Notebookcheck Logo

联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5在审查中。具有良好电池寿命的14英寸动力源

有力的。

联想的移动电脑凭借强大的Ryzen 9 5900HX APU、16GB内存和明亮、高对比度的14英寸显示屏（2880x1800像素，90赫兹，IPS）在16:10格式下得分。伴随着良好的电池寿命和低噪音、低热量的发展。
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Laptop / Notebook Windows

通过Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5，联想在其产品线中拥有了一款时尚、紧凑的14英寸笔记本电脑，该产品由Ryzen 9 5900HX APU驱动。我们的数据库没有任何可立即比较的对手（超薄、移动、45瓦的CPU）。因此，我们将使用价格相近的14英寸笔记本电脑，采用ULV CPU（15至28瓦），如Schenker Vision 14，LG Gram 14Z90P，华硕ExpertBook B9 B9400CE，华为MateBook X Pro 2021，MSI Modern 14 B11SB作为比较。

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 (Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 35 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne-H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) - 2048 MB VRAM, RAM: 1600 MHz, dual-channel mode, 27.20.14028.11002
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, on-board, no memory slots
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, Lenovo LEN8A90, IPS, Dolby Vision, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, 1024 GB 
, M.2-2280 (NVMe), 912 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC287 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined headset port, Brightness Sensor, TPM 2.0
Networking
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.9 x 312.4 x 221.4
Battery
61 Wh, 3950 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.32 kg, Power Supply: 436 g
Price
1 Euro
Links
Lenovo homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
86 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2021
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8		1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
89.1 %
v7 (old)
SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1 kg15.6 mm14.00"2880x1800
88.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2021
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		967 g16.8 mm14.00"1920x1200
87.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		995 g14.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
87.8 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2021
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		1.3 kg14.6 mm13.90"3000x2000
82.2 %
v7 (old)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080

外壳 - 为Yoga Slim设计的时尚金属外壳

联想将Yoga的技术装进了一个光滑、纤细的铝制外壳中，外壳的颜色是深灰色（石板灰）。这款笔记本电脑没有维修舱口。电池被牢固地内置在设备中。这台笔记本电脑没有暴露出任何制造方面的缺陷。缝隙尺寸准确，没有材料突起。此外，底座和盖子可以稍微扭曲，但整个情况仍然保持在限制范围内。紧密的铰链使盖子牢牢地固定在位置上，几乎不会让它晃动。最大开孔角度略低于180度，用一只手打开盖子是可能的。

在尺寸方面，尽管在某些情况下有不同的屏幕格式，但在我们的比较领域中的设备没有太大的差别。华硕ExpertBook是最紧凑的设备。说到重量，有两个方面。超轻设备(Asus ExpertBook,LG Gram,Schenker Vision 14)的重量都不到1,000克。其余设备的重量都在300克以上。

Size comparison

❌
319 mm 219 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg320 mm 203 mm 14.9 mm 995 g313.4 mm 215.2 mm 16.8 mm 967 g312.4 mm 221.4 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 15.6 mm 1 kg304 mm 217 mm 14.6 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 联想笔记本电脑缺乏Thunderbolt技术

14英寸设备中的两个USB-C插槽根据USB 3.2 Gen 2标准工作。支持Power Delivery和通过USB-C的DisplayPort。因此，Yoga提供两个视频输出。联想还为该笔记本电脑配备了一个USB-A端口（USB 3.2 Gen 1）。不过，没有存储卡读卡器。

这些端口位于两边的后部区域。掌托旁边的空间仍然没有电缆。如果联想在设备的两侧都放置一个USB-C端口，那就更理想了。

左侧：2个USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery)
左侧：2个USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery)
右侧。组合音频，USB 3.2 Gen 1（Type-A），电源按钮
右侧。组合音频，USB 3.2 Gen 1（Type-A），电源按钮

沟通

Wi-Fi芯片（Realtek RTL8852A）支持802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax Wi-Fi标准并提供蓝牙5功能。在最佳条件下确定的传输速度（附近没有其他Wi-Fi设备，笔记本电脑和服务器PC之间的距离很短）是不错的，但它们显然落后于基于英特尔的竞争者的速度。我们使用Netgear Nighthawk AX12 Wi-Fi 6三频路由器进行测试。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1336 (1053min - 1440max) MBit/s +48%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1303 (653min - 1347max) MBit/s +45%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1129 (947min - 1229max) MBit/s +25%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
919 (452min - 952max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
900 (774min - 1005max) MBit/s
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (424 - 928, n=20)
787 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1486 (713min - 1549max) MBit/s +123%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1401 (1271min - 1454max) MBit/s +110%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1313 (1251min - 1558max) MBit/s +97%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 877, n=20)
745 MBit/s +12%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
667 (636min - 696max) MBit/s
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
663 (634min - 685max) MBit/s -1%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø667 (636-696)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1462 (713-1549)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1400 (1271-1454)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1313 (1251-1558)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (774-1005)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1282 (653-1347)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1129 (947-1229)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1336 (1053-1440)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头（0.9MP）产生的图像最大分辨率为1280x720像素。在色彩准确性方面存在问题。色彩偏差约为15，与目标（DeltaE小于3）有很大差距。

ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
26.3 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
17 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021: 24.41 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 35.27 ∆E
ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
21 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
0 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085: 19.41 ∆E min: 0 - max: 26.13 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
19 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
20 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
15 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER Vision 14: 15.97 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 24.28 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.8 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
20 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
14 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5: 15.25 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 21.26 ∆E
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
SCHENKER Vision 14SCHENKER Vision 14
SCHENKER Vision 14
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5

