联想 Yoga 900S 12ISK 变形本简短评测
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML (Yoga 900 Series)
Processor
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, 20.19.15.4380
Memory
3.9 GB
, 933 MHz, 12-12-15-34, 双通道, 板载
Display
12.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 176 PPI, 电容式, IPS, Name: AUO B125HAN02.2, ID: AUO226D, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128, 128 GB
Weight
1.01 kg, Power Supply: 193 g
Price
1100 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 340.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 325.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.014 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 327.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1322:1 (Black: 0.248 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML 12.5", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 12.5", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre 13 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 12", 2304x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 49% | 26% | 50% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 44.15 | 42.98 -3% | 65.6 49% | 54.8 24% | 66.8 51% |
| sRGB Coverage | 64.2 | 62.8 -2% | 94.7 48% | 82.3 28% | 95.4 49% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.36 | 44.55 -2% | 67.5 49% | 56.6 25% | 68 50% |
| Response Times | -70% | -56% | -24% | -34% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 31.6 ? | 64 ? -103% | 50.8 ? -61% | 42.8 ? -35% | 41.2 ? -30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 30 ? -36% | 33.2 ? -51% | 24.8 ? -13% | 30.4 ? -38% |
| PWM Frequency | 62.5 ? | ||||
| Screen | -74% | 12% | 1% | 12% | |
| Brightness middle | 327.9 | 371 13% | 300.5 -8% | 385 17% | 387 18% |
| Brightness | 326 | 335 3% | 305 -6% | 350 7% | 358 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 84 -7% | 76 -16% | 86 -4% | 88 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.248 | 0.29 -17% | 0.184 26% | 0.17 31% | 0.47 -90% |
| Contrast | 1322 | 1279 -3% | 1633 24% | 2265 71% | 823 -38% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.43 | 8.51 -148% | 2.64 23% | 4.17 -22% | 1.6 53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.13 | 20.43 -187% | 5.06 29% | 7.61 -7% | 4 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.88 | 9.23 -391% | 2.8 -49% | 5.39 -187% | 1 47% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6460 101% | 6759 96% | 6999 93% | 7404 88% | 6680 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41.3 | 41 -1% | 60.9 47% | 62.7 52% | 61.6 49% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 62 -3% | 94.3 47% | 99.8 56% | 82.2 28% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -49% /
-59% | 2% /
10% | 1% /
3% | 9% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 62.5 Hz | ≤ 39 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 62.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 39 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 62.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450 20BVG733PB | |
| HP Spectre 13 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 | |
| Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz | |
| Toshiba Satellite Click 10 LX0W-C-104 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2736 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3194 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3912 points | |
Help | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Spectre 13 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 4% | 80% | 31% | 64% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 126.4 | 239 89% | 178.2 41% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 100.7 | 262.3 160% | 98.1 -3% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 131.1 | 352.8 169% | 222.3 70% | 545 316% | |
| Score Total | 1168 | 1037 -11% | 2335 100% | 1684 44% | |
| Score Write | 240 | 361 50% | 382 59% | 318 33% | |
| Score Read | 632 | 448 -29% | 1325 110% | 935 48% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.051 -34% | 0.035 8% | 0.035 8% | |
| Access Time Read * | 0.076 | 0.082 -8% | 0.047 38% | 0.088 -16% | 0.186 -145% |
| 4K-64 Write | 134.4 | 262.3 95% | 248.4 85% | 186.3 39% | 283 111% |
| 4K-64 Read | 505 | 370.9 -27% | 1153 128% | 767 52% | 509 1% |
| 4K Write | 90.9 | 70 -23% | 103.7 14% | 108.3 19% | 22.1 -76% |
| 4K Read | 35.76 | 29.07 -19% | 37.06 4% | 35.4 -1% | 16.4 -54% |
| Seq Write | 145.6 | 282.9 94% | 295.5 103% | 235.3 62% | 651 347% |
| Seq Read | 920 | 482.3 -48% | 1347 46% | 1323 44% | 1056 15% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128
Sequential Read:
826 MB/s
Sequential Write:
153 MB/s
512K Read:
470.3 MB/s
512K Write:
153.3 MB/s
4K Read:
40.74 MB/s
4K Write:
118.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
400.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
153.6 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L440 20AT004QGE | |
| Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet | |
| Lenovo B50-70 59-407828 | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 887 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 34458 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 3231 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 458 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 218 points | |
Help | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E544 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E544 | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 300-15IBR | |
| HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML | |
| Fujitsu Lifebook E544 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 13 80HE004LGE | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 80.8 | 24.9 | 14.6 | |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 29.5 | 16 | 13.6 | 4 |
| Overwatch (2016) | 13.8 | 8.4 |
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV128 | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN256HCHP | HP Spectre 13 HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | HP EliteBook Folio G1 V1C37EA HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -73% | 15% | -54% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 3.6 25% | 8.6 -79% | 2.7 44% | 6.8 -42% | 4.3 10% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 6.3 12% | 11 -53% | 2.7 62% | 10 -39% | 6 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.5 | 7.6 -1% | 11.3 -51% | 7.2 4% | 10.5 -40% | 6.4 15% |
| Load Average * | 17.4 | 27.2 -56% | 33.8 -94% | 22 -26% | 30.2 -74% | 22.7 -30% |
| Load Maximum * | 19.2 | 22.8 -19% | 36.2 -89% | 20.5 -7% | 33.6 -75% | 31.2 -63% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby |   0.28 / 0.32 Watt |
| Idle |  4.8 / 7.2 / 7.5 Watt |
| Load |
17.4 / 19.2 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad Yoga 260 20FD001XGE 44 Wh | HP Spectre 13 38 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 41 Wh | Dell XPS 13-9350 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet 37 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -31% | -42% | -5% | -23% | -41% | |
| Reader / Idle | 894 | 943 5% | 715 -20% | 782 -13% | 628 -30% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 582 | 346 -41% | 338 -42% | 501 -14% | 451 -23% | 300 -48% |
| Load | 219 | 92 -58% | 78 -64% | 231 5% | 150 -32% | 118 -46% |
Pros
+ 高品质镜面触控屏幕；1080p和1440p选项
+ 超长电池续航；大容量电池
+ 小巧便携；仅1千克重
+ 便于升级维护，可升级固态硬盘
+ 优秀的机身工艺
+ 完全无噪音
+ USB－C型接口
Cons
- 一般的NVMe固态硬盘性能
- 无SD读卡器或移动网络模组
- 一般的立体声扬声器
- 处理器和显卡降频问题
- 非常短的键程
- 售价高
Yoga 900S很容易让人一见钟情。它外观典雅，安静，续航时间长，同时十分便携可以满足室内以及移动中的使用需要。它的工艺品质和坚固度都配得上Yoga 900的旗舰定位。它是目前最实惠也最全面的变形本之一。
它让我们犹豫是否应该推荐的主要问题是键盘和降频。在测试软件和游戏中的表现表明用户将会无法完全利用它处理器的性能，相比其他搭配相同处理器的机型让人十分失望。只需要文字处理，上网和视频播放的用户可能会很难察觉到，但是我们认为在酷睿m系列处理器性能本来已经较低的情况下，完全发挥性能潜力就更加重要了。同时，它的键盘键程过短，可能会让适应了台式机键盘或大部分超极本键盘的用户很难接受。
另外，我们对它的系统也有一些不满之处。它没有搭配独立的视频输出接口，不支持手写笔和SD读卡器，也没有提供Thunderbolt 3接口。其他功能如NFC和GPS也将会让系统更加全面。不过，售价超过1000美元（约6538人民币）的Yoga 900S已经接近于性能更强更畅销的机型如XPS 13，ZenBook UX303或Spectre，因此除非用户对这台联想设备的一些功能如触控屏幕或360度转轴有特别的需要，可能它在竞争中很难占优势。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo Yoga 900S-12ISK-80ML
- 06/19/2016 v5.1 (old)
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Weighted Average
Price comparison
