31 ?(13, 18) 21%	18.8 ?(6.8, 12) 52%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(13, 12)	30.4 ?(16.4, 14) -22%	36 ?(22, 14) -44%	26 ?(6, 20) -4%	23.2 ?(10, 13.2) 7%
PWM Frequency				50 ?(20)
Screen		9%	-41%	-15%	-6%
Brightness middle	253	291 15%	282 11%	338 34%	194 -23%
Brightness	245	284 16%	250 2%	309 26%	186 -24%
Brightness Distribution	65	92 42%	74 14%	76 17%	86 32%
Black Level *	0.17	0.16 6%	0.37 -118%	0.39 -129%	0.22 -29%
Contrast	1488	1819 22%	762 -49%	867 -42%	882 -41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.17	3.4 -7%	5.63 -78%	3.94 -24%	3.06 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.13	9.6 -18%	11.28 -39%	9.96 -23%	8.81 -8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	1.8 10%	5.04 -152%	2.54 -27%	1.42 29%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.14 ^103%	2.19 ^100%	2.38 ^92%	2.34 ^94%
CCT	6850 ^95%	6544 ^99%	7254 ^90%	6902 ^94%	6432 ^101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42	42.8 2%	43 2%	46 10%	42.98 2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	66	67 2%	67 2%	71 8%	67.56 2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / 5%	-29% / -33%	1% / -7%	9% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

1680

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

4673

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3331

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

53 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

167 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

17.82 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	53 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	51 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	50 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Intel Celeron N3050	35 Points -34%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	175 Points +5%
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	174 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	167 Points
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Intel Celeron N3050	65 Points -61%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	5440 Points +16%
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	5346 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	4673 Points
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	3076 Points -34%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2897 Points -38%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	1680 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1638 Points -2%
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	1633 Points -3%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	938 Points -44%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	921 Points -45%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	4736 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	4682 Points
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2289 Points -51%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	2130 Points -55%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	1430 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1400 Points -2%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	760 Points -47%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	726 Points -49%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	4558 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	4491 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	1609 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1541 Points -4%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	4729 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	4719 Points 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	1616 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	1571 Points -3%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel Pentium N4200	91.5 Points
Dell Latitude 3180 Intel Pentium N4200	87.5 Points -4%
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel Pentium N4200	84.6 Points -8%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel Atom x5-Z8350	44.1 Points -52%
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Intel Celeron N3050	43.31 Points -53%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel Atom x5-Z8350	42.55 Points -53%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2094 points
Help

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell Latitude 3189 HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Liteonit CV3-8D128	2273 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	2094 Points
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680	1545 Points -26%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 32 GB eMMC Flash	1437 Points -31%
Medion Akoya E2215T HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8350, 64 GB eMMC Flash	1282 Points -39%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035

Transfer Rate Minimum: 26.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 135 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 100.6 MB/s

Access Time: 19.9 ms

Burst Rate: 78.7 MB/s

CPU Usage: 5.9 %

	Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	Dell Latitude 3189 Liteonit CV3-8D128	ODYS Vario Pro 12 32 GB eMMC Flash	Medion Akoya E2215T 64 GB eMMC Flash	HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		7181%	1851%	1279%	68%
Read Seq	53.9	408.4 658%	168.3 212%	169.6 215%	106 97%
Write Seq	66.4	214.3 223%	43.13 -35%	39.77 -40%	106.1 60%
Read 512	22.62	243.7 977%	155 585%	155.3 587%	33.53 48%
Write 512	67.3	170.6 153%	33.71 -50%	27.45 -59%	39.03 -42%
Read 4k	0.378	8.864 2245%	15.91 4109%	13.09 3363%	0.407 8%
Write 4k	0.263	49.14 18584%	11.64 4326%	7.915 2910%	1.026 290%
Read 4k QD32	0.998	132.2 13146%	32.2 3126%	15.11 1414%	0.898 -10%
Write 4k QD32	0.518	111.7 21464%	13.65 2535%	10.05 1840%	1.003 94%

3DMark 11 Performance		672 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell Latitude 3189 Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	804 Points +31%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Intel HD Graphics 505, Intel Pentium N4200	616 Points
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050	377 Points -39%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	297 Points -52%
Medion Akoya E2215T Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Intel Atom x5-Z8350	297 Points -52%

	low	med.	high
World of Warcraft (2005)	62.3	25.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)	25.4	14.4	11.5
Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014)	14.2	9.3
GTA V (2015)	9.5	4.3
Far Cry Primal (2016)	3
Civilization VI (2016)	9.7
Titanfall 2 (2016)	2.3
Prey (2017)	5.4
Rocket League (2017)	26.6
Dirt 4 (2017)	14.7

Noise Level

Idle		31.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)
HDD		32.3 dB(A)
Load		31.7 / 31.7 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.8 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


30.9 °C	42 °C	45.2 °C
30.1 °C	39.4 °C	44.6 °C
26.7 °C	30.6 °C	33.8 °C

Maximum: 45.2 °C
Average: 35.9 °C


42 °C	50.4 °C	28.4 °C
39.8 °C	39.4 °C	27.8 °C
33.9 °C	33 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 50.4 °C
Average: 35.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 39.2 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.7 °C / -10.2 F).

Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.46 / 0.47 Watt
Idle	5.7 / 7.8 / 8.7 Watt
Load	21 / 19 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 40)		6h 05min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Dell Latitude 3189 Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 42 Wh	607 min +66%
Medion Akoya E2215T Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 38 Wh	474 min +30%
ODYS Vario Pro 12 Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Wh	453 min +24%
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Pentium N4200, HD Graphics 505, 42 Wh	365 min
HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 Wh	286 min -22%

Pros

+ IPS显示屏

+ 大量的存储空间

+ USB Type-C

Cons

- 平庸的电池续航

- 昂贵

The Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T, provided by notebooksbilliger.de.

华硕发布了一台11.6英寸规格的变形本，VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH。内置的 Apollo Lake 处理器为办公和上网功能提供了足够的性能支持。鉴于，解码器集成于显卡中，该机可以播放大部分的视频格式，可以作为一个较好的家用电视视频播放设备。

显示屏留下了一个复杂的印象。华硕提供的这个高对比度屏幕，拥有这稳定的视角，但是亮度缺稍显不足。

The VivoBook Flip 12 主要用于家庭使用。

1-TB 硬盘的存在，使得电脑不缺存储空间。然而，一个小容量的固态硬盘可能会是更好的选择。特别是当电脑的处理器较弱时，固态硬盘和机械硬盘的差别在日常使用中就变明显了。用户需要自行安装固态硬盘。可惜，这更换过程显得并不容易。华硕也不提供配备固态硬盘的该机型。

电池续航时间勉强算是中等水平：在我们的无线连接测试中，该设备的续航时间是6小时5分钟。如果该机只是在家中的客厅使用，那么电池容量是够用的。但如果是在户外使用，用户必须随身携带电源适配器。而搭载相同硬件水平和电池容量的Dell Latitude 3189，却多了4小时的续航时间。

最后，需要提下售价。该机价格是500欧（约560美元），这价格对于一个简单的变形本来说太贵了。此外，该机的看起来没有比同等价位的其他笔记本好。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T - 06/16/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

74 / 98 → 75%

Keyboard

69%

Pointing Device

88%

Connectivity

42 / 80 → 52%

Weight

71 / 35-78 → 85%

Battery

88%

Display

82%

Games Performance

48 / 68 → 71%

Application Performance

46 / 87 → 52%

Temperature

88%

Noise

92%

Audio

50 / 91 → 55%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

68%

79%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH (N4200, HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2017-06-28 (Update: 2017-06-28)