ZTE Axon Series
Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P70, Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2, Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765G, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 870, Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 888 5G, UNISOC T618Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, Qualcomm Adreno 405, Qualcomm Adreno 430, Qualcomm Adreno 506, Qualcomm Adreno 530, Qualcomm Adreno 620, Qualcomm Adreno 630, Qualcomm Adreno 640, Qualcomm Adreno 650, Qualcomm Adreno 660, Qualcomm Adreno 730
Display: 5.20 inch, 5.50 inch, 6.00 inch, 6.21 inch, 6.47 inch, 6.67 inch, 6.68 inch, 6.70 inch, 6.80 inch, 6.92 inch
Weight: 0.14kg, 0.153kg, 0.165kg, 0.168kg, 0.169kg, 0.17kg, 0.173kg, 0.175kg, 0.178kg, 0.179kg, 0.182kg, 0.186kg, 0.188kg, 0.189kg, 0.198kg, 0.199kg, 0.204kg, 0.23kg
Price: 250, 299, 300, 349, 389, 399, 400, 449, 480, 499, 500, 550, 600, 749, 800, 829 euro
Average of 300 scores (from 545 reviews)
ZTE Axon 5.5 inch
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 5.5 inchProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 430
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.173kg
Price: 500 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Axon 5.5 inch (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: BC Hardware EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I've used a few ZTE devices over the last few years and I've come to respect what ZTE is capable of and the price at which they pull it off. While some of the earlier ZTE devices I looked at were aimed squarely at the budget market, the Axon steps up a notch and enters the market at the crowded mainstream. It's pretty easy to mistake the ZTE Axon for a flagship device.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/12/2016
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At around £300 it doesn’t blow the likes of the OnePlus 2 out of the water or anything quite so dramatic, but we’d go so far as to recommend it over the similarly priced HTC One M9 or as a cheaper alternative to the likes of the Xperia Z3+. Nicely done ZTE, can’t wait to see what you’re cooking up next.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/24/2015
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The $449 Axon Pro has some standout features, but ultimately, it left me unexcited. It offers a sumptuous display, outstanding audio and a camera that lets you have a lot of fun with focus. However, a polarizing design, short battery life and some software annoyances hold it back. I also want better picture quality, especially given the dual-lens setup.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/13/2015
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE surely took its time to enter the high-end smartphone market in the United States, but the Axon Pro proves that the wait has been well worth it. The newcomer presents a convincing package of well thought-out looks, superb build quality, high-end specs, and yet to be matched after sales support. The design of the smartphone impressed us with attention to detail that's not to be expected in the price range the Axon Pro inhabits. The same goes for the quality of the device's overall fit and finish.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/10/2015
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I've got to hand it to ZTE: The Axon is the sort of powerful, budget-friendly phone I never thought the company would, or could, make. It's got gobs of power. It's mostly well-built. The camera isn't half-bad. And that tantalizing $450 price tag currently represents the floor -- the least amount of money you could spend on a phone as well-specced as this.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2015
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So, is it worth it to pick up the ZTE Axon Pro over some of the aforementioned devices? Naturally, that’s tough because there are still opportunities to advance its performance in the areas of its camera and battery life. If you’re looking for the savings in a high-end, flagship phone, you’ll certainly get it here with the Axon Pro – whereas devices like the iPhone 6 and Galaxy S6 will still cost you at least $650. This is just the beginning, as the Axon Pro is meant to be the bridge device in getting ZTE’s name into the minds of consumers. So far, it strikes a nerve that’s deeply electrical. Let’s just hope they can use the momentum to their advantage.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/27/2015
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon Phone is available now for pre-order directly through ZTE and other outlets like Amazon, Ebay, and NewEgg, for $449.98, with the color options including phthalo blue, ion gold, and chromium silver. To make users feel more at ease with buying an unlocked phone, the Axon Phone comes with Passport 1.0, a protection plan that offers free premium protection, along with a 2 year warranty, advanced exchanges, and free two-way shipping should anything ever happen to your device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/27/2015
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 91% mobility: 86% workmanship: 93%
ZTE Axon Elite
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon EliteProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 430
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.169kg
Price: 449 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Flagship with some issues. The ZTE Axon Elite is the current flagship device from the Chinese manufacturer in the European market. At a first glance, it ticks all the right boxes with 4K video recording, fingerprint scanner and a very powerful processor. However, a closer inspection reveals some drawbacks.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Cool Smartphone EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
During the time with the ZTE Axon Elite, I have been part impressed with ZTE and part frustrated. For the most part, everything feels thought out and well-put together. The ability to tweak and change the wallpapers and themes was a lot more fun than it really should be. Yet, trying to set it up to the way I liked it felt like a chore, not a pleasure. The ringtone is nice and loud, but it’s louder than I want for longer than I want. It’s nice to hold in the hand, but in use it kept feeling that little bit slippery when I was trying to work one-handed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2015
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon Elite has great specs and some interesting tech at an excellent price, but while we appreciate many users will love the design we aren't entirely taken by it - especially the fake-leather parts on the rear. If you can't get the OnePlus 2, this is a close second best - and much easier to get hold of.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/26/2015
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% performance: 90% features: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/23/2015
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 72% performance: 91% features: 86% display: 95% mobility: 65%
Source: Netzwelt DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/12/2015
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
ZTE Axon Mini Premium
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon Mini PremiumProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.14kg
Price: 389 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Axon Mini Premium (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Pressure sensitive. ZTE's Axon Mini Premium Edition has a total of three methods for unlocking the screen: Force Touch, fingerprint reader and iris scanner - and that in the upper mid-range! The configuration is impressive and everyday performance is good. However, it has some shortcomings.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Recombu EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At just under £230, the ZTE Axon Mini is for the most part a handset worth considering. The UI needs a lot of work and the phone as a whole could have been refined a little more before hitting the market, but it boasts respectable performance, a nice screen, a surprisingly good camera and a solid feature set for the price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I wouldn’t recommend the Axon Mini over other mid-range options. It’s got a good screen, is a quick device when it works, and has some nice extra features, such as the pressure-sensitive touch screen. But having experienced performance issues and finding myself still confused by the phone's downright strange design, I can’t really say it’s worth going with ZTE over better-known brands. I can’t think of why you would choose the Axon Mini over say the OnePlus X. ZTE’s device is slightly more expensive than the OnePlus, and if my experience is anything to go by, sometimes it won’t even work.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 80% performance: 50% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 40%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you’ve felt that we’ve been too critical of the smartphone thus far – it is this price point that caused us to be. Well, that and the fact that we really liked the vanilla Android-toting Axon Pro. The Mini packs a lot of tech, impressive on paper but not so much in real life. Force Touch – great, but unresponsive and unnatural-feeling; fingerprint scanner – awesome, but not quick or reliable; iris scanner and voice unlock – clunky and impractical; 13 MP camera sounds great, but performs worse than some cheaper handsets we’ve reviewed. It feels more like a tech fan’s toy than an actual, fleshed out upper-midrange smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall the Axon Mini is an interesting device, ZTE has added quite a bit of extra value with the pressure-sensitive display, the fingerprint reader and the high-end audio. The 3GB of RAM is also good to see, as is 32GB of storage. The main thing I feel that lets down the phone is the processor, it isn’t a deal breaker, but having a better processor would seem more appropriate alongside all those extra features.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2015
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/12/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 82% display: 90% mobility: 90%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/14/2016
Source: Android TV DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 92%
ZTE Axon 7
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 7Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.175kg
Price: 449 euro
Links: ZTE homepage Axon 7 (Model)
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
王座后裔? 中兴Axon 7的目标是智能手机的最高桂冠。除了极致性能和超强配置,这台5.5寸的高端安卓设备还搭配了杜比Atmos音响系统,它足够让一整个房间充满音乐。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE have done a half decent job with the Nougat software. Very few manufacturers leave the Google software alone these days and ZTE’s take on Nougat isn’t as bad as many others’. While it’s not perfect it is certainly not a poor experience, once a decent keyboard and launcher was installed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE have done a half decent job with the Nougat software. Very few manufacturers leave the Google software alone these days and ZTE’s take on Nougat isn’t as bad as many others’. While it’s not perfect it is certainly not a poor experience, once a decent keyboard and launcher was installed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2017
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So look for headphones with flat impedance curves (good luck finding that in specifications though!) and fairly high sensitivity, and all should be fine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So look for headphones with flat impedance curves (good luck finding that in specifications though!) and fairly high sensitivity, and all should be fine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So look for headphones with flat impedance curves (good luck finding that in specifications though!) and fairly high sensitivity, and all should be fine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So look for headphones with flat impedance curves (good luck finding that in specifications though!) and fairly high sensitivity, and all should be fine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Top specs go hand in hand with top price and this is quite normal. But what if a company that is not at the top of the pyramid of the smartphone market offers a device which is not inferior to other high-end smartphones? ZTE have tried doing exactly this and have succeeded to a large extent. Their Axon 7 looks amazing and provides high-end features.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Top specs go hand in hand with top price and this is quite normal. But what if a company that is not at the top of the pyramid of the smartphone market offers a device which is not inferior to other high-end smartphones? ZTE have tried doing exactly this and have succeeded to a large extent. Their Axon 7 looks amazing and provides high-end features.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is a very good smart phone with a very good screen and very good performance at a price of around two thirds of that you’d pay for one of the big names in phones. That’s pretty impressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is a very good smart phone with a very good screen and very good performance at a price of around two thirds of that you’d pay for one of the big names in phones. That’s pretty impressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 does stumble a bit when it comes to low-light shots, and its loud speakers don't always offer the best bass. The OnePlus 3 and Alcatel Idol 4s are both worthy alternatives — the former for its whopping 6GB of RAM, the latter for its bundled-in VR headset — and both offer better battery life. The OnePlus 3 is still our favorite sub-$400 phone out there, but the Axon 7 is an extremely close second.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 does stumble a bit when it comes to low-light shots, and its loud speakers don't always offer the best bass. The OnePlus 3 and Alcatel Idol 4s are both worthy alternatives — the former for its whopping 6GB of RAM, the latter for its bundled-in VR headset — and both offer better battery life. The OnePlus 3 is still our favorite sub-$400 phone out there, but the Axon 7 is an extremely close second.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Make Use Of EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To be completely honest, this is an amazing phone. I struggled to find anything wrong with it. Everything about it is the top of its class, and it’s cheaper than most other phones. I kept looking for the catch, but there doesn’t seem to be one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Make Use Of EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To be completely honest, this is an amazing phone. I struggled to find anything wrong with it. Everything about it is the top of its class, and it’s cheaper than most other phones. I kept looking for the catch, but there doesn’t seem to be one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But other than superficial aspects, I have no real complaints with this phone. Regular readers know I place a lot of emphasis on value in my reviews (I'm not going to judge a $400 phone the same way I do a $850 phone, and I think phones that cost north of $700 should be scrutinized. That's why I thought the HTC 10 was a pile of "meh"), so whatever minor nitpick I have, such as a less-than-stellar low light camera performance or silly gesture shortcuts or no backlight for capacitive buttons that are too close together, I just tell myself "dude this phone is $400," and I don't think it's bad at all.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But other than superficial aspects, I have no real complaints with this phone. Regular readers know I place a lot of emphasis on value in my reviews (I'm not going to judge a $400 phone the same way I do a $850 phone, and I think phones that cost north of $700 should be scrutinized. That's why I thought the HTC 10 was a pile of "meh"), so whatever minor nitpick I have, such as a less-than-stellar low light camera performance or silly gesture shortcuts or no backlight for capacitive buttons that are too close together, I just tell myself "dude this phone is $400," and I don't think it's bad at all.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, if you think you want a ZTE Axon 7 you are most likely the kind of person who will be able to get it working just right. From my time with the Axon 7 I’m desperate to get my hands back on one when the Android 7 update comes out and have little reservations in recommending it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, if you think you want a ZTE Axon 7 you are most likely the kind of person who will be able to get it working just right. From my time with the Axon 7 I’m desperate to get my hands back on one when the Android 7 update comes out and have little reservations in recommending it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Digital Trends EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes. At $400, the Axon 7 is a no brainer. It packs a speedy processor, the best audio we’ve heard on a smartphone this year, a great display and camera, and software that’s unobtrusive. It may not sport dual cameras, bleeding-edge silicon, or an ungodly amount of memory, but to call the Axon 7 a slouch is to do it a disservice. Short of smartphones hundreds of dollars more, it’s one of the best on the market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Digital Trends EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes. At $400, the Axon 7 is a no brainer. It packs a speedy processor, the best audio we’ve heard on a smartphone this year, a great display and camera, and software that’s unobtrusive. It may not sport dual cameras, bleeding-edge silicon, or an ungodly amount of memory, but to call the Axon 7 a slouch is to do it a disservice. Short of smartphones hundreds of dollars more, it’s one of the best on the market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is the company's knight in shining armor that's meant to take US shores by storm. We've got good news for you ZTE: you're on the right track with the Axon 7. However, success isn't guaranteed, and that's a bummer considering how great of a product you've put together.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is the company's knight in shining armor that's meant to take US shores by storm. We've got good news for you ZTE: you're on the right track with the Axon 7. However, success isn't guaranteed, and that's a bummer considering how great of a product you've put together.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The all-metal build that carries over to the front-facing speakers has caught more than a few eyes when using in public, and the screen of this phone is a thing of sheer beauty. I can confidently say these are the second best speakers I’ve ever heard on a smartphone and I’ll definitely miss having those. Playing Fallout Shelter and Monument Valley provided the best gaming I’ve experienced on a phone, and to the average user, every day usage is going to feel very fluid.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The all-metal build that carries over to the front-facing speakers has caught more than a few eyes when using in public, and the screen of this phone is a thing of sheer beauty. I can confidently say these are the second best speakers I’ve ever heard on a smartphone and I’ll definitely miss having those. Playing Fallout Shelter and Monument Valley provided the best gaming I’ve experienced on a phone, and to the average user, every day usage is going to feel very fluid.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mobile Choice EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon mini is a great little phone. For £229.99 you get one of the best phones in the market, at that price range. The display can rival that of the best flagships, the audio smarts are proven to be outstanding and the camera comes with all the tricks you will need to wow your friends on social media.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% performance: 100% features: 95% mobility: 100% workmanship: 95%
Source: Mobile Choice EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon mini is a great little phone. For £229.99 you get one of the best phones in the market, at that price range. The display can rival that of the best flagships, the audio smarts are proven to be outstanding and the camera comes with all the tricks you will need to wow your friends on social media.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% performance: 100% features: 95% mobility: 100% workmanship: 95%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is, all things considered, a fantastic device at a terrific price point. On paper, in many ways, it outstrips the OP3. But when it comes down to the essentials — processing, camera and design, in particular — it feels as if the line has yet to fully find its feet, while the OP3, now on its third attempt to kill flagships seems a more confident and stable offering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is, all things considered, a fantastic device at a terrific price point. On paper, in many ways, it outstrips the OP3. But when it comes down to the essentials — processing, camera and design, in particular — it feels as if the line has yet to fully find its feet, while the OP3, now on its third attempt to kill flagships seems a more confident and stable offering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 also sports a USB Type-C port, which is becoming increasingly common among Android phones in 2016. And while the company ships a Quick Charge 3.0 charger and Type-C cable in the box, it generously provides a micro-USB adapter for those who want to keep using those older, far more ubiquitous cables. It's one of many nice touches in a box that includes a very decent pair of headphones and the aforementioned clear TPU case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 also sports a USB Type-C port, which is becoming increasingly common among Android phones in 2016. And while the company ships a Quick Charge 3.0 charger and Type-C cable in the box, it generously provides a micro-USB adapter for those who want to keep using those older, far more ubiquitous cables. It's one of many nice touches in a box that includes a very decent pair of headphones and the aforementioned clear TPU case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I'm still not convinced that the ZTE Axon 7's $399 price tag isn't a typo. This smartphone performs like something that costs hundreds of dollars more, with a fast processor, a rich display and a stunning design that oozes care and quality. The phone's MiFavor interface adds some nice software touches without getting in the way, while its 20-megapixel camera takes gorgeous outdoor photos complete with plenty of tools for photography nuts.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I'm still not convinced that the ZTE Axon 7's $399 price tag isn't a typo. This smartphone performs like something that costs hundreds of dollars more, with a fast processor, a rich display and a stunning design that oozes care and quality. The phone's MiFavor interface adds some nice software touches without getting in the way, while its 20-megapixel camera takes gorgeous outdoor photos complete with plenty of tools for photography nuts.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 leads the way in terms of affordable flagships and aside from one drawback, delivers in every department. ZTE scores another first with an excellent smartphone that’s compatible with all major US networks. With the Axon 7, ZTE raises the bar substantially for premium, affordable flagships by delivering an excellent smartphone with very few compromises, even next to the very best.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 92% workmanship: 92%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 leads the way in terms of affordable flagships and aside from one drawback, delivers in every department. ZTE scores another first with an excellent smartphone that’s compatible with all major US networks. With the Axon 7, ZTE raises the bar substantially for premium, affordable flagships by delivering an excellent smartphone with very few compromises, even next to the very best.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 92% workmanship: 92%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% features: 85% ergonomy: 76%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% features: 85% ergonomy: 76%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 88% performance: 95% features: 95% display: 92% mobility: 78%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 88% performance: 95% features: 95% display: 92% mobility: 78%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 16/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 16/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2016
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2016
Source: Kelisto.es ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: Kelisto.es ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Source: Geektopia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Geektopia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Megapk IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80%
Source: Megapk IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 82% mobility: 75% workmanship: 84%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 82% mobility: 75% workmanship: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% features: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% features: 80%
ZTE Axon 7 Mini
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 7 MiniProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 405
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.153kg
Price: 299 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
你需要的是迷你版吗? 与旗舰机型Axon 7一起,这家中国生产商也提供了一款迷你版旗舰。除了尺寸和功能的缩水,它的价位也有所降低。Axon 7 Mini可以和强大的竞争对手相抗衡吗?
