Wileyfox Spark+ (Plus) 智能手机简短评测

Name: Wileyfox Spark Plus
Brand: Wileyfox

矫捷的狐狸。 Wileyfox Spark+希望凭借传统设计在入门级移动设备市场中占据一席之地：可更换电池，双SIM卡和microSD卡槽。这个市场的竞争异常激烈，这台测试机需要在详尽评测中证明自己的实力。

Andreas Kilian, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 12/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Wileyfox Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Wileyfox Spark Plus (Spark Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.7 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米整合耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD最大支持32 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 3D重力感应器, 近距感应器, 电子指南针, Wi-Fi Direct

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz), 3G (900, 2,100 MHz), 4G LTE (800, 1,800, 2,600 MHz) CAT 4, 头部辐射值: 0.612 W/Kg@10g (CE), 身体辐射值: 0.633 W/Kg@10g (CE), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.65 x 143 x 70.4

Battery

8.4 Wh, 2200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 352 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13.4 MPix (自动对焦 f/2.8, 1080p 视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (定焦 f/2.0, 720p-视频拍摄 @ 30 fps)

Additional features

Speakers: 后置单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控, USB 数据线, Cyanogen界面, Designs, UKW-广播, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

134.5 g

Price

149.99 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s +486%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s +51%
Wileyfox Spark Plus Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	74.2 MBit/s
LG X Power K220 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.5 MBit/s -28%
Coolpad Modena 2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.4 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +491%
Lenovo Moto Z Play Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s +39%
Wileyfox Spark Plus Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	87.1 MBit/s
LG X Power K220 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.1 MBit/s -46%
Coolpad Modena 2 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	44.5 MBit/s -49%

ColorChecker colors photographed. The bottom half of each patch shows the original colors.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Wileyfox Spark+

Microsoft Lumia 950XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Wileyfox Spark+

Microsoft Lumia 950XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)

click to load images

Wileyfox Spark+

Microsoft Lumia 950XL

Samsung Galaxy S7

Canon EOS 70D (Referenz)


512 cd/m²	466 cd/m²	419 cd/m²
512 cd/m²	456 cd/m²	429 cd/m²
513 cd/m²	484 cd/m²	446 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 513 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 470.8 cd/m² Minimum: 21.59 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 456 cd/m²
Contrast: 1060:1 (Black: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.13

	Wileyfox Spark Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5"	ZTE Blade V7 Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5"	TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Archos 50 Power IPS, 1280x720, 5"
Screen
Brightness middle	456	312 -32%	508 11%	375 -18%	412 -10%	304 -33%
Brightness	471	302 -36%	491 4%	376 -20%	414 -12%	311 -34%
Brightness Distribution	82	79 -4%	89 9%	91 11%	94 15%	83 1%
Black Level *	0.43	0.15 65%	0.58 -35%	0.32 26%	0.42 2%	0.31 28%
Contrast	1060	2080 96%	876 -17%	1172 11%	981 -7%	981 -7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.5	8.2 -134%	7 -100%	6 -71%	5.6 -60%	5.9 -69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.5	16.5 -200%	14.1 -156%	9.5 -73%	9.7 -76%	14.3 -160%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.2	9.2 -188%	6.1 -91%	4.5 -41%	6.9 -116%	4.6 -44%
Gamma	2.13 ^103%	2.29 ^96%	2.15 ^102%	2.26 ^97%	2.4 ^92%	2.51 ^88%
CCT	6691 ^97%	9017 ^72%	8068 ^81%	6975 ^93%	8422 ^77%	7088 ^92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11 ms rise
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	32459 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	23822 Points -27%
TP-Link Neffos C5	32681 Points +1%
HTC Desire 530	23561 Points -27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28399 Points -13%
Archos 50 Power	23996 Points -26%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	10 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	592 Points +5820%
TP-Link Neffos C5	638 Points +6280%
HTC Desire 530	10 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	551 Points +5410%
Archos 50 Power	9 Points -10%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	292 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	174 Points -40%
TP-Link Neffos C5	281 Points -4%
HTC Desire 530	231 Points -21%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	313 Points +7%
Archos 50 Power	173 Points -41%
Memory (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	781 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	487 Points -38%
TP-Link Neffos C5	991 Points +27%
HTC Desire 530	300 Points -62%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	741 Points -5%
Archos 50 Power	643 Points -18%
System (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	1177 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	801 Points -32%
TP-Link Neffos C5	1199 Points +2%
HTC Desire 530	742 Points -37%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1035 Points -12%
Archos 50 Power	911 Points -23%
Overall (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	225 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	448 Points +99%
TP-Link Neffos C5	683 Points +204%
HTC Desire 530	149 Points -34%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	603 Points +168%
Archos 50 Power	176 Points -22%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	1690 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	602 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	805 Points

