联想YOGA 6 13可折叠评测。笔记本电脑现在有了衣服和布料
13.3英寸的2021年联想Yoga 6 13直接继承了去年的Yoga 6 13,取代了旧的Ryzen 7 4700UCPU,改为较新的Ryzen 7 5500U。尽管Yoga系列应该是联想中高端消费笔记本的主场,但Yoga 6 13的价格相当便宜,在我们的评测中配置的价格仅为800美元左右。
瑜伽6 13最引人注目的特点是其织物包覆的外盖,使该系统从其他可转换的笔记本电脑选项中脱颖而出。这个领域的竞争者包括其他经济实惠的机型,如 Acer Spin 3 SP313, 戴尔Inspiron 2合1, HP Envy x360 13, 或 华硕VivoBook Flip.
更多联想评论。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 18.2 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
85.4 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.1 kg | 13 mm | 13.20" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
83.7 % v7 (old) | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 CB 13IML05 82B80010GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.95 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
箱子 - 深蓝色织物的风格
我们必须为联想偏离典型的塑料、金属、碳纤维,甚至是皮革的做法点赞。 皮质 构成了市场上大多数其他笔记本电脑的表面。制造商已经做了很好的工作,将织物沿着机盖的边缘整合和固定,实现了织物和玻璃屏幕之间的无缝过渡。由于织物只适用于外盖,所以塑料键盘甲板和底座没有任何特殊的材质。
我们对织物包裹的外盖的主要担心是,它的表面经常暴露在各种元素中,包括手指、污垢、灰尘和可能的液体,很难适当地清洁。我们不会惊讶地看到其干净的蓝色表面随着时间的推移而变黑或变褐,形成难看的外观。微软Surface平板电脑上的Alcantara材料也存在类似问题。
该系统的厚度为18.2毫米,比包括IdeaPad Flex 5在内的大多数可转换笔记本电脑略厚。瑜伽C940,以及惠普Spectre x360 13。长度和宽度可与ZenBook Flip 13 UX363但我们认为它可以更小,因为Yoga 6 13的顶部和底部边框有点厚。
连接性 - 良好的端口选择
令人讨厌的是,只有沿左边缘的USB-C端口支持Power Delivery,这意味着你只能在这一侧为笔记本电脑充电。沿着右边的USB-C端口不支持Power Delivery。
与ZenBook Flip 13不同的是,没有集成HDMI端口。由于采用了AMD处理器,所以也不支持Thunderbolt。
沟通
该系统配备了Realtek RTL8852AE,用于Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.2连接,而不是通常的英特尔AX200/201,可能是为了节省成本。传输速率很稳定,但通常比使用英特尔模块的笔记本电脑要慢。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US |
网络摄像头
该相机像现在大多数笔记本电脑一样集成了一个手动快门。然而,相机质量仍然很差。
维护
只要你有一把T5 Torx扳手,底板就很容易拆卸。主板一旦暴露出来,就可以轻松地进行WLAN或M.2固态硬盘的升级,尽管如果升级固态硬盘,必须撕掉联想的贴纸。内存是焊接的,因此不能升级。
配件和保修
盒子里除了交流电适配器和文件外没有其他东西,这令人失望,因为该系统完全支持主动笔。标准的一年有限保修期适用。
输入设备 -更多的是IdeaPad而不是ThinkPad
键盘
如果你过去在IdeaPad或Yoga笔记本上打过字,那么你会对Yoga 6 13的打字感觉有一个很好的概念。键的反馈和行程都比较轻和浅,特别是与ThinkPad型号或竞争者的更硬和更深的键相比。 HP Envy x360 13.太糟糕了,这里的按键没有更接近联想在其卓越的ThinkPad系列上提供的东西。
与其他Yoga笔记本电脑相比,按键布局略有变化。特别是,现在最上面一排的次要功能与Yoga 9i 14或Yoga Slim 7上的按键不同,部分原因是加入了一个相机杀毒开关。
触摸板
点击板的尺寸偏小,为10 x 6.4厘米,相比之下,11.3 x 6.8厘米是在 XPS 13 7390 2-in-1.牵引力完全平稳,只有在以较慢的速度滑行时才有一点粘性,可以更准确地控制。不幸的是,由于点击板的行程较浅,反馈较弱,所以点击不令人满意。用户将需要一个外部鼠标来进行长时间的操作。
显示 - 全sRGB覆盖
友达光电B133HAN05系列面板在许多13.3英寸笔记本电脑上很常见,包括在 华硕ZenBook 13 UX333.然而,这是我们第一次看到 "B133HAN05.F "的变体。对比度非常好,超过1000:1,我们的独立亮度测量确实非常接近联想声称的300尼特。颜色也很鲜艳,可与许多采用1080p面板的成本较高的超极本相媲美。另一方面,响应时间只有平均水平,特别是在游戏时有明显的重影。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 291.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1534:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US AU Optronics B133HAN05.F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Samsung, SDC414A, OLED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 AMOLED, 13.2", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx Samsung SDC4149, OLED, 13.3", 3840x2160 | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Sharp LQ134N1JW53, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 CB 13IML05 82B80010GE IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 26% | 1% | -0% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 69.7 | 99.4 43% | 70 0% | 69.8 0% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 100 1% | 88.5 -11% | 98.8 0% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.4 | 96 34% | 81.2 14% | 70.6 -1% | ||
Response Times | 95% | 95% | 92% | -45% | -2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.8 ? | 2 ? 96% | 2 ? 96% | 2.8 ? 94% | 64 ? -37% | 47 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 2 ? 93% | 2 ? 93% | 2.8 ? 90% | 44 ? -53% | 30 ? -4% |
PWM Frequency | 60 | 60 ? | 242.7 ? | |||
Screen | -29% | 252% | -68% | 24% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 291.5 | 353 21% | 287 -2% | 355 22% | 551.3 89% | 242 -17% |
Brightness | 294 | 359 22% | 289 -2% | 368 25% | 517 76% | 232 -21% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 95 2% | 96 3% | 93 0% | 91 -2% | 85 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.1 47% | 0.01 95% | 0.37 -95% | 0.235 -24% | |
Contrast | 1534 | 3530 130% | 28700 1771% | 1490 -3% | 1030 -33% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.83 | 3.98 -4% | 2.24 42% | 5.74 -50% | 1.45 62% | 1.99 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.43 | 53.07 -530% | 3.69 56% | 9.52 -13% | 2.86 66% | 2.77 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.07 | 6.69 -525% | 1.7 -59% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 1.41 77% | 2.73 56% | 2.2 65% | 1.3 79% | 1.78 71% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.39 92% | 2.46 89% | 2.03 108% | 2.14 103% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 6469 100% | 6346 102% | 6523 100% | 6505 100% | 6580 99% | 6567 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73.6 | 65 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.6 | 99 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 33% /
-5% | 124% /
176% | 8% /
-24% | -7% /
9% | 4% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间涵盖了99%以上的sRGB,与大多数中端到高端超极本一样。其他机型上的某些AMOLED面板,如三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 13能够为更深的色彩提供更广泛的范围。
这款显示器开箱后的校准效果很差,灰度和色彩的deltaE值分别为6.2和3.83,相对较高。自己校准面板将大大改善颜色和灰度,使其deltaE值远低于2。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度很差,尤其是在晴天或其他明亮的阴天时。遮阳板肯定有助于防止颜色被冲淡,但明显的眩光是永远存在的。
请确保通过Radeon软件禁用AMD Vari-Bright,否则在电池供电的情况下,最大亮度会自动下降。
性能 - 六核7纳米的AMD是快速的
联想只提供集成了Ryzen 7 5500U的CPU。 Radeon RX Vega 7图形,而没有其他选择。这个特定的六核处理器是Zen 2 CPU,尽管有5xxxU的命名惯例,但原始性能水平仍可与英特尔的大多数Core i7 U系列CPU相媲美。
我们的设备在运行以下各种性能基准测试之前,通过联想Vantage设置为极限性能模式,以获得尽可能高的分数。我们建议用户熟悉Vantage和Radeon软件,因为大多数联想特有的功能和更新都在这里切换。
值得注意的是,内部显示器支持AMD FreeSync,以消除游戏时的撕裂现象,这在其他转换设备上并不常见。
处理器
原始多线程性能比采用酷睿i7-1165G7的竞争对手的笔记本电脑快10%左右。 酷睿i7-1165G7这是英特尔目前最顶级的Tiger Lake-U CPU。然而,单线程性能则慢了约20%。如果你重视多线程性能而不是单线程,那么AMD Ryzen系统可能是比英特尔更好的投资,反之亦然。
除了在我们的CineBench R15 xT循环测试开始时时钟速率出现不寻常的短暂下降外,性能的可持续性很好,正如我们下面的结果所示。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (2223 - 3316, n=20) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (449 - 461, n=19) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6030 - 8565, n=19) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1149 - 1183, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (995 - 1412, n=20) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (170 - 179, n=18) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (358 - 490, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4174 - 4378, n=19) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (29585 - 36896, n=18) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (1070 - 1126, n=20) | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (4063 - 5917, n=20) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (6.7 - 9.74, n=20) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (60 - 80.7, n=17) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VD008WGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U (0.607 - 0.67, n=19) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE |
* ... smaller is better
系统性能
PCMark结果比大多数竞争的英特尔第11代Tiger Lake-U超极本略高,可能部分是由于AMD CPU的多线程性能更高。请记住,尽管PCMark成绩可能表明,现实世界的图形性能仍然比Iris Xe系列慢。
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4626 - 5301, n=13) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8390 - 9789, n=13) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (6262 - 7958, n=13) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (4513 - 5540, n=13) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T |
PCMark 10 Score | 5209 points | |
Help |
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示在网页浏览或视频流时没有DPC延迟问题,但在运行Prime95等高CPU负载时延迟会激增。在4K60 FPS下的视频播放很流畅,没有任何丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试装置配备了一个中档的西部数据SN530 M.2 2242 NVMe固态硬盘。顺序写入率在2400MB/s时还算不错,但理论写入率相对较慢,最高可达950MB/s。事实上,我们在基准测试中只能达到650MB/s,表明在大多数情况下,理论写入率可能是无法实现的。
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 CB 13IML05 82B80010GE Samsung PM991 MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 204% | 88% | 93% | 261% | ||
Seq Read | 1860 | 2767 49% | 1771 -5% | 1337 -28% | 3789 104% | |
Seq Write | 500 | 1368 174% | 894 79% | 652 30% | 2257 351% | |
4K Read | 36.26 | 46.86 29% | 53.5 48% | 61.8 70% | 54.2 49% | |
4K Write | 118.6 | 140.1 18% | 157.8 33% | 106.7 -10% | 78.7 -34% | |
4K-64 Read | 419 | 954 128% | 478.1 14% | 565 35% | 1330 217% | |
4K-64 Write | 219 | 1361 521% | 741 238% | 757 246% | 2038 831% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.102 | 0.051 50% | 0.156 -53% | 0.079 23% | 0.042 59% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.17 | 0.022 87% | 0.023 86% | 0.046 73% | 0.04 76% | |
Score Read | 641 | 1277 99% | 709 11% | 761 19% | 1763 175% | |
Score Write | 388 | 1638 322% | 988 155% | 929 139% | 2343 504% | |
Score Total | 1300 | 3507 170% | 2034 56% | 2067 59% | 4938 280% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 880 | 2767 214% | 960 9% | 912 4% | 2270 158% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 185.3 | 1072 479% | 648 250% | 696 276% | 670 262% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 212.7 | 1319 520% | 882 315% | 994 367% | 1525 617% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 65% | 12% | 31% | 130% | ||
Write 4K | 89.2 | 143 60% | 170.6 91% | 64.8 -27% | 311.1 249% | |
Read 4K | 33.09 | 50.2 52% | 44.51 35% | 98 196% | 56.6 71% | |
Write Seq | 988 | 1963 99% | 872 -12% | 994 1% | 2397 143% | |
Read Seq | 1322 | 1990 51% | 1188 -10% | 1440 9% | 2277 72% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 332.6 | 375 13% | 483.1 45% | 444.5 34% | 803 141% | |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 389.3 | 363.7 -7% | 284.3 -27% | 397.1 2% | 849 118% | |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 984 | 3086 214% | 950 -3% | 1265 29% | 2410 145% | |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2461 | 3382 37% | 1872 -24% | 2501 2% | 4954 101% | |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 405.6 | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 930 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 135% /
154% | 50% /
61% | 62% /
70% | 196% /
213% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--由于只有8GB的内存,情况不一。
3DMark的结果大约比竞争者英特尔 Iris Xe80 EUs和96 EUs。对AMD来说,幸运的是,在真实世界的游戏中,性能差距通常比较窄。我们怀疑,有限的8GB系统内存也是我们机器上整体帧率的瓶颈。
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (3353 - 6249, n=58) | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ARE05 82A20008GE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ALC05 82LM005YGE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (1807 - 5086, n=58) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
Fujitsu Lifebook U939 i5 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5361 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 19193 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2880 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1107 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (17.1 - 41.1, n=40) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (8.9 - 20.3, n=40) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 20WK0024GE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 OLED UM325UA | |
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 (5.85 - 14.3, n=37) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US | |
Asus Zenbook S UX393JA | |
Asus VivoBook S13 S333JA-DS51 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 85.6 | 21.9 | 8.98 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.9 | 20.4 | 13.6 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 97.7 | 75 | 44.4 | 41.6 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 29.7 | 15.2 | 9.83 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.9 | 28.7 | 25 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 72.8 | 27.4 | 22.5 | 20.7 |
Emissions — Quiet For Basic Workloads
系统噪音
在简单地发送电子邮件或视频流时,风扇的噪音通常很安静。如果在极限性能模式下浏览网页,风扇的噪音偶尔会跳到33dB(A),然后迅速回落到26.3dB(A)或更低。
当运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,风扇噪音会明显上升。在这种情况下,风扇的噪音会在38 dB(A)到41 dB(A)之间,这与我们在微星Summit E13 Flip Evo或Galaxy Book Pro 13上观察到的情况不一样。值得庆幸的是,该系统只有在需要的时候才会发出声音。通过联想Vantage将系统设置为智能冷却或节省电池,可以降低风扇噪音上限,但要以性能为代价。
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US Vega 7, R5 5500U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 CB 13IML05 82B80010GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung PM991 MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -11% | -6% | 0% | -3% | 1% | |
off / environment * | 25.1 | 27 -8% | 27 -8% | 25.3 -1% | 24.5 2% | 26.5 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.1 | 27 -8% | 27 -8% | 25.4 -1% | 24.7 2% | 26.5 -6% |
Idle Average * | 25.1 | 27 -8% | 27 -8% | 25.4 -1% | 24.7 2% | 26.5 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.1 | 27 -8% | 27 -8% | 25.4 -1% | 26.4 -5% | 26.5 -6% |
Load Average * | 41 | 46 -12% | 40.7 1% | 25.4 38% | 37.8 8% | 32.6 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.6 | 44.6 -16% | 41.4 -7% | |||
Load Maximum * | 38.7 | 46.6 -20% | 40.7 -5% | 44.8 -16% | 48.8 -26% | 35.5 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 25.1 dB(A) |
Load |
| 41 / 38.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) |
温度
即使在重载的情况下,笔记本电脑的大部分表面温度仍然很低。只有顶部和底部的两个小热点会变得非常热,温度高达41摄氏度至53摄氏度,但幸好这些区域远离掌托和大多数按键。其他机型如三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 13往往有较冷的热点,但平均温度较高。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
压力测试
当使用Prime95时,CPU会在最初的几秒钟内提升到3.9GHz,然后在接下来的几分钟内下降到3.4GHz,直到核心温度达到93C。然后时钟频率会下降并稳定在2.6GHz,以保持72C的较低核心温度。
运行Witcher 3 ,更能代表真实世界的压力。在类似的条件下,AMD处理器将稳定在67摄氏度,而微星Summit E13 Flip则为65摄氏度。
用电池供电运行会稍微降低性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为9921和5050分,而在主电源上则为9793和5220分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 39 |
Prime95压力 | 2.6 | -- | 72 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 2.5 | 775 | 69 |
Witcher 3 Stress | 1.4 | 1400 | 67 |
扬声器 - 适合视频通话,不适合多媒体
由于低音再现不佳,内部扬声器的音频质量低于平均水平。音乐和视频听起来很尖锐,无论音量设置如何,都是一种清晰但不令人满意的音频体验。扬声器对语音通话效果很好,但建议使用耳机进行任何形式的多媒体播放。
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Energy Management — Low Consumption For Long Battery Life
消耗功率
根据亮度设置,在桌面上空转仅消耗5至7瓦,而在Galaxy Book Pro 360 13上则为5至12瓦,这是因为后者的AMOLED触摸屏。
运行游戏会消耗33瓦到42瓦,而Summit E13 Flip Evo在类似条件下会消耗47瓦到52瓦。某些intelTiger Lake-U机器在游戏时可能会消耗更多的电力,但它们往往也能提供稍快的性能。
在运行极端负载时,我们能够从小型(约9.4 x 4.1 x 3厘米)的45瓦交流适配器中记录到46.5瓦的临时最大功耗。
Off / Standby | 0.23 / 0.65 Watt |
Idle | 5 / 6.3 / 6.9 Watt |
Load |
41.5 / 46.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 13.2" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), OLED, 3840x2160, 13.3" | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 CB 13IML05 82B80010GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM991 MZALQ128HBHQ-000L2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | -5% | -23% | -27% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4.4 12% | 5 -0% | 5.7 -14% | 4.8 4% | 3.7 26% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 7.4 -17% | 6 5% | 8.4 -33% | 8.4 -33% | 5.5 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 11.3 -64% | 11.7 -70% | 8.8 -28% | 8.6 -25% | 6.5 6% |
Load Average * | 41.5 | 22 47% | 28 33% | 38.9 6% | 47.1 -13% | 27 35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 33.2 | 22.8 31% | 28.3 15% | 40.5 -22% | 51.6 -55% | |
Load Maximum * | 46.5 | 42.5 9% | 53 -14% | 66.9 -44% | 65.9 -42% | 30.6 34% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
电池寿命
内部的60Wh电池提供了将近13.5小时的实际WLAN使用时间,比预期的14英寸敞篷车要长。从空电到满电只需要不到2小时。
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US R5 5500U, Vega 7, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 13 UX363EA-HP069T i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 13 i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-aw2003dx i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60 Wh | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 CB 13IML05 82B80010GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 22% | 46% | -32% | -1% | -42% | |
Reader / Idle | 1050 | 1227 17% | 1880 79% | 713 -32% | 1267 21% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 791 | 639 -19% | 725 -8% | 366 -54% | 672 -15% | 457 -42% |
Load | 121 | 203 68% | 203 68% | 108 -11% | 109 -10% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 不同并不意味着更好
从客观角度看,与通常的塑料或金属相比,外盖织物有其优点和缺点。其粗糙的质地可以隐藏指纹和其他小瑕疵,而这些瑕疵在大多数其他笔记本电脑上有时很容易发现。另一方面,这种面料很难清洗,它很容易吸收油脂和污垢,随着时间的推移,这些污垢只会越积越多。
织物是一个有趣的卖点,我们建议用户在购买前亲自去看一看,感受一下。它是典型的光滑金属的一股新鲜空气,但它也有过时的风险。
Yoga 6 13的其他显著优势包括快速的AMD处理器和色彩准确的1080p触摸屏,这与英特尔驱动的超极本如华硕ZenBook Flip 13或惠普Spectre x360 13.不幸的是,有限的8GB不可升级的内存可能会让重度多任务的人感到失望。只要你不看重某些功能,如红外线、Thunderbolt或HDMI,这就是一台体面的可转换副笔记本,具有很强的色彩和性能。
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 82ND0009US
- 07/12/2021 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo