ZTE Axon 20 5G
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 24 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Axon 20 5G
Source: TechTablets
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
Crucially for those looking for all the bells and whistles of a quad-cam smartphone, the Axon 20 5G is disappointing for bokeh, telephoto zoom, and night photos. While 4K at 60 fps capture with effective stabilization is a nice draw for video enthusiasts, slow autofocus and exposure instabilities make the device difficult to recommend highly for video. More casual shooters, happy with a consistent and stable device that shoots reasonable quality standard or ultra-wide stills in good lighting, will be more at ease with the ZTE Axon 20 5G’s performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
ZTE’s ambitious under-display design for the front camera of the Axon 20 5G is esthetically impressive, but anyone who cares about selfie performance enough to read a review like this should probably look elsewhere. The performance compromises required to realize this design lead to seriously sub-par imaging when measured by nearly any metric. However, users who don’t care about the front camera at all should still consider this phone, as it appears to be a solid offering in other respects, and the hidden selfie cam is a neat trick for people who might use it only rarely.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Yugatech
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 02/07/2021
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN
Before I got to try this phone, and with no prior experience with ZTE, I kind of expected this to be a phone that focuses exclusively on doing one thing and fails at everything else. That isn't really the case, though. I was really happy with the performance, battery life, and the overall quality of the display and sound. ZTE gets a lot of the basics right, and on top of that, it adds the unique proposition of an under-display camera, and all of that costs about as much as you'd expect a phone with these specs to cost. You're not charged a ludicrous amount of money for a poorly implemented innovation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Neowin
We go hands-on with the world's first smartphone with an under-display camera, the ZTE Axon 20 5G. It has a Snapdragon 765G, 8GB of RAM, 128GB of storage, and it costs $449.
Hands-On, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2021
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
Early adopters will probably enjoy the novelty of the ZTE Axon 20 5G, but the compromises to the selfie camera, face unlock, and display quality make this hard to recommend to most – though if you really never take selfies, you may find the large screen and solid spec sheet enough to win you over.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE raced to be first to release a mass-produced phone, the Axon 20 5G, with an under-display camera. But being first doesn't equate to stellar camera performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/23/2020
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Someone has to be the first, and in this case, it's the Axon 20 5G. A phone with a first-gen tech that makes it really cool and also disappointing at the same time. The issue is that the under-display selfie cam is too blurry and not up to the standards in 2020. There's also a visible square where the camera is located, but we can let that one pass as it's barely visible.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might be an outlier, as a little-known brand in the West, but this ZTE is a nod to the future, showing off a convincing under-screen camera, while delivering a long-lasting and ample performance in a fairly affordable package. It's in the details - autobrightness adjustment, frame-like screen bezel, and so-so cameras overall - where it sometimes misses the mark.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, we prefer the Google Pixel 4a 5G because of its better cameras. And spending a little more money will net you the excellent OnePlus Nord, which is a pretty big step-up in UX and photography quality from the Axon 20 5G. Despite ZTE's impressive party trick, there are a few too many caveats to make this Android phone a top pick.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 90% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 88% display: 83% mobility: 83% workmanship: 88%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 81% mobility: 72% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2021
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2020
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2021
Source: Cell Phones VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/21/2020
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2020
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2020
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 765G:
具有8个CPU Kryo 475内核的快速中端ARM SoC(一个主频为2.4 GHz的高速ARM Cortex-A76主核,一个主频为2.2 GHz的A76中核和六个主频为1.8 GHz的ARM Cortex-A55小核)。作为首批SoC之一,它还集成了5G调制解调器(Snapdragon X52下行和上传速度高达3.7 / 1.6 Mbps,支持mmWave和Sub-6)。该处理器在采用三星高效的7纳米EUV工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.92":
只有较少的手机有很大的屏幕。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.