威刚XPG Xenia 15笔记本电脑评测。几乎和Razer Blade一样锋利
在5月和7月分别推出XPG Xenia Xe和Xenia 14之后,威刚现在准备更新其以游戏为中心的Xenia 15,用Tiger Lake-H和Nvidia Ampere GPU来取代旧型号上的Coffee Lake-H和Turing选项。其他升级包括一个新的1440p 165 Hz显示屏,而不是1080p 144 Hz,并支持PCIe4固态硬盘和Thunderbolt 4,而不是只有PCIe3和Thunderbolt 3。
我们的确切配置是GeForce RTX 3070,32GB内存和1TB存储空间,现在发货价格为2499美元,但更少的SKU可能以更低的价格提供。该机型与其他超薄的15.6英寸游戏笔记本竞争,如 Razer Blade 15, 微星GS66, 华硕Zephyrus S15, 联想Legion 7, 或 戴尔Alienware x15.
更多关于威刚的评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | ADATA XPG Xenia 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.5 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M | 2 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 |
案例 - 坚固的底座,薄弱的铰链
该底盘与其他的产品有许多相似之处。 申克核心15或 Neo 15因为这些型号都采用了同方的白标设计。威刚是该机箱的经销商,这意味着用户有可能从另一个经销商那里找到完全相同的型号,这取决于地区。然而,与上述两款Schenker型号不同,XPG Xenia 15的三个尺寸都比较小,而且略微轻一些,看起来更加紧凑。它的占地面积几乎与雷蛇Blade 15 Advanced相同,但它还是厚了一点,仅超过3毫米。
镁合金底座的感觉和Blade 15一样坚固,甚至比Blade 15的更好。 华硕Zephyrus S15或联想Legion 5,后者表现出更多的弯曲和嘎吱声。然而,盖子和铰链要弱得多,感觉比底座质量要差。特别是铰链,在更大的角度下变得更弱,而且它们也很明显地摇晃。这绝对是潜在的下一代设计中可以改进的地方。
连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt 4
端口选项和定位与Schenker XMG Neo 15相似,但有一些小的区别。例如,专用的3.5毫米麦克风插孔现在没有了,而后面的RJ-45端口没有保护盖。
值得一提的是,这台机器上的USB-C端口不能用来给笔记本充电,这与现在大多数其他游戏笔记本不同。我们尝试了两个不同的USB-C交流适配器,它们可以在微星GS66、Razer Blade 15和 外星人x15但它们在我们的威刚上不起作用。
SD卡阅读器
传输速度一般,不到Alienware x15上读卡器速度的一半。尽管如此,我们对该系统首先集成了读卡器表示赞赏,这比我们对Razer Blade 15或MSI GS66的评价要高。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F (AV Pro V60) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F (AV Pro V60) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
当与我们的Netgear RAX200测试路由器配对时,性能可以更加稳定。传输速率偶尔会降到300至500 Mbps的低水平,即使经过多次重测,它应该持续超过1 Gbps。
网络摄像头
720p网络摄像头的质量很差,这在大多数笔记本电脑上并不罕见。这款 雷蛇刀片17仍然是少数拥有1080p网络摄像头的游戏笔记本电脑之一。这里甚至没有隐私快门,但至少有一个红外摄像头用于支持Windows Hello。
维护 - 易于维修
底部面板需要用标准的飞利浦螺丝刀来拆卸,而不是用雷蛇刀片系列的Torx扳手。用户可以直接接触到两个M.2存储插槽、两个SODIMM插槽、电池和WLAN模块。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括通常的手册和交流适配器,没有额外的东西。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备 - 光学机械键
键盘
威刚将其光学机械键盘描述为 "无声",其反馈与Cherry Brown开关最为相似。实际上,这些按键仍然比传统超极本的按键响得多,特别是在按下空格或回车键时。我们发现反馈比Razer Blade 15或微星GS66的按键更清晰。 微星GS66但比新的Alienware x15上的机械键更柔和。
我们对键盘的一个特别批评点是,每个键上的深灰色字体与黑色键帽的对比度很差。因此,即使在光线明亮的房间里,也很难看到每个键上的印刷。启用背光可以缓解这个问题,但用户不应该为了看清按键而被迫打开背光,尤其是在电池寿命是一个问题的情况下。
所有的主键和副键符号都是背光的 与Alienware x15不同.
