ZTE Axon 7
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f2/2, 定焦, 视频拍摄最高支持1080p/30 FPS
Price comparison
Average of 33 scores (from 54 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Axon 7
王座后裔? 中兴Axon 7的目标是智能手机的最高桂冠。除了极致性能和超强配置,这台5.5寸的高端安卓设备还搭配了杜比Atmos音响系统,它足够让一整个房间充满音乐。
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
ZTE have done a half decent job with the Nougat software. Very few manufacturers leave the Google software alone these days and ZTE’s take on Nougat isn’t as bad as many others’. While it’s not perfect it is certainly not a poor experience, once a decent keyboard and launcher was installed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2017
Source: Toptenreviews EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So look for headphones with flat impedance curves (good luck finding that in specifications though!) and fairly high sensitivity, and all should be fine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: PC Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
So look for headphones with flat impedance curves (good luck finding that in specifications though!) and fairly high sensitivity, and all should be fine.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Laptop Media EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Top specs go hand in hand with top price and this is quite normal. But what if a company that is not at the top of the pyramid of the smartphone market offers a device which is not inferior to other high-end smartphones? ZTE have tried doing exactly this and have succeeded to a large extent. Their Axon 7 looks amazing and provides high-end features.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/29/2017
Source: Gadgetguy EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is a very good smart phone with a very good screen and very good performance at a price of around two thirds of that you’d pay for one of the big names in phones. That’s pretty impressive.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% performance: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 does stumble a bit when it comes to low-light shots, and its loud speakers don't always offer the best bass. The OnePlus 3 and Alcatel Idol 4s are both worthy alternatives — the former for its whopping 6GB of RAM, the latter for its bundled-in VR headset — and both offer better battery life. The OnePlus 3 is still our favorite sub-$400 phone out there, but the Axon 7 is an extremely close second.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Make Use Of EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
To be completely honest, this is an amazing phone. I struggled to find anything wrong with it. Everything about it is the top of its class, and it’s cheaper than most other phones. I kept looking for the catch, but there doesn’t seem to be one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Forbes EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
But other than superficial aspects, I have no real complaints with this phone. Regular readers know I place a lot of emphasis on value in my reviews (I'm not going to judge a $400 phone the same way I do a $850 phone, and I think phones that cost north of $700 should be scrutinized. That's why I thought the HTC 10 was a pile of "meh"), so whatever minor nitpick I have, such as a less-than-stellar low light camera performance or silly gesture shortcuts or no backlight for capacitive buttons that are too close together, I just tell myself "dude this phone is $400," and I don't think it's bad at all.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2017
Source: Ausdroid EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
In the end, if you think you want a ZTE Axon 7 you are most likely the kind of person who will be able to get it working just right. From my time with the Axon 7 I’m desperate to get my hands back on one when the Android 7 update comes out and have little reservations in recommending it.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% mobility: 80%
Source: Digital Trends EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
Yes. At $400, the Axon 7 is a no brainer. It packs a speedy processor, the best audio we’ve heard on a smartphone this year, a great display and camera, and software that’s unobtrusive. It may not sport dual cameras, bleeding-edge silicon, or an ungodly amount of memory, but to call the Axon 7 a slouch is to do it a disservice. Short of smartphones hundreds of dollars more, it’s one of the best on the market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is the company's knight in shining armor that's meant to take US shores by storm. We've got good news for you ZTE: you're on the right track with the Axon 7. However, success isn't guaranteed, and that's a bummer considering how great of a product you've put together.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Source: Android Guys EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The all-metal build that carries over to the front-facing speakers has caught more than a few eyes when using in public, and the screen of this phone is a thing of sheer beauty. I can confidently say these are the second best speakers I’ve ever heard on a smartphone and I’ll definitely miss having those. Playing Fallout Shelter and Monument Valley provided the best gaming I’ve experienced on a phone, and to the average user, every day usage is going to feel very fluid.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Mobile Choice EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon mini is a great little phone. For £229.99 you get one of the best phones in the market, at that price range. The display can rival that of the best flagships, the audio smarts are proven to be outstanding and the camera comes with all the tricks you will need to wow your friends on social media.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% performance: 100% features: 95% mobility: 100% workmanship: 95%
Source: Mobile Syrup EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The ZTE Axon 7 is, all things considered, a fantastic device at a terrific price point. On paper, in many ways, it outstrips the OP3. But when it comes down to the essentials — processing, camera and design, in particular — it feels as if the line has yet to fully find its feet, while the OP3, now on its third attempt to kill flagships seems a more confident and stable offering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/06/2016
Source: Android Central EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 also sports a USB Type-C port, which is becoming increasingly common among Android phones in 2016. And while the company ships a Quick Charge 3.0 charger and Type-C cable in the box, it generously provides a micro-USB adapter for those who want to keep using those older, far more ubiquitous cables. It's one of many nice touches in a box that includes a very decent pair of headphones and the aforementioned clear TPU case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Tom's Guide EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
I'm still not convinced that the ZTE Axon 7's $399 price tag isn't a typo. This smartphone performs like something that costs hundreds of dollars more, with a fast processor, a rich display and a stunning design that oozes care and quality. The phone's MiFavor interface adds some nice software touches without getting in the way, while its 20-megapixel camera takes gorgeous outdoor photos complete with plenty of tools for photography nuts.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Authority EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
The Axon 7 leads the way in terms of affordable flagships and aside from one drawback, delivers in every department. ZTE scores another first with an excellent smartphone that’s compatible with all major US networks. With the Axon 7, ZTE raises the bar substantially for premium, affordable flagships by delivering an excellent smartphone with very few compromises, even next to the very best.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 92% workmanship: 92%
Source: Inside Handy DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2017
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Verivox DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 76% features: 85% ergonomy: 76%
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 11/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Chip.de DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/14/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 88% performance: 95% features: 95% display: 92% mobility: 78%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 16/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 9/2016
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Android Mag DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/31/2016
Source: Kelisto.es ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/18/2017
Source: El Androide Libre ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Xataka ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Andro 4 All ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Computerhoy ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 90% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Media Trends ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Source: Geektopia ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/19/2016
Source: Toms Hardware Italia IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% display: 85% mobility: 75% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 70% display: 100% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Megapk IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 85% mobility: 80%
Source: Panorama IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: HDblog.it IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 82% mobility: 75% workmanship: 84%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: Hitek FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Source: Frandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Komorkomania PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2016
Source: Zoom RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Source: Svet Androida CZ→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/02/2018
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2017
Source: Smartphone.bg BU→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/29/2016
Source: Tek.no NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobil.se SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% features: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 530:
搭配于高通Snapdragon 820中的集成显卡,最大频率为624MHz。在2016年初它属于安卓系统智能手机/平板的高端显卡,可以运行需求很高的游戏。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
820 MSM8996:
整合四核处理器(两颗2.15GHz高速核心以及两颗1.6GHz节能核心)和Adreno 530显卡的高端ARM系统芯片。使用14纳米HPM技术制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.50":
这是比较大的智能手机尺寸,也十分常见。
大尺寸可以让屏幕有更高的分辨率。因而例如字体等的细节将会更丰富。不过另一方面,小屏幕的功耗会较低,而设备也会更轻盈小巧,售价更低。
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.