辅料

这台笔记本电脑带有通常的文件。一份快速启动指南和保修信息。

维护

必须拆下底盖才能进入内部。要做到这一点，需要拆除设备底部的所有螺丝。之后，可以用平铲子或灌浆料整理工具将底盖掀开。然后你可以接触到固态硬盘、WLAN模块、BIOS电池、电池和风扇。内存被牢固地焊接起来了。

Yoga Slim 7 Pro的内部
Yoga Slim 7 Pro的内部

担保

联想在德国为14英寸的产品提供了两年的保修期。将保修期延长至三年的现场保修将花费约90欧元（约106美元）。

输入设备 - 背光键盘

键盘

背光Chiclet键盘的平键提供了一个短的行程和一个清晰的压力点。我们喜欢按键所提供的阻力。键盘在打字过程中会有轻微的弯曲，但这并不证明是令人讨厌的。两段式键盘背光除了手动控制外，还提供了自动模式。总而言之，联想在这里提供了一个适合日常使用的键盘。

触摸板

具有多点触控功能的ClickPad（约12 x 7.5厘米）的光滑表面允许手指在其上轻松滑行。垫子对角落里的输入也有反应。它的行程很短，有一个清晰的压力点。

Yoga Slim 7 Pro的输入设备
Yoga Slim 7 Pro的输入设备

显示器 - 16:10格式的IPS

Yoga配备了一个14英寸的屏幕（2880x1800像素），格式为16：10。光面显示器的亮度（389.8cd/m²）和对比度（6533:1）分别非常好和优秀。90赫兹面板的响应时间是可以接受的，但它们不会让任何人感到震惊。

在40%及以下的亮度水平下，显示屏的闪烁频率为300Hz。这可能会导致敏感用户的头疼和/或眼睛问题。

像素网格
像素网格
屏幕出血
屏幕出血
419
cd/m²		430
cd/m²		444
cd/m²
362
cd/m²		392
cd/m²		378
cd/m²
360
cd/m²		368
cd/m²		355
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Lenovo LEN8A90 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 444 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 389.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 80 %
Center on Battery: 391 cd/m²
Contrast: 1352:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.44
ΔE Greyscale 5.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.44
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Lenovo LEN8A90, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"		SCHENKER Vision 14
CSOT T3_MNE007ZA1_1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14"		LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
LG Display LP140WU1-SPA1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14"		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
B140HAN06.B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9"		MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
BOE CQ NV140FHM-N4V, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Display
-0%
14%
-5%
-11%
-45%
Display P3 Coverage
76
75.4
-1%
97.6
28%
69.8
-8%
64.9
-15%
39.9
-47%
sRGB Coverage
100
99
-1%
99.9
0%
98.8
-1%
94.4
-6%
58.8
-41%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
75.6
76.4
1%
85.3
13%
71.3
-6%
66.3
-12%
41.2
-46%
Response Times
-13%
-38%
-80%
-39%
-15%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
37 ?(16, 21)
32.8 ?(15.6, 17.2)
11%
45 ?(20, 25)
-22%
60 ?(28.8, 31.2)
-62%
37.6 ?(17.6, 20)
-2%
25 ?(11, 14)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
15 ?(5, 10)
20.4 ?(10, 10.4)
-36%
23 ?(9, 14)
-53%
29.6 ?(14, 15.6)
-97%
26.4 ?(11.6, 14.8)
-76%
16 ?(9, 7)
-7%
PWM Frequency
300 ?(40)
92 ?(10)
-69%
Screen
14%
7%
22%
25%
-9%
Brightness middle
392
390
-1%
352
-10%
437
11%
502
28%
347
-11%
Brightness
390
387
-1%
332
-15%
421
8%
474
22%
311
-20%
Brightness Distribution
80
94
18%
91
14%
87
9%
89
11%
81
1%
Black Level *
0.29
0.29
-0%
0.22
24%
0.29
-0%
0.33
-14%
0.12
59%
Contrast
1352
1345
-1%
1600
18%
1507
11%
1521
13%
2892
114%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.4
2.8
18%
2.89
15%
1.8
47%
1.35
60%
5.05
-49%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.41
4.4
31%
4.66
27%
3.5
45%
3.67
43%
16.98
-165%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.44
1.8
48%
2.7
22%
1.4
59%
1.2
65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.44
3.5
36%
6.9
-27%
2.3
58%
1.7
69%
1.63
70%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.24 98%
2.34 94%
2.18 101%
2.24 98%
2.3 96%
CCT
6013 108%
6174 105%
7904 82%
6782 96%
6440 101%
6666 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69.1
76.4
11%
76
10%
65.4
-5%
61.1
-12%
38
-45%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99
-1%
100
0%
98.7
-1%
94.3
-6%
58
-42%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / 8%
-6% / 3%
-21% / 4%
-8% / 11%
-23% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

显示屏开箱后显示了非常体面的色彩再现，色彩偏差为3.4，它只是刚刚错过了目标（DeltaE小于3）。此外，它没有受到蓝色色调的影响。校准并没有带来任何改进。此外，sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率为100%。AdobeRGB（76%）和DCI-P3（76%）色彩空间没有被完全再现。