触摸板
点击板比Razer Blade 15的小(11.6 x 7.2厘米,13 x 8厘米)。然而,我们发现威刚系统上的点击板使用起来更加舒适,仅仅是因为其集成的鼠标键没有Razer上的那么松软。反馈更多,声音更大,体验更令人满意。
显示屏 - 几乎完美的游戏
XPG Xenia 15使用的京东方NE156QHM-NY2 1440p IPS面板与申科XMG Core 15或XMG Neo 15完全相同。因此,这里的观看体验在色彩、分辨率、刷新率和响应时间方面非常相似。特别是后两者的速度非常快,分别为165赫兹和25.6毫秒的综合速度,使这块1440p面板成为流畅游戏的绝佳选择,并将重影降至最低。
这个面板的主要缺点是缺乏G-Sync支持。这里不支持高级擎天柱,因此用户将不得不使用普通擎天柱。支持外部显示器的G-Sync。
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 321.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 845:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.53
ΔE Greyscale 5.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 15.6", 2560x1440 | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK LQ156M1JW03 (SHP155D), IPS-Level, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F LG Philips 156QHG, IPS, 15.6", 2560x1440 | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS-Level, 15.6", 2560x1440 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 23% | -1% | -0% | 23% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.2 | 66.5 -2% | 97.8 43% | 66.9 -2% | 67.7 -1% | 97.3 43% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.1 | 97.8 0% | 99.9 2% | 97.1 -1% | 98.4 0% | 99.9 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.1 | 67.6 -2% | 69 0% | 69.1 0% | 86.2 25% | |
Response Times | 10% | 13% | 43% | -2% | 21% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 ? | 12.8 ? 6% | 12 ? 12% | 4.2 ? 69% | 14.4 ? -6% | 8.8 ? 35% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 10.4 ? 13% | 10.4 ? 13% | 10 ? 17% | 11.6 ? 3% | 11.2 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | |||||
Screen | 10% | 14% | 26% | 16% | -0% | |
Brightness middle | 321.1 | 291 -9% | 409.5 28% | 353.4 10% | 259.5 -19% | 327 2% |
Brightness | 308 | 266 -14% | 390 27% | 340 10% | 264 -14% | 309 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 88 7% | 88 7% | 92 12% | 90 10% | 89 9% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.36 5% | 0.47 -24% | 0.31 18% | 0.25 34% | 0.33 13% |
Contrast | 845 | 808 -4% | 871 3% | 1140 35% | 1038 23% | 991 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.21 | 2.98 7% | 3.48 -8% | 2.17 32% | 2.52 21% | 4.49 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.56 | 7.59 28% | 6.31 40% | 5.69 46% | 5.55 47% | 8.42 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.53 | 0.91 41% | 0.89 42% | 1.05 31% | 1.93 -26% | 2.27 -48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 4.2 26% | 5 12% | 3.4 40% | 1.7 70% | 4.2 26% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.293 96% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.04 108% | 2.173 101% |
CCT | 7194 90% | 7624 85% | 6591 99% | 6830 95% | 6414 101% | 7014 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.3 | 86 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.8 | 99 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
7% | 17% /
15% | 23% /
23% | 5% /
10% | 15% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间包含了69%的AdobeRGB和几乎所有的sRGB,除了上述快节奏的游戏场景外,对于大多数图形编辑任务也是可以接受的。
这款显示器在开箱后可以进行更好的校准。尤其是色温对于相对较高的平均灰度deltaE值5.7来说太冷了。用我们的X-Rite色度计进行适当的校准可以解决这个问题,以充分利用面板的sRGB覆盖率,正如我们下面的Calman结果所示。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
最大亮度和户外能见度都与大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑相当。尽管如此,磨砂面板和宽大的180度铰链使Xenia 15在减少眩光方面略有优势。
性能 -Tiger Lake-H,配备125W TGP GPU
Nvidia控制面板明确指出,我们的Xenia 15中的RTX 3070的TGP为145 W,但威刚表示,该笔记本电脑只能够达到125 W,我们可以在下面的压力测试部分确认。即便如此,这也高于Razer Blade 15(105 W TGP)和MSI GS66(95 W TGP)中GPU的额定功率。