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	2903 Points
TP-Link Neffos C5	3443 Points +19%
HTC Desire 530	2922 Points +1%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4283 Points +48%
Archos 50 Power	2824 Points -3%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	3246 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1910 Points -41%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2738 Points -16%
HTC Desire 530	1796 Points -45%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	2773 Points -15%
Archos 50 Power	2116 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	13578 ms *
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	19234 ms * -42%
TP-Link Neffos C5	12783 ms * +6%
HTC Desire 530	17471 ms * -29%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	12953 ms * +5%
Archos 50 Power	18481 ms * -36%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	20.4 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.73 Points -38%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.21 Points -11%
HTC Desire 530	12.1 Points -41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.09 Points -16%
Archos 50 Power	13.16 Points -35%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	15 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.2 fps -45%
TP-Link Neffos C5	8.3 fps -45%
HTC Desire 530	8.9 fps -41%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9.6 fps -36%
Archos 50 Power	8.6 fps -43%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	9 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	4.9 fps -46%
TP-Link Neffos C5	14 fps +56%
HTC Desire 530	4.8 fps -47%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	5.2 fps -42%
Archos 50 Power	4.9 fps -46%

GFXBench 3.0
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	3 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3.4 fps +13%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.1 fps +103%
HTC Desire 530	1.7 fps -43%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1.8 fps -40%
Archos 50 Power	1.6 fps -47%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	7 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.8 fps -74%
TP-Link Neffos C5	2.8 fps -60%
HTC Desire 530	4 fps -43%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4.1 fps -41%
Archos 50 Power	3.6 fps -49%

GFXBench 3.1
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	2 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2.5 fps +25%
Archos 50 Power	0.87 fps -56%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	4.7 fps
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	1.2 fps -74%
Archos 50 Power	2.5 fps -47%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	9722 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	7026 Points -28%
TP-Link Neffos C5	9291 Points -4%
HTC Desire 530	6583 Points -32%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9256 Points -5%
Archos 50 Power	6981 Points -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	4659 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	2645 Points -43%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4223 Points -9%
HTC Desire 530	3871 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	3858 Points -17%
Archos 50 Power	2581 Points -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	5268 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	3070 Points -42%
TP-Link Neffos C5	4906 Points -7%
HTC Desire 530	4261 Points -19%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4432 Points -16%
Archos 50 Power	3001 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	853 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	618 Points -28%
TP-Link Neffos C5	810 Points -5%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	716 Points -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	172 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	101 Points -41%
TP-Link Neffos C5	167 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	42 Points -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	209 Points
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	124 Points -41%
TP-Link Neffos C5	203 Points -3%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	53 Points -75%
Archos 50 Power	122 Points -42%

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	5.78 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	8.26 MB/s +43%
TP-Link Neffos C5	6.85 MB/s +19%
HTC Desire 530	8.96 MB/s +55%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28.31 MB/s +390%
Archos 50 Power	8.78 MB/s +52%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	12.94 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	18.24 MB/s +41%
TP-Link Neffos C5	17.16 MB/s +33%
HTC Desire 530	11.82 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.9 MB/s +38%
Archos 50 Power	26.47 MB/s +105%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	12.24 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	70.3 MB/s +474%
TP-Link Neffos C5	52.4 MB/s +328%
HTC Desire 530	55.8 MB/s +356%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	43.95 MB/s +259%
Archos 50 Power	41.43 MB/s +238%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	144 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	187.3 MB/s +30%
TP-Link Neffos C5	145.8 MB/s +1%
HTC Desire 530	127 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	144.1 MB/s 0%
Archos 50 Power	199.7 MB/s +39%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	20.03 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	12.62 MB/s -37%
TP-Link Neffos C5	18.89 MB/s -6%
HTC Desire 530	18.22 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	51.1 MB/s +155%
Archos 50 Power	MB/s -100%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark Plus	39.66 MB/s
ZTE Blade V7 Lite	22.77 MB/s -43%
TP-Link Neffos C5	39.11 MB/s -1%
HTC Desire 530	35.56 MB/s -10%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	65.5 MB/s +65%
Archos 50 Power	MB/s -100%

Legend

Wileyfox Spark Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

TP-Link Neffos C5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Archos 50 Power Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


39.5 °C	39.8 °C	41.4 °C
40.9 °C	39.8 °C	41.7 °C
40.7 °C	40.8 °C	41.9 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 40.7 °C


33.6 °C	36.3 °C	38.8 °C
35.8 °C	36.8 °C	42.2 °C
35.9 °C	36.5 °C	40.6 °C

Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 37.4 °C

Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Wileyfox Spark Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC Desire 530 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.003 / 0.32 Watt
Idle	0.87 / 2.13 / 2.27 Watt
Load	4.74 / 4.77 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Wileyfox Spark Plus 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh
Power Consumption		32%	-4%	-30%	25%	-31%
Idle Minimum *	0.87	0.63 28%	0.72 17%	1.58 -82%	0.68 22%	1.66 -91%
Idle Average *	2.13	1.37 36%	1.87 12%	2.59 -22%	1.58 26%	2.88 -35%
Idle Maximum *	2.27	1.71 25%	2 12%	2.66 -17%	1.61 29%	3.46 -52%
Load Average *	4.74	2.82 41%	5.99 -26%	5.22 -10%	3.36 29%	3.96 16%
Load Maximum *	4.77	3.36 30%	6.45 -35%	5.67 -19%	3.91 18%	4.34 9%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

6h 59min

	Wileyfox Spark Plus 2200 mAh	ZTE Blade V7 Lite 2500 mAh	TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Archos 50 Power 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	419	517 23%	453 8%	425 1%	630 50%	592 41%

Pros

+ 坚固的机身和优秀的工艺

+ 准确的触控屏幕

+ 可更换电池

+ 两个microSIM和一个microSD卡槽

+ 支持LTE

+ 流畅的使用感受

+ Cyanogen界面的方便功能

+ 明亮的屏幕色彩准确

+ 相机在日光下效果不错...

Cons

- ...不过暗光表现较差

- 不支持USB-OTG，NFC或Miracast

- 无指纹感应器

- 测试机的指南针无法使用

- 未附赠耳机或电源适配器

- 电池充电时间长

In review: Wileyfox Spark+. Test model provided by Wileyfox Germany.

Wileyfox Spark+的美观包装预示着这台设备希望以低成本实现高价值。另一方面，它包装中的附件也预示着这只是一台入门级设备。这台智能手机需要在许多功能上做出牺牲，如指纹感应器或USB-OTG，不过生产商保证了不错的机身工艺品质。我们十分喜欢它明亮准确的触控屏幕和日光下不错的拍照效果。它的两个microSIM卡槽和一个microSD卡槽也会吸引一部分用户的目光。流畅的操作界面和充足的性能则保证了它的实用性。

Wileyfox Spark+以较低的价位带来了较高的品质。遗憾的是这台设备缺少辅助功能，同时在暗光下的照片拍摄品质也较差。

这台测试机的硬件配置接近于售价150欧元（约1090人民币）的中兴Blade V7 lite，不过一大区别是中兴这台机型采用了铝合金机身且提供了指纹感应器。另一方面，这台中兴设备采用了内置电池且缺少第三个卡槽，它的屏幕也相比较暗。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Wileyfox Spark Plus - 2016-11-21 11/21/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Andreas Kilian

Chassis

82%

Keyboard

73 / 75 → 97%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

37 / 60 → 62%

Weight

94%

Battery

89%

Display

85%

Games Performance

10 / 63 → 16%

Application Performance

28 / 70 → 40%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

63%

Average

68%

82%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Wileyfox Spark+ (Plus) 智能手机简短评测

Andreas Kilian, 2016-12-15 (Update: 2016-12-17)