Notebookcheck Logo

傲睿士 X7 DT v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

性能无极限。 技嘉X7 DT v6将傲睿士游戏本的设计推向了一个新的高度。它带来了业界领先的显卡和处理器性能,高速固态硬盘盒强劲的网络模组以及屏幕选项。有能够让它慢下来的东西吗?
Windows Skylake Gaming
Aorus X7 DT v6 (X7 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8192 MB MB VRAM, Core: 1733 MHz, RAM: 10000 MHz MHz, 21.21.13.6926 - ForceWare 369.26, no
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-2400
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, AUO1096, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Sunrise Point HM170
Storage
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机接口(S/PDIF),麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Networking
Killer E2200 (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 426 x 308
Battery
94 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0 + 2 低音炮, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
3.25 kg, Power Supply: 900 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Rear: Charging port, USB 3.0
Rear: Charging port, USB 3.0
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, headphones, microphone
Left: Kensington Lock, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI, USB 3.0, headphones, microphone
Right: SD card reader (full), USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, HDMI, mini DisplayPort
Right: SD card reader (full), USB 3.0, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, HDMI, mini DisplayPort
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT73VR 6RF
 
155.1 MB/s +86%
Aorus X7 DT v6
 
83.3 MB/s
Aorus X7 v6
 
78 MB/s -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
76 MB/s -9%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
 
74 MB/s -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT73VR 6RF
 
209.4 MB/s +131%
Aorus X7 DT v6
 
90.6 MB/s
HP Omen 17-w110ng
 
87 MB/s -4%
Aorus X7 v6
 
87 MB/s -4%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
 
84 MB/s -7%
308.7
cd/m²
319.9
cd/m²
294.9
cd/m²
320.6
cd/m²
339.5
cd/m²
296.3
cd/m²
307.6
cd/m²
322.3
cd/m²
270.5
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO1096 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 339.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 308.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 339.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 754:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.57 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
Aorus X7 DT v6
AUO1096, TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440
Aorus X7 v6
B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), TN LED, 17.3", 2560x1440
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
HP Omen 17-w110ng
LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
MSI GT73VR 6RF
IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Display
2%
3%
5%
11%
Display P3 Coverage
59.6
60.9
2%
64.5
8%
66.6
12%
63.6
7%
sRGB Coverage
82.8
84.2
2%
83.1
0%
84.1
2%
95.8
16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
60.1
61.2
2%
60.8
1%
61.5
2%
65.7
9%
Response Times
-10%
-75%
-77%
-92%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
21.6 ?(12.4, 9.2)
31 ?(11, 20)
-44%
38 ?(16, 22)
-76%
37 ?(13, 24)
-71%
33.6 ?(13.2, 20.4)
-56%
Response Time Black / White *
13.2 ?(4.4, 8.8)
10 ?(3, 7)
24%
23 ?(5, 18)
-74%
24 ?(4, 20)
-82%
30 ?(5.2, 24.8)
-127%
PWM Frequency
59.5
Screen
-5%
13%
21%
13%
Brightness middle
339.5
343
1%
315
-7%
362
7%
334.8
-1%
Brightness
309
312
1%
290
-6%
342
11%
316
2%
Brightness Distribution
80
80
0%
85
6%
87
9%
87
9%
Black Level *
0.45
0.5
-11%
0.32
29%
0.31
31%
0.422
6%
Contrast
754
686
-9%
984
31%
1168
55%
793
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.88
7.33
-7%
4.88
29%
4.5
35%
4.11
40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.99
10.79
-8%
8.88
11%
9.31
7%
7.8
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.57
7.6
-16%
4.17
37%
3.48
47%
5.74
13%
Gamma
2.04 108%
2.19 100%
2.53 87%
2.23 99%
2.3 96%
CCT
8608 76%
9024 72%
6683 97%
6144 106%
5987 109%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54
55
2%
55
2%
55
2%
60.5
12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82
84
2%
83
1%
84
2%
96
17%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / -4%
-20% / -1%
-17% / 5%
-23% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 8.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z RAM SPD
CPU-Z RAM SPD
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
SPECViewperf 12
SPECViewperf 12
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.92 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.88 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.72 Points -10%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.69 Points -12%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.56 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.24 Points +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
9.14 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
8.55 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.3 Points -20%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
169 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
164 Points -3%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
160 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points -12%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
874 Points +5%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
Intel Core i7-6820HK
836 Points 0%
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
832 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
679 Points -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
676 Points -19%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
296.6 s *
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
205.9 s * +31%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
Aorus X7 DT v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
498 s *
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Intel Core i7-6700K
484.6 s * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.14 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
79.5 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
832 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
122.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
169 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5096 Points
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
