华硕 X555DA (A10-8700P, 全高清) 笔记本电脑评测
Asus X555DA-BB11 (X555 Series)
Processor
AMD A10-8700P 4 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Carrizo
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) - 512 MB VRAM, Core: 626 MHz, RAM: 667 MHz, DDR3, 15.201.1101.1002
Memory
8 GB
, 4 GB soldered + 4 GB DDR3 SODIMM, Dual-Channel, 1066.7 MHz, 9-9-9-24
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, TN LED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, ID: AUO38ED, glossy: no
Mainboard
AMD CZ FCH
Storage
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB
, 5400 rpm
Weight
2.132 kg, Power Supply: 242 g
Price
420 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 244.8 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 232.4 cd/m² Minimum: 10.74 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 242.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 467:1 (Black: 0.52 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
52.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.29% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
52.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
35.12% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Asus X555DA-BB11 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V Toshiba, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE BOE NT156WHM-N32, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus X555LN-XO112H AU Optronics B156XW04 V6, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 16% | 6% | 8% | 41% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 35.12 | 40.6 16% | 37.39 6% | 38.03 8% | 49.95 42% |
| sRGB Coverage | 52.7 | 61.2 16% | 56.2 7% | 56.5 7% | 73.9 40% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 36.29 | 41.95 16% | 38.63 6% | 39.29 8% | 51.7 42% |
| Response Times | -39% | -21% | -14% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 68 ? -62% | 58 -38% | 44.4 ? -6% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.4 ? | 26 ? -16% | 23 -3% | 27.2 ? -21% | |
| PWM Frequency | 217 ? | 200 ? | |||
| Screen | -40% | -32% | -7% | -86% | |
| Brightness middle | 242.7 | 226 -7% | 253 4% | 209.7 -14% | 189 -22% |
| Brightness | 232 | 217 -6% | 246 6% | 193 -17% | 184 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 91 3% | 86 -2% | 75 -15% | 92 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | 0.58 -12% | 0.44 15% | 0.19 63% | 2.2 -323% |
| Contrast | 467 | 390 -16% | 575 23% | 1104 136% | 86 -82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 9.84 -101% | 9.2 -88% | 7.8 -59% | 7.77 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.3 | 16.77 17% | 17.68 13% | 24.1 -19% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 11.1 -311% | 11.05 -309% | 7.3 -170% | 8.82 -227% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.35 94% | 2.55 86% | 2.39 92% | 2.43 91% |
| CCT | 6876 95% | 11979 54% | 11451 57% | 5771 113% | 9275 70% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 33.5 | 39 16% | 36 7% | 39.3 17% | 48 43% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 52.5 | 61 16% | 56 7% | 56.5 8% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-29% | -16% /
-23% | -4% /
-5% | -23% /
-51% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP ProBook 640 G2-T9X60ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV | |
| Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2335 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2856 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3246 points | |
Help | ||
| Asus X555DA-BB11 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Asus X555LN-XO112H Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -12% | -13% | 12908% | 28% | |
| Read Seq | 106.9 | 96.5 -10% | 92.1 -14% | 522 388% | 105.8 -1% |
| Write Seq | 97.5 | 77.9 -20% | 88.5 -9% | 476.6 389% | 104 7% |
| Read 512 | 32.28 | 20.82 -36% | 32.94 2% | 399.7 1138% | 35.72 11% |
| Write 512 | 35.39 | 19.83 -44% | 26.71 -25% | 185.4 424% | 44.85 27% |
| Read 4k | 0.373 | 0.342 -8% | 0.372 0% | 33.12 8779% | 0.47 26% |
| Write 4k | 0.636 | 0.836 31% | 0.283 -56% | 89.8 14019% | 1.044 64% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.694 | 0.595 -14% | 0.921 33% | 400.9 57667% | 0.894 29% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.682 | 0.706 4% | 0.473 -31% | 140.2 20457% | 1.099 61% |