Foreign Reviews
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE is hardly able to compete with the bigger smartphone manufacturers but its Axon lineup can definitely be called quite successful. After the strong performance of Axon 7, it is now time to review Axon 7 mini, which is one step lower in the price range, but it can undoubtedly compete with the popular names in this class.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE is hardly able to compete with the bigger smartphone manufacturers but its Axon lineup can definitely be called quite successful. After the strong performance of Axon 7, it is now time to review Axon 7 mini, which is one step lower in the price range, but it can undoubtedly compete with the popular names in this class.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/14/2017
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot to recommend the Axon 7 Mini if you're in the market for a phone that won't break the bank. This device retains the same great design as the flagship-challenging Axon 7, while making acceptable trade-offs in performance to keep the price low. The rear camera can turn out some pretty good-looking images, and watching videos on that vibrant screen with stereo sound is a pleasure.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot to recommend the Axon 7 Mini if you're in the market for a phone that won't break the bank. This device retains the same great design as the flagship-challenging Axon 7, while making acceptable trade-offs in performance to keep the price low. The rear camera can turn out some pretty good-looking images, and watching videos on that vibrant screen with stereo sound is a pleasure.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite all that, the software just feels a bit too sluggish and hampered by its hardware specs, which is a shame when its bigger brother is such a big leap forward for not that much more of an investment. It’s a solid offering from ZTE, but it isn’t a standout. If you find it at a discount, then it becomes a more compelling option.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Despite all that, the software just feels a bit too sluggish and hampered by its hardware specs, which is a shame when its bigger brother is such a big leap forward for not that much more of an investment. It’s a solid offering from ZTE, but it isn’t a standout. If you find it at a discount, then it becomes a more compelling option.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE launched the Axon 7 Mini at $299, which is way too high for this phone to be competitive. Since launch, though, it’s fallen in price and has hovered around $199 pretty permanently, which definitely puts the phone in a place where you should seriously consider it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE launched the Axon 7 Mini at $299, which is way too high for this phone to be competitive. Since launch, though, it’s fallen in price and has hovered around $199 pretty permanently, which definitely puts the phone in a place where you should seriously consider it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2017
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Going by specs alone, the Axon 7 Mini should have been a hit. Decent power, an OLED screen and a metal build for under £300? Sounds great.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Stuff TV EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Going by specs alone, the Axon 7 Mini should have been a hit. Decent power, an OLED screen and a metal build for under £300? Sounds great.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As for processing power, the smartphone stocks a 1.5GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 processor with 3GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage, expandable by MicroSDXC up to 128GB. The device has been responsive and able to manage heavy processing loads well within my limited test period, though I’ve had an app crash.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As for processing power, the smartphone stocks a 1.5GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 processor with 3GB of RAM and 32 GB of internal storage, expandable by MicroSDXC up to 128GB. The device has been responsive and able to manage heavy processing loads well within my limited test period, though I’ve had an app crash.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2017
Source: Paste EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you have a hard budget of $300 or less, the Axon 7 Mini offers truly fantastic hardware, and chances are you’ll grow used to its performance. But if you have a bit of wiggle room, use it, and find a better value.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Paste EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you have a hard budget of $300 or less, the Axon 7 Mini offers truly fantastic hardware, and chances are you’ll grow used to its performance. But if you have a bit of wiggle room, use it, and find a better value.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Paste EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you have a hard budget of $300 or less, the Axon 7 Mini offers truly fantastic hardware, and chances are you’ll grow used to its performance. But if you have a bit of wiggle room, use it, and find a better value.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Paste EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
If you have a hard budget of $300 or less, the Axon 7 Mini offers truly fantastic hardware, and chances are you’ll grow used to its performance. But if you have a bit of wiggle room, use it, and find a better value.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 Mini is an awkward mishmash of good and bad, adding up to a phone destined to be thought of as an also-ran even though it does have some great features.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 50% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 Mini is an awkward mishmash of good and bad, adding up to a phone destined to be thought of as an also-ran even though it does have some great features.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 50% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 Mini falls short of being the platonic ideal of a “mini” phone, one that takes a flagship, features intact, and gives us a handset with a smaller screen. Instead, it practically turns that approach on its head, barely decreasing size at all, and instead bringing us a phone that might be better called the Axon 7 Lite, dialing back on processing power and bells and whistles.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 Mini falls short of being the platonic ideal of a “mini” phone, one that takes a flagship, features intact, and gives us a handset with a smaller screen. Instead, it practically turns that approach on its head, barely decreasing size at all, and instead bringing us a phone that might be better called the Axon 7 Lite, dialing back on processing power and bells and whistles.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2016
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the ZTE Axon 7 Mini costs $100 less than its larger sibling and has the same premium build quality, it makes a number of compromises to reach its lower price point. Many of the things we love about the Axon 7, like its Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820 processor, 4GB of RAM, big battery, and dual-band Wi-Fi are all absent here. Rather than looking at it as a "mini" version of the Axon 7, you should instead look at the Axon 7 Mini as an entirely different phone. Ultimately, it's up against other midrange options like the Moto G4 and the Life One X2, both of which offer similar performance for $100 less. The G4 is a particularly compelling alternative since it has a cleaner UI and support for all major US carriers. If you're looking for a truly compact phone that doesn't compromise on its specs, the Google Pixel is your best option, but it costs twice as much. Most people will still get the best combination of price and performance by paying $100 more for the Axon 7, which remains our Editors' Choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
While the ZTE Axon 7 Mini costs $100 less than its larger sibling and has the same premium build quality, it makes a number of compromises to reach its lower price point. Many of the things we love about the Axon 7, like its Quad HD display, Snapdragon 820 processor, 4GB of RAM, big battery, and dual-band Wi-Fi are all absent here. Rather than looking at it as a "mini" version of the Axon 7, you should instead look at the Axon 7 Mini as an entirely different phone. Ultimately, it's up against other midrange options like the Moto G4 and the Life One X2, both of which offer similar performance for $100 less. The G4 is a particularly compelling alternative since it has a cleaner UI and support for all major US carriers. If you're looking for a truly compact phone that doesn't compromise on its specs, the Google Pixel is your best option, but it costs twice as much. Most people will still get the best combination of price and performance by paying $100 more for the Axon 7, which remains our Editors' Choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot to recommend the Axon 7 Mini if you're in the market for a phone that won't break the bank. This device retains the same great design as the flagship-challenging Axon 7, while making acceptable trade-offs in performance to keep the price low. The rear camera can turn out some pretty good-looking images, and watching videos on that vibrant screen with stereo sound is a pleasure.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot to recommend the Axon 7 Mini if you're in the market for a phone that won't break the bank. This device retains the same great design as the flagship-challenging Axon 7, while making acceptable trade-offs in performance to keep the price low. The rear camera can turn out some pretty good-looking images, and watching videos on that vibrant screen with stereo sound is a pleasure.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I found the Axon 7 it to be good enough to compete with the OnePlus 3, and for some, even Samsung’s Galaxy S7, in spite of its $400 price tag. It makes sense, then, that ZTE would create a smaller version of the widely praised device, hitting the $300 price point in the process.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Don’t get me wrong, there’s definitely a market for a $300 aesthetic twin of the Axon 7. But when you take into consideration how much you’re giving up for a $100 discount, it just doesn’t add up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Greenbot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Don’t get me wrong, there’s definitely a market for a $300 aesthetic twin of the Axon 7. But when you take into consideration how much you’re giving up for a $100 discount, it just doesn’t add up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: PC World EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I found the Axon 7 it to be good enough to compete with the OnePlus 3, and for some, even Samsung’s Galaxy S7, in spite of its $400 price tag. It makes sense, then, that ZTE would create a smaller version of the widely praised device, hitting the $300 price point in the process.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Good Gear Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Don’t get me wrong, there’s definitely a market for a $300 aesthetic twin of the Axon 7. But when you take into consideration how much you’re giving up for a $100 discount, it just doesn’t add up.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Source: Greenbot EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Don’t get me wrong, there’s definitely a market for a $300 aesthetic twin of the Axon 7. But when you take into consideration how much you’re giving up for a $100 discount, it just doesn’t add up.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mini isn't going to rival the performance of flagship devices, but you won't find many of its best features on higher priced setups. It's a fully capable Android phone, with a bright AMOLED display, front-facing speakers with Hi-Fi audio and a microSD card slot that doubles as a second SIM card slot. Best of all, it's affordable and comes unlocked, meaning everyone is invited.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE's progression to the high end is going nicely, with the Axon 7 looking to be its best effort yet. It's compact, well made and packing punch in all the right places. It's also sensibly priced, coming in under the OnePlus 3 and sitting just above the Moto G4 Plus. You get a lot for your money here, and that's always good.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Mini isn't going to rival the performance of flagship devices, but you won't find many of its best features on higher priced setups. It's a fully capable Android phone, with a bright AMOLED display, front-facing speakers with Hi-Fi audio and a microSD card slot that doubles as a second SIM card slot. Best of all, it's affordable and comes unlocked, meaning everyone is invited.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE's progression to the high end is going nicely, with the Axon 7 looking to be its best effort yet. It's compact, well made and packing punch in all the right places. It's also sensibly priced, coming in under the OnePlus 3 and sitting just above the Moto G4 Plus. You get a lot for your money here, and that's always good.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot of competition in the midrange market right now, with choices ranging from the OnePlus 3 to the Huawei Honor 8$399.99 at Amazon to the Motorola Moto G4$149.99 at Amazon. If the Mini stands out, it'll stand out for build quality. It's a warm, gorgeous metal unibody design in jewel tones, at a level where most of its competitors are plastic. The smaller size actually helps play that up: since you can more easily wrap your hands around the Axon 7 Mini, you are more able to appreciate its warm metal and curved form.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In conclusion, the ZTE Axon 7 mini will probably push the Axon brand down to the ~$300 level, and it is a very good spot to aim at. At this price point, the obvious competition would be the Google Nexus 5, the Sony XPERIA Z3+ and HTC One M9 and all of those have very good user reviews. It looks like a good topic for research.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
There's a lot of competition in the midrange market right now, with choices ranging from the OnePlus 3 to the Huawei Honor 8$399.99 at Amazon to the Motorola Moto G4$149.99 at Amazon. If the Mini stands out, it'll stand out for build quality. It's a warm, gorgeous metal unibody design in jewel tones, at a level where most of its competitors are plastic. The smaller size actually helps play that up: since you can more easily wrap your hands around the Axon 7 Mini, you are more able to appreciate its warm metal and curved form.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In conclusion, the ZTE Axon 7 mini will probably push the Axon brand down to the ~$300 level, and it is a very good spot to aim at. At this price point, the obvious competition would be the Google Nexus 5, the Sony XPERIA Z3+ and HTC One M9 and all of those have very good user reviews. It looks like a good topic for research.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2017
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 50% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% features: 63% ergonomy: 79%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% features: 63% ergonomy: 79%
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2017
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - 2/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 87% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 64%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 87% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 64%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/04/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 20/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 20/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 69% workmanship: 82%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% display: 80% mobility: 69% workmanship: 82%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 85%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/28/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/28/2016
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/20/2018
Source: Geekbecois FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Geekbecois FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tabletowo PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/26/2016
Source: Spiders Web PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/26/2016
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/27/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/06/2017
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/16/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/16/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/27/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/07/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/07/2017
ZTE Axon 7 Max
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 7 MaxProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 506
Display: 6.00 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/30/2016
ZTE Axon 7S
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 7SProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.50 inch, 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixels
Weight: 0.17kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/14/2017
Rating: performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
ZTE Axon M
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon MProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 821
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 530
Display: 5.20 inch, 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.23kg
Price: 800 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Will that work? ZTE delivers the first "foldable" smartphone. While we would have imagined something else, the statement is right in principle. With its two displays and hinge in between, the Axon M reminds us a little of the old Nokia Communicator, but it can do so much more. What exactly that is, we gathered for you in our review.
Foreign Reviews
Source: NDTV Gadgets EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE doesn't launch a lot of phones in India, and we don't have confirmation about whether the Axon M will come here at all. If or when it does, we'll put it through all our usual tests and spend enough time with it to give you an idea of how it might work as your next primary device.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: G Style Magazine EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I respect ZTE for trying something different(but not new) as we have grown accustomed to a candy bar style of smartphone but right now that form factor is working. Especially with behemoth displays getting over 6” depending which phone you use. I think it has potential but I’d like to see maybe if ZTE can do it without the glaring fold in the middle, utilize more screen real estate and also not make the glass so glossy. The price tag isn’t going to garner much buyers too with its coming out to $724 and is exclusively under the AT&T brand.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/06/2018
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M has a heavy and awkward design that's genuinely useful for gaming and multitasking. But if you're not down to go double, spend your money on either a top-tier phone, or a cheaper phone with the same specs as the Axon M.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2017
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
When it comes down to it, this isn’t the worst effort ZTE could have made, although it is a bit half-baked, and the Axon M falls short in key areas. Unfortunately, software is the one of the most deficient areas of the M. Simply stretching and splitting content in accordance with the in-built functionalities of the Android OS leaves the user with a rather slapdash user experience. Games can’t take advantage of the large double screen in any real way, videos are rather unpleasant with the black bar in the middle, and transitions between screen modes are often dreadfully unresponsive.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE's dual-screen folding smartphone looks, runs and feels like nothing else on the market. But when it comes to smartphones, more isn't always better.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M is clearly a unique smartphone with the two displays. ZTE has done a good job of building a solid smartphone that performed flawlessly for me. This wasn't easy considering there are different screen modes to manage.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It isn’t enough to just put another screen on an existing smartphone if it doesn’t first address its core experience – and that, in a nutshell, is the main problem with the ZTE Axon M. It gets us excited to see what comes next, but unless you’re actually looking for a dual screen phone, simply having this one won’t dramatically change your Android life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M for AT&T has a unique design that folds out to reveal a second display, effectively transforming the phone into a small tablet, but there are some kinks to work out.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We’ve seen a lot of interesting smartphones in 2017, but the Axon M stands out as the most unique device this year, and arguably in the past few years, too. There’s no doubt the Axon M is going to catch your attention, but do you think it offers enough? What do you think of ZTE’s latest attempt at being different? Do you need two screens? Are foldable displays the next big trend or nothing more than a clever gimmick like 3D cameras?
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/18/2017
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M is the wildcard smartphone of late 2017, and we’re eager to see how it performs and is received. This an ambitious design idea that makes a lot of sense for the future of smartphones.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon M for AT&T has a unique design that folds out to reveal a second display, effectively transforming the phone into a small tablet.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/17/2017
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2018
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: Movil Zona ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 85% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/13/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% features: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Tech Different IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 68% display: 70% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 50%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/01/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/20/2018
Source: Techzilla.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 65% display: 75% mobility: 70% workmanship: 50%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% features: 65% display: 75% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 69% price: 65% display: 65% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/23/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2017
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 9 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 845
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 630
Display: 6.21 inch, 18.8:9, 2248 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.179kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
After ZTE was almost completely banned from using Google’s software, it makes a comeback with a rather high-end smartphone. Read our review to learn what you can expect from ZTE’s Axon 9 Pro, which retails for around 600 Euros ($683).
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 9 Pro was one of the most exciting handsets launched at IFA, it is designed to compete at the highest level, and as such, it finds itself in a ferociously competitive market. The clean design and the 60FPS video upscaling feature might appeal to a crowd that is big on watching action-video content.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In any case, the Axon 9 Pro is a true 2018 flagship, by every standard. Fully decked-out and complete with at least a couple of interesting features and extras. We doubt that it will dramatically shift ZTE's current market standing in any way. But, for a small group of just the right kind of Android power users, it really does seem like the phone to beat.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2018
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE is having a hard year. Back in May, it was forced to “cease major operating activities” after the U.S. banned the company from buying U.S. goods (such as Qualcomm processors) due to the company violating sanctions against Iran. This ban was reversed after a month, under the condition that the company would have to pay a $1 billion fine to the U.S., with $400,000 extra left in escrow. This put a significant dent in the company’s operations, but ZTE is hoping for a comeback with a device it thinks will bring back the glory days.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2018
Source: Area DVD DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 94% features: 88% display: 82% mobility: 91%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android User DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Source: Connect - 12/18
Single Review, , Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% features: 90% mobility: 99% ergonomy: 77%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 84% performance: 98% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 98% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 100%
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 98% display: 86% mobility: 86% workmanship: 100%
Source: Curved DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/05/2019
ZTE Axon 10 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 10 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 855
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 640
Display: 6.47 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.178kg
Price: 600 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
ZTE pitches the Axon 10 Pro against modern flagships like the P30 Pro, especially in regard to design. The Chinese manufacturer has included an in-screen fingerprint scanner and 48 MP dual rear-facing cameras, but it has scrimped on many of the other flashy features adorning high-end handsets. Read on in this detailed review to find out how this 600-Euro (~US$678) supposed flagship killer performs in our tests.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Aside from some camera issues, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro doesn’t have many glaring weaknesses. You’re getting the same core specifications and features you would find on more expensive flagships, including the Snapdragon 855 and in-display fingerprint sensor. Also, there aren’t many phones that I can think of in this price range that offer both wireless charging and IP certification. It may not do too much to differentiate itself but not everyone cares about unique features or gimmicks. This is a phone that focuses on delivering a fast and reliable experience, and most of the features are practical. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro certainly nails those aspects and is a great bargain that shouldn’t be overlooked.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2020
Rating: performance: 91% display: 85% mobility: 64%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Chances are the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has slipped under your radar, but if you're in the market for a top-tier Android phone for around $500, it's one of the best you can get. The Axon 10 Pro offers a speedy Snapdragon 855 processor, an AMOLED display with slim bezels, triple rear cameras, and great battery life. You even get wireless charging and expandable storage.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ubergizmo English EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro (official page) is a good smartphone designed and built with care. It offers great performance and user experience, thanks to the mostly untouched Android user interface and good audio performance. Carrying it feels nice and the industrial design is agreeable.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The OnePlus 7T may be a more well-rounded phone for the money, but the Axon 10 Pro is a good alternative for those more concerned about battery life or storage capacity. If you're looking to spend less than the Axon 10 Pro's $549 price, look into the $399 Pixel 3a.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
As you can see, this $550 smartphone can definitely go head to head with phones that cost nearly double. It probably won’t win every battle, but that’s perfectly fine. What’s most surprising about this phone is that it beats OnePlus at its own game, offering flagship-tier hardware and a clean software experience at a very appealing price, making the ZTE Axon 10 Pro the new king of the budget flagship smartphone segment, That’s definitely something I wasn’t expecting when this phone showed up.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
At a time where flagship phones come in at $1,000 or more, ZTE shows up with a contender that’s nearly half the price. For only $549, the Axon 10 Pro will give you a phone that performs like a thousand dollar flagship. It boasts stunning battery life and a beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2019
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Aside from some camera issues, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro doesn’t have many glaring weaknesses. You’re getting the same core specifications and features you would find on more expensive flagships, including the Snapdragon 855 and in-display fingerprint sensor. Also, there aren’t many phones that I can think of in this price range that offer both wireless charging and IP certification. It may not do too much to differentiate itself but not everyone cares about unique features or gimmicks. This is a phone that focuses on delivering a fast and reliable experience, and most of the features are practical. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro certainly nails those aspects and is a great bargain that shouldn’t be overlooked.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2019
Rating: performance: 91% display: 88% mobility: 64%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
We may be in the age of the $999 flagship phone, but a few smartphone makers are still trying to put out premium devices that don't flirt with four-digit price tags. OnePlus and Asus have staked out their share of that market with the OnePlus 7 Pro and ZenFone 6, respectively, and now they're about to be joined by a familiar face that's been hard to find in the U.S. as of late.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2019
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Aside from some camera issues, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro doesn’t have many glaring weaknesses. You’re getting the same core specifications and features you would find on more expensive flagships, including the Snapdragon 855 and in-display fingerprint sensor. Also, there aren’t many phones that I can think of in this price range that offer both wireless charging and IP certification.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2019
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, we’re quite impressed with what we’re seeing in the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. For 599 euros this device offers 99-percent of the competition for substantially less money, and it’s a device we’re excited to get in for review soon. You can buy it right now from Saturn, Media Markt, and Amazon.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/10/2019
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 90% display: 95% mobility: 96%
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/27/2019
Source: A1 Blog DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2019
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2019
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech Stage DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect - 7/19
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% features: 85% mobility: 99% ergonomy: 71%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 11 5GProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 620
Display: 6.47 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.168kg
Price: 550 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
With the Axon 11 5G, ZTE relies on the name of the smartphone it already released. However, a look at the specifications sheet reveals that these are completely different smartphones, even if you take the 5G modem out of the equation. Read our review to learn what the ZTE Axon 11 5G has to offer.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 11 5G handles day-to-day tasks well, but is let down by a sub-par camera setup. There are better choices out there for the price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2020
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So should you buy the ZTE Axon 11 5G? Well, it certainly handles day-to-day tasks as well as any other phone. The little touches, like the in-display fingerprint scanner, aptX HD Bluetooth, and 5G support help the handset justify its price point. However, if you’re put off by a so-so display and below-average camera setup, then you’ll want to look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/28/2020
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2020
Source: Danviet VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/24/2020
ZTE Axon 11
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 11Processor: Mediatek Mediatek Helio P70
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Display: 6.47 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.165kg
Price: 349 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
ZTE promises buyers of the Axon 11 an appealing design and the excellent performance of the quad-camera system at an affordable price. Our review clarifies what users can actually expect from the almost 6.5-inch smartphone.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Pocketnow Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 11 is the company's latest mainline smartphone and even though JV hasn't used a flagship ZTE in quite a long time, there are some real surprises with this one.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2020
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 60% display: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
ZTE Axon 20 5G
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 20 5GProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 620
Display: 6.92 inch, 20.5, 2460 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.198kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: TechTablets
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/09/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
Crucially for those looking for all the bells and whistles of a quad-cam smartphone, the Axon 20 5G is disappointing for bokeh, telephoto zoom, and night photos. While 4K at 60 fps capture with effective stabilization is a nice draw for video enthusiasts, slow autofocus and exposure instabilities make the device difficult to recommend highly for video. More casual shooters, happy with a consistent and stable device that shoots reasonable quality standard or ultra-wide stills in good lighting, will be more at ease with the ZTE Axon 20 5G’s performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
ZTE’s ambitious under-display design for the front camera of the Axon 20 5G is esthetically impressive, but anyone who cares about selfie performance enough to read a review like this should probably look elsewhere. The performance compromises required to realize this design lead to seriously sub-par imaging when measured by nearly any metric. However, users who don’t care about the front camera at all should still consider this phone, as it appears to be a solid offering in other respects, and the hidden selfie cam is a neat trick for people who might use it only rarely.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2021
Source: Yugatech
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 02/07/2021
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN
Before I got to try this phone, and with no prior experience with ZTE, I kind of expected this to be a phone that focuses exclusively on doing one thing and fails at everything else. That isn't really the case, though. I was really happy with the performance, battery life, and the overall quality of the display and sound. ZTE gets a lot of the basics right, and on top of that, it adds the unique proposition of an under-display camera, and all of that costs about as much as you'd expect a phone with these specs to cost. You're not charged a ludicrous amount of money for a poorly implemented innovation.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Neowin
We go hands-on with the world's first smartphone with an under-display camera, the ZTE Axon 20 5G. It has a Snapdragon 765G, 8GB of RAM, 128GB of storage, and it costs $449.
Hands-On, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2021
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
Early adopters will probably enjoy the novelty of the ZTE Axon 20 5G, but the compromises to the selfie camera, face unlock, and display quality make this hard to recommend to most – though if you really never take selfies, you may find the large screen and solid spec sheet enough to win you over.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE raced to be first to release a mass-produced phone, the Axon 20 5G, with an under-display camera. But being first doesn't equate to stellar camera performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/23/2020
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Someone has to be the first, and in this case, it's the Axon 20 5G. A phone with a first-gen tech that makes it really cool and also disappointing at the same time. The issue is that the under-display selfie cam is too blurry and not up to the standards in 2020. There's also a visible square where the camera is located, but we can let that one pass as it's barely visible.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/22/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
It might be an outlier, as a little-known brand in the West, but this ZTE is a nod to the future, showing off a convincing under-screen camera, while delivering a long-lasting and ample performance in a fairly affordable package. It's in the details - autobrightness adjustment, frame-like screen bezel, and so-so cameras overall - where it sometimes misses the mark.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Overall, we prefer the Google Pixel 4a 5G because of its better cameras. And spending a little more money will net you the excellent OnePlus Nord, which is a pretty big step-up in UX and photography quality from the Axon 20 5G. Despite ZTE's impressive party trick, there are a few too many caveats to make this Android phone a top pick.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 90% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% performance: 88% display: 83% mobility: 83% workmanship: 88%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/21/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 81% mobility: 72% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2021
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2020
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/01/2021
Source: Cell Phones VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/21/2020
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/19/2020
Source: XT Mobile VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2020
Source: Unlimited Tech →zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
ZTE Axon 20
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 20Processor: UNISOC T618
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Display: 6.92 inch, 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.198kg
Price: 399 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
One of the most innovative phones of the year comes from ZTE. The Axon 20 is the first smartphone with an under-display camera that does without a notch or pop-up mechanism. Whether the camera module below the OLED panel in the Axon 20 is convincing can be found out in the review of the ZTE smartphone.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2021
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2021
Source: Heute DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/05/2021
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobility.bg BU→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/07/2021
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5GProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 888 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 660
Display: 6.68 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.188kg
Price: 749 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The Axon 30 Ultra is an exciting upper-range phone packed with up-to-date hardware. However, our review reveals that an Axon 30 Ultra cannot compete with high-end smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. You can read where ZTE's Axon 30 Ultra has shortcomings here.
