Notebookcheck Logo

微星 WT72-6QME 工作站简短评测

专业用户的重型机械。 微星的WT72现在搭配了Skylake架构Xeon处理器和更强劲的Nvidia Quadro GPU。它的其他特性大部分没有改变,这款工作站仍然是用于CAD和3D建模的一个可靠选择。
Windows Workstation Skylake
MSI WT72-6QM (WT72 Series)
Processor
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 4 x 2.8 - 3.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M - 8 GB VRAM, 10.18.13.5396, manuell
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, no, LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, 128GB*2 SSD (PCIe Gen3x4)
Soundcard
Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
6 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Mikrofon + Kopfhörer, Card Reader: SD (XC/HC)
Networking
Killer E2400 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Optical drive
Matshita BD-MLT UJ272
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 48 x 428 x 293.3
Battery
86580 mAh Lithium-Ion, 9 Zellen
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1080p FullHD
Additional features
Speakers: Dynaudio Tech Speakers 3W*2 + Subwoofer*1, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3.852 kg, Power Supply: 1.072 kg
Price
5000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

428 mm 293.3 mm 48 mm 3.9 kg412 mm 276 mm 46 mm 3.8 kg418 mm 282 mm 39 mm 3.9 kg417 mm 271 mm 37 mm 3.8 kg416 mm 272 mm 34 mm 3.8 kg427 mm 277 mm 22.4 mm 3.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
290
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 297.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 301 cd/m²
Contrast: 659:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.77 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.87 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.27% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.99
MSI WT72-6QM
17.3", 1920x1080
Bullman E-Klasse 5
17.3", 1920x1080
Dell Precision M6800
17.3", 1920x1080
HP ZBook 17 E9X11AA-ABA
17.3", 1920x1080
SCHENKER XMG U705
17.3", 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 inch 2015
17.3", 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad P70
17.3", 3840x2160
Display
-1%
10%
34%
-2%
6%
30%
Display P3 Coverage
67.3
66.5
-1%
71.8
7%
85.7
27%
66.3
-1%
69.7
4%
90.8
35%
sRGB Coverage
85.4
84.5
-1%
95.8
12%
100
17%
83.4
-2%
90.4
6%
100
17%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.5
61.8
-1%
70.2
12%
99.2
59%
61
-2%
66.8
7%
85.4
37%
Response Times
51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(13, 29)
44 ?(17.2, 26.8)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
26 ?(7, 19)
27.6 ?(4.8, 22.8)
-6%
PWM Frequency
86 ?(10, 15)
228 ?(95)
165%
Screen
14%
-39%
29%
14%
-45%
15%
Brightness middle
303
355
17%
250
-17%
320
6%
333
10%
315.5
4%
365
20%
Brightness
298
335
12%
247
-17%
311
4%
317
6%
295
-1%
341
14%
Brightness Distribution
94
89
-5%
83
-12%
88
-6%
86
-9%
87
-7%
85
-10%
Black Level *
0.46
0.44
4%
0.477
-4%
0.359
22%
0.3
35%
0.822
-79%
0.4
13%
Contrast
659
807
22%
524
-20%
891
35%
1110
68%
384
-42%
913
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.77
3.73
35%
11.4
-98%
2.04
65%
5.24
9%
12.21
-112%
3.8
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.87
2.84
42%
12.97
-166%
2.45
50%
4.33
11%
13.4
-175%
6.09
-25%
Gamma
1.99 111%
2.12 104%
2.65 83%
2.28 96%
2.14 103%
2.39 92%
2.3 96%
CCT
7363 88%
6457 101%
18595 35%
6518 100%
6437 101%
19530 33%
6332 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
56.04
55.45
-1%
68
21%
93
66%
55
-2%
59
5%
76.01
36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.27
84.39
-1%
100
17%
83.3
-2%
90.3
6%
99.97
17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / 10%
-15% / -26%
32% / 30%
6% / 10%
-20% / -32%
32% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13 ms rise
↘ 29 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 86 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting
≤ 15 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 86 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % (15 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 86 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
1.77 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
1.54 Points -13%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
1.95 Points +10%
Dell Precision M6800
1.55 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
7.85 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
7.11 Points -9%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
9.14 Points +16%
Dell Precision M6800
5.49 Points -30%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
157 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
135 Points -14%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
174 Points +11%
Dell Precision M6800
139 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
724 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
657 Points -9%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
843 Points +16%
Dell Precision M6800
529 Points -27%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
529 s *
Dell Precision M6800
534 s * -1%

Legend

 
MSI WT72-6QM Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5, NVIDIA Quadro M5000M, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
 
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET Intel Core i7-4710MQ, AMD FirePro M6100, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
 
Bullman E-Klasse 5 Intel Core i7-4790K, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
 
Dell Precision M6800 Intel Core i7-4800MQ, NVIDIA Quadro K3100M, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8529 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
27938 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7421 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8525
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
21475
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5627
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
95 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.77 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
109.6 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
724 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
157 Points
Help
PCMark 7 Score
6657 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4731 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5655 points
Help
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Transfer Rate Minimum: 71.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 153.4 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 114.8 MB/s
Access Time: 15.4 ms
Burst Rate: 309.7 MB/s
CPU Usage: 3 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
11110 Points
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
6167 Points -44%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
4074 Points -63%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
3662 Points -67%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
12645 Points +14%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
7979 Points
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
3579 Points -55%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
3644 Points -54%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
2731 Points -66%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
2259 Points -72%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
11066 Points +39%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
22786 Points
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
17342 Points -24%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
16199 Points -29%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
15497 Points -32%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
12079 Points -47%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
25302 Points +11%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
137273 Points
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
126937 Points -8%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
123260 Points -10%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
118906 Points -13%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
81160 Points -41%
MSI GT72S 6QF
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0)
125241 Points -9%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
29317 points
3DMark 11 Performance
11110 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
137273 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22786 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
7979 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4205 points
Help
SPECviewperf 11
1920x1080 Siemens NX (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
61.8 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
45 fps -27%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
47.84 fps -23%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
39 fps -37%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
38.53 fps -38%
1920x1080 Tcvis (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
55.9 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
50 fps -11%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
28.37 fps -49%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
42 fps -25%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
41.83 fps -25%
1920x1080 SolidWorks (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
49.26 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
54 fps +10%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
68.7 fps +39%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
52 fps +6%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
48.25 fps -2%
1920x1080 Pro/ENGINEER (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
17.87 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
24 fps +34%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
10.66 fps -40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
21 fps +18%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
18.27 fps +2%
1920x1080 Maya (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
71.6 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
58 fps -19%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
99.7 fps +39%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
55 fps -23%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
54.9 fps -23%
1920x1080 Lightwave (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
59.6 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
53 fps -11%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
77.8 fps +31%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
56 fps -6%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
51 fps -14%
1920x1080 Ensight (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
74 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
52 fps -30%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
55.7 fps -25%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
39 fps -47%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
34.18 fps -54%
1920x1080 Catia (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
55.3 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
57 fps +3%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
49.28 fps -11%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
47 fps -15%
Dell Precision M6800
Quadro K3100M, 4800MQ, WDC Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT-80PK4T0
50.3 fps -9%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
101 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
83 fps -18%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
66.5 fps -34%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
62 fps -39%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
86.9 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
45 fps -48%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
50.7 fps -42%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
32 fps -63%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
44.14 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
23 fps -48%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
26.31 fps -40%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
19 fps -57%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
31.35 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
14 fps -55%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
16.27 fps -48%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
10 fps -68%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
69.6 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
39 fps -44%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
39.17 fps -44%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
28 fps -60%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
6.86 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
2.12 fps -69%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
0.59 fps -91%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
2.1 fps -69%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
81.3 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
38 fps -53%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
42.61 fps -48%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
29 fps -64%
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) (sort by value)
MSI WT72-6QM
Quadro M5000M, E3-1505M v5, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
94.4 fps
MSI WT72-2OL32SR311BW
Quadro K4100M, 4980HQ, 4x Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NU (RAID 0)
48 fps -49%
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
FirePro M6100, 4710MQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721075A9E630
44.02 fps -53%
Bullman E-Klasse 5
Quadro K3100M, 4790K, Samsung SSD SM951 256GB MZHPV256HDGL
33 fps -65%
lowmed.highultra
Dirt 3 (2011) 211 202.7 171.4 158.2
Hitman: Absolution (2012) 83.5 75.9 67.2 50.3
Tomb Raider (2013) 406.8 319.6 227.9 107
Metro: Last Light (2013) 127.5 125.3 104.3 60.8
GRID 2 (2013) 176.3 145.6 134.5 102.7
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) 53.4 52 51.4 34.4
Thief (2014) 97.6 92.3 89.4 80.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) 167.8 143.2 87.4 63.6

Noise Level

Idle
33.3 / 33.4 / 33.5 dB(A)
DVD
34 / dB(A)
Load
38.8 / 40.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm distance)
Max. Load
 32.4 °C40.6 °C34.8 °C 
 28.8 °C35.2 °C28.8 °C 
 23.6 °C22.8 °C25.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 30.3 °C
42.6 °C34 °C34.4 °C
25.4 °C22.2 °C23 °C
22.8 °C23.2 °C23.8 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 27.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
MSI WT72-6QM
87 Wh
HP ZBook 17 G2 J8Z55ET
75 Wh
Bullman E-Klasse 5
83 Wh
Dell Precision M6800
97 Wh
SCHENKER XMG U705
82 Wh
Battery Runtime
-49%
-30%
9%
-24%
Reader / Idle
413
162
-61%
166
-60%
492
19%
138
-67%
WiFi v1.3
245
144
-41%
Load
76
49
-36%
85
12%
75
-1%
91
20%
WiFi
149
352
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 53min
WiFi Websurfing
4h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 16min

Pros

+ 非常优秀的整体和CAD/3D性能
+ 出色的温度控制
+ USB C型接口(Thunderbolt 3)
+ 易于维护,接口数量多
+ 不错的IPS屏幕

Cons

- 相对昂贵
- 沉重
- 显卡切换需要重启
- 性能在使用电池时下降严重
- 色域覆盖较差
- 基于游戏本平台

微星的WT72-6QME工作站是对优秀前代机型的一次成功更新。尽管Xeon E3-1505M处理器的性能不算出彩,但提供了对ECC内存的支持,这提高了可靠性。说到可靠性,尽管它的RAID 0硬盘阵列对于游戏本来说无可置疑,但对于稳定性和可靠性更为关键的情况是否适合就值得质疑了。原本为游戏设计,它的机身提供了出色的散热系统,长时间的持续负载也不会对它造成任何影响。在打开“Cooler Boost”功能后,较大的噪音可能会吵到邻座的同事。它的屏幕——与大多数17寸游戏设备相似——也十分优秀,尽管我们希望它能够对专业色域能够提供更好的覆盖。

微星对WT72工作站的更新继续着他们在这个领域的成功——不过顶级配置对于游戏本改造机型来说仍然显得有些过高。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

MSI WT72-6QM - 03/17/2016 v5 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
68 / 81 → 83%
Weight
51 / 10-66 → 73%
Battery
76%
Display
84%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
98%
Workstation
91%
Temperature
91 / 95 → 96%
Noise
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
82%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
80%
88%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星 WT72-6QME 工作站简短评测
Bernie Pechlaner, 2016-01-30 (Update: 2020-06- 8)