华为 Y6 II Compact 智能手机简短评测

Name: Huawei Y6 II Compact
Brand: Huawei

低价的诱惑。 华为认为“售价总还可以降低”，因而降低了Y6 II Compact的定价。这会让消费者感兴趣吗？

Florian Wimmer, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Yuchen Wang), Published 09/19/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei Y6 II Compact (Y Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6735 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Memory

2048 MB

Display

5.00 inch 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixel 294 PPI, 电容式触控屏幕, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米耳机接口, Card Reader: micro-SD 最大支持 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 近距感应器，加速感应器，指南针, WiFi Direct, DLNA, USB OTG, FM 收音机

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20); 带宽 (下载/上传): 150 MBps / 50 MBps (LTE), 42 MBps / 11.5 MBps (UMTS); 辐射值: 0.36 W/kg (耳部), 1.23 W/kg (身体), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.95 x 144.2 x 72.5

Battery

8.4 Wh, 2200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, removeable, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 160 h

Operating System

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 自动对焦，双LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED闪光灯

Additional features

Speakers: 位于底部的扬声器, Keyboard: 触控键盘, designs, phone manager, HiCare, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

140 g, Power Supply: 46 g

Price

169 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	303 MBit/s +539%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	303 MBit/s +539%
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.8 MBit/s +5%
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	290 MBit/s +453%
LG G5 Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash	151 MBit/s +188%
Honor 5C Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 650, 16 GB eMMC Flash	58.3 MBit/s +11%
Huawei Y6 II Compact Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash	52.4 MBit/s

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


472 cd/m²	487 cd/m²	481 cd/m²
479 cd/m²	491 cd/m²	503 cd/m²
465 cd/m²	503 cd/m²	501 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 503 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 486.9 cd/m² Minimum: 15.92 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 491 cd/m²
Contrast: 546:1 (Black: 0.9 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12

	Huawei Y6 II Compact IPS, 1280x720, 5"	LG K10 IPS, 1280x720, 5.3"	HTC Desire 530 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Honor 5C IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5"
Screen		7%	22%	14%	-5%
Brightness middle	491	370 -25%	375 -24%	515 5%	295 -40%
Brightness	487	355 -27%	376 -23%	498 2%	299 -39%
Brightness Distribution	92	92 0%	91 -1%	93 1%	96 4%
Black Level *	0.9	0.28 69%	0.32 64%	0.49 46%
Contrast	546	1321 142%	1172 115%	1051 92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.6	6.7 -2%	6 9%	6.2 6%	5.8 12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	12.9	17.8 -38%	9.5 26%	11.4 12%	8.6 33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.9	7.9 -61%	4.5 8%	7.4 -51%	4.8 2%
Gamma	2.12 ^104%	2.21 ^100%	2.26 ^97%	2.28 ^96%	1.84 ^120%
CCT	7090 ^92%	9072 ^72%	6975 ^93%	8664 ^75%	6252 ^104%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	33786 Points
LG K10	27383 Points -19%
HTC Desire 530	23561 Points -30%
Honor 5C	53143 Points +57%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	24748 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4885 Points
LG K10	4339 Points -11%
HTC Desire 530	4261 Points -13%
Honor 5C	11755 Points +141%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3535 Points -28%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4296 Points
LG K10	3774 Points -12%
HTC Desire 530	3871 Points -10%
Honor 5C	11319 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3037 Points -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	9393 Points
LG K10	9106 Points -3%
HTC Desire 530	6583 Points -30%
Honor 5C	13588 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	8322 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	203 Points
LG K10	52 Points -74%
Honor 5C	563 Points +177%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	167 Points
LG K10	41 Points -75%
Honor 5C	480 Points +187%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	826 Points
LG K10	730 Points -12%
Honor 5C	1418 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	192 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	157 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	848 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	124 Points
LG K10	Points -100%
Honor 5C	383 Points +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	100 Points
LG K10	Points -100%
Honor 5C	317 Points +217%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	873 Points
LG K10	Points -100%
Honor 5C	1418 Points +62%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	15 fps
LG K10	9.7 fps -35%
HTC Desire 530	8.9 fps -41%
Honor 5C	20 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	7.6 fps -49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	8.4 fps
LG K10	5.2 fps -38%
HTC Desire 530	4.8 fps -43%
Honor 5C	19 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	4.6 fps -45%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	6.1 fps
LG K10	4.1 fps -33%
HTC Desire 530	4 fps -34%
Honor 5C	8.4 fps +38%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	2.8 fps
LG K10	1.8 fps -36%
HTC Desire 530	1.7 fps -39%
Honor 5C	7.9 fps +182%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	4.1 fps
LG K10	fps -100%
Honor 5C	4.9 fps +20%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1.7 fps
LG K10	fps -100%
Honor 5C	4.5 fps +165%

PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	3400 Points
LG K10	3999 Points +18%
HTC Desire 530	2922 Points -14%
Honor 5C	5120 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	3350 Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	203 Points
LG K10	536 Points +164%
HTC Desire 530	149 Points -27%
Honor 5C	1225 Points +503%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	423 Points +108%
System (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1093 Points
LG K10	1050 Points -4%
HTC Desire 530	742 Points -32%
Honor 5C	2600 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	1134 Points +4%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	571 Points
LG K10	453 Points -21%
HTC Desire 530	300 Points -47%
Honor 5C	1504 Points +163%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	315 Points -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	283 Points
LG K10	310 Points +10%
HTC Desire 530	231 Points -18%
Honor 5C	814 Points +188%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	158 Points -44%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	10 Points
LG K10	562 Points +5520%
HTC Desire 530	10 Points 0%
Honor 5C	707 Points +6970%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	569 Points +5590%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	549 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	1581 Points
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	795 Points

Legend

Huawei Y6 II Compact Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

LG K10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash

HTC Desire 530 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Honor 5C HiSilicon Kirin 650, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 Spreadtrum SC9830A, ARM Mali-400 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	13234 ms *
LG K10	16638 ms * -26%
HTC Desire 530	17471 ms * -32%
Honor 5C	9111 ms * +31%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	13702 ms * -4%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	2805 Points
LG K10	2838 Points +1%
HTC Desire 530	1796 Points -36%
Honor 5C	4188 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	2842 Points +1%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	50 Points
LG K10	47 Points -6%
HTC Desire 530	34 Points -32%
Honor 5C	73 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	39 Points -22%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	18.3 Points
LG K10	17.48 Points -4%
HTC Desire 530	12.1 Points -34%
Honor 5C	27.93 Points +53%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	16.2 Points -11%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	211 MB/s
LG K10	131 MB/s -38%
HTC Desire 530	127 MB/s -40%
Honor 5C	263 MB/s +25%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	64.4 MB/s -69%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	75 MB/s
LG K10	78 MB/s +4%
HTC Desire 530	55.8 MB/s -26%
Honor 5C	75.5 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	41.4 MB/s -45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	23 MB/s
LG K10	9.2 MB/s -60%
HTC Desire 530	11.82 MB/s -49%
Honor 5C	61.7 MB/s +168%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	16.82 MB/s -27%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	15.5 MB/s
LG K10	7.5 MB/s -52%
HTC Desire 530	8.96 MB/s -42%
Honor 5C	15.7 MB/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	9.43 MB/s -39%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	31.57 MB/s
LG K10	75.5 MB/s +139%
HTC Desire 530	35.56 MB/s +13%
Honor 5C	51.9 MB/s +64%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	20.82 MB/s -34%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Huawei Y6 II Compact	17.12 MB/s
LG K10	45 MB/s +163%
HTC Desire 530	18.22 MB/s +6%
Honor 5C	24.21 MB/s +41%
Samsung Galaxy J3 2016	18.7 MB/s +9%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Settings	Value
	high	24 fps
	very low	30 fps

... in comparison

Dead Trigger 2
	Settings	Value
	high	29 fps

... in comparison

Max. Load

Idle


40.5 °C	41.8 °C	44.7 °C
40.1 °C	40.5 °C	45 °C
39.5 °C	39.9 °C	42.9 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 41.7 °C


41.2 °C	41.5 °C	42.2 °C
40.1 °C	41 °C	41 °C
40.2 °C	40.6 °C	40.7 °C

Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 40.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Huawei Y6 II Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.32 Watt
Idle	0.57 / 1.53 / 1.6 Watt
Load	2.82 / 5.69 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh	Honor 5C 3000 mAh	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh
Power Consumption		8%	-28%	-79%
Idle Minimum *	0.57	0.96 -68%	0.89 -56%	1.58 -177%
Idle Average *	1.53	1.14 25%	2.07 -35%	2.59 -69%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	1.23 23%	2.15 -34%	2.66 -66%
Load Average *	2.82	2.45 13%	3.46 -23%	5.22 -85%
Load Maximum *	5.69	2.92 49%	5.18 9%	5.67 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		19h 35min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 22min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 42min

	Huawei Y6 II Compact 2200 mAh	LG K10 2300 mAh	HTC Desire 530 2200 mAh	Honor 5C 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J3 2016 2600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-10%	-14%	-16%	17%
Reader / Idle	1175	1123 -4%	1117 -5%	997 -15%	1212 3%
H.264	682	603 -12%	457 -33%	602 -12%	590 -13%
WiFi v1.3	623	453 -27%	425 -32%	584 -6%	502 -19%
Load	222	231 4%	250 13%	156 -30%	433 95%

Pros

+ 不错的机身工艺

+ 低售价

+ 双SIM卡

+ 优秀的触控屏幕

+ 非常明亮的屏幕

+ 优秀的可视角度稳定性

+ 相对较高的性能

+ 优秀的电池续航

+ 高速内部闪存

Cons

- 屏幕对比度较低...

- ...和不准确的色彩还原

- 安卓系统版本较老

- 相机成像模糊

- 扬声器效果差

- microSD读卡器速度慢

- 充电时间长

In review: Huawei Y6 II Compact. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

华为的Y6 II Compact有三个非常清晰的核心竞争力：性能，电池续航和售价。我们的测试机在这三个方面表现都十分优秀，不过其他方面像是较弱的相机和低对比度屏幕都不能算是吸引人。

尽管它的机身采用了塑料材质，但有纹理的机背和高品质工艺给了它十足的质感。同时，一些额外功能如双SIM卡、microSD卡槽、USB OTG、收音机和LTE都一应俱全。而较差的扬声器、过时的操作系统和高发热量则背道而驰。

华为这台机型的设计重点很明显——高性价比和优秀电池续航。不过，这台智能手机的其他方面都有所欠缺，其中有几项让人不免难以接受。

喜欢它简洁设计，或者只是需要一台性能优秀、性价比高的智能手机的用户都可以考虑华为的Y6 II Compact。不过，请不要对它的相机期待太高，同样也请也不要期待得到色彩绚丽的屏幕或者优秀的扬声器。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Huawei Y6 II Compact - 09/13/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Chassis

71%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 90%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

41 / 60 → 68%

Weight

93%

Battery

93%

Display

82%

Games Performance

9 / 63 → 15%

Application Performance

31 / 70 → 45%

Temperature

84%

Noise

100%

Audio

44 / 91 → 48%

Camera

56%

Average

66%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华为 Y6 II Compact 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer, 2016-09-19 (Update: 2016-09-24)