联想Yoga Book C930(i5-7Y54, LTE, E-Ink)二合一笔记本评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
SD Card Reader - maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
Huawei Matebook E | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
Huawei Matebook E |
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 351 cd/m²
Contrast: 1526:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.26
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F BOE 0765, , 2560x1660, 10.8" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1826, 12.3" | Huawei Matebook E Chi Mei CMN7801, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 LSN120QL01L01, , 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE nicht auslesbar, Farbgamut: 70% lt. Hersteller, , 1920x1080, 10.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -13% | -3% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 88.5 | 68.5 -23% | 84.9 -4% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.2 -1% | 99.8 0% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.2 | 70.1 -16% | 79.9 -4% | ||
Response Times | -1% | 30% | 25% | 8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 42 ? 2% | 26 ? 40% | 28.4 ? 34% | 36 ? 16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 28 ? -4% | 22 ? 19% | 22.8 ? 16% | 27 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | 221.2 ? | ||||
Screen | 10% | -2% | -14% | -2% | |
Brightness middle | 351 | 461 31% | 439 25% | 388.1 11% | 382 9% |
Brightness | 338 | 444 31% | 428 27% | 344 2% | 363 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 93 7% | 92 6% | 78 -10% | 83 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.34 -48% | 0.35 -52% | 0.39 -70% | 0.37 -61% |
Contrast | 1526 | 1356 -11% | 1254 -18% | 995 -35% | 1032 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.59 | 3.43 25% | 5.17 -13% | 4.6 -0% | 3.61 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.81 | 5.55 43% | 7.68 22% | 9.1 7% | 7.92 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.26 | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 3.08 41% | 5.69 -9% | 6.1 -17% | 3.77 27% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 3.03 73% | 2.42 91% | 2.07 106% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 7712 84% | 7014 93% | 7999 81% | 7104 91% | 6760 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 74 | 64 -14% | 71 -4% | 59 -20% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 99 -1% | 100 0% | 91 -9% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
4% | 8% /
2% | 6% /
-8% | 3% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8734 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (8098 - 13618, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (5545 - 6248, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (57058 - 71128, n=3, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
Average Intel Core i5-7Y54 (8756 - 10501, n=3) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2232 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3244 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2385 points | |
Help |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 Samsung PM971 KUS020203M | Huawei Matebook E SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -18% | -24% | 36% | -88% | 8% | |
Read Seq | 880 | 691 -21% | 506 -42% | 1739 98% | 120.5 -86% | 844 ? -4% |
Write Seq | 759 | 670 -12% | 461 -39% | 1259 66% | 34.39 -95% | 679 ? -11% |
Read 512 | 721 | 261.1 -64% | 341.9 -53% | 698 -3% | 102.6 -86% | 653 ? -9% |
Write 512 | 665 | 241 -64% | 294.7 -56% | 869 31% | 26.58 -96% | 583 ? -12% |
Read 4k | 44.39 | 40.11 -10% | 32.46 -27% | 52.3 18% | 13.34 -70% | 48.1 ? 8% |
Write 4k | 90.8 | 98.8 9% | 65.3 -28% | 120 32% | 11.56 -87% | 94.5 ? 4% |
Read 4k QD32 | 270.9 | 301.8 11% | 381.8 41% | 247.9 -8% | 33.6 -88% | 410 ? 51% |
Write 4k QD32 | 165.6 | 172 4% | 184.4 11% | 259 56% | 13.79 -92% | 230 ? 39% |
AS SSD | -5% | -39% | 106% | -93% | 1% | |
Seq Read | 1241 | 1226 -1% | 489.8 -61% | 2130 72% | 128.4 -90% | 1279 ? 3% |
Seq Write | 797 | 514 -36% | 202.1 -75% | 887 11% | 28.76 -96% | 766 ? -4% |
4K Read | 43.38 | 38.82 -11% | 30.43 -30% | 44.11 2% | 45.5 ? 5% | |
4K Write | 91.6 | 88.6 -3% | 60.5 -34% | 125.8 37% | 91 ? -1% | |
4K-64 Read | 582 | 891 53% | 359.7 -38% | 2208 279% | 613 ? 5% | |
4K-64 Write | 231.7 | 144.3 -38% | 149.6 -35% | 598 158% | 273 ? 18% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.074 -30% | 0.107 -88% | 0.054 5% | 0.1095 ? -92% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.176 | 0.04 77% | 0.075 57% | 0.028 84% | 0.202 ? -15% | |
Score Read | 749 | 1053 41% | 439 -41% | 2465 229% | 786 ? 5% | |
Score Write | 403 | 284 -30% | 230 -43% | 812 101% | 441 ? 9% | |
Score Total | 1526 | 1847 21% | 890 -42% | 4470 193% | 1616 ? 6% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 448.1 | 173.2 -61% | 694 55% | 490 ? 9% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 94.3 | 83.8 -11% | 320.8 240% | 129.9 ? 38% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 254.5 | 140.7 -45% | 302.8 19% | 330 ? 30% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-10% | -32% /
-33% | 71% /
81% | -91% /
-89% | 5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F | |
Huawei Matebook E | |
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 615 (1032 - 1384, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1367 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4893 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 747 points | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 The Witcher 3 low | |
Average of class Convertible (22 - 354, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel HD Graphics 615 () | |
1366x768 The Witcher 3 medium | |
Average of class Convertible (28 - 257, n=42, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 high | |
Average of class Convertible (16 - 155.3, n=46, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=49, last 2 years) |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) | 35.1 | 18 | 7.9 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 61.4 | 28.9 | 18.4 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 26.4 |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M | Huawei Matebook E HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 HD Graphics 615, i5-7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Z8550, 64 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | 11% | -10% | 10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 40.5 4% | 36.3 14% | 47.2 -12% | 34 19% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.8 | 40.6 7% | 37.9 13% | 49.8 -14% | 40.2 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.7 | 37.8 -36% | 26.2 5% | 30.8 -11% | 25.7 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.7 | 32 -11% | 25.6 11% | 29.2 -2% | 27.1 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-5.3 °C / -9.5 F).
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.75 Watt |
Idle | 5.3 / 6.9 / 7.4 Watt |
Load |
19.7 / 30.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G, IPS, 2560x1660, 10.8" | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS , 1920x1080, 10.1" | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, IPS, 2736x1826, 12.3" | Huawei Matebook E i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1027, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160x1440, 12" | Average Intel HD Graphics 615 | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 44% | -2% | 1% | 9% | 7% | -64% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 2 62% | 3.1 42% | 3.9 26% | 5 6% | 4.12 ? 22% | 5.21 ? 2% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 4.6 33% | 8.8 -28% | 8.8 -28% | 6.3 9% | 7.02 ? -2% | 8.16 ? -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 5.7 23% | 9.8 -32% | 8.9 -20% | 7.8 -5% | 7.89 ? -7% | 11.1 ? -50% |
Load Average * | 19.7 | 11.5 42% | 22.7 -15% | 20 -2% | 19.5 1% | 20 ? -2% | 46.2 ? -135% |
Load Maximum * | 30.5 | 11.5 62% | 23.6 23% | 21.8 29% | 19.6 36% | 23.8 ? 22% | 67 ? -120% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 36 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) m3 m3-7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 45 Wh | Huawei Matebook E i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 33.7 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2 i5-7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 2016 Windows 64GB LTE Z8550, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 32 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 53% | 7% | 0% | 49% | 56% | |
Reader / Idle | 690 | 933 35% | 662 -4% | 1153 67% | 1344 ? 95% | |
H.264 | 395 | 668 69% | 773 ? 96% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 380 | 682 79% | 405 7% | 441 16% | 498 31% | 594 ? 56% |
Load | 153 | 198 29% | 134 -12% | 114.9 ? -25% |
Pros
Cons
新款Yoga Book的电子墨水屏非常独特。它最大的优点是它的多功能性。它非常小巧轻便,可用作笔记本电脑,平板电脑或电子阅读器。但当然,这种灵活性也需要一些妥协。
例如,键盘不适合频繁打字机,也没有背光。对于传统笔记本用户来说,接口很少是件麻烦事。如果您只需要一个电子阅读器,您可能会需要更轻的设备。
“联想笔记本部门针对的客户群体是那些希望将所有功能(手触,笔触,电子阅读器等)组合到一个设备中的人。正在寻找普通笔记本电脑的用户可能不会对其感到满意。”
尽管如此,令人惊讶的是联想已经成功地将所有这些功能组合到这样一个轻薄本中。它的设计和酷炫的功能将Book C930变成了一个真正吸引眼球的笔记本电脑。由于我们的评估系统中没有单独的电子墨水显示类别,因此我们手动为结果添加了两个百分点。
一些用户可能认为价格是另一个劣势——起价1050美元(约7000元人民币),该设备的定价约为其前身的两倍。除了许多改进之外,一些功能也已消失。没有了使用纸张图像数字化的可能性,更好的主摄像头也不见了,更不幸的是,续航时间明显短于其前代产品。不过性能上倒是有了显着提高,显示效果也更好。最重要的是:目前该设备没有真正的竞争对手。
Lenovo Yoga Book C930 YB-J912F
- 12/22/2018 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze