索尼 Xperia X 智能手机简短评测
Sony Xperia X (Xperia Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 6 x 1.8 GHz, Cortex-A72/-A53
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB
Display
5.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, LCD, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 19.8 GB free
Weight
152 g, Power Supply: 25 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 407 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 392.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.83 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 404 cd/m²
Contrast: 594:1 (Black: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.23
| Sony Xperia X LCD, 1920x1080, 5" | Huawei P9 IPS-NEO, JDI, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia Z5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Google Nexus 5X IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Apple iPhone SE IPS, 1136x640, 4" | OnePlus 3 Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 53% | 23% | 54% | 39% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 404 | 582 44% | 669 66% | 503 25% | 603 49% | 419 4% |
| Brightness | 392 | 563 44% | 624 59% | 498 27% | 579 48% | 431 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 91 0% | 85 -7% | 97 7% | 93 2% | 84 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | 0.38 44% | 0.68 -0% | 0.38 44% | 0.88 -29% | |
| Contrast | 594 | 1532 158% | 984 66% | 1324 123% | 685 15% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 4.4 38% | 7.96 -12% | 2.09 71% | 1.8 75% | 4.1 42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.2 | 7.4 44% | 3.5 73% | 12 9% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.7 | 4.8 51% | 10.95 -13% | 2.12 78% | 2.3 76% | 3.3 66% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.2 100% | 2.61 84% | 2.27 97% | 2.21 100% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 9502 68% | 6175 105% | 7402 88% | 6621 98% | 6955 93% | 6550 99% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.78 | 62.13 | 89.38 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.44 | 96.74 | 100 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 38 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
AnTuTu v6 | Geekbench 3 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1 | AndroBench 3-5
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| Apple iPhone SE | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Google Nexus 5X | |
| OnePlus 3 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia X | |
| Huawei P9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.13 / 0.25 Watt |
| Idle |  0.56 / 1.69 / 1.75 Watt |
| Load |
6.01 / 7.03 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia X 2620 mAh | Huawei P9 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia Z5 mAh | Google Nexus 5X mAh | Apple iPhone SE 1624 mAh | OnePlus 3 3000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 13% | 15% | 26% | 48% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1240 | 1514 22% | 1669 35% | 1775 43% | 1274 3% | 1338 8% |
| H.264 | 518 | 568 10% | 600 16% | 555 7% | 759 47% | 847 64% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 434 | 569 31% | 438 1% | 412 -5% | 673 55% | 840 94% |
| Load | 213 | 206 -3% | 213 0% | 245 15% | 207 -3% | 268 26% |
Pros
+ 雅致的机身
+ 指纹识别器
+ 20 GB空余存储空间
+ 安卓6.0
+ WiFi 802.11ac和LTE
+ 通话音质高
+ 优秀的相机
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 高系统性能
+ 优秀的电池续航
Cons
- 昂贵
- 不支持4K视频拍摄
- 满负载下降频问题
- microSD卡传输速度低
- 不可拆卸的电池
- 支持快速充电的电源适配器需要单独加价购买
索尼Xperia X在很多方面都做得不错，不过不能完全满足它高端智能手机的定位。不论如何，这台5寸安卓手机还是有不少优势。它搭配了雅致的铝合金机身，它的质感也十分优秀，但是无法完全达到前作Xperia Z5的水平。另一方面，这款智能手机搭配了明亮而可视角度宽广的全高清屏幕，指纹识别器，最新安卓6.0，20 GB可用存储空间，优秀的通信功能，和高通 Snapdragon 650 MSM8956处理器。许多潜在用户可能奇怪这台高端设备只搭配了中端处理器。我们的测试机售价480欧元（约3559人民币），有些太贵了。最后，Xperia X和Xperia Z5没有太大的区别，它现在也相比便宜很多。
索尼Xperia X是一款优秀、而价位较高的智能手机。它不像前代机型Xperia Z5，更接近于一台中端机型。
它的两个分别有2300万像素和1300万像素的相机可以说是最大的卖点。它们都支持高速快门，可以拍摄1080p视频（主相机支持60fps），同时提供了高于平均水平的拍摄效果。另外，它还支持一些实用功能，如预测自动对焦，它可以在拍摄移动对象时增强锐度。不论如何，它的性能还不足以用于高品质拍照，因为放大之后会发现它拍摄照片中的一些瑕疵。整体上，索尼Xperia X是一台优秀的智能手机，不过遗憾的是也没有能够超出这个层次。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Sony Xperia X
- 07/28/2016 v5.1 (old)
Manuel Masiero
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Price comparison
