华硕 VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T
Brand: Asus

完成待续。华硕的这台多媒体办公笔记本，强调其设计的优雅和外壳的轻巧。但很难凭借GeForce 940MX，在游戏领域跟上大部队。尽管它有很多不错的特质，但是我们还是不建议购买该机。当然不仅仅是因为它的电池续航能力很平庸。

Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 11/14/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Security Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T (Vivobook S15 S510 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1189 MHz, RAM: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 377.05, Nvidia Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, 2400 MHz, single channel, 1 of 2 slots occupied

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Storage

Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, 128 GB

, SSD + HDD 1 TB Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 (5400 rpm)

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 361 x 244

Battery

42 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: VGA

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器，至于底部, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.7 kg, Power Supply: 219 g

Price

950 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.3 MB/s +140%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	62.5 MB/s +84%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33.9 MB/s
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	23.3 MB/s -31%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86.4 MB/s +131%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.7 MB/s +118%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.4 MB/s
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	24.9 MB/s -33%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	668 MBit/s
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	649 MBit/s -3%
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	465 MBit/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	434 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	645 MBit/s +26%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	529 MBit/s +4%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	510 MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	495 MBit/s -3%


278 cd/m²	265 cd/m²	276 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	293 cd/m²	293 cd/m²
260 cd/m²	253 cd/m²	274 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 293 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 275.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 293 cd/m²
Contrast: 1172:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.66 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.23% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.94% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T AU Optronics B156W02 / AUO B156HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 BOE0700 / BOE CQ NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV ID: AU Optronics AUO41ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-0%	-1%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	38.94	39.02 0%	38.65 -1%	38.81 0%
sRGB Coverage	58.5	57.7 -1%	58 -1%	57.9 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	40.23	40.31 0%	39.94 -1%	40.03 0%
Response Times		-2%	7%	9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47 ?(21, 26)	42 ?(22, 20) 11%	44.8 ?(16.4, 28.4) 5%	38.8 ?(20, 18.8) 17%
Response Time Black / White *	28 ?(16, 12)	32 ?(18, 14) -14%	25.6 ?(6.8, 18.8) 9%	28 ?(16.4, 11.6) -0%
PWM Frequency		1087 ?(90)
Screen		-10%	-15%	-23%
Brightness middle	293	248 -15%	242 -17%	256.6 -12%
Brightness	275	239 -13%	243 -12%	243 -12%
Brightness Distribution	86	69 -20%	75 -13%	81 -6%
Black Level *	0.25	0.18 28%	0.24 4%	0.19 24%
Contrast	1172	1378 18%	1008 -14%	1351 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.81	4.85 -27%	4.65 -22%	5 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.64	8.34 -26%	9.64 -45%	20.1 -203%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.66	3.84 -44%	3.39 -27%	2.7 -2%
Gamma	2.54 ^87%	2.29 ^96%	2.7 ^81%	2.32 ^95%
CCT	6541 ^99%	6790 ^96%	6246 ^104%	6599 ^98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37	37 0%	36.69 -1%	36.7 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	58	57 -2%	57.66 -1%	57.7 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -7%	-3% / -9%	-5% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	151 Points +16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points +12%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -1%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Intel Core i5-7200U	128 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV Intel Core i7-7700HQ	740 Points +124%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Intel Core i5-8250U	560 Points +69%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points 0%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Intel Core i5-7200U	326 Points -2%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

130 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4042 Points +17%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	3719 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	3550 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8	3468 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A	4964 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	4666 Points +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 GeForce MX150, i5-7200U, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	4577 Points +2%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8	4483 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3468 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4483 points
Help

	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		46%	139%	4%
Read Seq	437.6	462.2 6%	1140 161%	491.6 12%
Write Seq	138.6	409.9 196%	468.1 238%	141.7 2%
Read 512	368.6	310.3 -16%	759 106%	345.6 -6%
Write 512	138.2	216.6 57%	414 200%	142.6 3%
Read 4k	16.05	31.89 99%	34.3 114%	18.83 17%
Write 4k	86.2	73.2 -15%	123.4 43%	76.3 -11%
Read 4k QD32	279.1	287.9 3%	530 90%	348.5 25%
Write 4k QD32	121.8	170.6 40%	319.2 162%	104.8 -14%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8

Sequential Read: 437.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 138.6 MB/s