4833 Points -5%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points -9%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4579 Points -10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4252 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
5394 Points +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
5353 Points
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points -6%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4816 Points -10%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
4378 Points -18%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8576 Points +1%
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
8478 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
8227 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
7128 Points -16%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5096 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
8478 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5353 points
Help
Aorus X7 DT v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
HP Omen 17-w110ng
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
MSI GT73VR 6RF
2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-67%
-38%
-37%
-1%
Read Seq
1829
485.4
-73%
1156
-37%
914
-50%
1673
-9%
Write Seq
1588
312.4
-80%
294.9
-81%
916
-42%
1576
-1%
Read 512
1064
294.8
-72%
616
-42%
698
-34%
1180
11%
Write 512
1507
287.8
-81%
294.7
-80%
916
-39%
1561
4%
Read 4k
52.9
21.44
-59%
42.7
-19%
31.37
-41%
51.5
-3%
Write 4k
161.1
75.7
-53%
153.3
-5%
65.7
-59%
144
-11%
Read 4k QD32
676
149.4
-78%
600
-11%
425
-37%
694
3%
Write 4k QD32
419.1
256.3
-39%
295.3
-30%
441.8
5%
422.1
1%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read: 1829 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1588 MB/s
512K Read: 1064 MB/s
512K Write: 1507 MB/s
4K Read: 52.9 MB/s
4K Write: 161.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 676 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 419.1 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K
28321 Points +4%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
27685 Points +2%
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
27135 Points
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
23591 Points -13%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
22022 Points -19%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
20656 Points -24%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
10854 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K
10419 Points -4%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
10344 Points -5%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
8705 Points -20%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
8396 Points -23%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
7137 Points -34%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K
125447 Points +3%
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
122172 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
103913 Points -15%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
101012 Points -17%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
86780 Points -29%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
64973 Points -47%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
21928 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K
21781 Points -1%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
21270 Points -3%
Aorus X7 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
17068 Points -22%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
16525 Points -25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
15806 Points -28%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
10551 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K
10382 Points -2%
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
10246 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
7579 Points -28%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K
365079 Points +7%
Aorus X7 DT v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
340743 Points
MSI GT73VR 6RF
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK
214758 Points -37%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
187717 Points -45%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
34143 points
3DMark 11 Performance
19769 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
169818 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31695 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16908 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
9557 points
Help
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
140.6 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
147.8 fps +5%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
164.7 fps
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
103.8 (19.8min - 180.2max) fps -37%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
168.7 fps +2%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
130 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
131.6 fps +1%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
125 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
125.5 fps 0%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
141 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
105 fps -26%
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
124 fps
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
133.7 fps +8%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
118 fps
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
97 fps -18%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
88.7 fps -25%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
89.7 (80min - 102max) fps -24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
119.4 fps +1%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
153 fps
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
128 fps -16%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
125.1 fps -18%
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
116.6 (81min - 183max) fps -24%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
144.2 fps -6%
Mafia 2 - 1920x1080 high AA:0x AF:16x (sort by value)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
214.6 fps
lowmed.highultra
Mafia 2 (2010) 214.6
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 140.6
BioShock Infinite (2013) 164.7
Metro: Last Light (2013) 130
Thief (2014) 125
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 141
Fallout 4 (2015) 124
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 118
Doom (2016) 153

Noise Level

Idle
32.2 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB(A)
Load
51.7 / 55.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 28.6 dB(A)
Aorus X7 DT v6
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X7 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
HP Omen 17-w110ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256
MSI GT73VR 6RF
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6820HK, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0)
Noise
0%
6%
3%
-1%
off / environment *
28.6
30
-5%
30
-5%
30
-5%
29.2
-2%
Idle Minimum *
32.2
33
-2%
32
1%
33
-2%
32
1%
Idle Average *
35.2
35
1%
33
6%
34
3%
32
9%
Idle Maximum *
35.2
40
-14%
34
3%
35
1%
35
1%
Load Average *
51.7
43
17%
39
25%
45
13%
50
3%
Load Maximum *
55.7
54
3%
51
8%
52
7%
64
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 34.2 °C45.4 °C37.2 °C 
 31.2 °C36.8 °C33 °C 
 27.6 °C26.6 °C30.8 °C 
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
46.8 °C58.2 °C40.8 °C
38.6 °C39.4 °C36 °C
33 °C34.2 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 58.2 °C
Average: 39.8 °C
Power Supply (max.)  53 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.4 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58.2 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.9 °C / -3.4 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203835.6382534.937.534.9313533.2354032.733.732.75034.632.934.6633332.8338033.831.533.810037.830.337.812539.230.939.21604730.34720050.629.150.625052.32852.331555.628.255.640058.227.758.250058.927.858.963054.827.354.880053.127.653.1100054.126.854.1125058.527.758.516006125.661200055.924.355.9250057.123.857.1315059.423.559.4400057.923.957.9500063.623.563.6630066.123.366.1800063.523.163.51000059.623.159.61250051.723.151.71600046.823.346.8SPL72.337.572.3N30.4330.4median 55.9median 26.8median 55.9Delta4.42.54.437.942.234.836.927.730.132.740.628.630.426.427.629.530.826.131.424.627.922.336.523.755.322.662.320.563.219.562.519.262.91967.818.668.91868.418.363.91970.518.171.118.268.818.470.618.374.718.474.518.577.818.67518.678.818.57618.665.730.8851.562.2median 18.6median 68.41.65.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X7 DT v6HP Omen 17-w110ng
Aorus X7 DT v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP Omen 17-w110ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 6.6 / 12.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 31.5 / 33.9 / 34.6 Watt
Load midlight 205.6 / 250.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X7 DT v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, TN LED, 2560x1440, 17.3"
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x SanDisk X400 1TB M.2 SD8SN8U1T001122 (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Power Consumption
10%
33%
31%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
31.5
29
8%
20
37%
19
40%
28.9
8%
Idle Average *
33.9
31
9%
24
29%
25
26%
30.6
10%
Idle Maximum *
34.6
38
-10%
29
16%
31
10%
33.1
4%
Load Average *
205.6
111
46%
86
58%
90
56%
224.4
-9%
Load Maximum *
250.8
253
-1%
183
27%
193
23%
302.6
-21%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
3h 02min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 34min
Aorus X7 DT v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94 Wh
Aorus X7 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 62 Wh
HP Omen 17-w110ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh
MSI GT73VR 6RF
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75.2 Wh
Battery Runtime
26%
11%
77%
25%
Reader / Idle
182
243
34%
432
137%
306
68%
WiFi v1.3
144
182
26%
196
36%
247
72%
198
38%
Load
94
58
-38%
115
22%
65
-31%

Pros

+ 破纪录的显卡性能
+ 超快处理器
+ 出色的存储速度
+ 处理器和显卡都可以便捷地超频
+ 简单强大的风扇速度控制软件
+ 创新冷却系统设计
+ 引人注目(同时相对轻盈)的设计
+ 120赫兹屏幕刷新率,响应速度优秀
+ 出色的键盘
+ 键盘背光和可定义按键
+ 易于维护升级

Cons

- 屏幕有不易察觉的横线
- TN面板一般的可视角度范围和色彩还原
- 负载下噪音较高(使用适当的冷却设定)
- 扬声器较弱
- 电池续航短
The AORUS X7 DT v6
The AORUS X7 DT v6

傲睿士X7 DT v6是Notebookcheck目前为止测试过最强劲的游戏本之一,而它相比竞争机型也轻盈许多。归功于英伟达GeForce GTX 1080结合未锁频酷睿i7-6820HK的组合,再加上技嘉的出色集成管理软件,傲睿士X7 DT v6可以轻松地在开机时就进入超频。同时,由于搭配了高效创新的散热系统,它在测试中得到了超高的分数:一部分达到了我们的数据库中前所未有的新高度。

它仅凭3.25千克重、30毫米厚的镁合金机身就做到了这一切。X7可以运行你打开的任何游戏,大部分都可以使用最高设定和屏幕的原声分辨率(1440p)。而它的屏幕也是整机的亮点之一,尽管它采用了TN技术,可视角度和色彩准确度一般,但提供了很高的响应速度和120赫兹刷新率,这可以完美匹配显卡带来的高帧率。在这方面最大的问题可能是很多用户会发现的屏幕上的横线,不过这只会在静止情况下出现,在显示电影或游戏等动态内容时则难以察觉。因为这个问题并不严重,X7也适合作为视频编辑的移动工作站。

它的输入设备、工艺品质和机身稳定性也十分出色,相比其他傲睿士产品线中的设备,它就像是一个得到整体升级的产品。它的缺点基本都是一些小细节,或难以避免的情况:它的扬声器较差,使用音效管理工具会让这略有改善。它在负载下也十分吵——不过用户可以通过技嘉的Command&Control软件直接控制它的噪音性能比。最后,由于功耗较高且不支持可切换显卡,它的续航时间很短——不过在购买这类机型时需要考虑电池续航的用户,我们建议重新考虑一下对设备的期待和侧重点。

长话短说,它是目前我们测试过最优秀的游戏本之一。如果你能够接受它的价码的话,应该不会对它失望。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Aorus X7 DT v6 - 12/05/2016 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
87%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
66 / 81 → 81%
Weight
55 / 10-66 → 80%
Battery
65%
Display
82%
Games Performance
100%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 89%
Noise
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
70%
Camera
65 / 85 → 76%
Add Points
+1%
Average
71%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 傲睿士 X7 DT v6 笔记本电脑简短评测
Steve Schardein, 2016-11-26 (Update: 2020-06- 8)