华硕 X555DA (A10-8700P, 全高清) 笔记本电脑评测

Name: Asus X555DA-BB11
Brand: Asus

又慢又过时。 AMD的Carrizo平台尚未成熟。性能比U级英特尔处理器慢，同时提供的电池续航更短和体验更差。

Allen Ngo (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 04/23/2017 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 ...

Carrizo AMD Windows

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus X555DA-BB11 (X555 Series)

Processor

AMD A10-8700P 4 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Carrizo

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) - 512 MB VRAM, Core: 626 MHz, RAM: 667 MHz, DDR3, 15.201.1101.1002

Memory

8 GB

, 4 GB soldered + 4 GB DDR3 SODIMM, Dual-Channel, 1066.7 MHz, 9-9-9-24

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TN LED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, ID: AUO38ED, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm

Soundcard

AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD卡读卡器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

TSSTcorp CDDVDW SU-228HB

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25.8 x 382 x 256

Battery

37 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 2 室

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.3 MP

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, Avast SecureLine, Asus Smart Gesture, AMD Catalyst Control Center, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.132 kg, Power Supply: 242 g

Price

420 USD

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Asus X555LN-XO112H Asus X555DA-BB11 Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, Gigabit Ethernet, VGA, HDMI, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock

Right: SD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 2.0, Optical drive

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV	71.2 MB/s +186%
Asus X555DA-BB11	24.9 MB/s
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V	22.7 MB/s -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV	90.4 MB/s +237%
Asus X555DA-BB11	26.8 MB/s
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V	26.6 MB/s -1%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	532 MBit/s +170%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	341 MBit/s +73%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	197 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	635 MBit/s +86%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	341 MBit/s
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	310 MBit/s -9%


223.2 cd/m²	235.9 cd/m²	222.4 cd/m²
216.4 cd/m²	242.7 cd/m²	220.9 cd/m²
241.6 cd/m²	243.6 cd/m²	244.8 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Maximum: 244.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 232.4 cd/m² Minimum: 10.74 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 242.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 467:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Asus X555DA-BB11 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Toshiba, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus X555LN-XO112H AU Optronics B156XW04 V6, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768
Display		16%	6%	8%	41%
Display P3 Coverage	35.12	40.6 16%	37.39 6%	38.03 8%	49.95 42%
sRGB Coverage	52.7	61.2 16%	56.2 7%	56.5 7%	73.9 40%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	36.29	41.95 16%	38.63 6%	39.29 8%	51.7 42%
Response Times		-39%	-21%	-14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(23.6, 18.4)	68 ?(32, 36) -62%	58 -38%	44.4 ?(15.2, 29.2) -6%
Response Time Black / White *	22.4 ?(14.4, 8)	26 ?(20, 6) -16%	23 -3%	27.2 ?(6.8, 20.4) -21%
PWM Frequency		217 ?(90)	200 ?(90)
Screen		-40%	-32%	-7%	-86%
Brightness middle	242.7	226 -7%	253 4%	209.7 -14%	189 -22%
Brightness	232	217 -6%	246 6%	193 -17%	184 -21%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	86 -2%	75 -15%	92 5%
Black Level *	0.52	0.58 -12%	0.44 15%	0.19 63%	2.2 -323%
Contrast	467	390 -16%	575 23%	1104 136%	86 -82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.9	9.84 -101%	9.2 -88%	7.8 -59%	7.77 -59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.3	16.77 17%	17.68 13%	24.1 -19%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	11.1 -311%	11.05 -309%	7.3 -170%	8.82 -227%
Gamma	2.34 ^94%	2.35 ^94%	2.55 ^86%	2.39 ^92%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	6876 ^95%	11979 ^54%	11451 ^57%	5771 ^113%	9275 ^70%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	33.5	39 16%	36 7%	39.3 17%	48 43%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	52.5	61 16%	56 7%	56.5 8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-21% / -29%	-16% / -23%	-4% / -5%	-23% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.4 ms rise
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.6 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	119 Points +86%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	115 Points +80%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	108 Points +69%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	99 Points +55%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	88 Points +38%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	64 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	35 Points -45%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	27 Points -58%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	288 Points +60%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	257 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	234 Points +30%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	223 Points +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	206 Points +14%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	180 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	118 Points -34%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	94 Points -48%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	1.33 Points +60%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	1.28 Points +54%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	1.14 Points +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	1.08 Points +30%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	0.98 Points +18%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	0.83 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	0.43 Points -48%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	0.35 Points -58%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	3.19 Points +39%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	2.81 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	2.62 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	2.49 Points +8%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	2.3 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.27 Points -1%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	1.42 Points -38%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	1.17 Points -49%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	9852 Points +105%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	8672 Points +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	7580 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	6994 Points +45%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	4808 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	3563 Points -26%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	2911 Points -39%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel Core i5-6200U	4359 Points +99%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES Intel Core i5-5200U	4134 Points +89%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	3725 Points +70%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	3286 Points +50%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	2192 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel Atom x5-Z8500	1164 Points -47%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel Atom x5-Z8300	948 Points -57%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 Intel Core i5-4200U	790 s * -56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel Core m3-6Y30	788 s * -55%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel Core m7-6Y75	698 s * -38%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD A10-8700P	507 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

4055

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

4808

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2192

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

14.45 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

2.3 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.83 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

19.23 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

180 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

64 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	4182 Points +79%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	3178 Points +36%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	2937 Points +26%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	2335 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	1956 Points -16%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	4231 Points +30%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	3707 Points +14%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	3246 Points
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	2880 Points -11%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	5275 Points +85%
Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	3343 Points +17%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	3234 Points +13%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	2856 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2335 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2856 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3246 points
Help

	Asus X555DA-BB11 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Asus X555LN-XO112H Toshiba MQ01ABF050
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-12%	-13%	12908%	28%
Read Seq	106.9	96.5 -10%	92.1 -14%	522 388%	105.8 -1%
Write Seq	97.5	77.9 -20%	88.5 -9%	476.6 389%	104 7%
Read 512	32.28	20.82 -36%	32.94 2%	399.7 1138%	35.72 11%
Write 512	35.39	19.83 -44%	26.71 -25%	185.4 424%	44.85 27%
Read 4k	0.373	0.342 -8%	0.372 0%	33.12 8779%	0.47 26%
Write 4k	0.636	0.836 31%	0.283 -56%	89.8 14019%	1.044 64%
Read 4k QD32	0.694	0.595 -14%	0.921 33%	400.9 57667%	0.894 29%
Write 4k QD32	0.682	0.706 4%	0.473 -31%	140.2 20457%	1.099 61%

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB

Transfer Rate Minimum: 41.5 MB/s

Transfer Rate Maximum: 111.6 MB/s

Transfer Rate Average: 78.8 MB/s

Access Time: 18.7 ms

Burst Rate: 140.7 MB/s

CPU Usage: 3.2 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7564 Points +487%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	2341 Points +82%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1834 Points +42%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1376 Points +7%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	1288 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	1265 Points -2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1206 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1154 Points -10%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U	1090 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410	899 Points -30%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	411 Points -68%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	342 Points -73%
1280x720 Performance Combined
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7270 Points +744%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	1769 Points +105%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1525 Points +77%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	1370 Points +59%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	1220 Points +42%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	1191 Points +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	1179 Points +37%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Intel HD Graphics 520, 6006U	867 Points +1%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	861 Points
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410	850 Points -1%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	441 Points -49%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	361 Points -58%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	38748 Points +861%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	8744 Points +117%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	6597 Points +64%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	6426 Points +59%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	6106 Points +51%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	5769 Points +43%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	5592 Points +39%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	4033 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	1928 Points -52%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	1708 Points -58%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	6100 Points +698%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	1567 Points +105%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	1010 Points +32%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	897 Points +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	810 Points +6%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	770 Points +1%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	764 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	762 Points 0%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	281 Points -63%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	225 Points -71%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ	116616 Points +209%
Asus X555LN-XO112H NVIDIA GeForce 840M, 4210U	85402 Points +126%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 NVIDIA GeForce 820M, 4200U	68464 Points +81%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES AMD Radeon R5 M330, 5200U	59371 Points +57%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y75	53318 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Intel HD Graphics 515, 6Y30	51362 Points +36%
HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET Intel HD Graphics 520, 6200U	51015 Points +35%
Asus X555DA-BB11 AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P	37735 Points
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500	23395 Points -38%
Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8300	17603 Points -53%

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 Performance		1297 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		31586 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3248 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		666 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		337 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Asus X555LD-XX283H GeForce 820M, 4010U, Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680	55.3 fps +52%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe	52.4 fps +44%
Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 256GB, SATA (SD8SB8U-256G)	41.4 fps +14%
Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	36.3 fps
Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	34.6 fps -5%
Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	28.9 fps -20%
HP Split x2 13-m210eg HD Graphics 4200, 4210Y, Micron RealSSD C400 MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64 GB	24 fps -34%
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8500, 128 GB eMMC Flash	20.1 fps -45%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	36.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	28.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17

Noise Level

Idle		31.6 / 32 / 32.4 dB(A)
Load		33.3 / 35.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A)

	Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP	Asus X555LN-XO112H GeForce 840M, 4210U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050	Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050
Noise		2%	3%	-13%	-8%	-6%
off / environment *	28.9	30.4 -5%	30.4 -5%	29.3 -1%		30.7 -6%
Idle Minimum *	31.6	31.8 -1%	30.9 2%	32.3 -2%	31.7 -0%	32 -1%
Idle Average *	32	31.8 1%	30.9 3%	32.3 -1%	31.7 1%	32 -0%
Idle Maximum *	32.4	31.8 2%	31 4%	32.4 -0%	31.8 2%	32.2 1%
Load Average *	33.3	31.9 4%	31.8 5%	44.4 -33%	40.8 -23%	37.3 -12%
Load Maximum *	35.5	31.8 10%	31.9 10%	49.2 -39%	43.2 -22%	42.6 -20%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


32.6 °C	31 °C	26.4 °C
33 °C	36.8 °C	26.4 °C
26.8 °C	26.8 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 30 °C


27.8 °C	40 °C	31.2 °C
27.8 °C	36.4 °C	45 °C
32.2 °C	27.6 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 33 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).

Asus X555DA-BB11 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	8.3 / 8.6 / 13.1 Watt
Load	31.2 / 43.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus X555LN-XO112H 4210U, GeForce 840M, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"
Power Consumption		29%	35%	-68%	19%
Idle Minimum *	8.3	6 28%	5.4 35%	8.29 -0%	4.2 49%
Idle Average *	8.6	8.7 -1%	6.8 21%	8.9 -3%	6.3 27%
Idle Maximum *	13.1	9.2 30%	7.3 44%	10.2 22%	7.1 46%
Load Average *	31.2	18.6 40%	21.1 32%	77.1 -147%	35.2 -13%
Load Maximum *	43.9	23.8 46%	25.5 42%	136.6 -211%	49.2 -12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		7h 15min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 56min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 12min

	Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh	Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh	HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh	Asus X555LN-XO112H 4210U, GeForce 840M, 37 Wh
Battery Runtime		102%	14%	101%
Reader / Idle	435			961 121%
WiFi v1.3	176	356 102%	201 14%	389 121%
Load	72			115 60%
WiFi					256

Pros

+ 准确的灰度级，无需校准

+ 有吸引力的光泽度设计

+ 低核心温度

+ 没有处理器节流

+ HDMI和VGA

+ 便宜

Cons

- 窄色域; 色浅

- 键盘键可以更硬

- 缓慢的处理器和显卡性能

- 平均水平的背光亮度

- 系统风扇总是激活

- 电池续航不佳

- 无USB Type-C

我们很难推荐X555DA，特别是当配备英特尔处理器的老型号机器X555LN或X555LD SKU可以跑赢并该机的AMD时。通常，当硬件速度较慢和廉价时，用户会期待更长的电池续航和较低发热来补偿。但X555DA在这两方面都是最差的，它的性能和电池续航均低于平均水平。

除了AMD处理器之外，华硕的硬件还是受到自身一系列的问题的困扰。A面和D面太容易弯曲，而且1080p TN显示屏的色彩还原度非常差。有兴趣的用户可以选择先前发布的ULV Broadwell甚至Haswell笔记本电脑，而不是华硕的这台AMD机器。

由于电池续航短，显示效果不佳，性能不足，该笔记本电脑无法成为预算级PC的主流。早在三、四年前就发布的英特尔处理器仍将在几乎所有方面给该机造成压力。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Asus X555DA-BB11 - 2017-04-13 04/13/2017 v6 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

72 / 98 → 74%

Keyboard

70%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

61 / 81 → 75%

Weight

62 / 20-67 → 90%

Battery

69%

Display

73%

Games Performance

54 / 85 → 63%

Application Performance

55 / 92 → 60%

Temperature

92%

Noise

89 / 95 → 93%

Audio

40%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

66%

73%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 X555DA (A10-8700P, 全高清) 笔记本电脑评测

Allen Ngo, 2017-04-23 (Update: 2017-05- 2)