512K Read: 368.6 MB/s

512K Write: 138.2 MB/s

4K Read: 16.05 MB/s

4K Write: 86.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 279.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 121.8 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	7537 Points +180%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-7200U	4547 Points +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4243 Points +58%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	2689 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	38082 Points +218%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	21835 Points +82%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-7200U	21160 Points +77%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	11986 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	6002 Points +178%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-7200U	3603 Points +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3545 Points +64%
Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	2158 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		2843 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		7748 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1944 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.
The Witcher 3 (2015)	41.4	25.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	46.9	26.1
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	43.8	29.8

Noise Level

Idle		31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB(A)
HDD		31.6 dB(A)
Load		43.3 / 43.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


30.5 °C	38.2 °C	37.4 °C
23.7 °C	29.4 °C	36.6 °C
23 °C	23.8 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 29.8 °C


36.4 °C	49 °C	33.3 °C
35.6 °C	35 °C	26.1 °C
26 °C	24.2 °C	23.6 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Average: 32.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.9 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.8 °C / 5 F).

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	3.6 / 6.8 / 9.5 Watt
Load	51.6 / 56 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 320-15IKB 80XL01NEGE i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SK Hynix HFS256G3BTND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		21%	1%	6%	-84%
Idle Minimum *	3.6	2.9 19%	3.7 -3%	2.8 22%	9.4 -161%
Idle Average *	6.8	5.9 13%	6.2 9%	6.3 7%	9.7 -43%
Idle Maximum *	9.5	7.3 23%	8.4 12%	6.9 27%	16.8 -77%
Load Average *	51.6	39.5 23%	50 3%	51.6 -0%	76.5 -48%
Load Maximum *	56	42 25%	65.2 -16%	69.7 -24%	105.6 -89%
Witcher 3 ultra *					86.5

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		7h 03min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 15min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 11min

	Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 42 Wh	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-55Z9 i5-7200U, GeForce MX150, 49 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh	HP Pavilion 15 Power 1GK62AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 70 Wh
Battery Runtime		108%	91%	91%
Reader / Idle	423	916 117%	883 109%	971 130%
WiFi v1.3	255	509 100%	462 81%	481 89%
Load	71	146 106%	129 82%	110 55%

Pros

+ 许多配置可供选择

+ 轻巧，小巧，轻薄

+ 设计优秀

+ 做工精湛

+ 安全功能

+ 良好的触摸板

+ 非常好的对比度

+ 欠佳的固态硬盘

+ 安静

+ 优秀音响系统

+ 拥有节能软件

Cons

- 外壳的稳定性可以更好

- 2x USB 2.0

- 接口位置不理想

- 慢速SD卡读卡器

- 按键软

- 显示屏可以更亮

- 色彩空间覆盖率不足

- 摄像头差

- 电池续航太短

The Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - provided by notebooksbilliger.de

对不起，华硕，你这台外观时尚的VivoBook S15 S510UQ在某种程度上是失败的。该机在市场上售价近1000欧元（约合1180美元），而且它的外壳稳定性不佳，而且键盘也只是可堪一用。如果电池续航时间只有4小时，那么拥有拥有安全芯片和指纹传感器，体积小巧，重量轻，这些优点有什么用？在色彩覆盖率低的情况下，图像处理能力如何从良好的对比度和精准的色彩中受益？为什么华硕使用的显卡并没有太多的改进？为什么不配备更快的GeForce MX150？台湾厂商在哪里找到的速度过时的固态硬盘？ 2个 USB 2.0、如蜗牛般的读卡器，以及非常糟糕的摄像头怎么配得上价格？

在我们看来，华硕已经成为改系列笔记本策略下的牺牲品。这一系列的笔记本的价格，让人难以忍受。我们希望1000欧元的定价可以给我们带来更多的东西。如果有人在寻找紧凑型15英寸多媒体电脑，那么这里有一个更好的选择—— 宏碁 Swift 3 SF315 。这是一台我们刚刚评测过的笔电。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus Vivobook S15 S510UQ-BQ189T - 2017-10-17 10/17/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis

77 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

72%

Pointing Device

84%

Connectivity

49 / 81 → 61%

Weight

67 / 20-67 → 99%

Battery

80%

Display

88%

Games Performance

68 / 85 → 80%

Application Performance

83 / 92 → 90%

Temperature

93%

Noise

84 / 95 → 88%

Audio

73%

Camera

29 / 85 → 34%

Average

73%

81%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook S15 S510UQ (i5-7200U, 940MX) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-11-14 (Update: 2017-11-14)