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Transfer Rate Minimum:
41.5 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum:
111.6 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average:
78.8 MB/s
Access Time:
18.7 ms
Burst Rate:
140.7 MB/s
CPU Usage:
3.2 %
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1297 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 31586 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3248 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 666 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 337 points | |
Help | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Asus X555LD-XX283H | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L470-20J5S00C00 | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE | |
| Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V | |
| HP Split x2 13-m210eg | |
| Dell Venue 10 Pro 5056 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 36.3 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 28.2 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 31.6 / 32 / 32.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.3 / 35.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.9 dB(A) | ||
| Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V HD Graphics 520, 6006U, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP | Asus X555LN-XO112H GeForce 840M, 4210U, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | Asus Vivobook F556UQ-XO626D GeForce 940MX, 6198DU, Toshiba MQ01ABF050 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 3% | -13% | -8% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 28.9 | 30.4 -5% | 30.4 -5% | 29.3 -1% | 30.7 -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.6 | 31.8 -1% | 30.9 2% | 32.3 -2% | 31.7 -0% | 32 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 31.8 1% | 30.9 3% | 32.3 -1% | 31.7 1% | 32 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.4 | 31.8 2% | 31 4% | 32.4 -0% | 31.8 2% | 32.2 1% |
| Load Average * | 33.3 | 31.9 4% | 31.8 5% | 44.4 -33% | 40.8 -23% | 37.3 -12% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.5 | 31.8 10% | 31.9 10% | 49.2 -39% | 43.2 -22% | 42.6 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
Asus X555DA-BB11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 8.3 / 8.6 / 13.1 Watt |
| Load |
31.2 / 43.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung CM871a MZNTY128HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus X555LN-XO112H 4210U, GeForce 840M, Toshiba MQ01ABF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | 35% | -68% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 8.3 | 6 28% | 5.4 35% | 8.29 -0% | 4.2 49% |
| Idle Average * | 8.6 | 8.7 -1% | 6.8 21% | 8.9 -3% | 6.3 27% |
| Idle Maximum * | 13.1 | 9.2 30% | 7.3 44% | 10.2 22% | 7.1 46% |
| Load Average * | 31.2 | 18.6 40% | 21.1 32% | 77.1 -147% | 35.2 -13% |
| Load Maximum * | 43.9 | 23.8 46% | 25.5 42% | 136.6 -211% | 49.2 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh | Toshiba Satellite Pro R50-C-16V 6006U, HD Graphics 520, 44 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 80TJ00H0GE A8-7410, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 24 Wh | HP Pavilion 15t-X7P42AV i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 63.3 Wh | Asus X555LN-XO112H 4210U, GeForce 840M, 37 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 102% | 14% | 101% | ||
| Reader / Idle | 435 | 961 121% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 176 | 356 102% | 201 14% | 389 121% | |
| Load | 72 | 115 60% | |||
| WiFi | 256 |
Pros
+ 准确的灰度级，无需校准
+ 有吸引力的光泽度设计
+ 低核心温度
+ 没有处理器节流
+ HDMI和VGA
+ 便宜
Cons
- 窄色域; 色浅
- 键盘键可以更硬
- 缓慢的处理器和显卡性能
- 平均水平的背光亮度
- 系统风扇总是激活
- 电池续航不佳
- 无USB Type-C
我们很难推荐X555DA，特别是当配备英特尔处理器的老型号机器X555LN或X555LD SKU可以跑赢并该机的AMD时。通常，当硬件速度较慢和廉价时，用户会期待更长的电池续航和较低发热来补偿。但X555DA在这两方面都是最差的，它的性能和电池续航均低于平均水平。
除了AMD处理器之外，华硕的硬件还是受到自身一系列的问题的困扰。A面和D面太容易弯曲，而且1080p TN显示屏的色彩还原度非常差。有兴趣的用户可以选择先前发布的ULV Broadwell甚至Haswell笔记本电脑，而不是华硕的这台AMD机器。
由于电池续航短，显示效果不佳，性能不足，该笔记本电脑无法成为预算级PC的主流。早在三、四年前就发布的英特尔处理器仍将在几乎所有方面给该机造成压力。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Asus X555DA-BB11
- 04/13/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Price comparison