用户应该熟悉预装的NUC Software Studio应用程序,因为它是笔记本电脑的控制中心。重要的功能,如每键RGB照明、颜色配置文件、电池和性能都在这里切换。在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们的设备被设置为性能模式。有一个独特的 "基准模式",这只是 "最大风扇模式 "的另一个术语,但除非另有说明,否则我们将这个功能关闭。
处理器
CPU性能稳定,与我们数据库中配备相同的笔记本电脑相比,仅有几个百分点的差距。 酷睿i7-11800HCPU。少数型号的处理器可以在更高的Turbo Boost时钟速率下运行更长的时间,如Alienware x15的多线程性能几乎快了20%,正如我们下面的CineBench R15循环结果所示。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=50) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=47) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (6508 - 14088, n=48) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1386 - 1522, n=45) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1342 - 2173, n=50) | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (201 - 231, n=46) | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=46) | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (5138 - 5732, n=46) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (33718 - 56758, n=46) | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=40) | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=40) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=46) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=45) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-55-57GF | |
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060 | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Aorus 15P XC | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 Ampere | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=46) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark结果非常好,可与其他配备GeForce RTX图形的高端游戏笔记本电脑相媲美。我们也很欣赏没有任何预装臃肿软件的情况。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6126 - 7311, n=11) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (9248 - 10832, n=11) | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8571 - 9669, n=11) | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7627 - 10851, n=11) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG |
PCMark 10 Score | 7058 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的问题,而在60FPS下的4K视频播放则是丝般顺畅,没有掉帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个M.2 NVMe固态硬盘
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 ADATA XPG Gammix S70 1TB | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -39% | 36% | -8% | -16% | |
Seq Read | 4332 | 2023 -53% | 5739 32% | 2198 -49% | 2950 -32% |
Seq Write | 5210 | 1836 -65% | 4201 -19% | 2596 -50% | 1600 -69% |
4K Read | 48.06 | 56.4 17% | 53.8 12% | 43.81 -9% | 53.6 12% |
4K Write | 168.9 | 130.2 -23% | 179.2 6% | 115.5 -32% | 126.8 -25% |
4K-64 Read | 1374 | 899 -35% | 2959 115% | 1692 23% | 1429 4% |
4K-64 Write | 2855 | 1164 -59% | 1891 -34% | 2162 -24% | 2177 -24% |
Access Time Read * | 0.039 | 0.096 -146% | 0.027 31% | 0.056 -44% | 0.064 -64% |
Access Time Write * | 0.122 | 0.031 75% | 0.154 -26% | 0.098 20% | 0.029 76% |
Score Read | 1855 | 1158 -38% | 3587 93% | 1956 5% | 1778 -4% |
Score Write | 3545 | 1478 -58% | 2490 -30% | 2537 -28% | 2464 -30% |
Score Total | 6396 | 3233 -49% | 7821 22% | 5513 -14% | 5090 -20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2261 | 3027 34% | 2236 -1% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 408.3 | 1177 188% | 690 69% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1241 | 2170 75% | 1546 25% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -46% | 8% | -40% | -34% | |
Write 4K | 264.7 | 136.2 -49% | 295.6 12% | 163.1 -38% | 156.4 -41% |
Read 4K | 74 | 59.9 -19% | 85.7 16% | 48.97 -34% | 66.7 -10% |
Write Seq | 5268 | 1846 -65% | 4149 -21% | 2607 -51% | 2318 -56% |