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
卡尔曼--灰鳞
卡尔曼--灰鳞
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度
CalMAN - ColorChecker（已校准）。
CalMAN - ColorChecker（已校准）。
CalMAN - 灰度表（已校准
CalMAN - 灰度表（已校准
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度（校准的）。
CalMAN - 色彩饱和度（校准的）。
瑜伽与sRGB
瑜伽与sRGB
瑜伽与AdobeRGB
瑜伽与AdobeRGB
瑜伽与DCI-P3
瑜伽与DCI-P3

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 300 Hz ≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 300 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 300 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

视角稳定的IPS面板可以从任何位置阅读。亮度和对比度可以让显示器在户外观看，但屏幕的反光表面破坏了这种体验。

在户外的瑜伽。
在户外的瑜伽。
视角
视角

性能 - 一个45瓦的APU被安置在紧凑的联想笔记本电脑中

有了Yoga Slim 7 Pro，联想在其阵容中拥有了一台14英寸的笔记本电脑，在所有CPU重的应用领域都有很好的表现。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

笔记本电脑提供三种能源配置（"智能冷却"、"高性能"、"省电模式"），你可以使用组合键 "Fn "+"Q "在它们之间切换。我们使用的是 "智能冷却 "模式。此外，我们使用 "高性能 "和 "省电 "配置文件运行了一些基准测试。结果可以在比较表中找到。

省电模式 智能制冷 高性能
PL1 12.5瓦 25瓦 45瓦
PL2 12.5瓦 35瓦 65瓦

在日常使用中，启用 "省电模式 "能源配置文件是没有问题的。在这种情况下，减少的计算能力对于办公和互联网的使用是绰绰有余的。此外，该模式还能使电池寿命略有增加。

处理器

Ryzen 9 5900HXAPU

（Cezanne）的CPU部分包括一个八核处理器，其基本运行速度为3.3 GHz。通过Turbo可以提高到4.65 GHz。还支持同步多线程（每个核心可以处理两个线程）。

Cinebench R15基准测试的多线程测试在3.6 GHz下处理很短的时间，之后时钟速度下降到3.3 GHz。单线程测试在3.6至4.65GHz下运行。在电池供电的情况下，CPU分别以3.3 GHz（多线程）或2.2至3.4 GHz（单线程）运行。

多线程（插入式
多线程（插入式
单线程（插入式
单线程（插入式

我们通过连续循环运行Cinebench R15基准的多线程测试至少30分钟来验证CPU Turbo在插电时是否也被持续使用。Turbo的使用程度不高。使用 "高性能模式 "配置文件会使时钟速度略有增加。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01052103154205256307358409451050115512601365147015751680178518901995Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø1902 (1801.56-1936.39)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Hoechstleistung: Ø1985 (1938.92-2024.19)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX; Akkusparmodus: Ø1064 (1018.33-1075.64)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø886 (876-943.04)
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø602 (507.87-688.11)
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø837 (823.72-913.58)
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø611 (464.15-634.96)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø771 (684.76-915.3)
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率（高性能）。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率（高性能）。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率（省电）。
运行CB15循环时的CPU时钟速率（省电）。
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
237 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1936 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
88.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4703 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
582 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1498 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
12109 Points
Help
Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R23
Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (358 - 2001, n=63, last 2 years)
1670 Points +11%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1515 Points +1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1500 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1498 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
1492 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1499, n=29)
1471 Points -2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
1404 Points -6%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1387 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1350 Points -10%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1306 Points -13%
Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=30)
12529 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
12181 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12109 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1555 - 21812, n=63, last 2 years)
11681 Points -4%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
6622 Points -45%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5878 Points -51%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5590 Points -54%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4611 Points -62%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4170 (4112.7min - 4169.54max) Points -66%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4043 (3994.31min - 4043max) Points -67%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook
  (128 - 790, n=59, last 2 years)
636 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
582 Points
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
581 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
581 Points 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
580 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=29)
573 Points -2%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
563 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
552 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
522 Points -10%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
505 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=30)
4847 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
4704 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4703 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (579 - 8541, n=59, last 2 years)
4542 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
2242 Points -52%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2235 Points -52%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2108 Points -55%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
2059 Points -56%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1663 Points -65%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1559 Points -67%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years)
250 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 243, n=25)
238 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
237 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
225 Points -5%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
219 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
209 Points -12%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
203 Points -14%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
202 Points -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=29)
2050 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
2024 Points +5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years)
1983 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1936 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
1076 Points -44%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
943 (876min - 943.04max) Points -51%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
915 Points -53%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
913 (828.19min - 893.66max) Points -53%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
688 (507.87min - 688.11max) Points -64%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
635 (464.15min - 634.96max) Points -67%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
747 Seconds * -194%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
713 Seconds * -181%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
566 Seconds * -123%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
543 Seconds * -114%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
525 Seconds * -107%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
442 Seconds * -74%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (159 - 2271, n=63, last 2 years)
360 Seconds * -42%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
254 Seconds *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
253 Seconds * -0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=29)
250 Seconds * +2%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5800 MIPS
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
5784 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5905, n=29)
5701 MIPS -2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
5547 MIPS -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2669 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)
5478 MIPS -6%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5408 MIPS -7%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5225 MIPS -10%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5192 MIPS -10%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5140 MIPS -11%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4883 MIPS -16%
7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=29)
57266 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
54374 MIPS +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
54089 MIPS
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11775 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years)
48300 MIPS -11%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
36011 MIPS -33%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
25894 MIPS -52%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
24151 MIPS -55%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
23950 MIPS -56%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
20624 MIPS -62%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
19404 MIPS -64%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (621 - 2350, n=58, last 2 years)
1795 Points +17%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1579 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1535 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
1529 Points 0%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1518 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1574, n=27)
1517 Points -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1514 Points -1%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1454 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
1442 Points -6%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1412 Points -8%
Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2557 - 14728, n=58, last 2 years)
10135 Points +38%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=27)
8188 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
7560 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7370 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5441 Points -26%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5186 Points -30%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5105 Points -31%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
5057 Points -31%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5040 Points -32%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4693 Points -36%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=29)
15.2 fps +7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
14.8 fps +4%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.2 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.97 - 25.1, n=58, last 2 years)
12.9 fps -9%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
8.26 fps -42%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
7.46 fps -47%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.87 fps -52%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
6.73 fps -53%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.5 fps -61%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.23 fps -63%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Subnotebook
  (38.5 - 220, n=57, last 2 years)
54.4 s * -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 87.4, n=29)
53.3 s * -9%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
51.4 s * -5%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
49.3 s * -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49 s *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
48.1 s * +2%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.6 s * +7%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.3 s * +8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
44.8 s * +9%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
44.1 s * +10%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.655 sec * -30%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.605 sec * -20%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.593 sec * -17%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.585 sec * -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.569 sec * -13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Akkusparmodus)
0.536 sec * -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.413 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years)
0.52 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.48 - 0.599, n=29)
0.507 sec * -0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.505 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX (Hoechstleistung)
0.501 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

