戴尔 XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5-7200U 笔记本电脑简短评测

小更新，没效果？ 戴尔悄悄地更新了它最畅销的机型：XPS 13是最先得到英特尔最新Kaby Lake处理器的机型之一。它的机身没有变化，搭配的屏幕也一如既往。

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 11/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake XPS Ultrabook Windows

Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 (XPS 13 9360 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4 双通道

Display

13.30 inch 16:9, 3200 x 1800 pixel 276 PPI, Sharp SHP144A

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH

Storage

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, 256 GB

, NVMe, 198 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Networking

Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/)

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15 x 304 x 201

Battery

60 Wh, 8085 mAh, 7.6V PW23Y

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Additional features

McAffee 防病毒, 12 Months Warranty

Released

09/29/2016

Weight

1.313 kg, Power Supply: 263 g

Price

1299 Euro

Links

Dell homepage
Dell notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus Zenbook UX302LA-C4003H Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HP Spectre 13 HP EliteBook 1030 G1-X2F03EA Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 Broadcom 802.11ac (Klaus I211)	762 MBit/s +13%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	676 MBit/s
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (Klaus I211)	664 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	637 MBit/s -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)	459 MBit/s -32%
Intel NUC5i5RYH Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Klaus I211)	443 MBit/s -34%
MSI PE60 2QD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	236 MBit/s -65%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10 Broadcom 802.11ac (Klaus I211)	768 MBit/s +13%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	680 MBit/s
MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (Klaus I211)	625 MBit/s -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (Klaus I211)	593 MBit/s -13%
Intel NUC5i5RYH Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (Klaus I211)	549 MBit/s -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260	534 MBit/s -21%
MSI PE60 2QD Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	322 MBit/s -53%


366 cd/m²	375 cd/m²	390 cd/m²
387 cd/m²	444 cd/m²	397 cd/m²
371 cd/m²	415 cd/m²	390 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Sharp SHP144A tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 444 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 392.8 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 444 cd/m²
Contrast: 1345:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13 ms rise
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	145 Points +24%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Core i7-6560U	133 Points +14%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points +10%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	117 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -1%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI CX72-7QL Intel Core i7-7500U	363 Points +21%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points +10%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Core i7-6560U	314 Points +5%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel Core i5-7200U	300 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	287 Points -4%

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.39 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

32.59 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.43 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

300 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

117 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

41.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.7 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Spectre 13 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3549 Points +29%
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	3479 Points +26%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512	3386 Points +23%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points +15%
Dell XPS 13-9350 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	2983 Points +8%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK	2761 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256	2550 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2761 points
Help

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK

Sequential Read: 1168 MB/s

Sequential Write: 329 MB/s

512K Read: 1015 MB/s

512K Write: 307 MB/s

4K Read: 33 MB/s

4K Write: 132 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 525 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 325 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	1947 Points +26%
MSI CX72-7QL Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U	1668 Points +8%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1541 Points
HP Spectre 13 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1487 Points -4%
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1428 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1398 Points -9%

3DMark 2001SE Standard		67477 points
3DMark 11 Performance		1683 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5778 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		848 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	30.8 (12.7^min - 53^max) fps +2%
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	30.3 fps
HP Spectre 13 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	29.8 fps -2%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 Intel Iris Graphics 6100, Intel Core i5-5257U	28.6 fps -6%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	28.16 fps -7%
Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	27.9 fps -8%
Dell XPS 13-9343 Intel HD Graphics 5500, Intel Core i5-5200U	23.39 fps -23%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz Intel HD Graphics 5300, Intel Core M-5Y31	18.8 fps -38%

	low	med.	high	ultra
World of Warcraft (2005)		48		10.1
Diablo III (2012)			30	28.6
BioShock Infinite (2013)	50.5	30.3	25.5	8.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.7
World of Warships (2015)	58	39.7	20.5
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	35.6	22.4	12.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	17.4
Far Cry Primal (2016)	16	8
Overwatch (2016)	40.1	30	13.9

Noise Level

Idle		30.6 / 30.6 / 32.2 dB(A)
Load		32.2 / 38.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


39 °C	40 °C	34 °C
35 °C	35 °C	29 °C
30 °C	28 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 33 °C


36 °C	42 °C	39 °C
30 °C	34 °C	34 °C
29 °C	30 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 33.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

	Dell XPS 13 9360 (7200U)	Dell XPS 13 9350 (6200U)	Dell XPS 13 9350 (6560U)	Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK
Heat		-8%	-16%	1%	-7%
Maximum Upper Side *	40	45.2 -13%	45 -13%	38.5 4%	42 -5%
Maximum Bottom *	42	45.2 -8%	50 -19%	47.7 -14%	37.5 11%
Idle Upper Side *	28	30.4 -9%		27.2 3%	34.8 -24%
Idle Bottom *	31	31.2 -1%		27.4 12%	33.4 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.26 / 4.8 Watt
Idle	3.7 / 6.1 / 6.5 Watt
Load	29.5 / 33 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		8h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 17min

	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5 i5-7200U, 3200x1800, 60 Wh	Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) 6560U, 1920x1080, 56 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX302LA-C4003H 4200U, 1920x1080, 50 Wh	Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, 1920x1080, 45 Wh	HP Spectre 13 6500U, 1920x1080, 38 Wh	Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB 6300U, 2736x1824, 38 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2015-03 5257U, 2560x1600, 75 Wh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-24%	-19%	-40%	-19%	-8%
H.264	547						581 6%
WiFi v1.3	526	436 -17%		472 -10%	338 -36%	427 -19%	539 2%
Load	137	141 3%	104 -24%	99 -28%	78 -43%	111 -19%	94 -31%
Reader / Idle		944	709	1028	715	899	1690
WiFi			336

Verdict

In review: Dell XPS 13 9360 with touchscreen and Intel i5-7200U Kaby Lake CPU

Kaby Lake架构戴尔XPS 13是对即将退出市场的Skylake版本的更新。新的Killer无线网模组在测试中提供了十分出色的性能表现。Kaby Lake处理器在测试中相比Skylake仅仅提供了稍高的测试分数，而落后于我们测试过的宏碁笔记本中的i5-7200U处理器所提供的性能。它的显卡表现也不算特别出色。戴尔宣称它们内部测试成绩相比更高，并希望给我们另外一台新设备一共测试。更换我们测试机的导热胶后它也提供了不小的散热效率，不过它的性能依然低于i5-7200U的理论水平。我们只好等待新的测试机到来，再重新测试来看它的小风扇究竟能否满足处理器全速运行下的散热需求。

XPS 13系列的另外一个问题在于电流噪音。我们可以在这台测试机运行时听到这种声音，不过只是在周围特别安静时。它有些像机械硬盘发出的声音。另一方面，如果考虑到尺寸小巧的机身，它的散热噪音控制都可以说是做得十分出色。

由于采用了动态亮度控制，对它的3K屏幕的测试变得十分困难。主观上，我们认为它除了较强的光线反射外都十分出色，但这在户外使用情况下会变得十分烦人（以及一些明亮的室内环境）。根据我们对前代机型的测试来看，它应该在这个方面没有太大变化。

它的键盘和触控板属于Windows设备中的佼佼者，再结合上非常优秀的电池续航，XPS 13是一台非常值得考虑的商务本。我们希望能够尽快得到替换测试机，完成对性能表现的测试。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 戴尔 XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i5-7200U 笔记本电脑简短评测

Klaus Hinum, J. Simon Leitner, 2016-11- 5 (Update: 2016-11- 6)