华硕 Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D
Brand: Asus

时尚。 Vivobook，华硕所提供的一个15.6英寸的多功能笔记本。它能立即捕捉你的眼球：使用一个整个白色底盘。配置也还行：酷睿i5处理器，GeForce显卡，ac Wi-Fi，Type-C USB。售价低于500欧元（约528美元）。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 03/04/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Skylake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D

Processor

Intel Core i5-6198DU 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1176 MHz, RAM: 900 MHz, DDR3, 64-位连接, ForceWare 378.49, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2134, 双通道, 一个卡槽 (已占用), 4 GB固定焊接

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 100 PPI, LG Philips LP156WHB-TPD1, TN LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Toshiba MQ01ABF050, 500 GB

, 500 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳麦合一, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Optical drive

Slimtype DVD A DA8AESH

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25.5 x 382 x 258

Battery

38 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

FreeDos

Camera

Webcam: SD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.3 kg, Power Supply: 241 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Medion Akoya P6670 HP 15-ba077ng Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A	57.3 MB/s +152%
HP 15-ba077ng	27.2 MB/s +20%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D	22.7 MB/s
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T	22.2 MB/s -2%
Medion Akoya P6670	21.8 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	16.5 MB/s -27%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A	83.2 MB/s +231%
HP 15-ba077ng	38.3 MB/s +52%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T	27.7 MB/s +10%
Medion Akoya P6670	27.3 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK	26 MB/s +3%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D	25.15 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	346 MBit/s +1%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	344 MBit/s
HP 15-ba077ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	54 MBit/s -84%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	340 MBit/s
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	333 MBit/s -2%
HP 15-ba077ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	43 MBit/s -87%


240 cd/m²	210 cd/m²	194 cd/m²
240 cd/m²	219 cd/m²	204 cd/m²
228 cd/m²	221 cd/m²	227 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP156WHB-TPD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 240 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 220.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 217 cd/m²
Contrast: 365:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 13.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.69% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	HP 15-ba077ng TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Medion Akoya P6670 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		1%	-2%	-2%	-9%	-6%
Display P3 Coverage	40.69	41.1 1%	39.98 -2%	39.72 -2%	37.06 -9%	38.14 -6%
sRGB Coverage	61.3	61.8 1%	60.2 -2%	59.2 -3%	55.8 -9%	57.2 -7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	42.04	42.46 1%	41.31 -2%	41.07 -2%	38.29 -9%	39.43 -6%
Response Times		3%	8%	24%	24%	8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47 ?(25, 22, Plateau)	36 ?(12, 24) 23%	42 ?(21, 21) 11%	42.4 ?(22, 20.4) 10%	27 ?(7, 20) 43%	42 ?(18, 24) 11%
Response Time Black / White *	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)	27 ?(8, 19) -17%	22 ?(6, 16) 4%	14.6 ?(9.4, 5.2) 37%	22 ?(11, 11) 4%	22 ?(6, 16) 4%
PWM Frequency			50 ?(70)	28740	50 ?(80)	50
Screen		27%	-1%	7%	16%	21%
Brightness middle	219	241 10%	209 -5%	224 2%	200 -9%	287 31%
Brightness	220	240 9%	200 -9%	201 -9%	198 -10%	269 22%
Brightness Distribution	81	92 14%	88 9%	75 -7%	83 2%	74 -9%
Black Level *	0.6	0.5 17%	0.56 7%	0.46 23%	0.28 53%	0.65 -8%
Contrast	365	482 32%	373 2%	487 33%	714 96%	442 21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	11.96	4.46 63%	12.21 -2%	10.5 12%	10.63 11%	5.42 55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.31	6.84 65%	20.66 -7%	16.8 13%	15.69 19%	9.54 51%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	13.22	4.83 63%	13.48 -2%	11.23 15%	11.19 15%	5.14 61%
Gamma	2.52 ^87%	2.49 ^88%	2.34 ^94%	2.12 ^104%	1.78 ^124%	2.48 ^89%
CCT	14631 ^44%	7773 ^84%	15364 ^42%	11096 ^59%	11258 ^58%	6952 ^93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	39	39 0%	38 -3%	38 -3%	35 -10%	36 -8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	62	62 0%	60 -3%	59 -5%	56 -10%	57 -8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		10% / 19%	2% / -0%	10% / 8%	10% / 12%	8% / 14%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3154

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

9954

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4491

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

49.22 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.22 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.34 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

58.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

290 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

117 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | JetStream 1.1

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	131 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points 0%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	117 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	117 Points
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	80 Points -32%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	78 Points -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	312 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	293 Points +1%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	291 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	290 Points
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	229 Points -21%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	222 Points -23%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	10803 Points +9%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	9954 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	9937 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	9915 Points 0%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	7188 Points -28%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	5148 Points -48%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	4984 Points +11%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	4491 Points
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	4415 Points -2%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	4415 Points -2%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	2596 Points -42%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	2262 Points -50%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	3013 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	3009 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	2854 Points -5%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	2120 Points -30%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	2062 Points -31%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	6205 Points
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	6182 Points 0%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	6059 Points -2%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD A12-9700P	5557 Points -10%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	5371 Points -13%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	3618 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	3507 Points -3%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	2158 Points -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	6769 Points
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	6502 Points -4%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	4899 Points -28%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK Intel Core i7-6500U	212.3 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Intel Core i5-6198DU	197.2 Points
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T Intel Core i5-6200U	196.3 Points 0%
Medion Akoya P6670 Intel Core i5-6200U	191.9 Points -3%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD A12-9700P	134 Points -32%

PCMark 7 Score		2864 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3178 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		3343 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4231 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	3497 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	3483 Points +10%
Medion Akoya P6670 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G	3396 Points +7%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	3178 Points
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128	2847 Points -10%
HP 15-ba077ng Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	2777 Points -13%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Toshiba MQ01ABF050

Transfer Rate Minimum: 50.2 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 110.4 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 81.9 MB/s

Access Time: 17.8 ms

Burst Rate: 249.5 MB/s

CPU Usage: 6.4 %

	Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	HP 15-ba077ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Liteonit CV3-8D128	Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	Medion Akoya P6670 Phison S11-128G
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		9189%	5186%	5407%	38%	6163%
Read Seq	102.2	434.9 326%	447.4 338%	348.6 241%	115.9 13%	441.8 332%
Write Seq	90.7	318.3 251%	243.3 168%	311.8 244%	113.3 25%	398 339%
Read 512	23.31	311.8 1238%	333.4 1330%	295.9 1169%	39.02 67%	295.5 1168%
Write 512	21.7	319.2 1371%	283.1 1205%	185.8 756%	55.6 156%	75.5 248%
Read 4k	0.486	18.23 3651%	20.99 4219%	23.76 4789%	0.44 -9%	31.19 6318%
Write 4k	1.06	85.4 7957%	62.7 5815%	44.94 4140%	1.188 12%	60 5560%
Read 4k QD32	0.952	323.8 33913%	143.1 14932%	171.6 17925%	1.125 18%	258 27001%
Write 4k QD32	1.016	253 24802%	138 13483%	143.2 13994%	1.245 23%	85.7 8335%

3DMark 11 Performance		2551 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A12-9700P	3811 Points +54%
Medion Akoya P6670 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2516 Points +1%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6198DU	2481 Points
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U	2273 Points -8%
HP 15-ba077ng AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), AMD A12-9700P	1856 Points -25%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	1835 Points -26%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	86.3	49.1	39.5

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Medion Akoya P6670 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Phison S11-128G	52.5 fps +7%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	49.1 fps
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SK hynix SSD Canvas SC300 HFS256G32MND	48.3 fps -2%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK GeForce 920MX, 6500U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0	41.8 fps -15%
HP 15-ba077ng Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	37.8 fps -23%

Noise Level

Idle		32 / 32 / 32.2 dB(A)
HDD		32.6 dB(A)
DVD		37.6 / dB(A)
Load		37.3 / 42.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


35.5 °C	34.6 °C	26.2 °C
34.6 °C	33.5 °C	26.2 °C
24.8 °C	24.7 °C	27.5 °C

Maximum: 35.5 °C
Average: 29.7 °C


32.7 °C	39.9 °C	32.6 °C
28.6 °C	30.4 °C	33.4 °C
28.8 °C	27.2 °C	26.1 °C

Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 31.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 55.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).

Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.55 / 0.7 Watt
Idle	4.4 / 7.1 / 9.7 Watt
Load	38 / 50.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		5h 38min

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 38 Wh	408 min +21%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D 6198DU, GeForce 940MX, 38 Wh	338 min
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh	332 min -2%
HP 15-ba077ng A12-9700P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), 41 Wh	296 min -12%
Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh	280 min -17%
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 40 Wh	257 min -24%

Pros

+ 雾面屏

+ 良好的系统性能

+ 有游戏能力

+ 变得几乎不发烫

+ 大多数时间运行安静

+ 良好的电池续航时间

+ Type-C USB（USB 3.1 Gen 1）

+ ac-局域网

Cons

- 暗，对比度低，视角不稳定

- 无维护舱口

In review: The Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

华硕Vivobook F556UQ是一款15.6英寸的全能笔记本电脑。它不是很贵，价格约460欧元（约485美元）。使用的Core酷睿i5处理器适用于所有常用是应用程序。配备GeForce显卡，它可以顺利运行许多市面上的游戏。计算机几乎不会发烫，不管负载如何，至少在日常使用时，它运行安静。500 GB硬盘驱动器，使你不会太快消耗完存储空间。你也可以使用更高容量型号的硬盘或固态硬盘代替它。然而，这需要打开笔记本电脑。现有的维护舱口只允许访问内存插槽。

Vivobook F556UQ，华硕所提供的一个平衡的全能设备。你将以相对较低的价格换取高性能。

键盘优秀，并且满足家庭使用。此外，电池续航时间良好。一般情况下，显示屏都是预算级笔记本的一大弱点。Vivobook也是如此。华硕采用了一个相当暗，而且低对比度，视角不稳定的屏幕。然而，鉴于价格，显示质量是可接受的。其他制造商应该以这为范本。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D - 2017-02-21 02/21/2017 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

74 / 98 → 76%

Keyboard

74%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

46 / 81 → 57%

Weight

61 / 20-67 → 87%

Battery

86%

Display

74%

Games Performance

63 / 85 → 74%

Application Performance

76 / 92 → 83%

Temperature

94%

Noise

86 / 95 → 91%

Audio

56%

Camera

25 / 85 → 29%

Average

69%

77%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2017-03- 4 (Update: 2017-03-13)