快速而流畅的系统为CPU密集型应用提供了足够的处理能力。集成的GPU允许在有限的范围内玩电脑游戏。这一点得到了非常好的PCMark结果的补充。内存（16GB，DDR4-3200，板载）在双通道模式下运行，而且不可能扩展。

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4467 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4654 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5288 points
PCMark 10 Score
6414 points
Help
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4993 - 7788, n=50, last 2 years)
6454 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (6290 - 6507, n=5)
6429 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6414 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5104 Points -20%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5008 Points -22%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4877 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4870 Points -24%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4823 Points -25%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
10836 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (10087 - 10836, n=5)
10544 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (9476 - 11331, n=50, last 2 years)
10490 Points -3%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10368 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10184 Points -6%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
10170 Points -6%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10086 Points -7%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8088 Points -25%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (9852 - 10196, n=5)
9980 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
9852 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6440 - 10623, n=50, last 2 years)
8635 Points -12%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7826 Points -21%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
6834 Points -31%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6807 Points -31%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6774 Points -31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6719 Points -32%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5305 - 10983, n=50, last 2 years)
8143 Points +21%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (6660 - 7105, n=5)
6858 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
6709 Points
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5114 Points -24%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4989 Points -26%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4812 Points -28%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4583 Points -32%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4529 Points -32%

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试（网页浏览、4K视频播放、高负荷的Prime95）没有发现DPC延迟的任何不正常现象。该系统似乎适用于实时视频和音频编辑。这一声明适用于我们在进行测试时使用当前软件的审查设备。未来的更新可能会导致延迟的改善，甚至恶化。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1225 μs * -288%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1159 μs * -267%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
GeForce MX450, i7-1165G7, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
973 μs * -208%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
739 μs * -134%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
339.4 μs * -7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
316.1 μs *

* ... smaller is better

储存

SK Hynix公司的NVMe SSD（M.2-2280）作为系统驱动器；它的存储容量为1TB，提供良好的传输速度。

一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
一个NVMe SSD作为系统驱动器。
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3520 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3277 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 556 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 459.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2154 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2288 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 65.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 154 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N		SCHENKER Vision 14
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW		LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR		MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB		Average SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
63%
7%
-8%
7%
-27%
-2%
Write 4K
154
240
56%
198.9
29%
153.5
0%
197.5
28%
236.2
53%
140.4 ?(87.7 - 161.9, n=5)
-9%
Read 4K
65.3
90.9
39%
55.9
-14%
47.69
-27%
52.9
-19%
47.53
-27%
64.5 ?(48.7 - 72.3, n=5)
-1%
Write Seq
2288
4236
85%
2441
7%
2037
-11%
2174
-5%
974
-57%
2059 ?(1829 - 2288, n=2)
-10%
Read Seq
2154
4101
90%
1939
-10%
2208
3%
2156
0%
1043
-52%
1867 ?(1579 - 2154, n=2)
-13%
Write 4K Q32T1
459.9
662
44%
631
37%
516
12%
632
37%
603
31%
432 ?(382 - 482, n=5)
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
556
720
29%
704
27%
366.8
-34%
694
25%
299.3
-46%
495 ?(401 - 603, n=5)
-11%
Write Seq Q32T1
3277
5222
59%
2566
-22%
3021
-8%
3017
-8%
974
-70%
3777 ?(3018 - 6067, n=5)
15%
Read Seq Q32T1
3520
7102
102%
3451
-2%
3532
0%
3561
1%
1983
-44%
4204 ?(3341 - 7146, n=5)
19%
AS SSD
45%
-4%
-11%
-8%
-48%
11%
Seq Read
2965
4899
65%
2975
0%
2784
-6%
2794
-6%
1610
-46%
3325 ?(2432 - 5456, n=5)
12%
Seq Write
2697
3952
47%
1261
-53%
1362
-49%
2385
-12%
931
-65%
2415 ?(1266 - 3541, n=5)
-10%
4K Read
55.6
83.8
51%
49.97
-10%
52.5
-6%
60.7
9%
36.18
-35%
59.2 ?(48.9 - 72.2, n=5)
6%
4K Write
144.4
205
42%
168.4
17%
202.3
40%
180.8
25%
170.5
18%
169.1 ?(128.4 - 237, n=5)
17%
4K-64 Read
1589
2938
85%
1539
-3%
1136
-29%
1768
11%
457.3
-71%
1446 ?(917 - 1953, n=5)
-9%
4K-64 Write
1733
2077
20%
1517
-12%
1642
-5%
1800
4%
914
-47%
2526 ?(1733 - 3818, n=5)
46%
Access Time Read *
0.032
0.025
22%
0.036
-13%
0.038
-19%
0.037
-16%
0.092
-188%
0.035 ?(0.017 - 0.058, n=5)
-9%
Access Time Write *
0.026
0.02
23%
0.026
-0%
0.017
35%
0.073
-181%
0.019
27%
0.0252 ?(0.017 - 0.038, n=5)
3%
Score Read
1941
3512
81%
1886
-3%
1467
-24%
2108
9%
655
-66%
1838 ?(1257 - 2309, n=5)
-5%
Score Write
2147
2677
25%
1811
-16%
1980
-8%
2219
3%
1178
-45%
2937 ?(2147 - 4410, n=5)
37%
Score Total
5073
7939
56%
4579
-10%
4135
-18%
5392
6%
2144
-58%
5678 ?(4206 - 6729, n=5)
12%
Copy ISO MB/s
2218
2100
-5%
1510
-32%
1737
-22%
2065
-7%
1277
-42%
2288 ?(1301 - 3364, n=5)
3%
Copy Program MB/s
577
994
72%
950
65%
479.1
-17%
734
27%
438.4
-24%
745 ?(554 - 1337, n=5)
29%
Copy Game MB/s
1324
1859
40%
1470
11%
935
-29%
1629
23%
977
-26%
1687 ?(993 - 3096, n=5)
27%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
54% / 51%
2% / -0%
-10% / -10%
-1% / -2%
-38% / -40%
5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

AMD的Vega 8集成图形核心支持DirectX 12，速度高达2,100 MHz。正如我们的TheWitcher 3 测试所显示的那样，该最大值也可以保持很长时间。高性能 "的能源配置文件并不影响图形性能。3DMark的结果总体上略高于平均水平。

在图形性能方面肯定会有更多的表现。由于使用了焊接的内存，联想应该选择更快的LPDDR4X-4267内存而不是DDR4-3200内存。这将更好地利用GPU并提供更高的基准测试结果。

Fire Strike （插入式）
Fire Strike （插入式）
Fire Strike （电池供电）
Fire Strike （电池供电）
Fire Strike （插上电源，高性能模式
Fire Strike （插上电源，高性能模式
Fire Strike （插上电源，省电模式
Fire Strike （插上电源，省电模式
夜间突袭
夜间突袭
野生生物
野生生物
极端野生动物
极端野生动物
3DMark 11 Performance
6424 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
157223 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
25549 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3517 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1401 points
Help
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (968 - 16296, n=55, last 2 years)
9537 Points +52%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8435 Points +35%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6866 Points +10%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6718 Points +7%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6624 Points +6%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6294 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
6258 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (3459 - 7591, n=54)
5910 Points -6%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years)
37257 Points +25%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
30951 Points +4%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
30164 Points +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
29751 Points
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
27570 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26910 Points -10%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (13941 - 36134, n=46)
26903 Points -10%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
24152 Points -19%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (832 - 11887, n=59, last 2 years)
6977 Points +83%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5694 Points +49%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5422 Points +42%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5169 Points +35%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4795 Points +26%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
4689 Points +23%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
3820 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (1694 - 5041, n=54)
3676 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook
  (804 - 4501, n=60, last 2 years)
2577 Points +110%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1968 Points +60%
LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1604 Points +31%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1560 Points +27%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1441 Points +17%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1430 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1227 Points
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (540 - 1557, n=54)
1156 Points -6%

游戏性能

Ryzen 9 APU将我们数据库中发现的许多游戏流畅地呈现在屏幕上。大多数游戏在高清分辨率（1280x720像素）和中等至部分高质量水平下达到可玩的帧率。对硬件要求适中的游戏允许更多。甚至玩现代游戏也是可能的--在降低的质量设置下。

The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Strange Brigade | Dirt 5 | Far Cry 5 | F1 2021 | Monster Hunter Stories 2
The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook
  (33 - 118, n=35, last 2 years)
70.5 fps +65%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
59.9 (30.6min, 32.9P0.1, 40.4P1 - 211max) fps +41%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
59.1 fps +39%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
56 fps +31%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.6 (41min - 51max) fps +9%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42.6 (18min, 23.2P0.1, 32.4P1 - 119max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (19.6 - 55.2, n=35)
40.8 fps -4%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
82.1 (68.9min) fps +58%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 99.5, n=63, last 2 years)
62.5 fps +20%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
52.1 (48.3min) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (Hoechstleistung)
52.1 (49min) fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (23.3 - 72, n=57)
48.6 fps -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.5 (32min) fps -11%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.4 (32.6min) fps -11%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (Akkusparmodus)
43.7 (40.6min) fps -16%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
37.7 (25.7min) fps -28%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
84.9 fps +54%
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
58.1 fps +5%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (Hoechstleistung)
56.1 fps +1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
55.3 fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (25.9 - 144.7, n=62, last 2 years)
50.3 fps -9%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.1 fps -17%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (Akkusparmodus)
45.1 fps -18%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (26.9 - 64.9, n=57)
44.3 fps -20%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
23.2 fps -58%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Average of class Subnotebook
  (29.9 - 111.6, n=61, last 2 years)
62 fps +61%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.3)
56.2 fps +46%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.3)
40.8 fps +6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.3)
38.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.3, Hoechstleistung)
38.2 fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (21.9 - 50.1, n=52)
35.4 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.3)
31.4 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.3, Akkusparmodus)
31.3 fps -19%
GTA V - 1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
135 (48.1min, 71.4P1 - 239max) fps +29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (63.4 - 172.6, n=57, last 2 years)
119.1 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
105 (28.7min, 71.4P1 - 168max) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (Hoechstleistung)
105 (36.5min, 71.4P1 - 185max) fps 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (Akkusparmodus)
87.7 (22.5min, 58.8P1 - 185max) fps -16%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (34 - 148, n=42)
87.7 fps -16%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
86.3 (17min, 55.6P1 - 155max) fps -18%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
61.4 (6.35min, 33.3P1 - 196max) fps -42%
Strange Brigade - 1280x720 lowest AF:1
Average of class Subnotebook
  (65.6 - 229, n=60, last 2 years)
142.2 fps +62%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
106 (78.7min, 88.7P1 - 150max) fps +21%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
87.8 (67.5min, 76.2P1 - 123max) fps
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Hoechstleistung)
87.4 (63.9min, 76.7P1 - 116max) fps 0%
SCHENKER Vision 14
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
83.5 (17.3min, 27.4P1 - 373max) fps -5%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
79.5 (15.3min, 26.8P1 - 243max) fps -9%
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (43 - 117, n=50)
78.6 fps -10%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Akkusparmodus)
72.2 (52.5min, 63P1 - 94.8max) fps -18%
Dirt 5 - 1280x720 Ultra Low Preset
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
75.7 (42.5min, 55.5P0.1, 62.3P1 - 124.7max) fps +44%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
52.6 (20min, 26.5P0.1, 29.7P1 - 63max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (31.2 - 60.6, n=4)
46.8 fps -11%
Far Cry 5 - 1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37 - 132, n=45, last 2 years)
68.6 fps +37%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
50 (44min - 60max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (22 - 71, n=31)
46 fps -8%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
39 (32min - 44max) fps -22%
F1 2021 - 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.3 - 127.4, n=11, last 2 years)
77.5 fps +85%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
42 (32min - 49max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (23.9 - 58.2, n=22)
41.4 fps -1%
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
40 (32min - 48max) fps -5%
Monster Hunter Stories 2 - 1280x720 Low Preset
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
73.6 (53.4min, 54.8P0.1, 60.1P1 - 91.3max) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
  (43 - 73.6, n=4)
57 fps -23%

为了验证帧率是否在很长一段时间内保持基本稳定，我们让游戏《Witcher 3》在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行了约60分钟。角色没有被移动。没有发现帧率的下降。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

111621Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 R9 5900HX, Vega 8: Ø16.3 (13-18)
SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø12.6 (11-14)
MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085 i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450: Ø23 (20-25)
在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，GPU的测量结果
在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，GPU的测量结果
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 117 105 29.3 13.3 9.36
The Witcher 3 (2015) 67.2 42.6 20.8 14.1
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 124 96.4 55.4 52.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 38.5 19.5 12.9 9.22
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 55.3 43.9 38.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 50 24 22 21 14
Strange Brigade (2018) 87.8 33.4 28 24.1 15.9
Hunt Showdown (2020) 49.3 16.6 14.3 9.05
Dirt 5 (2020) 52.6 21.2 16.4 13.6 10.2
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 73.6 44.4 37.6 30
F1 2021 (2021) 94 42 32

排放 - 热量和噪音的发展仍在绿色范围内

噪声排放

尽管其APU非常强大，Yoga Slim产生的噪音非常小。在空闲使用和低负载的情况下，两个风扇通常是静止的，安静的。它们在负载下也保持低调。最大声压级为35dB(A)。

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 26.5 / 27.4 dB(A)
Load
35 / 34.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2022.619.624.330.522.62525.422.228.231.725.43127.726.828.93227.74019.720.321.730.719.75025.727.42729.925.7631719.619.320.3178016.217.115.916.916.210016.616.315.216.716.612517.718.315.117.817.716018.319.215.816.718.320017.620.814.614.717.625018.720.713.91418.731521.122.813.41421.140019.619.913.512.119.650019.520.712.812.219.563019.320.112.511.919.380021.521.814.111.521.5100025.626.715.511.825.6125023.924.914.611.823.9160022.222.713.612.322.2200024.425.514.212.424.4250023.123.913.312.323.1315020.320.712.91320.3400018.819.713.213.318.8500017.618.313.513.317.6630015.816.713.513.515.8800015.216.213.913.915.21000015.81715.815.515.8125001516.215.815.3151600012.113.113.112.812.1SPL33.434.32625.133.4N1.71.90.70.61.7median 18.8median 20.1median 13.9median 13.3median 18.8Delta2.52.80.81.72.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8		SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
 		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Noise
-2%
5%
-6%
4%
-13%
-3%
1%
off / environment *
26
25
4%
26
-0%
24
8%
25.4
2%
26
-0%
25.3 ?(22.4 - 30.8, n=47)
3%
24.1 ?(22.5 - 26, n=57, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Minimum *
26
25
4%
26
-0%
24
8%
25.6
2%
26
-0%
26 ?(22.4 - 34.2, n=45)
-0%
24.3 ?(22.5 - 31.2, n=57, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Average *
26.5
25
6%
26
2%
24
9%
25.6
3%
26
2%
26.5 ?(22.4 - 34.2, n=47)
-0%
24.7 ?(22.5 - 31.2, n=57, last 2 years)
7%
Idle Maximum *
27.4
26.9
2%
26
5%
24
12%
25.6
7%
26
5%
27.2 ?(22.6 - 34.4, n=45)
1%
26.1 ?(22.5 - 33.5, n=57, last 2 years)
5%
Load Average *
35
38.6
-10%
30.5
13%
47.5
-36%
28.7
18%
46.3
-32%
36.5 ?(23.3 - 47.8, n=45)
-4%
35 ?(24.3 - 45.5, n=56, last 2 years)
-0%
Load Maximum *
34.6
41.2
-19%
30.5
12%
47.5
-37%
38.2
-10%
52.9
-53%
40.6 ?(32 - 57.8, n=47)
-17%
41.7 ?(27.3 - 50.8, n=57, last 2 years)
-21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
41.2
47.5
32
46.3