Read Seq | 2878 | 1714 -40% | 4203 46% | 2316 -20% | 2151 -25% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 501 | 344.2 -31% | 715 43% | 338 -33% | 525 5% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 819 | 582 -29% | 709 -13% | 475.6 -42% | 452.1 -45% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 5862 | 1874 -68% | 4681 -20% | 3090 -47% | 3055 -48% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 7060 | 2096 -70% | 6905 -2% | 3421 -52% | 3607 -49% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -43% /
-42% | 22% /
25% | -24% /
-19% | -25% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 接近于GeForce RTX 3080
的 移动GeForce RTX 3070的性能与我们期望的具有相同GPU的其他笔记本电脑相比,如果不是稍快的话。启用 "基准模式 "时,性能甚至更快,尽管只是最小的差距(26126对26907点,Fire Strike )。
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (12535 - 38275, n=54) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
Gigabyte G5 KC | |
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) | |
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING | |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (3715 - 22517, n=53) | |
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK | |
MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK | |
Gigabyte G5 KC | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4 | |
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
3DMark 11 Performance | 27369 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 40480 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20893 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9858 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 180 | 173 | 159 | 95.4 | 85.4 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 376.6 | 279.6 | 181 | 94.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 160 | 141 | 134 | 127 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 171 | 125 | 93.5 | 71.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 103 | 94.2 | 75.2 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 145 | 116 | 111 | 105 | 91 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 406 | 231 | 192 | 170 | 128 |
Emissions
系统噪音 - 大声玩家
在中低负荷时,风扇在尽可能长时间内保持安静方面做得很好。例如,当运行3DMark 06时,风扇噪音将保持在29 dB(A)以下,而Blade 15或Zephyrus G15则超过40 dB(A)。这可以解释在桌面上空转或浏览网页时,下面的表面温度比平常要高。
游戏时的风扇噪音很大,即使对游戏笔记本来说也是如此。运行时 Witcher 3导致稳定的风扇噪音几乎达到53 dB(A),而Blade 15或GS66则为46 dB(A)。当启用基准模式时,风扇噪音变得更加响亮,几乎为55 dB(A)。
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, ADATA XPG Gammix S70 1TB | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -18% | -2% | -5% | -25% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 24.8 | 25 -1% | 24.1 3% | 25.1 -1% | 26.2 -6% | 25 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.9 | 25 -0% | 26.6 -7% | 25.3 -2% | 34 -37% | 26 -4% |
Idle Average * | 24.9 | 30 -20% | 26.6 -7% | 25.3 -2% | 34 -37% | 27 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.9 | 40 -61% | 26.6 -7% | 25.3 -2% | 34 -37% | 31 -24% |
Load Average * | 28.8 | 47 -63% | 30.9 -7% | 42 -46% | 47.2 -64% | 49 -70% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.7 | 48 9% | 49.9 5% | 45.6 13% | 46.3 12% | 49 7% |
Load Maximum * | 54.9 | 51 7% | 53.5 3% | 51.6 6% | 58.2 -6% | 51 7% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.9 / 24.9 / 24.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.8 / 54.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) |
温度 - 大量的通风
即使在桌面上空转,表面温度一般也很高,因为风扇往往是空转的。在这种情况下,笔记本顶部和底部的热点温度可以分别达到38摄氏度或42摄氏度。游戏时,键盘的中心可以达到50摄氏度,而微星GS66或Razer Blade 15 Advanced的中心则为45摄氏度。 Razer Blade 15 Advanced.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64.2 °C / 148 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.5 °C / -9.9 F).
压力测试
当使用Prime95时,CPU会在第一分钟左右提升到3.7GHz,然后每隔几分钟就会下降并在2.8GHz和3.5GHz之间循环。核心温度将稳定在80℃左右,这比我们在微星GS66上记录的类似负载下的温度略低。
在测试游戏的基准模式时,事情变得很有趣。运行 Witcher 3 在关闭Benchmark Mode的情况下,将导致稳定的GPU时钟频率和主板功耗分别为1620MHz和111W,而在启动Benchmark Mode的情况下则为1725MHz和125W。因此,为了尽可能多地从GPU中榨取性能,需要启用该功能。在基准模式下运行时,CPU和GPU将分别稳定在76℃和81℃。 Witcher 3在基准模式下,CPU和GPU将分别稳定在76摄氏度和81摄氏度,这与Razer Blade 15 Advanced的数字相近。
用电池供电运行将限制性能。在电池上运行Fire Strike ,物理和图形分数将分别为19060和18191分,而在主电源上运行时,物理和图形分数为22616和26907分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 56 | 58 |
Prime95压力 | 2.8 - 3.5 | -- | ~80 | 63 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | ~3.2 | 1710 | 89 | 79 |
Witcher 3 Stress (Benchmark Mode off) | 3.0+ | 1620 | 74 | 76 |
Witcher 3 Stress (Benchmark Mode on) | 4.1+ | 1725 | 76 | 81 |
扬声器 - 游戏时很难听到
集成的扬声器偏弱,特别是在游戏时,因为风扇的声音可能相当大。最大音量也比GS66的要小。游戏时你肯定需要一副耳机,以便更好地听到游戏中的音频。
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management
消耗功率
在低负载情况下,系统的功耗在8瓦到32瓦之间,这取决于亮度设置、电源配置文件和GPU设置。运行时 Witcher 3会消耗大约188瓦,如果在基准模式下甚至接近200瓦,比我们在许多其他超薄的15.6英寸GeForce RTX笔记本电脑上记录的要多。更高分辨率的QHD面板和125瓦的目标TGP可能是更高瓦数的原因,因为这个尺寸类别的其他笔记本电脑通常配备FHD面板和约100瓦的GPU。
当同时运行Prime95和FurMark时,我们能够从中等尺寸(约15.1 x 7.5 x 2.6厘米)的230瓦交流适配器中记录到222瓦的最大消耗。消耗量将在150W和222W之间严重波动,这可能是由于散热问题。在运行如此高的负载时,电池的充电速度也会更慢,但它不会随着时间的推移而慢慢耗尽。
Off / Standby | 2.6 / 3.5 Watt |
Idle | 8.9 / 14.4 / 31.1 Watt |
Load |
97 / 222.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, ADATA XPG Gammix S70 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -3% | -21% | -34% | -6% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.9 | 10 -12% | 15.7 -76% | 19.5 -119% | 12.9 -45% | 10 -12% |
Idle Average * | 14.4 | 18 -25% | 20.3 -41% | 23.3 -62% | 15.4 -7% | 12 17% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.1 | 25 20% | 43 -38% | 40.1 -29% | 27.1 13% | 17 45% |
Load Average * | 97 | 101 -4% | 94.4 3% | 98.9 -2% | 98.2 -1% | 108 -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 188 | 187 1% | 167 11% | 174 7% | 164.9 12% | 123 35% |
Load Maximum * | 222.2 | 217 2% | 183.4 17% | 214 4% | 232.9 -5% | 182 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命 - 大型94Wh电池
运行时间比预期的要长,将近9个小时的实际WLAN使用时间要比我们在微星GS66或Alienware x15上记录的时间各长几个小时。
使用随附的交流电适配器,从空电到满电大约需要100分钟。
ADATA XPG Xenia 15 i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh | MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M, 82 Wh | Alienware x15 RTX 3070 P111F i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 87 Wh | Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -9% | -34% | -33% | -0% | -2% | |
Reader / Idle | 837 | 664 -21% | 582 -30% | 649 -22% | 728 -13% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 523 | 474 -9% | 366 -30% | 353 -33% | 426 -19% | 564 8% |
Load | 92 | 96 4% | 53 -42% | 129 40% | 90 -2% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 比看上去更快
XPG Xenia 15是一个令人惊讶的强有力的竞争者,与长期存在的超薄游戏笔记本电脑如 Razer Blade 15, 微星GS66,或 华硕Zephyrus S15.威刚笔记本电脑能够纳入比上述任何型号更好的键盘,甚至更高的TGP目标,从Nvidia GPU中挤出更多性能。终端用户的内存和存储升级受到欢迎,而GS66的用户则被迫打破防篡改贴纸,只是为了拆除底板。底座也相当结实,比Zephyrus S15或Zephyrus S15更不容易出现弯曲或吱吱作响的情况。 联想Legion 7.
小尺寸、高TGP目标、强大的底座和出色的1440p 165 Hz显示屏将XPG Xenia 15带到了比其他超薄游戏笔记本更高的位置。摇摇晃晃的盖子、特大的风扇和软绵绵的扬声器将它拉回了几个档次。
将125瓦的GPU塞进超薄机箱有其弊端。特别是,游戏时的风扇噪音明显比竞争对手大,以至于压倒了集成扬声器。同时,铰链没有留下强烈的印象,特别是与大多数华硕Zephyrus笔记本电脑上的较硬铰链相比。我们对Xenia 15的铰链在两到三年后的表现不那么有信心。
作为一个整体,考虑到Xenia 15比许多其他超薄的15.6英寸游戏笔记本占地面积更小,它所提供的性能给我们留下了深刻印象。1440p165显示屏和点击式键盘在这个尺寸级别的游戏和其他方面都是最好的。
价格和可用性
配备第11代英特尔CPU的威刚XPG Xenia 15是,现在在百思买有售。售价为2499美元。其他主要零售商尚未有2021年Xenia 15的库存,而截至本文写作时仍在销售采用第九代英特尔CPU的旧型号。
ADATA XPG Xenia 15
- 10/18/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo