戴尔 Vostro 15 5568 (酷睿 i5, 全高清) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: Dell Vostro 15-5568
Brand: Dell

体面的商务新人。 这台戴尔Vostro是一款为小企业设计的全功能实惠型的15寸笔记本电脑。它也搭配了设计雅致的机身。你可能需要做出一些妥协，不过我们并没有发现它有任何严重的问题。

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 02/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Dell Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Dell Vostro 15-5568 (Vostro 15 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, 21.20.16.4526

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, 单通道, 1/2插槽已占用, 最高支持 32 GB

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Chi Mei CMN154C-8KV42 , TN LED

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), 256 GB

, 200 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: SD读卡器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.2 x 380 x 252.5

Battery

42 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3 芯

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 高清

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, 45瓦电源适配器，说明书, Dell Tools, Office 365 (试用版), 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.872 kg, Power Supply: 280 g

Price

740 Euro

Links

Dell homepage
Dell notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Dell Vostro 15-5568 DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Power, RJ45 Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0 with PowerShare, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm audio

Right side: SD-card reader, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, VGA, Kensington Lock

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA	72.7 MB/s +188%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU	68.1 MB/s +170%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000	62.5 MB/s +148%
Dell Vostro 15-5568	25.2 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA	89 MB/s +249%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000	81.7 MB/s +220%
Dell Vostro 15-5568	25.5 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	583 MBit/s +118%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	434 MBit/s +62%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	268 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	628 MBit/s +206%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	495 MBit/s +141%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	205 MBit/s


236 cd/m²	254 cd/m²	220 cd/m²
208 cd/m²	229 cd/m²	212 cd/m²
219 cd/m²	213 cd/m²	210 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN154C-8KV42 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 254 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 222.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 231 cd/m²
Contrast: 409:1 (Black: 0.56 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 10.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.21

	Dell Vostro 15-5568 Chi Mei CMN154C-8KV42 , , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU BOE NT156FHM-N41, , 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
Display P3 Coverage		38.65	39.89	38.58
sRGB Coverage		58	59.5	58
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage		39.94	41.24	39.85
Response Times		6%	-9%	15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	47.6 ?(24.4, 23.2)	44.8 ?(16.4, 28.4) 6%	51 ?(23, 28) -7%	43 ?(20, 23) 10%
Response Time Black / White *	27.2 ?(10, 17.2)	25.6 ?(6.8, 18.8) 6%	30 ?(10, 20) -10%	22 ?(6, 16) 19%
PWM Frequency			50 ?(40)
Screen		37%	-0%	-3%
Brightness middle	229	242 6%	214 -7%	180 -21%
Brightness	222	243 9%	201 -9%	178 -20%
Brightness Distribution	82	75 -9%	77 -6%	93 13%
Black Level *	0.56	0.24 57%	0.43 23%	0.45 20%
Contrast	409	1008 146%	498 22%	400 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	10.36	4.65 55%	10.68 -3%	9.91 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	14.95	9.64 36%	18.07 -21%	18.19 -22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	10.9	3.39 69%	11.32 -4%	11.25 -3%
Gamma	2.21 ^100%	2.7 ^81%	2.26 ^97%	2.35 ^94%
CCT	10084 ^64%	6246 ^104%	12204 ^53%	12115 ^54%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	37.69	36.69 -3%	38 1%	37 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	57.92	57.66 0%	59 2%	58 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		22% / 32%	-5% / -2%	6% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
47.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 24.4 ms rise
47.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

LatencyMon with deactivated wireless connections

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	146 Points +13%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Intel Core i7-6500U	130 Points +1%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points 0%
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Intel Core i7-7500U	355 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Intel Core i5-7200U	330 Points +3%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Intel Core i7-6500U	329 Points +3%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel Core i5-7200U	319 Points
HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET Intel Core i5-6200U	291 Points -9%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

129 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

319 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

37.45 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D256	3823 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	3550 Points +7%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	3331 Points
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3163 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4725 Points +3%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D256	4699 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	4666 Points +2%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	4573 Points

PCMark 7 Score		5113 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3331 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4276 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4573 points
Help

... in comparison

	Dell Vostro 15-5568 SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU Liteonit CV3-8D256
AS SSD		66%	-5%	-3%
Seq Read	502	1227 144%	493.8 -2%	402.9 -20%
Seq Write	465.2	636 37%	315.9 -32%	333.5 -28%
4K Read	26.84	37.12 38%	17.96 -33%	29.56 10%
4K Write	50.3	73.1 45%	73.4 46%	62.9 25%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)

Sequential Read: 497.8 MB/s

Sequential Write: 466.8 MB/s

512K Read: 363.4 MB/s

512K Write: 368.5 MB/s

4K Read: 29.02 MB/s

4K Write: 56 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 296 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 229.4 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4243 Points +207%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2821 Points +104%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2092 Points +51%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1529 Points +10%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1463 Points +6%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1384 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	21835 Points +233%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	13459 Points +105%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	9122 Points +39%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	8219 Points +25%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	6881 Points +5%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6554 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3545 Points +365%
Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U	2222 Points +191%
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	1637 Points +115%
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	765 Points 0%
Dell Vostro 15-5568 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	763 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		1490 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5503 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		716 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
Tomb Raider (2013)	61.5	32.2	17.9	8.9
BioShock Infinite (2013)	39.9	23	18.8	6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.3

Noise Level

Idle		29 / 29 / 29 dB(A)
Load		33.9 / 37 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


32.3 °C	38 °C	27.6 °C
29 °C	33.6 °C	25 °C
25.6 °C	25.3 °C	24.9 °C

Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 29 °C


28.2 °C	39 °C	33.2 °C
23.5 °C	29.9 °C	25.4 °C
23.1 °C	24.5 °C	24.1 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 27.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.3 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke 62 Max

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).

	Dell Vostro 15-5568 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Liteonit CV3-8D256
Heat		-5%	-7%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	38	46.6 -23%	44.3 -17%	35.1 8%
Maximum Bottom *	39	49.1 -26%	46.3 -19%	46.7 -20%
Idle Upper Side *	25.7	24.6 4%	27.8 -8%	27 -5%
Idle Bottom *	33.8	25.1 26%	27.7 18%	27.4 19%

* ... smaller is better

Dell Vostro 15-5568 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.36 / 0.68 Watt
Idle	3.3 / 6.8 / 7.7 Watt
Load	30.9 / 40.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G), TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU 6500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-8D256, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		-22%	-19%	-45%
Idle Minimum *	3.3	2.8 15%	3.8 -15%	7 -112%
Idle Average *	6.8	6.3 7%	6.6 3%	8 -18%
Idle Maximum *	7.7	6.9 10%	11.3 -47%	10.6 -38%
Load Average *	30.9	51.6 -67%	38 -23%	39.7 -28%
Load Maximum *	40.3	69.7 -73%	45 -12%	51.9 -29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		16h 51min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 25.10586.0.0)		5h 57min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 50min

	Dell Vostro 15-5568 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 42 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh	HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh	Acer TravelMate P259-MG-71UU 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		11%	10%	-41%
Reader / Idle	1011	883 -13%	746 -26%	615 -39%
H.264	512			245 -52%
WiFi v1.3	357	462 29%	513 44%	280 -22%
Load	110	129 17%	123 12%	56 -49%

Pros

+ 美观的机身

+ 优秀的系统性能

+ 不错的可升级空间

+ 实用的电池续航

Cons

- 较差的TN屏幕

- 一般的输入设备

- 有限的商务功能

- 扬声器品质低

- 无指点杆

In review: Dell Vostro 15-5568. Test model courtesy of Dell Germany.

戴尔Vostro 15是一台不错的办公笔记本电脑。相比售价更昂贵的商务笔记本电脑来说它有不少不足之处，而这也不算是个新闻。但是，它并没有让人望而却步的严重问题。当然，全高清TN屏幕在色彩还原上表现较差，整体色彩偏蓝，但这对于办公用途（收发邮件，电子表格，简报，视频会议等）来说并不算是太大的问题。我们测试过的机型中也还有可视角度范围表现更差的。

它还有一些其他的缺点，比如平庸的输入设备，较慢的无线连接速度，安全功能的缺乏和较差的扬声器。不过其中有一些可以通过可选升级得到改进（键盘背光，指纹感应器，其他无线模组）。