Foreign Reviews
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G shows no frame drops at 30 fps and just a few at 60 fps; however, it shows a lot of stutters when playing video games and motion blur is noticeable. A big plus is that video play resumes instantly after moving the slider forwards or backwards in the timeline. Another plus is that the device is quite smooth when browsing, when in the gallery app, and when gaming. The ZTE device manages judder well, has smooth and accurate touch, and responds only rarely to ghost touches, but its measured touch-to-display response time at 103 ms, frequent stutters and visible aliasing make for an uncomfortable gaming experience overall.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/18/2022
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
For those seeking a smartphone with great qualities as a recording device, the Axon 30 Ultra is not a good fit. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra performs adequately in playback, however, and even excels in the arena of artifacts. Its scores in timbre, dynamics, and volume reflect the fact that this smartphone is functional for everyday uses.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/15/2021
Source: DxOMark EN→zh-CN
The Axon 30 Ultra is ZTE’s 2021 flagship device. It boasts a 6.7-inch, FHD+, an AMOLED flexible curved screen display with 144 Hz refresh rate, and a Snapdragon 888 chipset running Android 11. Providing enough juice to power all that, the Axon 30 Ultra is equipped with 4600 mAh battery that offers super-fast 65W charging. The main camera uses a Sony IMX686 chip linked to a f/1.6-aperture OIS lens, with a Samsung GW3 sensor on the ultra-wide coupled to a 120° field-of-view, ultra-low distortion, f/2.2-aperture lens. The dedicated portrait camera uses the same 64 MP Samsung sensor as the ultra-wide alongside a f/1.9-aperture lens. Finally the tele shooter features an 8 MP sensor with a periscope telephoto lens for 5x optical and up to 60x hybrid zoom. That’s a lot of hardware for a device that falls within our Premium ranking segment of smartphones priced between $600 to $799. Let’s see how it gets on in our DXOMARK Camera tests.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2021
Source: PC Mag EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is an excellent reminder of just how starved the US is for innovative yet affordable smartphones. It’s among the most handsome phones we’ve seen this year, and has a solid OLED display and an interesting camera stack. But despite its strengths, we can’t recommend the phone for US buyers. Poor connectivity and political uncertainty make it a risky bet that we wouldn’t take. If you’re looking for a small, relatively inexpensive Android flagship that will just work, no matter which carrier you choose, the Samsung Galaxy S21 is your best option. Both the 9 Pro and the S21 pack the latest Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 mobile platform, plenty of RAM, and incredible OLED displays with adaptive refresh rates. These excellent flagship-class phones have the power and features you need now, and much more reliability down the road.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/12/2021
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
ZTE stumbled a few years back when it was briefly on the US government's shit list, but it was able to get back to normal (unlike Huawei). The Axon 30 Ultra is its first major US release since the unpleasantness, and it's mostly successful. The display, build quality, specs, and camera hardware are all excellent values, and it's very fast with the Snapdragon 888. I like using the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but I don't like holding it much. The design is visually attractive, but the sharp, narrow rail along the edge digs into your hand. The curved screen also doesn't do any favors for the hand-feel. This phone would also get a higher score were it not for the lacking 5G support in the US. One 5G band is better than none, but the lack of wireless support makes me feel like this is not a long-haul device. Carriers are going to be investing heavily in 5G going forward, and this phone will barely benefit.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Irish Mirror EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a smartphone that immediately grabbed my attention. Its headline features include a 6.67in AMOLED display, quad-camera system with three 64MP shooters and a telescope lens, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 888 chipset and 65W fast charging. All of this comes in a slim, sleek and stylish frame with a price that undercuts many flagships by hundreds of euro. This isn’t just targeting the average flagship – this is pitched against the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra which comes in at €1479, almost twice the price of the Axon 30 Ultra,
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN
The Axon 30 Ultra comes at a price point of $749 in the US and 749€ in Europe. At this price, the nearest competitors are the Galaxy S21 and the OnePlus 9. The S21 is a very different form-factor phone, so not exactly quite the same comparison device, you’d have to compare it to the S21+, which at currently $899 and 1049€ is far outpricing the Axon 30 Ultra. While my experience on myOS on the Axon 30 Ultra has been fine and the phone received a couple of software updates since I got it, generally it would be wise to go into considering the phone with low expectations for much future significant udpates. In general, the Axon 30 Ultra was overly positive for me, and was a breath of fresh air in the flagship landscape. While the phone has weaknesses, it’s priced quite fairly, so it makes me look forward to ZTE’s next iteration.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/30/2021
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G is a phone with a bold gambit: to provide all the features and feel of an ‘ultra’ smartphone, at a price that won’t leave a hole in your wallet. It mostly succeeds with aplomb, but for a lack of stated long-term software support, this is a phone with few weaknesses and soaring strengths.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G is a high-specced phone with a great display, a good array of cameras, fantastic zoom photography capability, and a blindingly fast battery charging rate. The software still needs some refining, but the phone is a great choice for those seeking a flagship device who may not want to pay the highest price for a flagship.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN
There is an awful lot to like about the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, particularly the build quality and clean software. The phone is a fun one to play with as its large display is almost mesmerizing, especially when playing around with the camera. Games and videos look silky smooth with the (up to) 144Hz refresh rate and the 20:9 aspect ratio feels very comfortable. It will be at least two years before our mobile needs even come close to requiring the hardware of this device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
ZTE stumbled a few years back when it was briefly on the US government's shit list, but it was able to get back to normal (unlike Huawei). The Axon 30 Ultra is its first major US release since the unpleasantness, and it's mostly successful. The display, build quality, specs, and camera hardware are all excellent values, and it's very fast with the Snapdragon 888. I like using the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but I don't like holding it much. The design is visually attractive, but the sharp, narrow rail along the edge digs into your hand. The curved screen also doesn't do any favors for the hand-feel. This phone would also get a higher score were it not for the lacking 5G support in the US. One 5G band is better than none, but the lack of wireless support makes me feel like this is not a long-haul device. Carriers are going to be investing heavily in 5G going forward, and this phone will barely benefit.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
ZTE stumbled a few years back when it was briefly on the US government's shit list, but it was able to get back to normal (unlike Huawei). The Axon 30 Ultra is its first major US release since the unpleasantness, and it's mostly successful. The display, build quality, specs, and camera hardware are all excellent values, and it's very fast with the Snapdragon 888. I like using the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but I don't like holding it much. The design is visually attractive, but the sharp, narrow rail along the edge digs into your hand. The curved screen also doesn't do any favors for the hand-feel. This phone would also get a higher score were it not for the lacking 5G support in the US. One 5G band is better than none, but the lack of wireless support makes me feel like this is not a long-haul device. Carriers are going to be investing heavily in 5G going forward, and this phone will barely benefit.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/19/2021
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN
Is the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra the right phone for you? If you’re looking for a phone that’s well-rounded at a great price, the Axon 30 Ultra checks all the right boxes. It does have a few issues, but unless you’re a hardcore mobile gamer, there’s really no reason to mass up on this phone. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a great buy for the casual user who wants to upgrade from a mid-range device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra provides a premium flagship experience at a much cheaper price than most of the competition. It may miss out on a couple of specs, but those are sacrifices we imagine many will be willing to make.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: The Verge EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is exactly what it appears to be: a lower cost alternative to the big Android flagships with top-tier performance and a great screen. I wouldn’t recommend it to just anyone, and you need to be comfortable either living with a couple of quirks or navigating a way around them. You don’t quite get the same level of polish or reassurance that you would from a Samsung, OnePlus, or Google device, but in return you get excellent performance for the money.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN
That said, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra won’t top any best lists, as it’s dragged down by its less refined features. Had the phone offered a little more battery capacity, a QHD resolution display or some consistent photography software, it would easily be equivalent to the OnePlus 9 Pro, iPhone 12 Pro or Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra. Fortunately, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra doesn’t have to be. Its current price is low enough that it's easy to overlook those shortcomings. ZTE’s made a real flagship-killing phone with the Axon 30 Ultra, and it should be your top choice if you want the ultimate hardware for the cheapest price you can get.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN
There might be no under-display selfie camera, but for the asking price you'll soon forget about that. This ZTE is powerful and has a one super smooth 144Hz screen. However, some software notification issues irritate, and while the cameras have potential there's not great synergy between all the optics on the rear.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
It’s a genuinely exciting flagship smartphone in practically every department: it’s lightweight, feels great in the hand, the 144Hz 6.67in AMOLED display is detailed and crisp, the Snapdragon 888 allows it to perform like a gaming phone and, well, that camera setup is incredible.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN
The Axon does come short in a few other areas - not by much, but the room for improvement is there. The display has a ton of potential but doesn't quite live up to it, dust and water protection is missing, there's no wireless charging. For all its camera chops, the Axon is also missing AF on the ultrawide. All things considered, though, we can give the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G a recommendation. It'll be a particularly good fit for those looking to take nice pictures without springing the cash for the true no-holds-barred flagships that can run you twice the price. Sure, there will be compromises, but there won't be any dealbreakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Neowin EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is an odd case of a phone that's almost unique based on how un-unique it seemingly is. The design is pretty boring and unexceptional even if there's nothing wrong with it, and there's no feature that's going to blow your mind in any way, but there's also nothing too terribly wrong with it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN
ZTE’s step back into the flagship market is definitely noted. The Axon 30 Ultra brings premium design and performance at a more than reasonable price of $749, positioning itself somewhere between the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and the Galaxy S21 pricewise. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is very powerful, with a Snapdragon 888 processor coupled with 8GB or 12GB of RAM. The phone is indeed snappy, and the 144Hz FHD+ AMOLED display is its strongest weapon.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
ZTE took a big step forward in modernizing its smartphone lineup with the Axon 30 Ultra. This sleek device bests some competitors with a 144Hz screen and matches them on many other features. It lacks a few extras you'll find on other affordable flagships, but this is a finely crafted phone for an aggressively competitive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is the 2021 flagship offering from the company. With a starting price of $749, the Axon 30 Ultra positions itself somewhere between the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE and the Galaxy S21 when it comes to price. However, the specs sheet mentions perks and features you’d expect out of much more expensive phones: 65W fast charging, a periscope zoom camera, a Snapdragon 888 chip with 5G, and a 144Hz OLED display, for example.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2021
Source: XDA Developers EN→zh-CN
There are a lot of good Android flagships from Chinese tech brands such as the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, OPPO Find X3 Pro, and the Vivo X60 Pro Plus. But the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has something on all of those phones — it will be sold in the US. While it’s not going to take a dent out of Apple or Samsung’s pie, with LG shutting down its mobile business, there’s room in the US phone scene for another brand to make an impression.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Source: Futurezone.at DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/08/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2021
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2021
Source: Nextpit Germany DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2021
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 89% features: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: El Español ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/22/2021
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tutto Android IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2021
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% display: 90% mobility: 79% workmanship: 86%
Source: Nextpit France FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/24/2021
Source: 3DNews.ru RU→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/08/2021
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/03/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/14/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/16/2021
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
ZTE Axon 30 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 30 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 888 5G
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 660
Display: 6.67 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.186kg
Price: 400 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Genk VN→zh-CN
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 05/04/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/16/2021
ZTE Axon 30 5G
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 30 5GProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 870
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 650
Display: 6.92 inch, 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 499 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
不仅Axon 30 5G的屏下摄像头得到了极大的改善,而且中兴也在各方面对该设备进行了升级。更快的SoC以及USB速度,更多的RAM,以及120Hz的AMOLED显示屏。阅读我们的评论,了解Axon 30尽管价格低廉,但是否是一个抢手货。
Foreign Reviews
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN
I absolutely love that ZTE is working out the kinks for its under-display selfie camera. It’s incredibly joyful to look at the screen and not have your eyes immediately roam to a hole-punch cutout of any kind. And the quality itself is still much better than what Samsung packed into the Galaxy Z Fold 3. ZTE’s definitely leading the pack here, and we’re excited to see it adopted in future devices. But there’s always an elephant in the room, and the ZTE Axon 30’s stiffest competition comes straight from Google. The Pixel 6 is priced at $100 more (without any deals), but brings Android 12 out of the box, an IP68 rating, wireless charging, and a striking design. Sure, you’ll have to “deal” with a hole-punch cutout, but it’s really not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things. ZTE is definitely on the right track as the Axon 30 is still a competitive phone with a competitive price. Performance is just as good as you would hope, and even the camera system will get you by in most situations. It’s just the rest of the package that leaves us wanting more.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN
I absolutely love that ZTE is working out the kinks for its under-display selfie camera. It’s incredibly joyful to look at the screen and not have your eyes immediately roam to a hole-punch cutout of any kind. And the quality itself is still much better than what Samsung packed into the Galaxy Z Fold 3. ZTE’s definitely leading the pack here, and we’re excited to see it adopted in future devices. But there’s always an elephant in the room, and the ZTE Axon 30’s stiffest competition comes straight from Google. The Pixel 6 is priced at $100 more (without any deals), but brings Android 12 out of the box, an IP68 rating, wireless charging, and a striking design. Sure, you’ll have to “deal” with a hole-punch cutout, but it’s really not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things. ZTE is definitely on the right track as the Axon 30 is still a competitive phone with a competitive price. Performance is just as good as you would hope, and even the camera system will get you by in most situations. It’s just the rest of the package that leaves us wanting more.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
Innovative features don’t make or break a smartphone, but they certainly make the ZTE Axon 30 a more attractive option. With an invisible under-display camera and in-display fingerprint sensor, this almost-flagship device from ZTE does have a wow factor, which is hard to come by nowadays. Unfortunately, some of the device’s more glaring faults are hard to ignore, even at the reasonable mid-tier $500 starting price, which is a good bit cheaper than the Axon 30 Ultra at $750. There are no abject deal breakers on this phone, but you won’t see it at the top of a “Best Smartphone” this year. Suffice it to say, it provides a lot of cool features, but in the end the gimmicks don’t make up for the substantive shortcomings.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
Innovative features don’t make or break a smartphone, but they certainly make the ZTE Axon 30 a more attractive option. With an invisible under-display camera and in-display fingerprint sensor, this almost-flagship device from ZTE does have a wow factor, which is hard to come by nowadays. Unfortunately, some of the device’s more glaring faults are hard to ignore, even at the reasonable mid-tier $500 starting price, which is a good bit cheaper than the Axon 30 Ultra at $750. There are no abject deal breakers on this phone, but you won’t see it at the top of a “Best Smartphone” this year. Suffice it to say, it provides a lot of cool features, but in the end the gimmicks don’t make up for the substantive shortcomings.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
There’s certainly a market for the ZTE Axon 30. The massive edge-to-edge display and powerful processor make watching videos, playing games, and recording in 4K that much easier, and obviously everyone loves a big battery. Plus, with cool features like under-display cameras and in-display fingerprint sensors, it looks like a very modern phone. Still, it’s hard to ignore the better, more affordable options on the market, particularly when you consider the lackluster camera. The performance lags compared to competitors like Google and Samsung, even with the powerful processor, and the cheap body and flimsy buttons do not bode well for an enjoyable smartphone experience. You also can't ignore the Google Pixel 6, which is only $100 more. If you can afford the premium, the Pixel is a much better phone... unless you just really want an invisible under-display camera.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android Police EN→zh-CN
There’s certainly a market for the ZTE Axon 30. The massive edge-to-edge display and powerful processor make watching videos, playing games, and recording in 4K that much easier, and obviously everyone loves a big battery. Plus, with cool features like under-display cameras and in-display fingerprint sensors, it looks like a very modern phone. Still, it’s hard to ignore the better, more affordable options on the market, particularly when you consider the lackluster camera. The performance lags compared to competitors like Google and Samsung, even with the powerful processor, and the cheap body and flimsy buttons do not bode well for an enjoyable smartphone experience. You also can't ignore the Google Pixel 6, which is only $100 more. If you can afford the premium, the Pixel is a much better phone... unless you just really want an invisible under-display camera.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2021
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→zh-CN
Wrapping up this review, the ZTE Axon 30 has a bunch of talking points—with the star of the show being the no-notch display. It effortlessly handles everyday tasks while its battery life is no slouch either. Despite this, I would hesitate to recommend it to someone. Especially due to its cameras. The ones on the back require further optimization whereas the front camera is abysmal when compared to regular selfie cameras. But if you’re someone who enjoys experimenting with cutting-edge technology, the Axon 30 could be worth a shot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal EN→zh-CN
Wrapping up this review, the ZTE Axon 30 has a bunch of talking points—with the star of the show being the no-notch display. It effortlessly handles everyday tasks while its battery life is no slouch either. Despite this, I would hesitate to recommend it to someone. Especially due to its cameras. The ones on the back require further optimization whereas the front camera is abysmal when compared to regular selfie cameras. But if you’re someone who enjoys experimenting with cutting-edge technology, the Axon 30 could be worth a shot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 70% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a welcome addition to the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While it’s pretty ordinary in many respects, its 6.92-inch 120Hz OLED display really stands out from the crowd. We can’t say we understand ZTE’s decision to focus on hiding the selfie camera so effectively behind that display, and we would have liked to have seen such a component married with more convincing specs elsewhere. But there’s no denying how tight the implementation of this technology is, even if it takes its toll on selfie quality. There are better-rounded mid-range phones on the market, such as the OnePlus Nord 2 and the Xiaomi Mi 11. But the ZTE Axon 30 5G’s party trick undoubtedly earns it a place at the table as an affordable media playback specialist.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a welcome addition to the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While it’s pretty ordinary in many respects, its 6.92-inch 120Hz OLED display really stands out from the crowd. We can’t say we understand ZTE’s decision to focus on hiding the selfie camera so effectively behind that display, and we would have liked to have seen such a component married with more convincing specs elsewhere. But there’s no denying how tight the implementation of this technology is, even if it takes its toll on selfie quality. There are better-rounded mid-range phones on the market, such as the OnePlus Nord 2 and the Xiaomi Mi 11. But the ZTE Axon 30 5G’s party trick undoubtedly earns it a place at the table as an affordable media playback specialist.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN
The Axon 30 is ZTE’s next flagship phone that packs a ton of impressive specs alongside its standout feature: a truly edge-to-edge screen. Unlike nearly every other phone on the market, the Axon 30’s display doesn’t have a notch or cutout for the front-facing camera. To achieve this, ZTE has incorporated an under-display camera, one of the few in mainstream phones, which is visible when you’re taking front-facing photos but - disappears completely when not in use. Well, almost completely, for if you look closely there’s a small off-color square that the camera hides behind. The Axon 30’s cameras are also impressive for its price, capable of capturing great daylight photos with its range of ultra-wide and macro capabilities. It doesn’t have a telephoto lens, and its night mode requires some light to function – which pales compared to the flagship capability of phones like the iPhone 13 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S21. Overall, the ZTE Axon 30 is a great mid-range phone that offers excellent value compared to more expensive handsets – and has a feature that won’t come to other flagship phones until 2022 or later.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar EN→zh-CN
The Axon 30 is ZTE’s next flagship phone that packs a ton of impressive specs alongside its standout feature: a truly edge-to-edge screen. Unlike nearly every other phone on the market, the Axon 30’s display doesn’t have a notch or cutout for the front-facing camera. To achieve this, ZTE has incorporated an under-display camera, one of the few in mainstream phones, which is visible when you’re taking front-facing photos but - disappears completely when not in use. Well, almost completely, for if you look closely there’s a small off-color square that the camera hides behind. The Axon 30’s cameras are also impressive for its price, capable of capturing great daylight photos with its range of ultra-wide and macro capabilities. It doesn’t have a telephoto lens, and its night mode requires some light to function – which pales compared to the flagship capability of phones like the iPhone 13 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S21. Overall, the ZTE Axon 30 is a great mid-range phone that offers excellent value compared to more expensive handsets – and has a feature that won’t come to other flagship phones until 2022 or later.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN
ZTE has crafted an excellent phone that delivers incredible performance and fast 5G speeds on a nice budget. $499 is easy to swallow for a higher end phone, and it’s certainly punching above its weight as far as performance goes. You’re getting a large battery, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1, Android 11 out of the box; they’re crossed off a lot of the small things you’d expect from a nice phones these days. But it’s still not perfect. That camera, while good, leaves something to be desired, and the phone really does feel cheap. A nice solid case might round that out, but the cheaper materials and almost cheap-feeling weight don’t feel like a $500 phone, even if everything else about the phone is great. This phone’s not going to make sense for everybody, but it’s definitely worth checking out for most people.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2021
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN
ZTE has crafted an excellent phone that delivers incredible performance and fast 5G speeds on a nice budget. $499 is easy to swallow for a higher end phone, and it’s certainly punching above its weight as far as performance goes. You’re getting a large battery, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1, Android 11 out of the box; they’re crossed off a lot of the small things you’d expect from a nice phones these days. But it’s still not perfect. That camera, while good, leaves something to be desired, and the phone really does feel cheap. A nice solid case might round that out, but the cheaper materials and almost cheap-feeling weight don’t feel like a $500 phone, even if everything else about the phone is great. This phone’s not going to make sense for everybody, but it’s definitely worth checking out for most people.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2021
Source: Engadget
The Axon 30 is arriving after the Axon 30 Ultra, and while it's not as powerful as its predecessor, it packs a nearly perfectly hidden under-display camera. Unfortunately, the camera quality isn't great, front or back, but this is a decently powerful device with a great screen, for around $500, so there are going to be compromises. Still, The ZTE Axon 30 is well built, runs a clean version of Android, and is a showcase for tech we can expect to become more common soon.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2021
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN
With the Axon 30, ZTE has proved it can successfully camouflage its under-display camera. But that doesn’t mean it’s up to the task. Image quality from the secretive selfie lens really isn’t good enough, even if the implementation is impressive. Aside from that, the Axon 30 has a gorgeous, fluid screen and a decent rear camera setup. The lack of wider 5G support in the US is frustrating in a 2021 phone, but there is still a lot here for $500. The bigger challenge is that competition is tough in the middleweight phone arena. Google’s latest Pixel, the 5a, rings in at $450, and offers better-performing cameras, front and back. If you’re struggling to pick between the two, the decision loosely boils down to a bigger screen or better selfies.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2021
Source: Engadget
The Axon 30 is arriving after the Axon 30 Ultra, and while it's not as powerful as its predecessor, it packs a nearly perfectly hidden under-display camera. Unfortunately, the camera quality isn't great, front or back, but this is a decently powerful device with a great screen, for around $500, so there are going to be compromises. Still, The ZTE Axon 30 is well built, runs a clean version of Android, and is a showcase for tech we can expect to become more common soon.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2021
Source: Engadget EN→zh-CN
With the Axon 30, ZTE has proved it can successfully camouflage its under-display camera. But that doesn’t mean it’s up to the task. Image quality from the secretive selfie lens really isn’t good enough, even if the implementation is impressive. Aside from that, the Axon 30 has a gorgeous, fluid screen and a decent rear camera setup. The lack of wider 5G support in the US is frustrating in a 2021 phone, but there is still a lot here for $500. The bigger challenge is that competition is tough in the middleweight phone arena. Google’s latest Pixel, the 5a, rings in at $450, and offers better-performing cameras, front and back. If you’re struggling to pick between the two, the decision loosely boils down to a bigger screen or better selfies.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2021
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN
As we said, the Axon 30 5G has a few intriguing features on its specs sheet even if you look past the under-display selfie camera. It's got a high-performance Snapdragon 870 SoC, as well as a very good 120Hz OLED panel. Looking ahead, the Axon 30 5G may go down the price ladder, and then you can probably consider buying one. But for now, we suggest you skip it unless you are here solely for the novelty of the under-display camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN
While the under-display camera here is without rival - it's easily the best implementation of the technology to date, meaning the big screen can dominate - much of the Axon 30 5G's other features don't live up to quite such lofty heights. So-so cameras, some software hiccups, and limited battery ultimately distract from the mighty impressive semi-invisible front camera. Still, at this price point that's perfectly acceptable.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN
As we said, the Axon 30 5G has a few intriguing features on its specs sheet even if you look past the under-display selfie camera. It's got a high-performance Snapdragon 870 SoC, as well as a very good 120Hz OLED panel. Looking ahead, the Axon 30 5G may go down the price ladder, and then you can probably consider buying one. But for now, we suggest you skip it unless you are here solely for the novelty of the under-display camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Pocket Lint EN→zh-CN
While the under-display camera here is without rival - it's easily the best implementation of the technology to date, meaning the big screen can dominate - much of the Axon 30 5G's other features don't live up to quite such lofty heights. So-so cameras, some software hiccups, and limited battery ultimately distract from the mighty impressive semi-invisible front camera. Still, at this price point that's perfectly acceptable.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN
At its $499 price point for the 8GB/128GB base model, and $599 for the 12GB/256GB version, the Axon 30 is not exactly swimming with sharks when it comes to the competition. The main ones are the OnePlus 9, which is also suited for T-Mobile, but starts at $729 with faster processor and longer battery life. The other, more formidable direct competitor to the Axon 30 are the Motorola Edge 2021 specs, with the phone now dropped to $499, too, with bigger battery and camera sensor, but weaker processor/memory combo. Both of those, however, don't have the Axon 30's wow factor with its "all-screen" display design and cool hidden selfie camera, so if you are looking for a sub-$500 phone with most modern bells and whistles, the new ZTE budget champ deserves a strong consideration.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Phone Arena EN→zh-CN
At its $499 price point for the 8GB/128GB base model, and $599 for the 12GB/256GB version, the Axon 30 is not exactly swimming with sharks when it comes to the competition. The main ones are the OnePlus 9, which is also suited for T-Mobile, but starts at $729 with faster processor and longer battery life. The other, more formidable direct competitor to the Axon 30 are the Motorola Edge 2021 specs, with the phone now dropped to $499, too, with bigger battery and camera sensor, but weaker processor/memory combo. Both of those, however, don't have the Axon 30's wow factor with its "all-screen" display design and cool hidden selfie camera, so if you are looking for a sub-$500 phone with most modern bells and whistles, the new ZTE budget champ deserves a strong consideration.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Mobile Tech Review
The $499 Axon 30 runs Android 11 on the Snapdragon 870 with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage plus a microSD card slot (a 12GB + 256GB version is also available). It has 4 rear cameras and the new 16MP under-display selfie camera puts the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3’s to shame. It comes with a 65 watt super-fast charger and a clear case. The unlocked phone is available direct from ZTE’s website in the US.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/11/2021
Source: XDA Developers EN→zh-CN
The Axon 30’s selfie camera is very out of sight, out of mind, but it’s still nowhere near the capabilities of regular front-facing cameras. It does the job for video calls and quick pictures, but I’d never rely on it for taking snapshots of anything “important”. It’s a means to an end in order to have a completely bezelless, no-hole-punch experience, and it achieves that quite well as a result. If you value a selfie camera, then I can’t stress enough how much this phone is not for you. However, if you don’t care about the selfie camera, then there’s no reason to not get the Axon 30. The area over the camera is no longer an eyesore and blends into the rest of the display, and it’s good enough for the occasional video call if required. The primary camera is excellent, the performance thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 is also stellar, and a starting price of €499 places this device in a pretty competitive space.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2021
Source: Mobile Tech Review
The $499 Axon 30 runs Android 11 on the Snapdragon 870 with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage plus a microSD card slot (a 12GB + 256GB version is also available). It has 4 rear cameras and the new 16MP under-display selfie camera puts the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3’s to shame. It comes with a 65 watt super-fast charger and a clear case. The unlocked phone is available direct from ZTE’s website in the US.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/11/2021
Source: XDA Developers EN→zh-CN
The Axon 30’s selfie camera is very out of sight, out of mind, but it’s still nowhere near the capabilities of regular front-facing cameras. It does the job for video calls and quick pictures, but I’d never rely on it for taking snapshots of anything “important”. It’s a means to an end in order to have a completely bezelless, no-hole-punch experience, and it achieves that quite well as a result. If you value a selfie camera, then I can’t stress enough how much this phone is not for you. However, if you don’t care about the selfie camera, then there’s no reason to not get the Axon 30. The area over the camera is no longer an eyesore and blends into the rest of the display, and it’s good enough for the occasional video call if required. The primary camera is excellent, the performance thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 is also stellar, and a starting price of €499 places this device in a pretty competitive space.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 09/11/2021
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is uniquely exciting because of its futuristic under-display camera and the phone’s unexpectedly good specs, combined with a fairly low price. Still, it's tricky to actually recommend the phone as a practical purchase. You may want to go for the Axon 30 5G because of the large display and great performance, which makes it an excellent option for games. The phone’s charging and battery life do well also, but are not the best you can get for the money. The photography is about passable, but it isn't any better than its rivals, particularly when it comes to selfie quality. The Axon 30 is a much better phone than the Axon 20 was, but unfortunately the competition has moved forward, too, as you can see with comparable phones from OnePlus and Samsung. At least the Axon 30 can still lay claim to having the best under-display camera on the market, especially when it costs about a third of the price of the other phone with the same feature.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is uniquely exciting because of its futuristic under-display camera and the phone’s unexpectedly good specs, combined with a fairly low price. Still, it's tricky to actually recommend the phone as a practical purchase. You may want to go for the Axon 30 5G because of the large display and great performance, which makes it an excellent option for games. The phone’s charging and battery life do well also, but are not the best you can get for the money. The photography is about passable, but it isn't any better than its rivals, particularly when it comes to selfie quality. The Axon 30 is a much better phone than the Axon 20 was, but unfortunately the competition has moved forward, too, as you can see with comparable phones from OnePlus and Samsung. At least the Axon 30 can still lay claim to having the best under-display camera on the market, especially when it costs about a third of the price of the other phone with the same feature.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a competitively priced mid-range smartphone with premium features, including a gorgeous 6.92in AMOLED display and second-gen under-display camera tech that blows the UDC competition out of the water - even if it's still not quite enough to take on traditional selfie cameras just yet.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30 5G is a competitively priced mid-range smartphone with premium features, including a gorgeous 6.92in AMOLED display and second-gen under-display camera tech that blows the UDC competition out of the water - even if it's still not quite enough to take on traditional selfie cameras just yet.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
That said, the ZTE Axon 30 still provides a lot of power for your dollar. In fact, its performance prowess can almost hang with the latest top-tier flagship phones, and its super-fast charging helps counterbalance the middling battery life. Lastly, its under-display camera technology is currently best in class and provides an experience unlike any other. So at $500, it’s hard to argue with ZTE’s offering here, but ultimately it’s going to come down to what you value most. If you’re looking for a big-screen powerful device, and care little for premium build quality the ZTE Axon 30 is a respectable option. Still, it’s sad to see ZTE miss the mark on some staple features and software support, which means the other impressive feats come at a significant trade-off, and for most, the Pixel 5a will be the better buy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
That said, the ZTE Axon 30 still provides a lot of power for your dollar. In fact, its performance prowess can almost hang with the latest top-tier flagship phones, and its super-fast charging helps counterbalance the middling battery life. Lastly, its under-display camera technology is currently best in class and provides an experience unlike any other. So at $500, it’s hard to argue with ZTE’s offering here, but ultimately it’s going to come down to what you value most. If you’re looking for a big-screen powerful device, and care little for premium build quality the ZTE Axon 30 is a respectable option. Still, it’s sad to see ZTE miss the mark on some staple features and software support, which means the other impressive feats come at a significant trade-off, and for most, the Pixel 5a will be the better buy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Android Headlines EN→zh-CN
I am impressed with all the improvements ZTE has made with the Axon 30 5G. There are some significant improvements with the second-generation under-display selfie camera. But along with that, they have improved pretty much every single gripe or annoyance from the Axon 20 5G. I like the new hardware design language and despite being a large device how lightweight it feels in the hand. The display is better, brighter, with an improved touch sampling rate and a smaller chin. There is a better processor and storage is now UFS3.1. Battery life is still good and now there is 65W fast charge support. Software is better and there is 5G connectivity out of the box. In summary, all the little tweaks and changes result in a markedly improved user experience. If you are not a big selfie camera person and want an uninterrupted display for under $500 then the Axon 30 5G should be near the top of your shopping list.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Headlines EN→zh-CN
I am impressed with all the improvements ZTE has made with the Axon 30 5G. There are some significant improvements with the second-generation under-display selfie camera. But along with that, they have improved pretty much every single gripe or annoyance from the Axon 20 5G. I like the new hardware design language and despite being a large device how lightweight it feels in the hand. The display is better, brighter, with an improved touch sampling rate and a smaller chin. There is a better processor and storage is now UFS3.1. Battery life is still good and now there is 65W fast charge support. Software is better and there is 5G connectivity out of the box. In summary, all the little tweaks and changes result in a markedly improved user experience. If you are not a big selfie camera person and want an uninterrupted display for under $500 then the Axon 30 5G should be near the top of your shopping list.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN
One could live with the aforementioned aspects; however, the large deal-breaker is the unsatisfactory power efficiency of the panel. At 423nits brightness, the phone uses 2.87W of power, which is significantly worse than Samsung Display OLED panels (S20U – 2.4W, S21U, 1.8W) Much like the many phones that got ruined by inefficient displays in the past, it also looks like the Axon 30 is also suffering from a larger battery life hit due to the display. Given the choice of a UDC with an inefficient screen, or a hole-punch with an efficient screen, I’d always choose the latter. Overall, I think the Axon 30 is an interesting phone, but I can’t help feel it’s still more of an immature technology showcase rather than a refined product. I think the Ultra sibling is still a much better phone, but at least ZTE is pricing the Axon 30 at a quite reasonable level.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/03/2021
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN
In the end, the ZTE Axon 30 5G is a tough one to figure. It sports a remarkably stunning display, and I admire the efforts to create a new OS. It shows initiative to better the product. Yet, I find myself nitpicking on the horrid selfie camera and the lack of wireless charging or an IP rating. For a $500 phone using a brand new technology, I might be asking too much. But if the Google Pixel 5a can offer water resistance on a phone that's $50 cheaper, I expect the Axon 30 5G to have at least an IP rating. That being said, if you are down for blurry selfies and don't care about the small details, you will be satisfied with this phone. The sheer computing power and that achingly pretty (oh-so-pretty) display will win your heart any day of the year. Just know what you signed up for when buying yourself one.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AnandTech EN→zh-CN
One could live with the aforementioned aspects; however, the large deal-breaker is the unsatisfactory power efficiency of the panel. At 423nits brightness, the phone uses 2.87W of power, which is significantly worse than Samsung Display OLED panels (S20U – 2.4W, S21U, 1.8W) Much like the many phones that got ruined by inefficient displays in the past, it also looks like the Axon 30 is also suffering from a larger battery life hit due to the display. Given the choice of a UDC with an inefficient screen, or a hole-punch with an efficient screen, I’d always choose the latter. Overall, I think the Axon 30 is an interesting phone, but I can’t help feel it’s still more of an immature technology showcase rather than a refined product. I think the Ultra sibling is still a much better phone, but at least ZTE is pricing the Axon 30 at a quite reasonable level.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/03/2021
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN
In the end, the ZTE Axon 30 5G is a tough one to figure. It sports a remarkably stunning display, and I admire the efforts to create a new OS. It shows initiative to better the product. Yet, I find myself nitpicking on the horrid selfie camera and the lack of wireless charging or an IP rating. For a $500 phone using a brand new technology, I might be asking too much. But if the Google Pixel 5a can offer water resistance on a phone that's $50 cheaper, I expect the Axon 30 5G to have at least an IP rating. That being said, if you are down for blurry selfies and don't care about the small details, you will be satisfied with this phone. The sheer computing power and that achingly pretty (oh-so-pretty) display will win your heart any day of the year. Just know what you signed up for when buying yourself one.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN
ZTE hedged all its bets on a gorgeous screen, decent performance and the innovation of an under-display camera, with the trade-offs being less-than-flagship internals, subpar camera quality and the lack of a water/dust resistance rating. The naff camera is a head scratcher, given the importance of having a good front-facing snapper. The picture quality, along with the distracting camera door, proves this technology is not ready for primetime. But all-in-all, the Axon 30 5G is a decent flagship-killing package for the price. If you can workaround its pitfalls, this is a glimpse at one of the next big steps forward in smartphone design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN
ZTE hedged all its bets on a gorgeous screen, decent performance and the innovation of an under-display camera, with the trade-offs being less-than-flagship internals, subpar camera quality and the lack of a water/dust resistance rating. The naff camera is a head scratcher, given the importance of having a good front-facing snapper. The picture quality, along with the distracting camera door, proves this technology is not ready for primetime. But all-in-all, the Axon 30 5G is a decent flagship-killing package for the price. If you can workaround its pitfalls, this is a glimpse at one of the next big steps forward in smartphone design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
As mentioned above, the ZTE Axon 30 5G smartphone is worth your money. But considering this phone perfect might not be good. It has the best gaming performance, aesthetic appearance, vibrant color screen, above-average camera technology, and most importantly, decent battery life. The under-display phone equips all the aspects users need for everyday use. Plus, it’s one of the best recommendations for performance enthusiasts looking for a powerful phone. However, at the same time, few negligible flaws appear on the Axon 30 phone, but when comparing with the plus point, it all makes sense in the end. If you’re looking for an alternative option, you can definitely check out the Mi Mix 4 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
As mentioned above, the ZTE Axon 30 5G smartphone is worth your money. But considering this phone perfect might not be good. It has the best gaming performance, aesthetic appearance, vibrant color screen, above-average camera technology, and most importantly, decent battery life. The under-display phone equips all the aspects users need for everyday use. Plus, it’s one of the best recommendations for performance enthusiasts looking for a powerful phone. However, at the same time, few negligible flaws appear on the Axon 30 phone, but when comparing with the plus point, it all makes sense in the end. If you’re looking for an alternative option, you can definitely check out the Mi Mix 4 smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: On MSFT EN→zh-CN
Overall, the ZTE Axon 30 is a mid-range Android phone that's almost to the flagship level. The device has some great specs, that can help you speed through your tasks, and its 120Hz AMOLED panel is amazing. The operating system is also clean, and all the cameras can get most jobs done right. You can buy the ZTE Axon 30 yourself come September 8 starting at $500.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2021
Source: On MSFT EN→zh-CN
Overall, the ZTE Axon 30 is a mid-range Android phone that's almost to the flagship level. The device has some great specs, that can help you speed through your tasks, and its 120Hz AMOLED panel is amazing. The operating system is also clean, and all the cameras can get most jobs done right. You can buy the ZTE Axon 30 yourself come September 8 starting at $500.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/26/2021
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN
ZTE has beaten most smartphone makers with the release of the ZTE Axon 30 – one of the first to ‘not show off’ its invisible, under-display, selfie camera for full screen, uninterrupted visuals. It uses a 16MP sensor under a seven-layer transparency and a special UDC Pro Display chip to manage the screen’s transparency and overall screen performance. To quote ZTE
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/28/2021
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN
ZTE has beaten most smartphone makers with the release of the ZTE Axon 30 – one of the first to ‘not show off’ its invisible, under-display, selfie camera for full screen, uninterrupted visuals. It uses a 16MP sensor under a seven-layer transparency and a special UDC Pro Display chip to manage the screen’s transparency and overall screen performance. To quote ZTE
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/28/2021
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN
ZTE Axon 30 5G not only satisfies the small regret of the previous generation of under-screen proactive effects, but its comprehensive configuration also understands the needs of users quite well. 120Hz high color gamut screen, Snapdragon 870 processor, Sony IMX 682 main camera, full-featured NFC, 55W fast charging, etc., are all flagship standard equipment without compromise. While exploring the proactive under-screen, ZTE Axon 30 5G has not forgotten the essence of mobile phones. It has everything that should be there to bring users the most comprehensive experience upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: Igeekphone EN→zh-CN
ZTE Axon 30 5G not only satisfies the small regret of the previous generation of under-screen proactive effects, but its comprehensive configuration also understands the needs of users quite well. 120Hz high color gamut screen, Snapdragon 870 processor, Sony IMX 682 main camera, full-featured NFC, 55W fast charging, etc., are all flagship standard equipment without compromise. While exploring the proactive under-screen, ZTE Axon 30 5G has not forgotten the essence of mobile phones. It has everything that should be there to bring users the most comprehensive experience upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/27/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 84% performance: 80% mobility: 84% workmanship: 87%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 84% performance: 80% mobility: 84% workmanship: 87%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2021
Source: Computerbild DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2021
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2021
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/28/2021
Rating: performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 88%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/28/2021
Rating: performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 88% workmanship: 88%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/24/2021
Source: Komputerswiat PL→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/24/2021
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 91% features: 92% mobility: 82% workmanship: 88%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/20/2022
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 91% features: 92% mobility: 82% workmanship: 88%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 40 UltraProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 8 Gen 1
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 730
Display: 6.80 inch, 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixels
Weight: 0.204kg
Price: 829 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Axon 40 Ultra则不同。中兴通讯的新旗舰机的自拍相机隐藏在显示屏下面。此外,手机的玻璃后盖上有多达三个6400万像素的摄像头,包括一个3.5倍光学变焦的长焦镜头。相比之下,其他高端组件,如120赫兹的AMOLED显示屏和骁龙8代似乎几乎是小菜一碟。
Foreign Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition smartphone doesn’t come with any major improvement and everything is as it is as the Axon 40 Ultra. The primary difference would be the new design layout and fast charging speed. But if you are looking for something unique from the ZTE in the flagship range, you should purchase this phone right away. Although, the phone is currently exclusive to the china market only. Aside from this, there are tons of other value-of-money options that come this year. Therefore, we would recommend you go with alternative options such as Google Pixel 7 Pro which renders the best features and is offered at almost the same price. But the final decision is in your hand, so pick the device according to your wish wisely.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/23/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition smartphone doesn’t come with any major improvement and everything is as it is as the Axon 40 Ultra. The primary difference would be the new design layout and fast charging speed. But if you are looking for something unique from the ZTE in the flagship range, you should purchase this phone right away. Although, the phone is currently exclusive to the china market only. Aside from this, there are tons of other value-of-money options that come this year. Therefore, we would recommend you go with alternative options such as Google Pixel 7 Pro which renders the best features and is offered at almost the same price. But the final decision is in your hand, so pick the device according to your wish wisely.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/23/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition was launched in December 2022 at the price of $810 (Rs 66,999 in India) approx. The smartphone comes with 5G connectivity and equips 6.8 inches AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and 1500 nits peak brightness. For software, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition runs on the Android 12 OS and MyOS 12 user interface. Besides this, you will receive flagship performance with the 4nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset integrated with Adreno 730 GPU support. You can purchase this device in 12GB / 18GB RAM with 512GB / 1TB internal storage option, while support for SD card is missing on the smartphone. As for photography, the Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition on the rear packs a true 64MP triple camera setup that can record 8K videos at 30fps. Aside from this, you are offered a 16MP under-display selfie camera at the front for video calls. Besides this, the smartphone carries necessary comms and sensors while an under-display fingerprint scanner is also present for biometric authentication. The smartphone has a massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with 80W fast charging support. You can pick this device in a single Black color only.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition was launched in December 2022 at the price of $810 (Rs 66,999 in India) approx. The smartphone comes with 5G connectivity and equips 6.8 inches AMOLED display panel with a 120Hz refresh rate and 1500 nits peak brightness. For software, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition runs on the Android 12 OS and MyOS 12 user interface. Besides this, you will receive flagship performance with the 4nm Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset integrated with Adreno 730 GPU support. You can purchase this device in 12GB / 18GB RAM with 512GB / 1TB internal storage option, while support for SD card is missing on the smartphone. As for photography, the Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition on the rear packs a true 64MP triple camera setup that can record 8K videos at 30fps. Aside from this, you are offered a 16MP under-display selfie camera at the front for video calls. Besides this, the smartphone carries necessary comms and sensors while an under-display fingerprint scanner is also present for biometric authentication. The smartphone has a massive Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with 80W fast charging support. You can pick this device in a single Black color only.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/09/2022
Source: Android Headlines EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra gets a lot of things right. Stellar hardware design, uninterrupted and curved 6.8-inch AMOLED display, a large 5,000 mAh battery, loud stereo speakers, and great rear cameras. Not to mention USA availability and out-of-the-box 5G support. In addition, it has a clean software experience with zero bloatware and 65W fast charging support. With the Ultra moniker in the branding and improved hardware along with the curved uninterrupted display, the price is $799 for the base version. So if you want a unique-looking device and are not into selfies then the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra makes sense. But if selfies are important to you then for about the same price you can get the Samsung Galaxy S22 or for a bit more get the Google Pixel 6 Pro with a small cutout and a large curved 4K AMOLED display. And outside the USA you can look at plenty of devices from Xiaomi and Oppo/Vivo to compare against before settling on a smartphone of your choice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Headlines EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra gets a lot of things right. Stellar hardware design, uninterrupted and curved 6.8-inch AMOLED display, a large 5,000 mAh battery, loud stereo speakers, and great rear cameras. Not to mention USA availability and out-of-the-box 5G support. In addition, it has a clean software experience with zero bloatware and 65W fast charging support. With the Ultra moniker in the branding and improved hardware along with the curved uninterrupted display, the price is $799 for the base version. So if you want a unique-looking device and are not into selfies then the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra makes sense. But if selfies are important to you then for about the same price you can get the Samsung Galaxy S22 or for a bit more get the Google Pixel 6 Pro with a small cutout and a large curved 4K AMOLED display. And outside the USA you can look at plenty of devices from Xiaomi and Oppo/Vivo to compare against before settling on a smartphone of your choice.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN
It's sleek, it's upscale, it's fast. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra packs some powerful hardware, kept in check by a dedicated cooling system. You'll enjoy that edge-to-edge 120Hz AMOLED panel with an invisible front camera under the screen. Weirdly, it also skips some of the most popular features that define a flagship: waterproofing, wireless charging, and consistently great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN
It's sleek, it's upscale, it's fast. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra packs some powerful hardware, kept in check by a dedicated cooling system. You'll enjoy that edge-to-edge 120Hz AMOLED panel with an invisible front camera under the screen. Weirdly, it also skips some of the most popular features that define a flagship: waterproofing, wireless charging, and consistently great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/28/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN
Priced at $799, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has quite a bit of competition, especially from more mainstream brands such as Samsung. But overall, it is a solid performer with clean-looking software and near-stock Android experience. The curved display is excellent if you watch a lot of videos and play a lot of games, and we can appreciate the future forward design of an in-display camera. The only downside are its cameras that would have otherwise made this phone truly amazing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Phandroid EN→zh-CN
Priced at $799, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has quite a bit of competition, especially from more mainstream brands such as Samsung. But overall, it is a solid performer with clean-looking software and near-stock Android experience. The curved display is excellent if you watch a lot of videos and play a lot of games, and we can appreciate the future forward design of an in-display camera. The only downside are its cameras that would have otherwise made this phone truly amazing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2022
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra smartphone is a decent flagship smartphone that offers proper performance, decent battery life, and an industry-leading display. Besides this, you will attain an impeccable gaming experience with a smooth user interface. So, overall, it’s worth your money and time. But still, there’s no denying that the market offers several alternative options too. If you are looking for all-rounder specs with faster android updates, we will recommend you to go with the Pixel 6 Pro for impressive camera quality, while the Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus comes out to be a great choice with 4 years of Android and security updates.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra smartphone is a decent flagship smartphone that offers proper performance, decent battery life, and an industry-leading display. Besides this, you will attain an impeccable gaming experience with a smooth user interface. So, overall, it’s worth your money and time. But still, there’s no denying that the market offers several alternative options too. If you are looking for all-rounder specs with faster android updates, we will recommend you to go with the Pixel 6 Pro for impressive camera quality, while the Samsung Galaxy S22 Plus comes out to be a great choice with 4 years of Android and security updates.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/08/2022
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN
If it didn't have the under-display camera, the Axon 40 Ultra would be easy to confidently back as a flagship alternative for users who didn't want just another Samsung Galaxy or Google Pixel. But since it does have that unusual selfie shooter, it makes judging the phone's overall quality and ideal buyer tricky. The low price of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra makes it easy to choose if your budget can't stretch to a Galaxy S22 Ultra, thanks to the Axon’s 64MP cameras and 65W charging. But the front camera can be very important to users for selfies or video calls, so the quality of the under-display camera could be a deal breaker, even at this price. I'd recommend the Axon 40 Ultra to anyone who wants the maximum amount of phone for less than $800 and feels like the similarly priced iPhone 13 or Galaxy S22 don’t offer quite enough. If you're prepared to spend the money needed to get a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or iPhone 13 Pro Max, you're probably going to get a better-rounded experience with those phones. If you're determined to stick to a £700 - £800 budget though, the most interesting comparison for the Axon 40 Ultra is....
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
The Axon 40 Ultra gets most of the basics right, delivering a high-powered, long-lasting smartphone that tops up in under an hour. The addition of versatile rear cameras and that full-screen experience enabled by a stealthy under-display selfie camera means you’ve got an intriguing yet capable proposition at a very reasonable asking price. However, it’s clear that there are a few gaps in the Axon 40 Ultra’s armor, starting with those disappointing selfies. Even at a more affordable flagship price, just shy of $800 is a tough ask for a phone that lacks an IP rating, wireless charging, and a long-term update pledge. There are a few alternatives on the market that come in at the same price or undercut the ZTE device while offering these extras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN
If it didn't have the under-display camera, the Axon 40 Ultra would be easy to confidently back as a flagship alternative for users who didn't want just another Samsung Galaxy or Google Pixel. But since it does have that unusual selfie shooter, it makes judging the phone's overall quality and ideal buyer tricky. The low price of the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra makes it easy to choose if your budget can't stretch to a Galaxy S22 Ultra, thanks to the Axon’s 64MP cameras and 65W charging. But the front camera can be very important to users for selfies or video calls, so the quality of the under-display camera could be a deal breaker, even at this price. I'd recommend the Axon 40 Ultra to anyone who wants the maximum amount of phone for less than $800 and feels like the similarly priced iPhone 13 or Galaxy S22 don’t offer quite enough. If you're prepared to spend the money needed to get a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or iPhone 13 Pro Max, you're probably going to get a better-rounded experience with those phones. If you're determined to stick to a £700 - £800 budget though, the most interesting comparison for the Axon 40 Ultra is....
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
The Axon 40 Ultra gets most of the basics right, delivering a high-powered, long-lasting smartphone that tops up in under an hour. The addition of versatile rear cameras and that full-screen experience enabled by a stealthy under-display selfie camera means you’ve got an intriguing yet capable proposition at a very reasonable asking price. However, it’s clear that there are a few gaps in the Axon 40 Ultra’s armor, starting with those disappointing selfies. Even at a more affordable flagship price, just shy of $800 is a tough ask for a phone that lacks an IP rating, wireless charging, and a long-term update pledge. There are a few alternatives on the market that come in at the same price or undercut the ZTE device while offering these extras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/03/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN
Yes, the selfie camera is pants, but I’m a sucker for value for money. That is what the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers in a strong Android flagship packed with powerful specs, good battery life and decent rear cameras. Hiding the front-facing snapper under the screen has become an artform for ZTE now,; it is one of the best at making it an invisible, un-disturbed rectangle of AMOLED goodness. All-in-all, if you can work around its pitfalls, this is a decent phone that is pitted against stiff competition.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag EN→zh-CN
Yes, the selfie camera is pants, but I’m a sucker for value for money. That is what the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra offers in a strong Android flagship packed with powerful specs, good battery life and decent rear cameras. Hiding the front-facing snapper under the screen has become an artform for ZTE now,; it is one of the best at making it an invisible, un-disturbed rectangle of AMOLED goodness. All-in-all, if you can work around its pitfalls, this is a decent phone that is pitted against stiff competition.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/26/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a good phone, but it just falls short of being a great one. The screen is excellent, the battery life very good, and performance levels are outstanding, too. However, the rear camera is decent without being exceptional, and the under-screen selfie camera is genuinely terrible, despite (or probably because of) its innovative design. If mobile photography is one of your priorities, then you’d be better off checking out a device such as the Pixel 6.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN
Every year it feels increasingly strange that ZTE continues to try to compete at the near flagship level. Its OS is getting better, but it’s still incomplete and filled with random software instead of a smooth experience. Considering the battery issues I faced last year, I wasn’t expecting great hardware this year, but the Axon 40 Ultra feels great in my hand. The screen could be better, but overall it’s passable. The camera is pretty fun, and I love that 35mm focal length for photography. I’d like to see more companies adopt something similar in the future. The under-display camera, on the other hand, is terrible and ZTE should probably give that up. You can pre-order the phone from ZTE for $799 USD (roughly $1,000 CAD).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2022
Source: Trusted Reviews EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a good phone, but it just falls short of being a great one. The screen is excellent, the battery life very good, and performance levels are outstanding, too. However, the rear camera is decent without being exceptional, and the under-screen selfie camera is genuinely terrible, despite (or probably because of) its innovative design. If mobile photography is one of your priorities, then you’d be better off checking out a device such as the Pixel 6.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN
Every year it feels increasingly strange that ZTE continues to try to compete at the near flagship level. Its OS is getting better, but it’s still incomplete and filled with random software instead of a smooth experience. Considering the battery issues I faced last year, I wasn’t expecting great hardware this year, but the Axon 40 Ultra feels great in my hand. The screen could be better, but overall it’s passable. The camera is pretty fun, and I love that 35mm focal length for photography. I’d like to see more companies adopt something similar in the future. The under-display camera, on the other hand, is terrible and ZTE should probably give that up. You can pre-order the phone from ZTE for $799 USD (roughly $1,000 CAD).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/23/2022
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
If you’re not a selfie fan and you love the idea of an interrupted display with a few extra pixels of usable space, then sure. It’s not a perfect phone, but you can expect strong specs and a solid rear camera setup to back up that unique viewing experience. In case I didn’t make it clear earlier though, anyone who expects to get much use of out of the front camera should really look elsewhere. This tech is impressive, and this is the best it’s been yet, but there’s still work to be done. In practice, this isn’t the phone for you if you ever choose to use your selfie shooter.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor EN→zh-CN
If you’re not a selfie fan and you love the idea of an interrupted display with a few extra pixels of usable space, then sure. It’s not a perfect phone, but you can expect strong specs and a solid rear camera setup to back up that unique viewing experience. In case I didn’t make it clear earlier though, anyone who expects to get much use of out of the front camera should really look elsewhere. This tech is impressive, and this is the best it’s been yet, but there’s still work to be done. In practice, this isn’t the phone for you if you ever choose to use your selfie shooter.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobile Tech Review
ZTE’s 2022 flagship Android 12 phone, the Axon 40 Ultra, leans heavy on the ultra specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, triple rear 64MP cameras including a periscope telephoto, a 120Hz 6.8” AMOLED display with under display selfie camera and fingerprint scanner, and 5G. It goes on sale globally.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN
Another year, another Axon Ultra is challenging the established ways of doing smartphone cameras. The signs were there last year, but we may have overlooked them - now, ZTE has abandoned caution and has gone for a 35mm primary camera. And we can't say we're not fans. 35mm smartphone cameras from the early days were limited, but there were no ultrawides back then - today, there's always the zoom-out button for when stepping back isn't possible. And the Axon's main camera, thanks to its unusual specs, opens up possibilities you don't get anywhere else or not to that extent - mostly in real, actual lens blur, but also perspective. The Axon's other two cameras are properly good too, especially during the day, but not too shabby in the dark either. It's only in certain aspects of video recording that we saw missteps, but judging by the rate of updates we've been getting, they should be addressed sooner rather than later. There'll be no fix for the under-display selfie camera whose biggest virtue is its invisibility - certainly not its image quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: XDA Developers EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a phone with a lot of compromises, but it’s aimed at a very specific type of user. If you don’t care about the selfie camera, it’s probably already high up on your list thanks to that stellar display. Coming in at €829 though, it’s a pretty tall ask when there are smartphones with a lot of the same features and better cameras for a lot cheaper. For example, in Europe, you can save €80 and get the Realme GT 2 Pro, a phone that honestly offers a lot more. You get a longer support window, much better cameras, the same charging speed, better software, and a much nicer QHD+ LTPO display. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra’s best selling point is the display, but even that a lot of people likely won’t care about and falters behind the display tech of a cheaper phone. A friend of mine saw the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and thought it was cool, but pointed out that the front-facing camera on their phone doesn’t bother them because it’s in the center of the status bar anyway. To be honest, I completely see where they’re coming from.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Source: Mobile Tech Review
ZTE’s 2022 flagship Android 12 phone, the Axon 40 Ultra, leans heavy on the ultra specs: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, triple rear 64MP cameras including a periscope telephoto, a 120Hz 6.8” AMOLED display with under display selfie camera and fingerprint scanner, and 5G. It goes on sale globally.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN
Another year, another Axon Ultra is challenging the established ways of doing smartphone cameras. The signs were there last year, but we may have overlooked them - now, ZTE has abandoned caution and has gone for a 35mm primary camera. And we can't say we're not fans. 35mm smartphone cameras from the early days were limited, but there were no ultrawides back then - today, there's always the zoom-out button for when stepping back isn't possible. And the Axon's main camera, thanks to its unusual specs, opens up possibilities you don't get anywhere else or not to that extent - mostly in real, actual lens blur, but also perspective. The Axon's other two cameras are properly good too, especially during the day, but not too shabby in the dark either. It's only in certain aspects of video recording that we saw missteps, but judging by the rate of updates we've been getting, they should be addressed sooner rather than later. There'll be no fix for the under-display selfie camera whose biggest virtue is its invisibility - certainly not its image quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: XDA Developers EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a phone with a lot of compromises, but it’s aimed at a very specific type of user. If you don’t care about the selfie camera, it’s probably already high up on your list thanks to that stellar display. Coming in at €829 though, it’s a pretty tall ask when there are smartphones with a lot of the same features and better cameras for a lot cheaper. For example, in Europe, you can save €80 and get the Realme GT 2 Pro, a phone that honestly offers a lot more. You get a longer support window, much better cameras, the same charging speed, better software, and a much nicer QHD+ LTPO display. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra’s best selling point is the display, but even that a lot of people likely won’t care about and falters behind the display tech of a cheaper phone. A friend of mine saw the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and thought it was cool, but pointed out that the front-facing camera on their phone doesn’t bother them because it’s in the center of the status bar anyway. To be honest, I completely see where they’re coming from.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2022
Source: TechTablets
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: G Style Magazine EN→zh-CN
ZTE might not be a brand you’re familiar with here in the U.S., but they’re pretty well known globally. It’s a shame that we actually don’t have more devices here to choose from other than your usually Apple or Samsung phones, which pretty much dominate here. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra really is a great device that has a lot going for it in terms of specs and usability. The cameras for the most part are fantastic and the display is gorgeous even though it’s only FHD+. The under-display front camera is very well hidden and really does make the display look that much better. The only thing I’d really ding the phone is the lack of waterproofing or dust proofing certifications and that the glass isn’t Gorilla Glass or equivalent. Also so lackluster selfie cam quality. However, I’m able to turn a blind eye to some of its shortcomings mainly because the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra will retail at an astonishing $799 globally, in this configuration, when it is released on June 21, 2022. That undercuts many of today’s flagships. Not only that. It still comes with a charger!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
The OnePlus 10 Pro ($899) might be another device you should consider in lieu of the Axon 40 Ultra. It doesn’t have an under-display selfie camera and costs $100 more, but you’re getting perks like wireless charging, a good primary camera, a superior screen, and three years of OS updates. It also shares a few of the Axon 40 Ultra’s strengths such as battery life, fast charging, and the same powerful processor, though it’s a little rough around the edges due to the similarly lacking IP rating (unless you buy from T-Mobile), mediocre supporting cameras, and some software inconsistencies. You should also keep the iPhone 13 ($799) in mind if you’re open to joining the Apple ecosystem. It lacks a high refresh rate screen, has a massive notch, lacks a telephoto camera, and misses out on fast charging (and the charger). However, Apple’s phone also brings a powerful processor, IP68 rating, wireless charging, and access to an exclusive ecosystem.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN
I’m impressed enough with the design of the Axon 40 Ultra that I’d recommend the phone on that alone. The material, shape, and notch-less screen are big enough selling points on their own that make the phone very pleasant to use. The Snapdragon muscle and great battery life are the cherry on top. It’s not a perfect phone, though, with a camera that lags behind the competition and an update policy that doesn’t have the track record of what you’ll get from a Samsung phone. But even with those complaints, it’s one of the most appealing phones I’ve reviewed in a while, and anyone that’s looking for a well designed phone could do much worse than what ZTE’s got on offer. If you’re interested in jumping on the Axon 40 Ultra early, ZTE is offering a promotion where you can put down a $1.99 pre-order to knock $50 off the phone’s $799 list price. That entry model is the 128/8GB variant, but ZTE is offering a some steps up if you need more.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN
The Axon 40 Ultra will be available for purchase in North America starting June 21. At $799, the handset undercuts every 2022 flagship, including that of Samsung, Google, Apple, and OnePlus. For all the high-end specs you're getting, along with a matured under-display camera, ZTE has quite the value offering on its hands. Stay tuned for the rest of the review as I further test the performance and battery life of the device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: TechTablets
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: G Style Magazine EN→zh-CN
ZTE might not be a brand you’re familiar with here in the U.S., but they’re pretty well known globally. It’s a shame that we actually don’t have more devices here to choose from other than your usually Apple or Samsung phones, which pretty much dominate here. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra really is a great device that has a lot going for it in terms of specs and usability. The cameras for the most part are fantastic and the display is gorgeous even though it’s only FHD+. The under-display front camera is very well hidden and really does make the display look that much better. The only thing I’d really ding the phone is the lack of waterproofing or dust proofing certifications and that the glass isn’t Gorilla Glass or equivalent. Also so lackluster selfie cam quality. However, I’m able to turn a blind eye to some of its shortcomings mainly because the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra will retail at an astonishing $799 globally, in this configuration, when it is released on June 21, 2022. That undercuts many of today’s flagships. Not only that. It still comes with a charger!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN
The OnePlus 10 Pro ($899) might be another device you should consider in lieu of the Axon 40 Ultra. It doesn’t have an under-display selfie camera and costs $100 more, but you’re getting perks like wireless charging, a good primary camera, a superior screen, and three years of OS updates. It also shares a few of the Axon 40 Ultra’s strengths such as battery life, fast charging, and the same powerful processor, though it’s a little rough around the edges due to the similarly lacking IP rating (unless you buy from T-Mobile), mediocre supporting cameras, and some software inconsistencies. You should also keep the iPhone 13 ($799) in mind if you’re open to joining the Apple ecosystem. It lacks a high refresh rate screen, has a massive notch, lacks a telephoto camera, and misses out on fast charging (and the charger). However, Apple’s phone also brings a powerful processor, IP68 rating, wireless charging, and access to an exclusive ecosystem.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Talk Android EN→zh-CN
I’m impressed enough with the design of the Axon 40 Ultra that I’d recommend the phone on that alone. The material, shape, and notch-less screen are big enough selling points on their own that make the phone very pleasant to use. The Snapdragon muscle and great battery life are the cherry on top. It’s not a perfect phone, though, with a camera that lags behind the competition and an update policy that doesn’t have the track record of what you’ll get from a Samsung phone. But even with those complaints, it’s one of the most appealing phones I’ve reviewed in a while, and anyone that’s looking for a well designed phone could do much worse than what ZTE’s got on offer. If you’re interested in jumping on the Axon 40 Ultra early, ZTE is offering a promotion where you can put down a $1.99 pre-order to knock $50 off the phone’s $799 list price. That entry model is the 128/8GB variant, but ZTE is offering a some steps up if you need more.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: Zdnet.com EN→zh-CN
The Axon 40 Ultra will be available for purchase in North America starting June 21. At $799, the handset undercuts every 2022 flagship, including that of Samsung, Google, Apple, and OnePlus. For all the high-end specs you're getting, along with a matured under-display camera, ZTE has quite the value offering on its hands. Stay tuned for the rest of the review as I further test the performance and battery life of the device.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the latest flagship 5G smartphone launched in May 2022 at the expected price of $743 (Rs 57,590 in India) approx. As for the primary specs, let’s start with the 6.8-inches AMOLED display panel, 1500 nits peak brightness, and impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Apart from this, you will also receive a 16MP selfie camera hidden under the display. For the main camera, the back panel offers a triple camera setup that introduces a 64MP standard, 64MP periscope telephoto, and a 64MP ultrawide lens for next-level photography. On the other hand, you can record 8K videos at 30fps with gyro-EIS support from the main camera. As for the storage, you will have 8GB/12GB/16GB RAM option with 256GB/ 512GB /1TB internal storage. The device runs on the latest Android 12 OS with MyOS 12 user interface. For gaming and performance, the flagship 4nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and Adreno 730 GPU back the phone. For security, the device offers an under-display fingerprint sensor. The phone has a Li-Po 5000 mAh with an 80W fast charging support.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is the latest flagship 5G smartphone launched in May 2022 at the expected price of $743 (Rs 57,590 in India) approx. As for the primary specs, let’s start with the 6.8-inches AMOLED display panel, 1500 nits peak brightness, and impressive 144Hz refresh rate. Apart from this, you will also receive a 16MP selfie camera hidden under the display. For the main camera, the back panel offers a triple camera setup that introduces a 64MP standard, 64MP periscope telephoto, and a 64MP ultrawide lens for next-level photography. On the other hand, you can record 8K videos at 30fps with gyro-EIS support from the main camera. As for the storage, you will have 8GB/12GB/16GB RAM option with 256GB/ 512GB /1TB internal storage. The device runs on the latest Android 12 OS with MyOS 12 user interface. For gaming and performance, the flagship 4nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset and Adreno 730 GPU back the phone. For security, the device offers an under-display fingerprint sensor. The phone has a Li-Po 5000 mAh with an 80W fast charging support.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/30/2022
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2022
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 95% performance: 85% mobility: 92% workmanship: 85%
Source: Go2 Mobile DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2022
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 95% performance: 85% mobility: 92% workmanship: 85%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/27/2022
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2022
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 100% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/16/2022
Rating: Total score: 90% features: 100% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% display: 88% mobility: 83% workmanship: 93%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2022
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 88% display: 88% mobility: 83% workmanship: 93%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 69% display: 86% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/11/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 69% display: 86% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 73%
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/09/2022
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 73%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2022
Rating: Total score: 80%
ZTE Axon 40 Pro
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 40 ProProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 870
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 650
Display: 6.70 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.199kg
Price: 480 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
After running down all of the specs and review of the ZTE Axon 40 Pro smartphone, we can concluded that this phone is worth your money. With this device, you won’t face lags while playing games thanks to the advanced refresh rate. On the other hand, the immersive screen makes the viewer experience great for every user, while the long-lasting battery life and beautiful camera result make this phone a great deal. We highly recommend you purchase this device if it’s available in your country. Despite this, if you are looking for alternative options, the first thing that can par with this handset is the Xiaomi Poco F4 GT feature because it has all-rounder specs and features. But in the end, it’s your money so choose wisely according to your desire.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/09/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 Pro smartphone arrives with flagship-level specs at $446 (Rs 34,590 in India) approx, while the phone is expected to release in May 2022. As for the primary specs, you will receive a 6.67-inches AMOLED display panel with a 144Hz refresh rate, and 1000 nits peak brightness. Besides this, the device provides 8GB to 12GB RAM support with 256GB to 512GB of internal storage. The phone runs on the latest Android 12 OS with MyOS 12 custom UI support, and for the chipset, you will get a 7nm – Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G chipset. The ZTE Axon 40 Pro smartphone is equipped with a quad-rear camera consisting of a 100MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth lens. As for the video recording, you can record 4K videos at 60fps with gyro-EIS support. On the front, you get a decent 16MP selfie camera. The battery section brings a Li-Po 5000 mAh battery with a 66W fast charging support. You can pick this phone in Black, Gold, and Blue color options. Furthermore, you also get an under-display fingerprint scanner on this device.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/26/2022
ZTE Axon 30s
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 30sProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 870
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 650
Display: 6.92 inch, 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.189kg
Price: 250 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 30s does have good performance and the latest Android interface experience, with subtle 5G connectivity and beautiful camera results. Following this, the sound output looks quite clear and crisp, and the 10-Bit AMOLED panel gives an immersive user experience with better smooth refresh rate support. But at the same time, it is undeniable that the phone has a lower battery capacity, which means it will reduce screen time to some extent. Besides this, this phone has been exclusive to the Chinese smartphone market for a while. So you can check out other alternative options, such as Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, as it brings all-rounder features and specs.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/19/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
ZTE Axon 30s was announced in September 2022 and the phone is expected to arrive at $236 (Rs 19,390 in India) approx. As for the primary specs, let’s start with the display that renders a 6.92-inches AMOLED panel with an impressive 120 Hz refresh rate and 1B color support. Besides this, Axon 30s smartphone has the latest Android 12 OS, which is loaded with lots of custom features of the MyOS 12 skin. In terms of storage, the starting variant comes with 128GB space accompanied by 8GB RAM, while the higher variant comes with 256GB and 12GB RAM support. As for the camera section, you will get a quad camera setup including a 64MP primary, 8MP ultrawide, 5MP macro, and a 2MP depth lens. Moving to the front camera setup, you will attain a 16MP under-display selfie lens that captures a good amount of contrasts and colors. As for the video recording, the main sensor can record 4K videos at 60fps with gyro-EIS support. For the battery section, you will get a Li-Ion 4200 mAh battery with 55W fast charging support. Besides this, you can choose this handset in two shade options – Black and Blue.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/07/2022
ZTE Axon 40 SE
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 40 SEProcessor: UNISOC T618
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G52 MP2
Display: 6.67 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.182kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 SE smartphone cannot justify the price point, the reason for that is it offers a standard Unisoc processor, offering 4GB RAM, and a few other downsides that make this phone an overpriced deal in the budget smartphone range. There’s no doubt if the company release this phone with some discount, it could become an amazing deal for the users. For now, we won’t suggest this phone to our users. But if you are getting additional discount offers, you can go with this phone. Aside from this, the phone is released in the Mexican smartphone market. But still, there are alternative options that fit a great deal such as Honor X40 GT which offers good specs and camera quality at an affordable price. In case you are looking for an all-rounder smartphone then we recommend to you check Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer smartphone.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2022
Source: OI Spice Tech News EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 40 SE was announced in October 2022, and the expected price of this phone is $294 (Rs 24,290 in India) approx. This 4G smartphone features a 6.67 inches AMOLED display panel. The device runs on the latest Android 12 OS supported by MyOS 12 user interface. The ZTE Axon 40 SE arrives with the 12nm – Unisoc T618 chipset for your daily tasks. In terms of the visual aspect, the smartphone makers render the Mali-G52 MP2 GPU. In terms of the storage unit, the handset appears with 128GB internal space with 4GB RAM support. The camera setup brings a triple camera setup with a 50MP primary, a 5MP macro, and a 2MP depth lens that can record 1080p videos at 30fps. Besides this, you get an 8MP selfie camera on the front side. As for the additional features, the phone renders a Side-mounted fingerprint sensor, a 3.5 mm audio jack, GPS, NFC, Bluetooth, and USB Type-C 2.0 port. The phone is available in Black and Blue color options. Now let’s talk about battery performance, the device equips a Li-Ion 4500 mAh battery with 22.5W fast charging support.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/25/2022
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
Specifications
Notebook: ZTE Axon 50 UltraProcessor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 8+ Gen 1
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 730
Display: 6.67 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.199kg
Links: ZTE homepage
Price comparison
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Nave EN→zh-CN
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra smartphone is for people who require a dependable phone that is capable of keeping pace with their lifestyle and this smartphone absolutely excels in every category. The Axon 50 Ultra is guaranteed to offer consumers an exceptional experience thanks to its cutting-edge technology and high-end specifications. It is also a very fashionable smartphone with outstanding features and performance that shouldn’t cost too much if you consider the price of the previous model. The Axon 50 Ultra is ideal for anyone searching for a high-end smartphone or an impressive camera setup. The Axon 50 Ultra is unquestionably a phone you ought to think about if you’re looking for something that will outperform what you want. Speaking of the downsides, the device lacks the latest Android 13 OS support, wireless charging and reverse charging support.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/10/2023
Source: Unite4buy PL→zh-CN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2023
Comment
ZTE:
Qualcomm Adreno 430:
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
搭配于高通Snapdragon 820中的集成显卡,最大频率为624MHz。在2016年初它属于安卓系统智能手机/平板的高端显卡,可以运行需求很高的游戏。
Qualcomm Adreno 630:
高通骁龙845 SoC中的集成显卡。据高通公司称,比旧款骁龙835中的Adreno 540快了30%,功耗降低30%。
Qualcomm Adreno 640:
适用于智能手机和平板电脑的图形芯片已集成在Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC中。 高通公司声称它比Snapdragon 845 SoC中的Adreno 630快20%,并提供了50%以上的计算单元(ALU)。
Qualcomm Adreno 620:
ARM Mali-G72 MP3:
ARM Mali-G52 MP2:
具有2个集群的中端集成图形卡。ARM声称G52系列比G51系列在同一工艺节点上快30%,效率高15%。
Qualcomm Adreno 405:
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
Qualcomm Adreno 660:
Qualcomm Adreno 650:
适用于智能手机和平板电脑的图形芯片,集成在Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC中。高通公司声称它比Snapdragon 855 SoC中的Adreno 640快25%,并提供了50%以上的计算单元(ALU)。对于Android,它应该是2020年最快的图形卡之一。
Qualcomm Adreno 730:
用于智能手机和平板电脑的图形芯片,集成在高通公司Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC内。高通公司声称,它比骁龙888系统芯片中的Adreno 660快30%。对于安卓来说,它应该是2021年底最快的图形卡之一。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
820 MSM8996:
整合四核处理器(两颗2.15GHz高速核心以及两颗1.6GHz节能核心)和Adreno 530显卡的高端ARM系统芯片。使用14纳米HPM技术制造。
617 MSM8952: 骁龙617 MSM8952
中端ARM系统芯片,搭配8个处理器核心(Cortex-A53,支持64位)和Adreno 405的显卡。采用28纳米LP工艺制造。
625:
中端八核处理器,搭配8个ARM Cortex-A53处理核心,频率最高2GHz,一颗Adreno 506显卡芯片,一个DDR3L-1866内存控制器和X9 LTE(Cat. 7)网络模组。采用最新的14纳米制程技术制造。
SD 845:
适用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2018年初推出,采用台积电的10 nm LPP FinFET制造。 集成了高性能2.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核(Cortex-A75),和低功耗1.8 GHz(最高)4x Kryo 385内核,从而提高效率。 此外,还提供X20 LTE调制解调器,交流WiFi和双通道32位1866 MHz LPDDR4x内存控制器。
SD 855:
用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2018年末推出,以台积电(TSMC)7纳米制程生产。集成了一个基于改良的ARM Cortex-A76架构的``Prime Core'',频率高达2.84 GHz。另外三个基于A76的性能内核,但频率为2.42 GHz。此外,还集成了四个基于ARM Cortex-A55架构的节能内核,频率为1.8 GHz。除了处理器内核之外,SoC还集成了X24 LTE调制解调器(最多下载速度12 Gigbit),新的Wi-Fi调制解调器(支持Wi-Fi 6、60 GHz mmWave),Hexagon 690 DSP和用于AI处理的新Tensor内核。 ,一个Spectra 380 ISP,具有集成的计算机视觉引擎和集成的LPDDR4x存储器控制器。
SD 765G:
具有8个CPU Kryo 475内核的快速中端ARM SoC(一个主频为2.4 GHz的高速ARM Cortex-A76主核,一个主频为2.2 GHz的A76中核和六个主频为1.8 GHz的ARM Cortex-A55小核)。作为首批SoC之一,它还集成了5G调制解调器(Snapdragon X52下行和上传速度高达3.7 / 1.6 Mbps,支持mmWave和Sub-6)。该处理器在采用三星高效的7纳米EUV工艺制造。
SD 870:
2020年中期上市,在TSMC(改良型N7P)以7nm制造的高端智能手机用SoC。 基于最高3.2GHz的ARM Cortex-A77体系结构,集成一个Prime Core。 此外,3个性能核心基于A77,但时钟最高可达2.42GHz。 此外,基于 ARM Cortex-A55 体系结构和时钟,集成四个节能核心,最高 1.8GHz。
SD 8 Gen 1:
用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2021年底推出,在三星以4纳米工艺制造。集成了一个基于ARM Cortex-X2架构的 "Prime Core",时钟频率高达3GHz。另外三个性能核心基于A710,但时钟频率高达2.5GHz。此外,还集成了四个节能内核,基于ARM Cortex-A510架构,时钟频率高达1.8GHz。除处理器内核外,该SoC还集成了一个WiFi 6e调制解调器、一个Hexagon DSP(用于AI加速)和一个Spectra ISP。集成的内存控制器支持快速的LPDDR5内存,频率高达3,200 MHz。5G现在包括在芯片中的骁龙X65调制解调器。
SD 8+ Gen 1:
用于智能手机的高端SoC,于2021年底推出,在台积电以4纳米工艺制造。集成了一个基于ARM Cortex-X2架构的 "Prime Core",时钟频率高达3.2 GHz。还有三个性能核心基于A710,但时钟频率高达2.5GHz。此外,还集成了四个节能内核,基于ARM Cortex-A510架构,时钟频率高达1.8GHz。除处理器内核外,该SoC还集成了一个WiFi 6e调制解调器、一个Hexagon DSP(用于AI加速)和一个Spectra ISP。集成的内存控制器支持快速的LPDDR5内存,频率高达3,200 MHz。5G现在包括在芯片中的骁龙X65调制解调器。与非加版相比,8+ Gen 1提供了时钟频率高200 MHz的Prime Core和时钟频率高10%的GPU。此外,它现在是在台积电而不是三星生产。
Mediatek Mediatek:
Helio P70:
基于ARM的八核SoC,具有4个大的ARM Cortex-A73内核和4个小巧且节能的ARM Cortex-A53内核。频率高达2.1 GHz。集成了Cat-7(DL)/ Cat-13(UL)LTE调制解调器(4G),ARM Mali-G72 MP3 GPU和专用的AI处理单元。
UNISOC :
T618:
入门级八核SoC,具有两个高达2 GHz的快速ARM Cortex A75内核和六个高达1.8 GHz的高能效ARM Cortex A55内核。 SoC还包括LTE调制解调器(TDD-LTE,FDD-LTE,TDSCDMA,WCDMA,CDMA,GSM),ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU和三核ISP。该芯片是在台积电(TSMC)的12nm FinFET中制造的。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
78.78%: No rating comment found (one expected)!
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.