索尼 Xperia XZ Premium 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 578 cd/m²
Contrast: 932:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.15
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.7" | Huawei P10 Plus LTPS, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 32% | -19% | 15% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle | 578 | 557 -4% | 464 -20% | 568 -2% | 560 -3% |
| Brightness | 568 | 553 -3% | 468 -18% | 562 -1% | 562 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 97 5% | 85 -8% | 92 0% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.62 | 0.35 44% | 0.43 31% | ||
| Contrast | 932 | 1591 71% | 1321 42% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.4 50% | 3.2 -14% | 2.4 14% | 1.7 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.1 | 3.1 39% | 10.5 -106% | 3.8 25% | 3.4 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.3 54% | 1.4 50% | 2.5 11% | 1.6 43% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.21 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.37 93% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6728 97% | 6667 97% | 6590 99% | 6779 96% | 6435 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 81.57 | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.83 | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1136 Hz | ≤ 33 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1136 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 33 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1136 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Random Read 4KB | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Random Write 4KB | |
| Huawei P10 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | |
| Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Huawei P10 Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) | |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ Premium audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.03 / 0.22 Watt |
| Idle |  0.62 / 2.44 / 2.59 Watt |
| Load |
4.94 / 7.91 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 0% | 0% | -30% | 28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.62 | 0.77 -24% | 0.85 -37% | 1.03 -66% | 0.68 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 2.44 | 2.04 16% | 1.2 51% | 2.61 -7% | 1.13 54% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.59 | 2.24 14% | 1.25 52% | 2.83 -9% | 1.16 55% |
| Load Average * | 4.94 | 4.69 5% | 6.97 -41% | 7.03 -42% | 4.69 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.91 | 8.66 -9% | 9.74 -23% | 10.08 -27% | 5.24 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe ZS570KL 3000 mAh | Huawei P10 Plus 3750 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | -23% | -7% | 1% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1754 | 1835 5% | 1393 -21% | 1655 -6% | 1565 -11% |
| H.264 | 802 | 813 1% | 799 0% | 756 -6% | 742 -7% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 695 | 587 -16% | 463 -33% | 760 9% | 736 6% |
| Load | 236 | 225 -5% | 149 -37% | 174 -26% | 275 17% |
Pros
Cons
哦，索尼，这样真的很棒：你第二次运用现有创新技术制造高端智能手机。Xperia XZ Premium配备了高分辨率的声音系统，适当的耳机和慢动作功能。它可以很好地工作。而价格只比Xperia XZ贵了几美元。另外，优化后的电池续航时间变长了，而其惊人的HDR屏幕也理所当然地像我们希望的那样成为了高端设备的标杆。要是Sony在这里使用了AMOLED屏幕的话......
令人惭愧的一点是：与这些技术亮点相比，它的外观看起来很过时：外壳很厚重，虽然优雅，却很容易扭曲。宽阔的边框并不能让显示屏变得更现代。除此之外，该设备仅具有标准的存储容量，以及较慢的GPS模块，平均Wi-Fi接收能力弱于路由器的使用范围，并且它的通话质量比较弱。缺乏快速充电功能和且便宜耳机，于其旗舰设备的身份不符。
Xperia XZ Premium是运用众多新技术的设备。事实证明，即使在智能手机显示屏幕上，4K视频和HDR也能令人印象深刻。它具有令人信服的电池续航时间和慢动作功能，但索尼可以将更多的精力投入基本功能，如通话质量和Wi-Fi接收上。
要是索尼能再勇敢点，他们可以让Xperia XZ Premium成为一款出色的智能手机，让对手黯然失色。而现在，该设备只是具有许多令人信服的技术的高端智能手机之一。不要误会我们的意思，在许多方面，索尼Xperia XZ Premium仍然可以说是一款拥有梦幻般的HDR屏幕的优秀智能手机。但索尼可能忘记了一点：对比技术运用，基础功能的作用仍然存在。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Sony Xperia XZ Premium
- 07/12/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
