Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarXMG Apex 17 (Clevo NH77ERQ)笔记本电脑评测。适用于抗噪的游戏玩家
正如申克科技所知，该设备可以在内部网店bestware.com上进行广泛的配置。.虽然处理器是一个 Ryzen 7 5800H或 Ryzen 9 5900HX，显卡是 GeForce RTX 3060有6GB的VRAM或一个 GeForce RTX 3070带8GB VRAM。在这两种情况下，一个哑光的144赫兹IPS显示屏负责图像再现。DDR4工作内存范围从8到最大64GB（2x SO-DIMM）。否则，17英寸的机箱最多可容纳两个M.2 SSD（PCIe 3.0 x4）。买家还可以影响WLAN模块、键盘的语言和操作系统。
Apex 17的价格从1,479欧元（约合1,692美元）开始。我们的测试配置包括Ryzen 7 5800H、GeForce RTX 3070、32GB双通道内存和1TB固态硬盘，目前价格超过2000欧元（约合2,289美元）。
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 (XMG Apex Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 48 W PL2 / Short Burst, 37 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1560 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, ForceWare 472.12, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, Dual Channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, Full-HD, FreeSync, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB
, NVMe, two M.2-slots (one in use)
Weight
2.56 kg, Power Supply: 688 g
Price
2079 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Apex 17的竞争者包括其他配备RTX 3070的17英寸游戏笔记本，如 Razer Blade 17刀片17、微星 微星GP76，以及 Acer Nitro 5 AN517和内部的 XMG Neo 17.所有这些笔记本电脑都作为对比设备出现在表格中。
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 32.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 27 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | ||
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 24.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
由于Apex 17在结构上几乎与最近测试的 Gigabyte A7 X1(Clevo barebone)，所以我们不会在本文中进一步讨论机箱、设备和输入设备。你可以在链接的评论中找到相应的信息。
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (447 - 1645, n=127) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (523 - 1684, n=128) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1018 (584-1179)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (582-967)
网络摄像头
8.4 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
14 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
显示
尽管基本规格相同（全高清，144赫兹，IPS），但使用的显示屏与A7 X1不同。Schenker笔记本使用的不是AU Optronics的面板，而是LG Philips的面板，不幸的是，它与Gigabyte的同类产品不太匹配。除了亮度，对比度也比较弱。平均285cd/m²和823:1的对比度在2000欧元左右（约合2289美元）的价格范围内是相当低的。XMG Neo 17的QHD面板具有381 cd/m²和1108:1，表明它可以做得更好。
另一方面，短的响应时间和合适的色彩空间也有加分。96%的sRGB对于游戏笔记本来说是完全足够的。色彩再现也很难被批评，尽管仍然可以通过校准实现改进（我们的ICC文件在下面有链接）。视角稳定性处于典型的IPS水平，所以它是好的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 294 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 285 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 292 cd/m²
Contrast: 823:1 (Black: 0.355 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.96
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.298
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 BOE NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | 8% | 1% | -43% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 70.5 8% | 71.7 10% | 64.7 0% | 36.7 -44% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.9 | 99.5 4% | 98.8 3% | 96.4 1% | 55.3 -42% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.8 | 71.8 9% | 73.6 12% | 66.9 2% | 37.9 -42% |
| Response Times | -4% | 44% | 24% | -27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.2 ? | 16.8 ? -11% | 4.2 ? 72% | 7.4 ? 51% | 18 ? -18% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 10 ? 4% | 8.8 ? 15% | 10.8 ? -4% | 14 ? -35% |
| PWM Frequency | 24510 ? | ||||
| Screen | 15% | -22% | 22% | -19% | |
| Brightness middle | 292 | 410 40% | 323.3 11% | 328 12% | 282 -3% |
| Brightness | 285 | 381 34% | 315 11% | 314 10% | 255 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 88 -6% | 91 -3% | 87 -7% | 85 -10% |
| Black Level * | 0.355 | 0.37 -4% | 0.33 7% | 0.29 18% | 0.24 32% |
| Contrast | 823 | 1108 35% | 980 19% | 1131 37% | 1175 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.47 | 2.55 -3% | 4.59 -86% | 1.93 22% | 5.91 -139% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.69 | 4.33 50% | 10.82 -25% | 4.94 43% | 10.98 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.96 | 1.28 -33% | 1.4 -46% | 0.68 29% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 3.4 21% | 7.9 -84% | 2.8 35% | 5.85 -36% |
| Gamma | 2.298 96% | 2.275 97% | 2.28 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 7000 93% | 6637 98% | 5941 109% | 7023 93% | 7372 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 72 | 67 | 35 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 89 | 55 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
11% | 10% /
-6% | 16% /
18% | -30% /
-25% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
测试条件
可以在预装的控制中心进行各种系统设置，该中心来自裸机制造商Clevo。这些设置包括风扇控制和性能配置。为了获得Apex 17的最大功率，我们使用性能模式进行测试（只有电池测量是在娱乐模式下进行的）。我们将风扇速度设置为默认选项自动。
注意：为了防止安装在测试设备上的Windows 11对基准测试结果产生负面影响，我们等待AMD最新的主板驱动程序和微软的某个更新（关键词L3缓存错误）。
权力
无论你选择哪种CPU或GPU的配置。Apex 17都倾向于高端领域。为了对未来有充分的准备，我们建议使用16GB内存和至少500GB的固态硬盘。基本配置在这方面是非常微不足道的（8GB和250GB）。
处理器
审查样本中安装的Ryzen 7 5800H是一个极快的八核处理器，可以通过SMT并行处理多达16个线程。在我们的基准测试过程中，没有令人讨厌的惊喜。Cinebench的分数都处于较高的水平，可以在竞争中保持自己的优势。在Loop测试中，性能也相当稳定（对比图）。
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance Test
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2064.09-2085.83)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1865 (1855.12-1943.35)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2006 (1963-2025.09)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -2! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 | |
| Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Single Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=199, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 | |
| 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=192, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -9! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=189, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
系统性能
系统性能看起来同样不错。Apex 17在这里也占据了最高位置之一，尽管竞争设备仍然是用Windows 10测试的，这可能意味着某些偏差。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6717 - 6983, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9548 - 10226, n=6) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8849 - 9514, n=6) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8948 - 10389, n=6) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6972 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
在延迟方面还有改进的余地。根据LatencyMon工具，Apex 17在其交付状态下并不真正适合于实时音频和/或视频编辑，如果计划有这样的应用场景（应该只适用于极少数买家）。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
我们的测试设备上有一块来自三星的1TB SSD作为大容量存储。像往常一样，970 Evo Plus提供了一个全面成功的性能--无论是读取还是写入。如果你想以后扩展存储，引擎盖下有一个免费的M.2插槽。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3571 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3227 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
618 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
359.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2826 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2889 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
76.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
172 MB/s
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
图形卡
Nvidia一代放大器的性能在很大程度上取决于设定的TGP。申克公司给RTX 3070在性能模式下提供了整整140瓦（包括15瓦的动态提升），这是该GPU的最大值。因此，Apex 17在图形基准测试中取得相当好的成绩并不令人惊讶。与CPU和系统性能类似，17-incher也使自己在这里的测试领域的上三分之一处感到舒适。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG -1! | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) -1! | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7178 - 29128, n=52) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=192, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (2644 - 11019, n=53) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| 2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1640 - 6542, n=39) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 28685 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 47429 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24012 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10640 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
在1,920 x 1,080的原生全高清分辨率下，RTX 3070可以流畅地显示所有当前游戏的最大细节。即使是要求特别高的游戏通常也能达到60 FPS以上。Apex 17在使用外部QHD显示器时也仍能很好地处理。
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (122.1 - 207, n=34) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) | |
| Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (34.9 - 109, n=52) | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 | |
在耐力测试期间，与 的时候Witcher 3(1小时@FHD/Ultra），没有出现任何异常。帧率在整个期间保持相当稳定，这是它应该的。
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø99.8 (95-102)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø97.3 (86-100)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø93.6 (89-99)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø107 (96-112)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø78.2 (75-81)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 172 | 158 | 92.9 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 262 | 174 | 100 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 148 | 135 | 127 | 122 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 132 | 100 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 104 | 91.9 | 75 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 124 | 119 | 110 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 203 | 183 | 173 | |
| Hitman 3 (2021) | 176 | 170 | 162 | |
| Outriders (2021) | 118 | 117 | 117 | |
| Resident Evil Village (2021) | 178 | 176 | 156 | |
| Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 105 | |||
| Days Gone (2021) | 154 | 140 | 106 | |
| Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) | 144 | 143 | ||
| Deathloop (2021) | 117 | 106 | 90.1 | |
| New World (2021) | 96.8 | 92.7 | 86.8 | |
| Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 82.7 | 79.2 | ||
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 103 | 91 | 87 | |
| Back 4 Blood (2021) | 220 | 205 | 193 | |
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 112 | 111 | 110 | |
| Riders Republic (2021) | 136 | 114 | 105 |
排放
噪声排放
Clevo裸机的关键弱点之一一直是风扇控制不佳。尽管Apex 17在空闲模式下保持相对安静，为25至31 dB(A)，但在使用性能模式时，风扇在负载下转为57至59 dB(A)--这种恼人的噪音水平，最终迫使人们使用耳机。如果你想让它更安静，你应该在游戏时切换到娱乐或安静模式，特别是在播放视频等要求不高的任务中。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 28 / 31 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 57 / 59 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | 11% | 1% | 0% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24 4% | 24.2 3% | 24 4% | 26 -4% | 24 ? 4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 29 -16% | 24.7 1% | 25 -0% | 26 -4% | 25.5 ? -2% |
| Idle Average * | 28 | 32 -14% | 24.7 12% | 32 -14% | 33.1 -18% | 27.2 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 38 -23% | 24.7 20% | 34 -10% | 31.3 -1% | 30.2 ? 3% |
| Load Average * | 57 | 49 14% | 44.3 22% | 54 5% | 49.8 13% | 42.4 ? 26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 53 7% | 56.3 1% | 51 11% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 59 | 55 7% | 47.7 19% | 54 8% | 49.6 16% | 53.4 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Apex 17的温度发展与竞争对手一致，尽管其噪音水平较高。在使用FurMark和Prime95工具满负荷工作一小时后，我们可以从机箱上部哄骗到45°C（113°F），在底部哄骗到49°C（120.2°F）。特别是处理器在机箱内发热。虽然RTX 3070在压力测试中达到约83°C（181.4°F），但根据HWMonitor工具，Ryzen 7 5800H几乎突破了100°C（212°F）大关。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -13% | -10% | -3% | -9% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 45 | 47 -4% | 41 9% | 43 4% | 44 2% | 46.2 ? -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 51 -4% | 47.2 4% | 47 4% | 52.7 -8% | 49.2 ? -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 32 -19% | 33.2 -23% | 30 -11% | 32.6 -21% | 31.2 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 37 -23% | 39 -30% | 33 -10% | 32.1 -7% | 32.2 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲者
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
能源消耗
得益于图形切换(Nvidia Optimus)，Apex 17在要求不高的任务中不会消耗太多的能量。10至20瓦的空闲消耗比竞争对手少。负载下的差异是有限的。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 2.2 Watt |
| Idle | 10 / 14 / 20 Watt |
| Load |
112 / 231 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -50% | -8% | -21% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 13 -30% | 20.9 -109% | 12 -20% | 18.7 -87% | 13.6 ? -36% |
| Idle Average * | 14 | 16 -14% | 25.1 -79% | 16 -14% | 22 -57% | 18.9 ? -35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 20 | 26 -30% | 45 -125% | 28 -40% | 25.2 -26% | 26.7 ? -34% |
| Load Average * | 112 | 125 -12% | 102 9% | 92 18% | 134.7 -20% | 106.9 ? 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 202 | 187 7% | 189 6% | 198 2% | 135 33% | |
| Load Maximum * | 231 | 259 -12% | 234.8 -2% | 210 9% | 157 32% | 250 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption Witcher 3
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21: Ø202 (197-222)
电池寿命
电池容量不大。49Wh在2021年不再是最新的，特别是考虑到价格。作为比较。竞争对手提供62至70瓦特。幸运的是，运行时间并没有因为适度的能源消耗而完全下降。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，Apex 17在中等亮度下持续了约5个小时，这是一个不错的速度。
| SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 49 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 65 Wh | Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -30% | 15% | -18% | 32% | 33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 422 | 281 -33% | 404 -4% | 337 -20% | 608 44% | 565 ? 34% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 294 | 208 -29% | 314 7% | 252 -14% | 334 14% | 375 ? 28% |
| Load | 62 | 44 -29% | 88 42% | 49 -21% | 86 39% | 85.3 ? 38% |
| H.264 | 420 | 408 ? |
Pros
+ 为CPU和GPU提供稳定的电源
+ 许多维护选项
+ 相对较好的输入设备
+ 个人配置
Cons
- 在性能模式下有相当多的噪音发展
- 显示器可以做得更好（亮度、对比度）。
- 外壳看起来质量不是很高
- 电池容量低
判决书
如果你正在寻找一款具有良好维护选项的游戏笔记本，Apex 17是正确的选择。
现在很少有可从外部获取的可拆卸电池（尽管电池容量还有待改进）。
除了在性能模式下极高的噪音发展--有不同的性能配置文件--这台17英寸的笔记本在其他方面看起来相当不引人注意。外壳、输入设备和接口都很结实。另一方面，有点遗憾的是，制造商没有安装一个更好的显示器。亮度和对比度只能在有限的范围内满足高要求。
作为回报，Apex 17在性能方面取得了成绩。处理器和显卡提供了高于平均水平的基准速率（这尤其要归功于慷慨的TDP）。
希望拥有RTX 3070的经济爱好者应该选择 Acer Nitro 5 AN517它的价格比类似设备低几百欧元（约114美元）（但也有较低的TGP）。
价格和可用性
XMG Apex 17在制造商的商店bestware.com有售。起价为1,479欧元（约合1,692美元）。
SCHENKER XMG Apex 17 M21
- 11/02/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
