海盗船Voyager a1600笔记本电脑在审查。为游戏玩家、流媒体和创作者提供全面的AMD动力

Name: Corsair Voyager a1600
Brand: Corsair

伦勃朗和纳维联合起来了!

海盗船推出的Voyager a1600是一个非常有趣的设备，它以特殊的Elgato快捷方式在竞争中脱颖而出。由于采用了AMD CPU和AMD GPU的组合，游戏玩家和流媒体人应该得到他们的钱。我们已经把顶级型号的产品通过我们的测试课程，并将在这次审查中具体考察该笔记本的功能和性能。

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/14/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Ryzen (Zen) Radeon Gaming Laptop / Notebook

当涉及到PC领域的配件时，海盗船是一个著名的名字：外围设备、电源、固态硬盘、机箱、显示器以及预制桌面系统，其中一些我们已经测试过，是制造商目前阵容的一部分。通过Voyager系列，海盗船现在也进入了笔记本领域，并希望通过Voyager a1600参与到游戏领域。起步的位置一点也不差，因为随着 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS和一个专用的 AMD Radeon RX 6800M有一个很好的基础。在顶级配置中，你还可以期待32GB DDR5内存和2TB存储空间的SSD。另一方面，240赫兹的QHD面板，总是必须的。然而，3,550欧元的价格属于上层联盟的范畴。

如果你使用一个 AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS配有16GB内存和1TB SSD。在这里，目前应该是2600欧元。在测试中，海盗船Voyager a1600与当前游戏笔记本领域的强大对手竞争。更多的细节可以在下表中找到。

Test device courtesy of Corsair DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Corsair Voyager a1600

Processor

AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 35 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX 6800M - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2525 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 135 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), Adrenalin 21.40.56.02, SmartShift

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0A3B, IPS, 240 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, M.2-2280, NVMe, 1800 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headphone Combo Jack, AC-in, Card Reader: Full size SD card reader, UHS III, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Integrated CORSAIR SLIPSTREAM

Networking

Qualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 356 x 286.7

Battery

99 Wh, 6410 mAh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: Full-HD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Dolby Atmos custom tuned internal speakers NVMe SSD, Keyboard: CHERRY MX Ultra-Low Profile mechanical key switches with CAPELLIX LED RGB backlighting, Keyboard Light: yes, 230-Watt-Netzteil, Tasche, iCue, Elgato Stream Deck, Camera Hub, Dolby Access, VOYAGER Hub, CORSAIR Diagnostics, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.403 kg, Power Supply: 451 g

Price

3550 EUR

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	2.4 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.5 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.10"	2560x1600
90.8 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	2.6 kg	19.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2022	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	23 mm	16.10"	2560x1440
88.9 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

外壳和功能 - 薄而结实

海盗船Voyager a1600的外壳是由铝制成的，因此使设备具有非常好的稳定性。在我们的扭转测试中，只有显示器的盖子稍微扭曲了一下。否则，这款游戏笔记本的外观相对适中，没有任何RGB照明，这是相当不错的。显示器由两个小铰链固定，不能完全防止弹跳。

在连接方面，海盗船提供了现代接口，尽管数量非常可控。只有一个USB Type-A是很遗憾的，但有三个支持Thunderbolt的USB-C端口。因此，这台笔记本电脑为未来做好了准备。接口数量如此稀少可能是由于Slipstream功能，因为各种配件可以通过这种无线技术直接连接到笔记本上，不需要额外的加密狗。海盗船本身为此提供了自己的鼠标、键盘和耳机。Wi-Fi模块来自富士康，提供当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准。

作为流媒体笔记本电脑的预期用途需要一个好的网络摄像头。测试显示，内置的1080p摄像头的表现比竞争对手更好。尽管如此，我们建议在固定使用时使用外部摄像头。对于移动使用，你可以放心地使用集成的摄像头。

尺寸比较

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Corsair Voyager a1600 Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W DIN A4 ❌

左边：Kensington锁，AC-in，2个USB Type-C，麦克风/耳机组合插孔

对。USB Type-A, Thunderbolt USB4, SD读卡器（UHS-III）。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	158 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.86 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	68 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	60 MB/s -29%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.7 MB/s +103%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +34%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	89.78 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s -20%

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1723 (1681^min, 1688.83^P1 - 1736^max) MBit/s +94%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (886 - 1790, n=22)	1660 MBit/s +87%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=69, last 2 years)	1491 MBit/s +68%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616	1260 (1156^min - 1343^max) MBit/s +42%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	886 (444^min - 941^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1664 (1649^min - 1680^max) MBit/s +95%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (852 - 1777, n=21)	1606 MBit/s +88%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)	1387 MBit/s +63%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	967 (489^min - 981^max) MBit/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	852 (425^min - 931^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1875 (859^min - 1931^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1655 (1613^min, 1615.32^P1 - 1702^max) MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 MediaTek RZ616	1646 (1468^min - 1762^max) MBit/s -12%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (623 - 1961, n=22)	1471 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=69, last 2 years)	1432 MBit/s -24%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Corsair Voyager a1600 Qualcomm WCN685x	1780 (896^min - 1840^max) MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)	1565 (988^min - 1682^max) MBit/s -12%
Average Qualcomm WCN685x (521 - 1838, n=21)	1321 MBit/s -26%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)	1236 MBit/s -31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng MediaTek MT7921	976 (499^min - 1054^max) MBit/s -45%

Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1846 (859-1931)

Corsair Voyager a1600; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø871 (444-941)

ColorChecker Corsair Voyager a1600: 16.78 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 24.62 ∆E

输入设备

海盗船为Voyager a1600提供了一个基于Cherry MX开关的机械键盘。这些都是非常坚固的，设计的寿命非常长。非常短的行程和明显的压力点给了用户良好的触觉反馈。此外，行程没有阻尼，这防止了海绵状的输入感觉。

键盘的照明可以通过iCUE软件根据需要进行配置。用户可以获得不同的效果和完整的颜色调色板。此外，所有按键都可以单独配置。

触摸板的宽度为整整15.5厘米，深度为10厘米。因此，ClickPad非常大，在实践中最适合作为鼠标的替代品。如果你觉得活动输入区域太大，你可以通过双击左上角的白点来停用右侧。不过这个功能没有光学或触觉指示。玻璃表面有一种微妙的缎面效果，即使手指有点出汗，操作起来也很舒服。下方的两个输入键工作良好，按压时相当安静。

显示 - 快速16:10面板

海盗船Voyager a1600的显示屏是一个16英寸的IPS面板，频率为240赫兹。16:10的格式，其分辨率为2560 x 1600像素，提供了一个宽大的工作面。到目前为止，Voyager a1600还没有替代的显示屏变体。

在我们的测试中，安装的面板达到了340cd/m²的良好亮度。然而，相比之下，竞争者显然提供了更明亮的显示屏。由于黑值相对较高，对比度受到很大影响。因此，在我们的测试中，Voyager a1600只达到了670：1的对比度。

由于PWM导致的眼睛疲劳不应该是海盗船Voyager a1600的问题。背光出血在我们的设备上不是一个问题。


340 cd/m²	354 cd/m²	339 cd/m²
331 cd/m²	355 cd/m²	324 cd/m²
342 cd/m²	347 cd/m²	326 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0A3B tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 339.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 670:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.62 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Corsair Voyager a1600 BOE0A3B, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AUO B160QAN02.S, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.1"	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS LED, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		25%	-5%	22%	3%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	68.7	99.82 45%	63.7 -7%	97.3 42%	71 3%	69.3 1%
sRGB Coverage	98.2	99.99 2%	95.3 -3%	100 2%	97.9 0%	98.2 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.1	90.21 29%	65.7 -6%	84.9 21%	73.3 5%	70.8 1%
Response Times		3%	17%	15%	-3%	24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13 ?(7, 6)	11 ?(1, 10) 15%	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4) 29%	13.8 ?(6.3, 7.5) -6%	14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3) -12%	12.6 ?(5.9, 6.7) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	10 ?(5, 5)	11 ?(1, 10) -10%	9.6 ?(4.8, 4.8) 4%	6.4 ?(1.8, 4.6) 36%	9.4 ?(4.4, 5) 6%	5.6 ?(1.5, 4.1) 44%
PWM Frequency		7400 ?(100)
Screen		71%	12%	29%	-30%	18%
Brightness middle	355	498 40%	478.8 35%	498 40%	335 -6%	547 54%
Brightness	340	502 48%	477 40%	468 38%	319 -6%	523 54%
Brightness Distribution	91	94 3%	90 -1%	80 -12%	90 -1%	88 -3%
Black Level *	0.53	0.11 79%	0.43 19%	0.36 32%	0.28 47%	0.44 17%
Contrast	670	4527 576%	1113 66%	1383 106%	1196 79%	1243 86%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.43	1.87 23%	2.24 8%	1.77 27%	4.38 -80%	2.1 14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.31	6.15 -43%	4.49 -4%	5.24 -22%	9.48 -120%	7 -62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.14	1.94 -70%	1.89 -66%	0.63 45%	1.33 -17%	0.9 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.62	3.15 -20%	2.3 12%	2.4 8%	7 -167%	3.2 -22%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	330.95 ^1%	2.25 ^98%	2.14 ^103%	2.103 ^105%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6909 ^94%	7294 ^89%	6955 ^93%	7046 ^92%	6244 ^104%	6979 ^93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		33% / 51%	8% / 9%	22% / 26%	-10% / -19%	14% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

显示质量很好，色彩空间覆盖率也很高。然而，在这种比较中，竞争对手往往也能提供更好的比率。我们的评测样本在这个学科上只能击败联想的Legion 7。由于与sRGB色彩空间相比，灰度和色彩的Delta E-2000值很好，我们认为海盗船在运送该设备时使用了校准的显示器。手动校准又稍微改善了Delta E-2000值。然而，最大的显示器亮度受到影响。我们建议让显示器保持其交付状态。色彩空间的覆盖范围对于半专业的照片和视频编辑来说是足够的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

原则上，哑光显示的表面适合在户外使用。然而，相对较低的显示亮度对它不利。

视角测试显示了一个典型的IPS面板的结果。在四个角落的图像中可以看到轻微的颜色变化，这不会导致正常使用中的任何限制。

性能 - 伦勃朗基地有大量的内存和存储空间

海盗船Voyager a1600的组合为AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS和 AMD Radeon RX 6800M提供了一个非常好的基础上，目前的游戏与最大的细节在一台笔记本电脑。与32GB工作内存和2TB固态硬盘相连，用户在这里也得到了一个体面的性能。

测试条件

海盗船提供了在三种不同模式下使用该设备的可能性，可以通过iCUE软件进行切换。这些选项是安静、平衡和极端。差异在于CPU和GPU的最大性能，即使与智能移位技术相结合。所有的性能测试都是在极限模式下进行的。

处理器

淘宝网AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS是一个八核处理器，基于目前的Rembrandt架构。该SoC在Boost状态下的时钟频率为3.3-4.9 GHz，并支持SMT，为用户提供总共16个线程。在与基于英特尔的竞争者的直接比较中，AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS很难保持自己的优势。然而，该测试样本在AIDA64测试中的表现要好一些，在排名中位居第三。

关于进一步的基准测试，我们建议你参考我们的CPU比较表.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2152 (2123.71-2170.49)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS; @Turbo Mode: Ø2279 (2140.75-2332.5)

Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2337 (2320.19-2354.74)

Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2490 (2422.04-2631.06)

HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)

Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø3279 (3244.91-3512.16)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	85.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	80.3 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	71.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	66.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	60.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	58 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.6 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	22449 Points +67%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)	21798 Points +62%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	16887 Points +26%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	16253 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14455 (14309.4^min - 14455.1^max) Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	14403 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12606 - 14403, n=5)	13439 Points 0%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1935 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=187, last 2 years)	1886 Points +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1799 Points +16%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1743 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1564 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (1526 - 1570, n=5)	1553 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1526 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	8522 Points +65%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8294 Points +61%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	6352 Points +23%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5892 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5616 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5552 Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (4829 - 5552, n=5)	5167 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	743 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	725 Points +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	695 Points +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	640 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	612 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (596 - 620, n=5)	608 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	599 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	3512 (3244.91^min - 3512.16^max) Points +63%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3416 Points +58%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	2813 (2455.34^min - 2812.94^max) Points +30%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	2631 (2422.04^min - 2631.06^max) Points +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2355 (2320.19^min - 2354.74^max) Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2333 (2140.75^min - 2332.5^max) Points +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (2054 - 2342, n=5)	2191 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	280 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	277 Points +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	261 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	251 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (218 - 254, n=5)	242 Points -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	241 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	231 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (220 - 277, n=5)	239 Seconds * -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	224 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	215 Seconds * +5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	197.6 Seconds * +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	182.7 Seconds * +20%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	171 Seconds * +25%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	149 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	86384 MIPS +39%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85163 MIPS +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	72679 MIPS +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	64864 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	62721 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62006 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (52948 - 63591, n=5)	60092 MIPS -3%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	6358 MIPS +10%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6300 MIPS +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	5863 MIPS +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (5538 - 5958, n=5)	5766 MIPS -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5680 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5679 MIPS -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	5138 MIPS -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	16447 Points +64%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	14985 Points +49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	13500 Points +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	12463 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10018 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (8381 - 10040, n=5)	9358 Points -7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	9224 Points -8%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1890 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	1874 Points +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	1810 Points +22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	1746 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1589 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (1480 - 1614, n=5)	1541 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1537 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	25.4 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.4 fps +39%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	20 fps +19%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	18.5 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.2 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.2 fps -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14.2 - 17.9, n=5)	16.2 fps -4%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	56.1 s * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	54 s * +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (47.6 - 57.2, n=5)	51.3 s * +10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=183, last 2 years)	47.3 s * +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	41.7 s * +27%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	41 s * +28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	34.5 s * +40%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.5 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4907 sec * -0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (0.4672 - 0.502, n=5)	0.4874 sec * -0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4671 sec * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4489 sec * +8%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4383 sec * +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX	0.4209 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6406

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

18728 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

73218 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

12340 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

17195

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

41849

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

2.52 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

21.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

174.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

2.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

25.29 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

178.03 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

245 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2161 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

202.73 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5152 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

596 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

13445 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1554 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	96.4 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	86.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	84.1 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	82.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	78.7 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	77.2 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	64.3 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21730 KRay/s +38%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	17242 KRay/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	16064 KRay/s +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (14212 - 16072, n=5)	15317 KRay/s -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	11535 KRay/s -27%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9316 KRay/s -41%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7636 KRay/s -52%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	106387 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106357 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102881 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (90523 - 102881, n=5)	96872 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	52916 Points -47%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	41656 Points -58%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	36195 Points -64%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4877 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4216 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3657 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3614 MB/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3378 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (3035 - 3614, n=5)	3326 MB/s -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2673 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	116692 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	105344 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	104030 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (97461 - 105203, n=5)	102908 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	101029 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99861 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	98781 Points -6%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13211 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	13062 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	13011 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12905 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (12548 - 13039, n=5)	12830 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	9927 Points -24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9247 Points -29%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	58428 Points +7%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	56486 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53547 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49657 - 56486, n=5)	52606 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	31779 Points -42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	25547 Points -53%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	21106 Points -61%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	142686 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	142360 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	125268 MB/s -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (51791 - 142686, n=5)	118697 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109010 MB/s -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102111 MB/s -25%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	85401 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1392 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1358 MB/s +57%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1143 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	948 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	905 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	888 MB/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (737 - 888, n=5)	818 MB/s -6%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11705 KRay/s +39%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	9147 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8981 KRay/s +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (7530 - 8981, n=5)	8272 KRay/s -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	6663 KRay/s -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	5322 KRay/s -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	4457 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	40868 MPixel/s +38%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40239 MPixel/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40066 MPixel/s +35%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	36231 MPixel/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	30604 MPixel/s +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	29413 MPixel/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25757 - 30291, n=5)	28445 MPixel/s -4%

系统性能

基准测试结果显示了良好的系统性能，尽管与基于英特尔的笔记本的明显区别再次明显。然而，主观上，海盗船Voyager a1600提供了非常好的系统性能，在日常使用中没有明显的延迟。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	8636 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7788 Points +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7539 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7377 Points +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	7322 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	7208 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6860 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11190 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years)	10838 Points +9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10715 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10521 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10249 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	9970 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9758 Points -2%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	10932 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years)	9895 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9632 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9613 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	9549 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9097 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	8983 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	14291 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years)	12073 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11385 Points 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	11350 Points 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	11293 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	10888 Points -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9322 Points -18%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2132 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=148, last 2 years)	1902 Points +34%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1861 Points +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1661 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1596 Points +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1415 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2012 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=148, last 2 years)	1804 Points +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1786 Points +30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1609 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1551 Points +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1379 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2307 Points +44%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=148, last 2 years)	2088 Points +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1936 Points +21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1795 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1754 Points +10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1599 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2007 Points +89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1868 Points +76%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=148, last 2 years)	1701 Points +60%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1449 Points +37%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1310 Points +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	1060 Points 0%

PCMark 10 Score		7208 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65123 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63993 MB/s +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	63110 MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	60342 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50837 MB/s +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (49150 - 51517, n=5)	50427 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	49972 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49150 MB/s -2%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	69716 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69002 MB/s +35%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	67695 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	66496 MB/s +30%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	51836 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	51270 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51041 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (43646 - 51838, n=5)	49919 MB/s -3%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	66803 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	64272 MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	63527 MB/s +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	55214 MB/s 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	55214 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55102 MB/s 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	51577 MB/s -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (15975 - 55235, n=5)	46524 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.6 ns * -27%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	95.2 ns *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.2 ns * +1%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	94 ns * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (79.2 - 110.9, n=5)	93.1 ns * +2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	90.1 ns * +5%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	86 ns * +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	85.4 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在Edge中打开多个浏览器标签时，记录的延迟没有增加。Voyager a1600还掌握了4K YouTube视频的播放，没有问题。我们只看到在启动Prime95之后延迟略有增加。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2127.9 μs * -175%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1393.9 μs * -80%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1194.1 μs * -54%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1155.7 μs * -50%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	773 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	717.4 μs * +7%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

海盗船Voyager a1600拥有2TB固态硬盘，提供了大量的存储空间，由于其预期用途，这绝对是需要的。在基准测试中，已安装的模型不能跟上竞争者的步伐。尽管如此，对于大多数用户来说，其传输速率还是绰绰有余的。在负载测试中，固态硬盘的性能始终可以不受限制。顺便说一下，笔记本的底板起到了散热的作用。总共可以安装两个M.2-2280格式的大容量存储设备。

关于进一步的比较和基准，请参考我们的SSD/HDD 比较表.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

Sequential Read: 3524 MB/s

Sequential Write: 2050 MB/s

512K Read: 1754 MB/s

512K Write: 2055 MB/s

4K Read: 39.29 MB/s

4K Write: 137.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 443.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 493.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	91.8 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX ^-1! Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	88.1 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	87.8 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	86.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	79.5 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.8 pt
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	70.8 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	64.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4343 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4195 (4171.24^min - 4194.51^max) MB/s +31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3928 (3889.8^min - 3927.66^max) MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=32)	3898 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3625 (3612.57^min - 3624.81^max) MB/s +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3595 (3264.19^min - 3594.73^max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)	3478 MB/s +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3207 (3148.45^min - 3206.84^max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4954 (4429.55^min - 4954.26^max) MB/s +47%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4780 (3934.47^min - 4779.5^max) MB/s +42%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4599 (4248.83^min - 4598.67^max) MB/s +36%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2370 - 7628, n=32)	4122 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	4033 (3953.13^min - 4032.82^max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)	3807 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3377 (3301.76^min - 3376.79^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3274 (3228.15^min - 3273.86^max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=32)	7102 MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	6867 (6210.3^min - 6866.91^max) MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6697 (4182.58^min - 6697.46^max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6694 (5547.2^min - 6693.9^max) MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6693 (6460.49^min - 6692.89^max) MB/s +10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6499 (5666.71^min - 6499.29^max) MB/s +7%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)	6325 MB/s +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6099 (5570.64^min - 6098.73^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=32)	5469 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5412 (5265.32^min - 5411.99^max) MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5048 (5040.92^min - 5048.44^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5003 (4959.7^min - 5002.55^max) MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4985 (4772.28^min - 4984.61^max) MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4982 (4649.6^min - 4981.68^max) MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)	4867 MB/s -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4765 (4460.74^min - 4765.06^max) MB/s -6%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)	77.5 MB/s +32%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	77.1 (76.91^min - 77.11^max) MB/s +32%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	74.1 (72.94^min - 74.14^max) MB/s +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	70.3 (69.8^min - 70.31^max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	67.6 (66.3^min - 67.64^max) MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	66.7 (66.39^min - 66.66^max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)	65.9 MB/s +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	58.6 (57.33^min - 58.61^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	258 (233.29^min - 257.8^max) MB/s +83%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	222 (217.59^min - 222.42^max) MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)	222 MB/s +58%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (115.5 - 295, n=32)	214 MB/s +52%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	205 (195.73^min - 204.56^max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	161 (159.24^min - 160.98^max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	159.1 (155.4^min - 159.1^max) MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	140.8 (138.42^min - 140.84^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (658 - 4075, n=32)	2876 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2859 (2841.54^min - 2858.59^max) MB/s +104%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2842 (2837.59^min - 2841.89^max) MB/s +102%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2750 (2675.05^min - 2750.14^max) MB/s +96%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)	2569 MB/s +83%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1535 (1515.74^min - 1535.37^max) MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1528 (1477.56^min - 1527.59^max) MB/s +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1404 (1371.85^min - 1404.22^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2786 (2543.84^min - 2785.68^max) MB/s +461%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2679 (2487.07^min - 2678.86^max) MB/s +439%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2658 (2651.88^min - 2657.7^max) MB/s +435%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (387 - 3548, n=32)	2190 MB/s +341%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)	2121 MB/s +327%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	585 (555.77^min - 584.61^max) MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	539 (505.45^min - 539.19^max) MB/s +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	497 (485.81^min - 496.85^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7400 Points +26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7356 Points +25%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 9031, n=31)	7222 Points +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7009 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6743 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6475 Points +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5985 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5878 Points
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2855 Points +57%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2814 Points +54%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2709 Points +49%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1224 - 3399, n=31)	2666 Points +46%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2445 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1994 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1957 Points +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1824 Points
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3614 Points +12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1081 - 3999, n=31)	3262 Points +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3221 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3144 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3128 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	3093 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2930 Points -9%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2591 - 9971, n=31)	5479 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	5396.69 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5348.25 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5232 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4996.87 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4940 MB/s +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4821 MB/s
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4531.51 MB/s -6%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4539.36 MB/s +67%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4336 MB/s +59%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4186.78 MB/s +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1900 - 8590, n=31)	3992 MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3750 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2851.98 MB/s +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2725 MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2667.04 MB/s -2%
4K Read
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	73.81 MB/s +48%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)	72.4 MB/s +46%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	67.72 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +31%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	64.38 MB/s +29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	63.8 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	61.45 MB/s +24%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	49.75 MB/s
4K Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	247.26 MB/s +75%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	212.27 MB/s +50%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +50%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	203.82 MB/s +44%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (112.6 - 254, n=31)	197.6 MB/s +40%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	160.74 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	143.61 MB/s +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	141.54 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2264.38 MB/s +75%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2218.05 MB/s +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2191.95 MB/s +70%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (662 - 2811, n=31)	2045 MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1880 MB/s +45%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1393.84 MB/s +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	1380.56 MB/s +7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1292.41 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3168.51 MB/s +13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2807.18 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (567 - 3414, n=31)	2665 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	2579.14 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2546.85 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2528 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2490.61 MB/s -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2298.82 MB/s -18%
Access Time Read
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.078 ms *
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05526 ms * +29%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.045 ms * +42%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.036 ms * +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)	0.03406 ms * +56%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.028 ms * +64%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.076 ms * -162%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04826 ms * -66%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)	0.03371 ms * -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.029 ms *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.022 ms * +24%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.021 ms * +28%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB	0.016 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Corsair Voyager a1600: Ø6086 (5628.61-6111.88)

图形卡

AMD Radeon RX 6800M 是一款配备了12GB VRAM的快速专用显卡。由于RDNA2的存在，AMD目前用于笔记本的6000系列还为光线追踪计算提供了独立的RT核心。在测试中，Corsair Voyager a1600可以拿出良好的3D性能。与拥有GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 图形芯片的竞争对手的差距部分很小。基本上，海盗船Voyager a1600提供足够的性能，目前足以将许多现代游戏流畅地呈现在屏幕上。通过AMD的智能移位技术，CPU总是能从GPU获得最佳性能。

在2D模式下，AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS的iGPU会做工作，从而节省能源。

更多的比较和基准测试，请参考我们的G PU比较表.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	96.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	93.9 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	89 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M	88.9 pt
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83.7 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	78.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	75.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)	43904 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	42089 Points +8%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (39075 - 41706, n=2)	40391 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	39075 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	37288 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	36065 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	34141 Points -13%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	177650 Points +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	170020 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144658 Points -15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	144426 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143493 Points -16%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (91327 - 170020, n=3)	140735 Points -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	108854 Points -36%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (30507 - 34993, n=3)	33233 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	32853 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)	31462 Points +3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	30507 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	28006 Points -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	26612 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	25891 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)	13136 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11762 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	11076 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (10439 - 11316, n=4)	11067 Points +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10439 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10404 Points 0%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	9980 Points -4%

3DMark 05 Standard		57639 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		46732 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		77244 points
3DMark 11 Performance		30013 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		209564 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		59585 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		25639 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		13599 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		10391 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU ()	380 Seconds * -503%
Average of class Gaming (63 - 399, n=9, last 2 years)	231 Seconds * -267%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	63 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	51 Seconds * +19%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	382 Seconds *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	378 Seconds * +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (285 - 459, n=16)	376 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	372 Seconds * +3%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=187, last 2 years)	296 Seconds * +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (261 - 429, n=13)	295 Seconds * +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	268 Seconds * +30%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	42 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (36 - 46, n=16)	41.4 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=181, last 2 years)	36.5 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	36 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (32 - 41, n=13)	35 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (22 - 30, n=15)	25.3 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (20 - 28, n=13)	23.1 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HX	23 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=175, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	251 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=121, last 2 years)	242 fps +36%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	208.1 (192^min) fps +17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	189 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (177.8 - 199, n=2)	188.4 fps +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	188 (156^min) fps +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	186.6 (141^min) fps +5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	177.8 (43.6^min, 105.5^P0.1, 142.7^P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=164, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	118.1 (112^min) fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	114.4 (108^min, 109^P1) fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (108 - 110, n=2)	109 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	108 (38^min, 58.3^P0.1, 88.2^P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	102.1 (82^min) fps -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.8 fps -9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.7 (83^min) fps -10%

GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	183.4 (2.86^min, 142.9^P1) fps +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	176.1 (2.91^min, 111.1^P1) fps +13%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	173.9 (3.58^min, 125^P1) fps +11%
Average of class Gaming (24.2 - 187.1, n=143, last 2 years)	169.5 fps +9%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	162.4 (8.03^min, 90.9^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	156.3 fps 0%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	156.2 (7.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (124 - 156.2, n=2)	140.1 fps -10%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=168, last 2 years)	113.7 fps +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (10.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps +22%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	111.4 (6.89^min, 66.7^P1) fps +20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	110.2 (10.6^min, 76.9^P1) fps +19%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	96.9 (7.1^min, 62.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.6 fps +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	92.8 (6.46^min, 55.6^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (75.1 - 92.8, n=2)	84 fps -9%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	163.9 fps +30%
Average of class Gaming (33.5 - 230, n=142, last 2 years)	155 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	148.5 fps +18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	134.7 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	131 (51^min) fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	125.6 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	123.5 fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (118 - 125.6, n=2)	121.8 fps -3%
1920x1080 High Quality
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.2 fps +24%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=180, last 2 years)	120 fps +23%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	111.9 fps +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103.9 fps +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.6 (59^min) fps +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (97.5 - 99.7, n=2)	98.6 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	97.5 fps
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.9 fps -3%

F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	297 (230^min) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 470, n=16, last 2 years)	263 fps +14%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	246 (211^min, 167^P1) fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	231 (185^min, 141^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (187 - 231, n=2)	209 fps -10%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	182.1 (157^min, 116^P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	146 (121^min) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming (27.6 - 271, n=16, last 2 years)	145.2 fps +17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	124.1 (104^min, 92^P1) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	121.9 (100^min, 78^P1) fps -2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (114 - 124.1, n=2)	119.1 fps -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	97.5 (82^min, 69^P1) fps -21%

X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	120.2 fps +165%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.5 fps +148%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=192, last 2 years)	108 fps +138%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103.1 fps +128%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	70.8 fps +56%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (45.3 - 50.4, n=2)	47.9 fps +6%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	45.3 fps
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	44.1 fps -3%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	150.5 fps +197%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	141.3 fps +179%
Average of class Gaming (38.2 - 193.1, n=185, last 2 years)	137.7 fps +172%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	130.8 fps +158%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87.9 fps +73%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (50.7 - 61.4, n=2)	56.1 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	51.2 fps +1%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	50.7 fps

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	166 fps +52%
Average of class Gaming (35 - 232, n=99, last 2 years)	139.7 fps +28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 fps +4%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	109 (87^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (95 - 109, n=2)	102 fps -6%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	153 fps +51%
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=102, last 2 years)	130.7 fps +29%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	109 fps +8%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	101 (78^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (89 - 101, n=3)	95 fps -6%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	224 (140^min, 162.1^P1) fps +9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	206 (116.9^min, 151.5^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (179 - 206, n=3)	188.3 fps -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	171.2 (74.4^min, 123.2^P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	167.2 (107.5^min, 131.7^P1) fps -19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	146.6 (72.6^min, 102.4^P1) fps -29%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	137.6 (22.6^min, 94^P1) fps -33%
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	261 (74.9^min, 186.3^P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming (49.4 - 465, n=151, last 2 years)	256 fps +12%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	229 (152.3^min, 169.8^P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M (192 - 229, n=2)	211 fps -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	189.4 (106.8^min, 136.7^P1) fps -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	184 (117.2^min, 131.2^P1) fps -20%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	164.1 (81.9^min, 109.9^P1) fps -28%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	156 (44^min, 107.5^P1) fps -32%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	177.8 (154.9^min) fps +42%
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 244, n=185, last 2 years)	161.2 fps +28%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	151.4 (134.2^min) fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	149.1 (131.9^min) fps +19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	125.5 (105.8^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	125.5 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	116 (100.1^min) fps -8%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	113.7 (86.4^min) fps -9%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	168 (144.9^min) fps +46%
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)	150.3 fps +31%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	145.2 (127.1^min) fps +26%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	144 (127.1^min) fps +25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	114.8 (94.7^min) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 6800M ()	114.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.1 (93.8^min) fps -2%
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	95.2 (75.3^min) fps -17%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M: Ø112.7 (97.284-143.2)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	177.1	172	156.2	92.8	84	85.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)	309	236	177.8	108		59.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146.1	126.2	125.5	114.8		95.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	160.8	125.6	97.5		71	41.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	60	50.7	45.3			28.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)	129	113	109	101	100	61
Strange Brigade (2018)	394	258	229	206	145	77.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	143.9	119.7	112.8	106.1	80.5	43.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	111	97	94	86	82	62
Metro Exodus (2019)	205	137.4	99.8	78.7	61.4	37.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	116.1	100.1	89.2	77.6	57	30.3
F1 2020 (2020)	305	247	228	172.4	127.4	70.2
Dirt 5 (2020)	242	154	121	95	76	47
F1 2021 (2021)	342	277	231	124.1	88.2	47.6
New World (2021)	122.5	103	83.7	66.2		34.1
Forza Horizon 5 (2021)	213	165	159	97	79	50
God of War (2022)	88.6	88.3	85.4	68.4	53	33.8
GRID Legends (2022)	233	205	171.2	144.1	115.8	72.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	122.5	95.5	82	76.9	48.1	22.1
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	196.7	161.5	104.6	80.5	54.9	28.2
F1 22 (2022)	226	226	192.3	49.7	29.9	13.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022)	104.9	82.5	61.4	46	32.8	17.9
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022)	93.4	87.9	80.7	76.3	59.2	33.7
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022)	90.8	94.2	88.6	82.5	63.2	38.1

排放与能源--不可忽视的问题

噪声排放

测量的噪声排放几乎显示了游戏笔记本电脑的典型结果。然而，测得的51.1 dB(A)很响，主观上认为明显更响。原因是非常高频率的风扇噪音。唯一的补救措施是选择平衡或安静的配置文件。在压力测试中，噪音水平分别下降到46和36 dB(A)。

Noise Level

Idle		30.5 / 30.6 / 30.7 dB(A)
Load		44.5 / 51.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A)

	Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	HP Omen 16-b1090ng GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Noise		7%	22%	0%	-3%	5%
off / environment *	29.9	25.5 15%	22.8 24%	26 13%	26 13%	24.5 18%
Idle Minimum *	30.5	25.5 16%	23 25%	26 15%	30 2%	24.5 20%
Idle Average *	30.6	25.5 17%	23 25%	29 5%	31 -1%	30 2%
Idle Maximum *	30.7	27.4 11%	23 25%	34 -11%	33 -7%	32.5 -6%
Load Average *	44.5	49.9 -12%	26.8 40%	50 -12%	49 -10%	43.9 1%
Load Maximum *	51.1	55 -8%	54.2 -6%	56 -10%	57 -12%	54.2 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *			54.3	53	53	48.8

* ... smaller is better

温度

在压力测试中，我们测量了机箱底部的最热点，高达54℃。然而，机箱上部的温度也相当高，刚刚超过50℃。在游戏过程中，机箱温度只略微下降了1-2℃。

在压力测试中，CPU和GPU温度分别上升到95和83℃。然而，SoC的平均时钟频率仍然为3.7GHz。AMD的GPU也实现了高时钟频率，略低于2.2GHz。海盗船使用了一个带有蒸汽室和两个风扇的大型冷却系统。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


43.3 °C	50.7 °C	41.5 °C
36.3 °C	44.3 °C	33.3 °C
34 °C	31.5 °C	32.2 °C

Maximum: 50.7 °C
Average: 38.6 °C


36 °C	54.2 °C	36.7 °C
35.5 °C	51 °C	36.3 °C
33.1 °C	36.1 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 39.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 63.5 °C | Room Temperature 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


32.4 °C	35.8 °C	32.5 °C
30.8 °C	31.3 °C	31.1 °C
30.1 °C	29.3 °C	30.1 °C

Maximum: 35.8 °C
Average: 31.5 °C


29.8 °C	33 °C	28.8 °C
31.4 °C	32.5 °C	30.1 °C
30.3 °C	30.2 °C	29.8 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 30.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 44.3 °C | Room Temperature 23.2 °C | FFIRT 550-Pocket

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42.6 °C	49.2 °C	40.2 °C
35.9 °C	33.5 °C	32.4 °C
33.6 °C	30.6 °C	31.6 °C

Maximum: 49.2 °C
Average: 36.6 °C


36.5 °C	53.6 °C	36.7 °C
34 °C	49.5 °C	36.3 °C
32.4 °C	35.4 °C	33.9 °C

Maximum: 53.6 °C
Average: 38.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 59.3 °C | Room Temperature 23.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.7 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, AMD Radeon RX 6800M	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-3%	14%	8%	14%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	50.7	55.1 -9%	37.2 27%	47 7%	41 19%	44.4 12%
Maximum Bottom *	54.2	50.3 7%	43 21%	49 10%	62 -14%	60.8 -12%
Idle Upper Side *	35.8	35.5 1%	34 5%	31 13%	25 30%	33.8 6%
Idle Bottom *	33	36.1 -9%	32.8 1%	32 3%	26 21%	38.8 -18%

* ... smaller is better

演讲者

两个扬声器位于掌托下方。然而，声音是从键盘旁边的扬声器栅栏中向上引出的。通常情况下，这两个扬声器缺乏低音，所以中音和高音明显占优势。然而，我们建议使用耳机进行游戏。这可以通过USB使用3.5毫米插孔或通过Slipstream连接到笔记本电脑上。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Corsair Voyager a1600 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

在功耗方面，我们测量了空闲时约16至22瓦的功率。在平均负载下，我们登记了大约133瓦，尽管峰值达到258瓦。根据规格，该电源可以提供230瓦。然而，在测试中，较高的负载峰值并没有导致问题。在压力测试期间，电池没有额外放电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 2.05 Watt
Idle	16.9 / 20.3 / 22.2 Watt
Load	133.4 / Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Corsair Voyager a1600; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø206 (195.6-225)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø211 (161.5-258)

Energy consumption with an external monitor

Corsair Voyager a1600; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø93.6 (90.5-133.9)

Corsair Voyager a1600; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø105.5 (96.3-142.2)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198.4 (190.7-212)

Corsair Voyager a1600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø211 (194.2-221)

电池寿命

海盗船的电池容量为99Wh，在电池容量方面用尽了最大限度。由于闲置能耗相对较高，该设备在闲置时落后于竞争对手。然而，联想的Legion 7的得分更差。尽管如此，Voyager a1600在WLAN测试中取得了合格的运行时间，略低于6小时。在这项测试中，显示亮度为52%，相当于150cd/m²的一般条件。海盗船还在电池模式下明显地节制了CPU和GPU的性能。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		6h 58min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)		5h 50min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge: 107.0.1418.62)		4h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 58min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 06min

	Corsair Voyager a1600 R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M, 99 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 99 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.98 Wh	HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-31%	-6%	14%	10%	-36%	6%
Reader / Idle	418		293 -30%		603 44%		565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 35%
H.264	358			490 37%		306 -15%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) 14%
WiFi v1.3	350	339 -3%	436 25%	344 -2%	336 -4%	267 -24%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 7%
Load	126	53 -58%	110 -13%	133 6%	114 -10%	40 -68%	85.8 ?(41 - 173, n=118, last 2 years) -32%
Witcher 3 ultra		51				55	78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高CPU和GPU性能

+ 12 GB VRAM

+ 32 GB DDR5内存

+ 2TB SSD

+ 非常好的做工

+ 纤细的设计

+ 快速、校准的240赫兹显示屏

+ 没有PWM，也没有混浊现象

+ 非常大的触摸板

+ 带Cherry MX开关的机械按键

+ Elgato Stream甲板的特点

+ 海盗船Slipstream

Cons

- 高频率的风扇噪音

- 没有4K选项

- 低于平均水平的SSD性能

- 只有全高清网络摄像头

- 没有RJ-45

结论--多功能的笔记本游戏玩家和流媒体玩家

海盗船通过Voyager a1600创造了一个真正伟大的设备。AMD SoC和AMD GPU的组合很好，在测试中相当具有说服力。在与英特尔当前SoC的直接对决中，它往往不得不承认失败。然而，性能上的差异其实并不明显。由于材料的选择，Voyager a1600看起来特别高端，这也使该设备具有非常好的稳定性。该设备看起来一点都不笨重

乍一看，连接性变成了一个有点简陋的东西。然而，那些依靠Slipstream技术来连接外围设备的人几乎不会错过缺席的USB Type-A端口。

AMD的Ryzen 9 6900HS表现良好，在负载下持续快速，没有太大的性能损失。我们也可以证明AMD的Radeon RX 6800M也是如此。我们喜欢16:10格式的显示屏。唯一的缺点是亮度有点低，而且在AdobeRGB和P3色彩空间中的色彩空间覆盖率不是很完美，这就排除了用于视频或照片编辑的专业用途。然而，作为一台游戏笔记本电脑，海盗船Voyager a1600可以轻松地做到没有这些。

海盗船Voyager a1600不仅仅是一个纯粹的游戏笔记本，因为它的强大功能使它成为流媒体和内容创作者的完美设备。

然而，凭借独特的流媒体功能，Voyager a1600将被人记住。可以根据需要分配的快速启动按钮适合流媒体者，你可以不需要额外的流媒体平台。话虽如此，由于预期的用途，我们会希望有一个更高质量的摄像头，而不仅仅是作为一个移动应急解决方案。海盗船Voyager a1600的最大缺点是内置冷却装置。在负载情况下，温度仍然在限制范围内，这是毫无疑问的，但在最大性能下，测量的噪音水平仍然太高。那些放弃极限模式的人将得到低排放的回报，但同时也会放弃一些性能。