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试中的Yoga Slim 7。
压力测试中的Yoga Slim 7。

我们的压力测试（Prime95和FurMark至少运行一个小时）是由CPU和GPU分别以3.2GHz和1200MHz的频率执行。该压力测试代表了一种极端情况。通过这个测试，我们检查系统是否在全负荷下保持稳定。

这台紧凑的笔记本电脑并没有发热多少。在压力测试中，我们在两个测量点登记的温度超过40℃（约104°F）。在日常使用中，温度都在绿色范围内。

Max. Load
 39.7 °C41.6 °C39.5 °C 
 34.7 °C36.7 °C31.6 °C 
 26.7 °C26.5 °C28.5 °C 
Maximum: 41.6 °C
Average: 33.9 °C
34.6 °C48.4 °C37.7 °C
32.4 °C35.4 °C34.1 °C
28.9 °C30.4 °C29.7 °C
Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  51.8 °C | Room Temperature 22.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
热力图--顶部(负载)
热力图--顶部(负载)
热力图--顶部（空闲时）。
热力图--顶部（空闲时）。
热力图--底部(负载)
热力图--底部(负载)
热力图--底部（空闲时）。
热力图--底部（空闲时）。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8		SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
 		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Heat
-15%
4%
-4%
-5%
-22%
-2%
-0%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.6
46.2
-11%
47.2
-13%
45.9
-10%
42.2
-1%
55.6
-34%
41.5 ?(34.7 - 52.8, n=39)
-0%
42.1 ?(32.2 - 50.2, n=60, last 2 years)
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
48.4
52.2
-8%
45.8
5%
57
-18%
40.4
17%
67.8
-40%
45 ?(33 - 60.9, n=39)
7%
44.5 ?(26.8 - 59, n=60, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Upper Side *
25.7
30.6
-19%
23.8
7%
24.5
5%
31.2
-21%
28.3
-10%
28 ?(23 - 37, n=39)
-9%
27.4 ?(22.3 - 36, n=60, last 2 years)
-7%
Idle Bottom *
27.8
33.6
-21%
22.9
18%
25.9
7%
32.2
-16%
28.9
-4%
29.3 ?(23.6 - 43, n=39)
-5%
28 ?(22.1 - 37, n=60, last 2 years)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器产生的声音还算不错，但几乎没有提供任何低音。此外，最大音量也相对较低。我们建议使用耳机或外部扬声器以获得更好的声音体验。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.830.536.82541.331.741.33140.13240.14033.330.733.35033.229.933.26330.720.330.78034.116.934.11003416.73412539.517.839.516041.916.741.920038.414.738.425048.21448.231556.21456.240061.312.161.350061.712.261.763062.211.962.280065.811.565.8100063.411.863.4125060.111.860.1160061.212.361.2200062.812.462.8250058.412.358.4315058.91358.9400057.913.357.9500058.313.358.3630063.113.563.1800061.313.961.31000066.715.566.71250068.615.368.6160005812.858SPL74.225.174.2N34.50.634.5median 60.1median 13.3median 60.1Delta5.81.75.833.835.128.331.535.234.533.631.235.136.524.825.924.62426.926.720.9251835.820.744.32146.51551.713.556.213.459.41364.512.863.71363.212.763.911.664.711.465.111.765.81265.912.460.612.352.412.66012.661.812.661.112.558.311.851.92575.20.735.2median 12.7median 601.78.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5SCHENKER Vision 14
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Vision 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - Yoga Slim Pro提供良好的电池寿命

能源消耗

这台笔记本电脑在能耗方面没有显示任何问题。最大的空闲功耗为10.3瓦。在负载下，需求分别增加到54瓦（中等负载）和54.4瓦（TheWitcher 3 测试）。下图说明了压力测试和我们的TheWitcher 3测试期间相当稳定的功耗。USB-C电源适配器的输出容量为95瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.9 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.6 / 7.7 / 10.3 Watt
Load midlight 54 / 44.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8		SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs		MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450		Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
 		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
-38%
28%
19%
-9%
-16%
-4%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
4.6
9.8
-113%
2.5
46%
3.4
26%
6.7
-46%
3
35%
5.26 ?(3 - 12.5, n=46)
-14%
4.43 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=60, last 2 years)
4%
Idle Average *
7.7
12.5
-62%
5.3
31%
4.9
36%
10
-30%
6.3
18%
7.78 ?(4.1 - 12.8, n=46)
-1%
7.58 ?(2.5 - 16, n=60, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Maximum *
10.3
13.7
-33%
9.5
8%
5.9
43%
10.3
-0%
10.3
-0%
9.18 ?(4.6 - 15.7, n=46)
11%
9.43 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=60, last 2 years)
8%
Load Average *
54
39.3
27%
26.2
51%
38.8
28%
35.7
34%
66
-22%
44.9 ?(28.2 - 98.9, n=46)
17%
45.8 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=58, last 2 years)
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.4
44.8
18%
38.7
29%
32.7
40%
66.6
-22%
Load Maximum *
44.5
72.8
-64%
42.8
4%
66.6
-50%
67.6
-52%
90.6
-104%
59.4 ?(29.5 - 101.8, n=46)
-33%
68.7 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=60, last 2 years)
-54%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø54.4 (52-58.3)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø44.6 (41.2-52.2)

电池寿命

在Wi-Fi测试（使用脚本访问网站）和视频测试（短片Big Buck Bunny（H.264编码，全高清）循环运行）中，这台14英寸的笔记本分别实现了8:58小时和10:26小时的运行时间。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的省电功能被禁用，显示屏亮度被设置为150cd/m²左右。在视频测试中，无线模块也被禁用。

使用 "省电 "能源配置文件将运行时间分别增加到10:12小时（Wi-Fi）和12:54小时（Big Buck Bunny）。

该电池的容量为61Wh。
该电池的容量为61Wh。
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
21h 39min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 92, Akkusparmodus)
10h 12min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 92)
8h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 29min
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8, 61 Wh		SCHENKER Vision 14
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 53 Wh		LG Gram 14Z90P-G.AA79G
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 72 Wh		Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh		Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh		MSI Modern 14 B11SB-085
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 52.4 Wh		Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
-34%
104%
58%
37%
-3%
38%
Reader / Idle
1299
2925
125%
1167
-10%
1808 ?(581 - 3407, n=11, last 2 years)
39%
H.264
626
401
-36%
1149
84%
790
26%
917 ?(527 - 1298, n=26, last 2 years)
46%
WiFi v1.3
538
366
-32%
854
59%
745
38%
629
17%
523
-3%
729 ?(389 - 1585, n=61, last 2 years)
36%
Load
89
219
146%
188
111%
182
104%
116.5 ?(57 - 197, n=47, last 2 years)
31%

Pros

+ 明亮、高对比度的IPS显示屏
+ 16:10格式下的90赫兹显示
+ 高分辨率（2880x1800像素
+ 良好的色彩空间覆盖
+ 高计算能力
+ 良好的性能发展
+ 时尚的铝制外壳
+ NVMe SSD
+ 工作安静
+ 适度的热量发展
+ USB 3.2 Gen 2
+ 通过USB-C的显示端口
+ 电源交付
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 反射性显示表面
- 焊接的RAM
- 没有内存插槽
- 没有Thunderbolt
- 没有存储卡读卡器
- 平庸的WLAN传输速率

结论 - 时尚、纤细、快速

联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5（82MS001NGE），由。
联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5（82MS001NGE），由。

尽管其强大的 Ryzen 9 5900HXAPU，这款紧凑的笔记本电脑的实际电池运行时间为9至10小时（智能冷却）和10至13小时（省电）。这应该能让你度过一天，而不需要使用附带的USB-C电源适配器（95瓦）。

通过Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5，联想证明了移动性和高处理能力不需要相互排斥。

由于APU可以均匀地发展其性能，所以节流是不需要担心的。在整个负载范围内，噪音和热量发展是适中的。通常情况下，在日常使用中几乎听不到设备的噪音。

联想没有在这台纤薄的笔记本电脑中加入Thunderbolt端口。可用的USB-C端口（Power Delivery，通过USB-C的DisplayPort）按照USB 3.2 Gen 2标准运行。内置键盘（背光）总体上留下了良好的印象。

14英寸显示屏（2880x1800像素，90赫兹，IPS）采用16:10格式，具有稳定的视角、高亮度、出色的对比度、非常体面的色彩还原和良好的色域覆盖。不过，光亮的显示屏表面值得批评。它对人体工程学有不利影响，而且在Yoga这样的设备上没有任何意义。

瑜伽的一个替代品是 申克尔Vision 14.它提供了一个哑光的14英寸显示屏（2880x1800像素，90赫兹，IPS），格式为16:10，可扩展内存，PCI Express 4，Thunderbolt 4，而且它的重量少了300克。在单线程CPU性能方面，它与联想笔记本电脑不相上下，但在多线程性能方面，Vision的四核处理器无法与Yoga的八核处理器相比。此外，申克笔记本电脑提供的电池寿命比瑜伽更差。

价格和可用性

在写这篇文章的时候，联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro在美国还没有上市。但你可以随时关注联想的网上商店 ，亚马逊 ，或newegg ，例如，等待该设备的出现。

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 - 10/28/2021 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
81 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
55 / 75 → 73%
Weight
71 / 20-75 → 93%
Battery
86%
Display
85%
Games Performance
65 / 78 → 83%
Application Performance
93 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
93%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
76%
86%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 (Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 Series)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5在审查中。具有良好电池寿命的14英寸动力源
Sascha Mölck, 2021-08-15 (Update: 2021-08-15)