联想 Yoga 700-11ISK 变形本简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13-9365 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 70 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
|
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 300 cd/m²
Contrast: 909:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE HD Graphics 5300, 5Y10c, Lite-On IT L8T-128L9G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 17% | 49% | 53% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.6 | 53.2 22% | 65.5 50% | 67.5 55% | 44.54 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 64.2 | 72.4 13% | 96.1 50% | 96.6 50% | 65.7 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.17 | 52.9 17% | 66.9 48% | 69 53% | 46.15 2% |
Response Times | -54% | 611% | -54% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 23 ? | 38 ? -65% | 20 ? 13% | 46 ? -100% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 19 ? | 27 ? -42% | 34 ? -79% | 31 ? -63% | |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1000 ? 1900% | 50 ? 0% | ||
Screen | 7% | 17% | 41% | -0% | |
Brightness middle | 300 | 314 5% | 345 15% | 389.2 30% | 290 -3% |
Brightness | 284 | 308 8% | 328 15% | 392 38% | 286 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 93 13% | 91 11% | 92 12% | 86 5% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.48 -45% | 0.38 -15% | 0.27 18% | 0.42 -27% |
Contrast | 909 | 654 -28% | 908 0% | 1441 59% | 690 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.87 | 6.12 22% | 8.4 -7% | 3.61 54% | 6.5 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.75 | 10.92 38% | 11.9 33% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.45 | 6.1 28% | 4.3 49% | 3.8 55% | 6.35 25% |
Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.35 94% | 2.63 84% | 2.16 102% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6856 95% | 7391 88% | 7368 88% | 5969 109% | 7156 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 46.81 14% | 62 51% | 63 54% | 42 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 71.74 12% | 97 52% | 65 2% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
1% | 226% /
142% | 13% /
24% | 1% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2625 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3202 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3729 points | |
Help |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe | Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE Lite-On IT L8T-128L9G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -33% | -13% | -19% | -15% | |
Write 4k QD32 | 268.6 | 173.2 -36% | 197.1 -27% | 149.2 -44% | 216.7 -19% |
Read 4k QD32 | 324.2 | 136.4 -58% | 272 -16% | 243.7 -25% | 222.3 -31% |
Write 4k | 73.6 | 57.9 -21% | 76.8 4% | 68 -8% | 34.96 -52% |
Read 4k | 31.27 | 21.12 -32% | 29.3 -6% | 30.14 -4% | 23 -26% |
Write 512 | 301.9 | 176.2 -42% | 201 -33% | 158.2 -48% | 318.9 6% |
Read 512 | 385.7 | 226.2 -41% | 374.9 -3% | 313.1 -19% | 352.4 -9% |
Write Seq | 302.8 | 184.3 -39% | 199.9 -34% | 158.2 -48% | 322 6% |
Read Seq | 456.2 | 477.3 5% | 518 14% | 663 45% | 468.7 3% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 | |
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK | |
Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 911 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2705 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 466 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 27.9 | 14.8 | ||
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 21.8 | 12 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 5.1 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.3 °C / 0.6 F).
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.45 Watt |
Idle | 4.3 / 7.1 / 7.2 Watt |
Load |
14.6 / 15.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK 40 Wh | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng 33 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 37 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE 34 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -28% | -62% | 23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.3 | 5.3 -23% | 7.3 -70% | 2.9 33% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 8.2 -15% | 10 -41% | 5.5 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.2 | 9 -25% | 10.15 -41% | 5.7 21% |
Load Average * | 14.6 | 20.7 -42% | 25.2 -73% | 11.3 23% |
Load Maximum * | 15.7 | 21.4 -36% | 29.3 -87% | 13.6 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK 40 Wh | HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng 33 Wh | Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM 37 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3 38 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 3 11 80J8001WGE 34 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -41% | -25% | -10% | 7% | |
Reader / Idle | 864 | 474 -45% | 640 -26% | 791 -8% | 856 -1% |
H.264 | 462 | 311 -33% | 468 1% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 417 | 285 -32% | 321 -23% | 488 17% | 443 6% |
Load | 226 | 109 -52% | 112 -50% | 138 -39% | 260 15% |
Pros
Cons
联想Yoga 700-11ISK是一个小而多功能的变形本。与前代相比,得益于更先进的组件,联想提高了性能,特别是改进了媒体播放性能。您仍然应该认为变形本局限于运行简单的应用程序。如果您计划编辑电影或同时运行多个应用程序,该测试机型可能不是正确的选择。
Yoga 700-11ISK的其他优点包括被动散热,因此无操作声。IPS显示屏亮度高,可提供宽广的视角,但某些用户可能会遇到屏幕闪烁的问题。
轻巧便携——联想Yoga 700-11ISK是处理简单事务的好选择,但键盘却令人特别失望。
两个主要的缺点是键盘和性能。输入时,提供的反馈很少,它是我们迄今为止评测的最糟糕的键盘之一。我们还期望它能有更好的性能,因为即使m3处理器在负载下被严重节流,在更合理的散热方案下,它能更为出色。总的来说,在这个价格范围内,有更好的替代品 - 例如,宏碁 Aspire Switch 12 Alpha。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Lenovo Yoga 700-11ISK
- 02/07/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff