Wileyfox Spark X 智能手机简短评测

Name: Wileyfox Spark X
Brand: Wileyfox

竞争力。 Wileyfox推出了它的第五台智能手机，Spark X。它提供了双SIM卡支持，LTE和大容量电池。作为一台5.5寸手机，它的野心十足，售价也不足200欧元（约1454人民币）。

Michael Moser, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 12/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Phablet Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Wileyfox Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Wileyfox Spark X (Spark Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 267 PPI, 电容式，5点触控, IPS, NIT: TYP 420, MIN340 (LCD+TP), Dragontrail-Glass, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 11.29 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: microSD (microSDHC最高支持32 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensors: A-GPS; 加速感应器, 近距感应器, 指南针, OTG

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 四频 (850/900/1,800/1,900 MHz), 3G 双频 (900/2,100 MHz), 上传最大支持5.76 MB/s; LTE CAT 4 三频 (800/1,800/2,600 MHz), 上传最大支持50 MB/s, 下载最大支持150 MB/s;, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.75 x 154.35 x 78.6

Battery

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 10 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 3 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 352 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 290 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦, LED闪光灯, CMOS传感器, 视频拍摄@ 1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix CMOS传感器

Additional features

Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 触控QWERTZ键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB充电／数据线，质保卡和快速开始说明, 安卓 6.0.1 Marshmallow采用Cyanogen 13界面, 24 Months Warranty,

身体辐射值: 1.306 W/Kg@10g (CE) 头部辐射值: 0.632 W/Kg@10g (CE)

Dual-SIM, 2x Micro-SIM notification LED (Red/Green) for email, SMS; other notifications, missed calls UKW-Radio

, fanless

Weight

163 g

Price

179.99 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
LG X Power K220 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	53.5 MBit/s +11%
Wileyfox Spark X Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	48.3 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
LG X Power K220 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.1 MBit/s +2%
Wileyfox Spark X Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	46 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Wileyfox Spark X

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Canon EOS 70 D

click to load images

Wileyfox Spark X

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Canon EOS 70 D

click to load images

Wileyfox Spark X

Samsung Galaxy S7

Microsoft Lumia 950 XL

Canon EOS 70 D


534 cd/m²	545 cd/m²	546 cd/m²
543 cd/m²	554 cd/m²	546 cd/m²
541 cd/m²	534 cd/m²	535 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 554 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 542 cd/m² Minimum: 20.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 554 cd/m²
Contrast: 815:1 (Black: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.24

	Wileyfox Spark X IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	LG X Power K220 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"	Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		-2%	-9%	1%	-39%
Brightness middle	554	381 -31%	414 -25%	412 -26%	552 0%
Brightness	542	352 -35%	420 -23%	414 -24%	526 -3%
Brightness Distribution	96	85 -11%	94 -2%	94 -2%	91 -5%
Black Level *	0.68	0.2 71%	0.33 51%	0.42 38%	0.64 6%
Contrast	815	1905 134%	1255 54%	981 20%	863 6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.2	7.3 -40%	8.1 -56%	5.6 -8%	11 -112%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.7	21.2 -98%	13.8 -29%	9.7 9%	20.8 -94%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	7.4 -9%	9.6 -41%	6.9 -1%	14.3 -110%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.26 ^97%	2 ^110%	2.4 ^92%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	7118 ^91%	8417 ^77%	7754 ^84%	8422 ^77%	12996 ^50%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	32729 Points
Blackview R7	50572 Points +55%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	30676 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	28399 Points -13%
LG X Power K220	30432 Points -7%

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	611 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	1700 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	5334 Points
Blackview R7	10762 Points +102%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	4944 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4432 Points -17%
LG X Power K220	4960 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	4680 Points
Blackview R7	10334 Points +121%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	4333 Points -7%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	3858 Points -18%
LG X Power K220	4330 Points -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	10441 Points
Blackview R7	12585 Points +21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	9768 Points -6%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9256 Points -11%
LG X Power K220	10103 Points -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	209 Points
Blackview R7	590 Points +182%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	209 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	53 Points -75%
LG X Power K220	201 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	172 Points
Blackview R7	518 Points +201%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	172 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	42 Points -76%
LG X Power K220	165 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	835 Points
Blackview R7	1155 Points +38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	831 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	716 Points -14%
LG X Power K220	860 Points +3%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	15 fps
Blackview R7	17 fps +13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	8.4 fps -44%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	9.6 fps -36%
LG X Power K220	15 fps 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	8.4 fps
Blackview R7	17 fps +102%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	14 fps +67%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	5.2 fps -38%
LG X Power K220	8.4 fps 0%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	6.7 fps
Blackview R7	4.7 fps -30%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	3 fps -55%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4.1 fps -39%
LG X Power K220	6.6 fps -1%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	3 fps
Blackview R7	4.7 fps +57%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	6 fps +100%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1.8 fps -40%
LG X Power K220	3.1 fps +3%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	4.8 fps
Blackview R7	2.5 fps -48%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	1.9 fps -60%
LG X Power K220	4.1 fps -15%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	1.9 fps
Blackview R7	2.5 fps +32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	4.4 fps +132%
LG X Power K220	2 fps +5%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	3007 Points
Blackview R7	4364 Points +45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	3813 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	4283 Points +42%
LG X Power K220	3759 Points +25%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	227 Points
Blackview R7	338 Points +49%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	192 Points -15%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	603 Points +166%
LG X Power K220	200 Points -12%
System (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	1222 Points
Blackview R7	1971 Points +61%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	1090 Points -11%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	1035 Points -15%
LG X Power K220	1092 Points -11%
Memory (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	773 Points
Blackview R7	1030 Points +33%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	450 Points -42%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	741 Points -4%
LG X Power K220	521 Points -33%
Graphics (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	292 Points
Blackview R7	655 Points +124%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	286 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	313 Points +7%
LG X Power K220	290 Points -1%
Web (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	10 Points
Blackview R7	10 Points 0%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	10 Points 0%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	551 Points +5410%
LG X Power K220	10 Points 0%

Legend

Wileyfox Spark X Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview R7 Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G4 Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG X Power K220 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	3239 Points
Blackview R7	3885 Points +20%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	2697 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	2773 Points -14%
LG X Power K220	2657 Points -18%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	12625 ms *
Blackview R7	9748 ms * +23%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	12910 ms * -2%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	12953 ms * -3%
LG X Power K220	13196 ms * -5%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Wileyfox Spark X	20.75 Points
Blackview R7	25.35 Points +22%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus	18.03 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play	17.09 Points -18%
LG X Power K220	18.13 Points -13%

* ... smaller is better

	Wileyfox Spark X	Blackview R7	Acer Liquid Zest Plus	Lenovo Moto G4 Play	LG X Power K220
AndroBench 3-5		42%	-7%	55%	-3%
Sequential Read 256KB	194.8	247.6 27%	178.6 -8%	144.1 -26%	196.8 1%
Sequential Write 256KB	37.91	122.7 224%	39.51 4%	43.95 16%	43.74 15%
Random Read 4KB	12.26	28.02 129%	20.25 65%	17.9 46%	18.78 53%
Random Write 4KB	15.57	11.4 -27%	7.95 -49%	28.31 82%	7.32 -53%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	39.5	15.56 -61%	27.68 -30%	65.5 66%	32.08 -19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	20.59	11.87 -42%	16.17 -21%	51.1 148%	18.17 -12%

Max. Load

Idle


35.6 °C	35.6 °C	39.9 °C
36.8 °C	36.5 °C	40.5 °C
36.7 °C	36.6 °C	37.6 °C

Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 37.3 °C


34.4 °C	33.9 °C	35.6 °C
34 °C	34.6 °C	36.3 °C
32.7 °C	35 °C	37.2 °C

Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 34.9 °C

Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Wileyfox Spark X audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Blackview R7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 85% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG X Power K220 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.06 / 0.16 Watt
Idle	0.53 / 1.76 / 1.86 Watt
Load	3.97 / 4.21 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh	LG X Power K220 4100 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh	Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh
Power Consumption		2%	3%	-115%	-16%
Idle Minimum *	0.53	0.64 -21%	0.68 -28%	1.83 -245%	0.83 -57%
Idle Average *	1.76	1.3 26%	1.58 10%	3.21 -82%	2.06 -17%
Idle Maximum *	1.86	1.34 28%	1.61 13%	3.45 -85%	2.08 -12%
Load Average *	3.97	4.18 -5%	3.36 15%	5.67 -43%	3.53 11%
Load Maximum *	4.21	4.87 -16%	3.91 7%	9.16 -118%	4.49 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		23h 01min
WiFi Websurfing		11h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 24min

	Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh	LG X Power K220 4100 mAh	Blackview R7 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh	Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh
Battery Runtime		42%	-39%	11%	21%
Reader / Idle	1381			1998 45%
H.264	777			683 -12%
WiFi v1.3	675	987 46%	412 -39%	630 -7%	815 21%
Load	264	365 38%		306 16%

Pros

+ 优秀的电池续航

+ 明亮的屏幕

+ 可更换电池

+ 时尚的设计和材质选择

+ 不错的工艺品质

Cons

- 相机品质较差

- 性能弱

- 响应慢

- 尽管边框较宽安卓控制键仍然位于屏幕上

- 屏幕像素密度低

- 无电源适配器

- 一般的通话音质

In review: Wileyfox Spark X. Test model provided by Wileyfox Germany.

Wileyfox在Spark X的描述中写道：“最合理的屏幕尺寸和电池续航让这台智能手机可以成为你的理想多媒体伴侣”。整体上，Spark X确实有一些优势：长续航，可更换电池，优秀的工艺品质和不错的材质。而明亮清晰的屏幕和低售价也都让人不禁侧目。

Wileyfox Spark X的设计重心放在了一些特定方面：时尚的设计和长电池续航以及180欧（约1309人民币）的实惠价位。正在寻找高性价比智能手机的用户可以考虑一下Wileyfox Spark X。

这样一台低价设备也自然有不少不足之处：它的性能一般，响应迟缓，通话质量一般，拍照效果较差（特别是暗光下），未搭配电源适配器，低分辨率（仅720p）和机身坚固性等。如果你能接受这些缺点的话，它可能会十分适合你。如果不能的话则不妨看看同价位的其他设备，这个市场区间竞争激烈，用户有很多选择。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Wileyfox Spark X - 2016-11-29 11/29/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Michael Moser

Chassis

80%

Keyboard

76 / 75 → 100%

Pointing Device

85%

Connectivity

39 / 60 → 65%

Weight

91%

Battery

94%

Display

82%

Games Performance

10 / 63 → 15%

Application Performance

30 / 70 → 42%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

54 / 91 → 59%

Camera

58%

Average

68%

80%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Wileyfox Spark X 智能手机简短评测

Michael Moser, 2016-12-15 (Update: 2016-12-17)